You are on page 1of 3

HONEY COMB PERFORMANCE TASK #4

PreCalulus

You are an engineer for Plasticore Corporation who makes custom tables of varying
sizes for banquet halls. You have been asked to design and manufacture round
banquet tables with layered honeycomb cores. Each honeycomb in the core has a
height of one foot. The size of the honeycombs do not change, as the size of the
table increases the number of honeycomb layers increases.

a) Your team at Plasticore has been asked to build a table that measures 15 feet in
diameter. Each individual honeycomb cell costs $0.25 to manufacture, including
material and labor costs. What is the total cost to manufacture the honeycomb core for your table?

b) Plasticore just got an order from the Aquaturf for 80 tables that measure 15’ in diameter. What is the total
cost for the honeycomb cores used to build the 80 tables?

c) Since The Plasticore Corporation is located in the state of Connecticut, Aquaturf has to pay 6.35% sales tax
on the total cost calculated in part (b). Also Plasticore charges a shipping and handling delivery fee of 10% of
the pre-tax cost. Calculate those two extra fees and find the final total cost of the Aquaturf order of eighty 15
feet diameter honeycomb core tables.

Response Expectations

You are expected to clearly communicate your result for all three parts (a) & (b) & (c) by
 Showing all mathematics used in solving, including any possible tables, graphs and diagrams you might
have used.
 Explaining each part of the work with complete sentences and labels.
 Answer each part with a full complete sentence.
Student Scoring Rubric
Performance Task
PreCalculus
27 points

The following rubric will be used to determine your score on this task. Parts 1 & 2 will be scored on a 4 point
scale depending upon how complete and accurate the work is (0-4 scale – see attached details for particulars
in these categories). Part 3 (scored 1 or 0 on accuracy)

Elements being assessed: Earned


Points:
Mathematical Support - this section scores your ability to clearly,
completely and efficiently show the work necessary in solving all the parts
of this task.
a) Total cost of one table (4)

b) Cost of 80 tables (4)

c) Cost of 80 tables with tax and shipping fees (4)


Conceptual Understanding and Communication – this section scores
your ability to explain clearly in words and complete sentences what each
part of your work represents.
c) Total cost of one table (4)

d) Cost of 80 tables (4)

e) Cost of 80 tables with tax and shipping fees (4)


Accuracy of Response – this is score as 1 point for correct or 0 point for
incorrect in each part.
f) Total cost of one table (1)

g) Cost of 80 tables (1)

h) Cost of 80 tables with tax and shipping fees (1)

TOTAL SCORE (27 possible points) & Grade*


Scoring details: This rubric identifies the aspects of possible scores for each element.
SCORE given Mathematical Support Conceptual Understanding and
Demonstrating knowledge of Communication
mathematical principals and concepts Written explanation of the rationales and
which result in a correct solution to a steps of the solution process. A
problem justification of each step is provided.
Though important, the length of the
response, grammar, and syntax are not
the critical elements of this dimension.

4 – fully correct &  Shows complete understanding of  Gives a complete written explanation
complete, has all the problem’s mathematical concepts and of the solution process; clearly explains
expected principles what was done and why it was done
elements.  Shows complete evidence of an  Uses appropriate mathematical
appropriate strategy that would correctly terminology and notations including
solve the problem labeling answer if appropriate.
 Executes formulas and computations  May include tables, graphs and/or
completely and correctly diagrams with a complete explanation of
all its elements
3 – Mostly correct  Shows nearly complete  Give a nearly complete written
& complete, understanding of the problem’s explanation of the solution process;
missing some mathematical concepts and principals clearly explains what was done and
minor parts.  Executes formulas completely; begins to address why it was done
computations are generally correct but  Uses mostly correct mathematical
may contain minor errors. terminology and notations
 Shows nearly complete evidence of  May include tables, graphs and/or
an appropriate strategy for solving the diagrams with most of its elements
problem explained.
2 – shows some  Shows some understanding of the  Give some written explanation of the
understanding but problem’s mathematical concepts and solution process.
has some difficulty principles  Explanation is vague, difficult to
communicating  Uses some correct mathematical interpret, or does not completely explain
clearly and terminology and notations the solution process
showing full work. May contain major formula or  May include a diagram, table or
computational errors. graph with some of its elements explained
 Shows some evidence of a strategy
for solving the problem
1 – shows limited  Shows limited to no understanding of  Gives minimal written explanation of
understanding of the problem’s mathematical concepts and the solution process; may fail to explain
problem principles what was done and why it was done
 May misuse or fail to use  Explanation does not match
mathematical terminology and notations presented solution process
 Attempts an answer  May include minimal discussion of
 Reflects an inappropriate strategy for the elements in a diagram/table or graph;
solving the problem and/or strategy may explanation of significant elements is
be difficult to identify unclear
0  No work done to show attempt to  No written explanation of the solution
answer process is provided

You might also like