1
SURVILLIANCE AND SECURITY OF
MICROSERVICES
Nirmal Mahale, Mayur Panchal,
Sreyash Kunkekar and Om Gavade
{omgavade6@gmail.com}
Abstract — This project addresses the critical
challenge of enhancing microservices security and
monitoring within the AWS ecosystem. Our focus
is on fortifying data protection and ensuring real-
time insights into microservices' health and
performance. We differentiate ourselves by
integrating security and monitoring seamlessly
into AWS using modern technologies like Spring
Boot, ReactJS, Prometheus, and Grafana. Key
aspects include robust authentication, encryption,
and access controls for security, alongside real-
time metrics for monitoring. Anticipated
outcomes are heightened security, anomaly
detection, and improved system integrity. The
project benefits businesses and organizations,
enhancing the security and reliability of
microservices-based applications. In summary,
this project represents an innovative approach at
the intersection of microservices, security, and
monitoring, promising to set new standards in
cloud-based application development and
cybersecurity.
Technical Keywords (ACM Keywords):
Microservices, microservice monitoring, micro– service
management, microservice dashboard.
I. INTRODUCTION
Microservices are an architecture consisting of
services that can often be developed, deployed and
run independently of each other [1] [2].
Microservices team collaboration raises many issues
related to development and architecture [1] [3]. In
this article, we address these two challenges that need
to be supported by microservices management and
monitoring.
The first is the relationship between software
architecture and team organization. Although the
relationship between software architecture and teams
is well known (see Conway's Law [4]), this is
especially true for microservices architectures. In
microservice architecture, teams work as
independently of each other as possible. A team is
usually responsible for the development, deployment,
and (using DevOps [5]) operations and solutions of a
particular service. This autonomy is so great that
different teams can choose different tools for
different microservices, depending on which system
is best for the task at hand.
The second is the distribution and size of
microservices. A microservices-based system will
have many independently created and implemented
services that interact with the runtime. Due to the
independence of individual services and service
development, the interaction between services and
the entire design process is evident only during
operation. Because services can be used and modified
independently and continuously over time, the
development process is constantly changing and
evolving. Therefore, knowledge about system
architecture and service interaction and behavior
needs to be developed and updated. Numerous
scenarios to assess healthcare application needs as
part of the study.
In this article, we propose an experimental dashboard
for microservices monitoring and management that can
provide such information and integrate different
methods according to the needs of stakeholders to

provide information about microservices and
microservices-based Runtime and development
information for your system.
II. MOTIVATION
The motivation for creating a comprehensive
report on this project is the critical importance of
addressing the growing security and monitoring
challenges of microservices within the AWS
ecosystem. As enterprises increasingly adopt
microservices architectures for their applications, the
need for robust security measures and real-time
monitoring becomes paramount.
The motivation stems from the realization that
traditional security and monitoring approaches can
fall short in the dynamic and distributed nature of
microservices. Therefore, there is an urgent need to
develop innovative solutions that seamlessly
integrate with leading cloud platforms such as AWS
and leverage modern technologies to strengthen data
protection, provide real-time insights, and increase
the overall security posture of microservices-based
applications.
Highlighting the integration of technologies such
as Spring Boot, ReactJS, Prometheus and Grafana,
the report aims to showcase the forward-thinking and
technologically advanced approach of the project.
The motivation is also based on the belief that the
project's emphasis on robust authentication,
encryption and access control for security, along with
real-time monitoring metrics, will significantly
improve system integrity and reliability.
The expected results of increased security,
anomaly detection and improved system integrity
further underline the relevance and importance of the
project. These results not only address current
challenges facing businesses and organizations, but
also promise to set new standards in cloud application
development and cybersecurity.
Essentially, the motivation for this report is to
recognize the project's potential to fundamentally
impact the way microservices security and
monitoring is approached and implemented, thereby
contributing to the development of cloud-based
application development best practices and overall
improvement.
2
III. LITERATURE SURVEY
1. Version-based Microservice Analysis,
Monitoring,
and Visualization
To restrict the configuration and proliferation of
service versions, semantic versioning was frequently
employed in the creation of microservice systems.
Although SemVer can reduce the complexity of
MSAs, the interconnections between various aspects
remain challenging to handle. As a result, this article
describes a tool for monitoring microservice systems,
visualizing version-based service dependency
graphs, and offering graph search functions. Version-
based Microservice Analysis, Monitoring, and
Visualisation (VMAMV) is the suggested method.
This solution detects possible design problems for
microservices with multiple versions before design
time, discovers service anomalies for all service
versions during runtime, and warns users of problems
as soon as they arise. Experiments indicate that
VMAMV is viable and useful for detecting faults and
abnormalities in microservices.
2 A Dashboard for Microservice Monitoring and
Management
This paper introduces an experimental
microservice monitoring and management
dashboard. The dashboard is designed to cater to
diverse stakeholder requirements and facilitates the
incorporation of various monitoring infrastructures to
collect runtime data from microservices. In addition
to runtime information, the dashboard accommodates
the integration of additional information sources to
furnish static details about microservices and their
development. The primary motivation for developing
this dashboard is elucidated, encompassing
fundamental concepts. Furthermore, the paper
outlines crucial usage scenarios and describes the
current array of supported views within the
dashboard.
3.Security monitoring of microservice-based
applications
A relatively recent paradigm in software
development, microservice-based architecture has
become incredibly popular.

Many relatively tiny independent functional
components, or microservices, work together to
perform complex tasks in a microservice-based
application. Microservices improve scalability and
resilience while facilitating quick application
development and deployment. However, compared to
conventional monolithic systems, microservices-
based systems have more serious security issues. In
this post, we'll talk about the several security flaws in
microservice-based architectures
and how their varied parts make the aggregate
framework more vulnerable to attacks.In order to
address these issues, this paper also suggests a
behavioural analysis framework based on machine
learning (ML) that examines network traffic and API
requests to find weaknesses and vulnerabilities in the
microservice architecture. Previous studies have
shown how network monitoring may be used to
safeguard cloud systems that are microservice-based.
On the other side, they enforced security compliance
by manually created policies. Policies created by
hand have limitations. The manual policy definition
process may be automated by using a novel machine
learning (ML)-based pattern recognition technique,
which is discussed in this article. Modern
performance has been attained by ML-based threat
detection approaches in a number of cybersecurity
applications, including vulnerability and malware
detection. Nevertheless, the area of security
3
monitoring for microservice-based systems is still in
its infancy and has not yet been impacted by machine
learning.
4.SmartVM: A Multi-Layer Microservice-
Based
Platform for Deploying SaaS
The emergence of Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) has
presented SaaS developers with numerous
challenges, particularly in dealing with the intricacies
of multi-tenancy and the substantial increase in user
numbers. This paper addresses the imperative of
achieving resource-optimized, on-demand dynamic
scaling across multiple tenants to mitigate costs.
Introducing a novel platform named SmartVM, this
platform empowers SaaS developers to construct,
tailor, and deploy SaaS solutions through a multi-tier
microservice-based approach.
The research involves the development of an e-
commerce SaaS prototype as an evaluative measure
for the effectiveness and efficiency of SmartVM. The
findings demonstrate that SmartVM deployments
surpass the performance of conventional monolithic
and microservice deployments, particularly in areas
such as intelligent monitoring, cost reduction, and
resource optimization

IV. PROBLEM STATEMENT
The project is driven by the need to address the
expanding challenges in monitoring and securing
microservice application systems. The primary
research question it seeks to investigate is: “How
can intelligent monitoring schemes be developed
and applied effectively to enhance the security
and performance of microservice-based
application systems? “The significance and
relevance of this problem are underscored by the
pervasive adoption of microservices in modern
software development. Microservices offer
unparalleled flexibility and scalability, enabling
organizations to deliver agile and feature-rich
applications. However, they introduce
complexities in security and monitoring, posing
substantial risks.
In the development of a microservices-based
application with a central focus on surveillance
and security enhancement, a critical challenge
arises in the creation of a robust and efficient
dashboard for monitoring the distributed
microservices ecosystem. The complexity of a
decentralized architecture necessitates a
comprehensive approach to real-time
monitoring, ensuring the seamless operation of
each microservice. Simultaneously, our objective
is to engage in thorough research to identify and
implement innovative security measures that go
beyond conventional practices, thereby elevating
the overall security posture of the microservices
architecture. This entails exploring cutting-edge
technologies, advanced authentication protocols,
and encryption methodologies to fortify data
protection and preemptively address potential
security vulnerabilities. By marrying
sophisticated monitoring with pioneering
security solutions, our endeavor aspires to not
only ensure the operational integrity of the
microservices-based application but also to set a
benchmark for security standards within this
dynamic and evolving technological landscape.
4
V. OBJECTIVES
Design and Implement Security
Mechanisms: We aim to create robust security
measures for microservices, covering aspects
like user authentication, access control, and data
encryption to safeguard sensitive information.
Integrate Monitoring Tools: Our goal is to
seamlessly integrate monitoring tools, such as
Prometheus and Grafana, to develop real-time
dashboards offering insights into the
performance and health of microservices.
Implement Threat Detection Algorithms: We
plan to implement advanced threat detection
algorithms and anomaly identification techniques
to enhance the overall security posture of the
microservices-based system.
Leverage AWS Services: We'll utilize AWS
services for deployment, scaling, and
infrastructure management, ensuring the
seamless integration of our security and
monitoring solutions.
Build ReactJS-based Frontend: Our objective
is to create a user-friendly frontend using
ReactJS, providing an intuitive interface for
effective system management and user
interaction.
Conduct Testing and Validation: We will
rigorously test and validate the developed
security and monitoring system to ensure its
reliability and effectiveness in diverse scenarios.
VI. SCOPE
Microservices Security: We focus on
enhancing the security of microservices through
authentication, access control, and encryption.
Real-Time Monitoring: Our scope includes the
integration of real-time monitoring tools for
continuous insights into the health and
performance of microservices.
Threat Detection and Anomaly Identification:
We aim to proactively identify security threats
and anomalies through advanced algorithms,
ensuring a proactive response to potential risks.
AWS Integration (CI/CD): We will leverage
AWS services for deployment and scaling,
implementing Continuous Integration and
Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) practices for

efficient development.
Git-Version Control: Our project includes
establishing a collaborative Git repository for
version control, facilitating seamless code
management and collaboration among team
members.
User-Friendly Frontend: We strive to build a
ReactJS-based frontend that ensures a user-
friendly experience for system management and
interaction.
Testing and Validation: The scope involves
thorough testing and validation processes to
guarantee the reliability and functionality of the
security and monitoring system.
VII. SYSTEM DESIGN
User Interface (ReactJS Frontend):
Provides a user-friendly interface for system
management and interaction. Allows users to
view real-time dashboards, security alerts, and
system performance metrics.
Microservices Layer (Spring Boot):
Implements microservices responsible for
specific functionalities. Includes modules for
user authentication, access control, and data
encryption.
Authentication:
Utilizes secure authentication mechanisms to
validate user identity. Integrates with identity
providers or supports custom authentication
protocols.
Authorization:
Implements access control mechanisms to ensure
proper authorization for microservices. Enforces
least privilege principles to limit access based on
roles and permissions.
Data Encryption:
Incorporates encryption algorithms to secure data
at rest and during transit. Adheres to industry
standards for data protection.
Monitoring and Observability Layer:
Prometheus and Grafana Integration:
Deploys Prometheus for collecting real-time
5
metrics from microservices. Integrates Grafana
for visualizing and analyzing the collected
metrics through dashboards.
Anomaly Detection:
Utilizes machine learning algorithms for
proactive detection of anomalies in system
behavior. Alerts administrators in case of
potential security threats or performance
deviations.
AWS Integration:
Deployment and Scaling:
Utilizes AWS services such as AWS Elastic
Beanstalk or AWS ECS for microservices
deployment. Implements auto-scaling based on
demand to ensure optimal performance.
Continuous Integration and Continuous
Deployment (CI/CD):
Sets up CI/CD pipelines using AWS
CodePipeline or similar tools.Automates the
build, test, and deployment processes for
efficient development.
Git-Version Control:
Establishes a collaborative Git repository for
version control.
Enables multiple team members to contribute,
track changes, and manage the codebase
effectively.
Collaborative Development:
Facilitates collaborative development through
communication tools and practices. Includes
mechanisms for code reviews, pull requests, and
team communication.
Externalization of Configuration:
Adopts the practice of externalizing
configuration settings for flexibility and easier
management. Stores configuration parameters
outside the application code, enhancing security
and manageability.
Testing and Validation:
Implements thorough testing processes,
including unit testing, integration testing, and

system testing. Validates the system's security
measures and monitoring capabilities in various
scenarios.
Application Scenarios:
E-commerce Platforms, Healthcare Systems,
Finance, Banking:
Illustrates how the system benefits diverse
domains by enhancing security and monitoring.
Government and Public Services, Media and
Entertainment:
Highlights specific use cases in government,
media, and entertainment sectors.
Manufacturing and Industrial IoT, Education and
E-Learning:
Describes how the system can be applied in
industrial IoT, education, and e-learning
environments.
Transportation and Logistics, Energy and
Utilities, Startups:
Explores applications in transportation, energy,
utilities, and startups.
VIII. SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS
Development environment:
• Integrated development environment (IDE):
Eclipse, IntelliJ IDEA or Visual Studio Code for
Java development using Spring Boot. Code editor
suitable for ReactJS development.
Microservice Framework:
• Spring Boot: Used to create and deploy
microservices. Integration with Spring Security
for authentication and access control.
Front-end development:
• ReactJS: JavaScript library for building user
interfaces. Integration with backend for instant
data visualization.
Containerization:
• Docker: Containerization of microservices to
ensure consistency across different
environments. Simplifying deployment and
scaling.
6
Monitoring & Visualization:
• Grafana: Control panel and visualization
platform. Integration with Prometheus to
generate useful insights about microservice
metrics. Monitoring and reporting tools designed
for microservices architecture.
Authentication and Authorization:
• AWS Identity and Access Management
(IAM): Centralized access control for AWS
services.
• Spring Security: Integration to secure Spring
Boot microservices. JWT (JSON Web Token) for
authentication.
Database:
MYSQL, JDBC, Workbench, Relational DB,
ORM
Continuous Integration/Continuous
Deployment (CI/CD):
• Jenkins, GitLab CI or AWS Code Pipeline:
Automated build, testing and deployment process
.
Collaboration and Version Control:
• Git: Version control system to track change in
the code base.
API Documentation:
• OpenAPI
• Documentation and description of the
RESTful API.
HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS:
Servers: High-performance servers or cloud
instances.
Storage: Fast and scalable storage, SSD-based.
Network: High-speed internet, load balancers.
Security: Hardware security modules,
firewalls, IDS/IPS
IX. MATHEMATICAL MODEL
Model Objective: To Analyze the Security
Management in a application following
Microservices Architecture.

Let the following variables be defined:
(T): Total time for monitoring (in some unit of
time, e.g., seconds).
(N): Number of monitored microservices.
(T_sample): Time interval between consecutive
monitoring samples.
(M \): Number of microservices in the system.
(A \): Number of applications using the
monitoring system.
(T_Deploy): Time required for the initial
deployment of the monitoring system.
Now, we can express the total time for
monitoring (\( T \)) as a function of these
variables:
T = N * T_sample + T_deploy
The total time includes the time spent on regular
monitoring (
N * T_sample) and the initial deployment time
(T_deploy). This model reflects the dynamic
nature of the system, considering both ongoing
monitoring activities and the setup phase.
X. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
Scalability and Flexibility:
Advantage: Microservices architecture allows for
independent scaling of individual microservices,
providing flexibility to adapt to varying
workloads.
Disadvantage: Managing the scalability of
numerous microservices can become complex,
requiring careful orchestration.
Resilience and Fault Isolation:
Advantage: Microservices operate
independently, enhancing fault isolation. If one
7
microservice fails, it does not necessarily impact
the entire system.
Disadvantage: Coordinating interactions
between microservices can be challenging, and
failure in communication can affect the overall
system.
Rapid Development and Deployment:
Advantage: Microservices enable agile
development and deployment, allowing for faster
release cycles and quick adaptation to changes.
Disadvantage: Coordinating releases across
multiple microservices may lead to versioning
challenges and potential compatibility issues.
Customization and Technology Diversity:
Advantage: Microservices offer the flexibility to
use different technologies for each microservice
based on specific requirements.
Disadvantage: Managing diverse technologies
can result in compatibility issues and increased
operational complexity.
Security Enhancement:
Advantage: Focusing on security measures can
lead to a more resilient system, with the ability to
implement fine-grained security controls for each
microservice.
Disadvantage: Implementing security measures
across a distributed system requires meticulous
planning to avoid vulnerabilities in the overall
architecture.
Innovation and Research Opportunities:
Advantage: The microservices approach allows
for continuous innovation and exploration of new
security measures to address evolving threats.
Disadvantage: Experimentation and research can
introduce uncertainties and may require careful
consideration of potential risks.
Centralized Monitoring with Efficient
Dashboard:
Advantage: A centralized dashboard facilitates
real-time monitoring of the entire microservices
ecosystem, providing insights into performance,
security, and potential issues.
 8

Disadvantage: Designing and maintaining an Ubiquitous Computing and Communications

efficient dashboard can be resource-intensive, (ISPA/IUCC), Guangzhou, China, 2017, pp. 470-
and ensuring compatibility with diverse 474, doi: 10.1109/ISPA/IUCC.2017.00077.
microservices may pose challenges. 7. J. Flora, "Improving the Security of
Microservice Systems by Detecting and Tolerating
Enhanced Security Posture: Intrusions," 2020 IEEE International Symposium
Advantage: Research-driven implementation of on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops
innovative security measures can significantly (ISSREW), Coimbra, Portugal, 2020, pp. 131-134,
strengthen the overall security posture of the doi: 10.1109/ISSREW51248.2020.00051.
microservices-based application. 8. A. Janes and B. Russo, "Automatic
Disadvantage: Experimenting with new security Performance Monitoring and Regression Testing
measures may introduce uncertainties and During the Transition from Monolith to
potential vulnerabilities if not thoroughly tested Microservices," 2019 IEEE International
and validated. Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering
Workshops (ISSREW), Berlin, Germany, 2019, pp.
163-168, doi: 10.1109/ISSREW.2019.00067.
XI. REFERENCE 9. T. Asik and Y. E. Selcuk, "Policy
enforcement upon software based on microservice
1. S. -P. Ma, I. -H. Liu, C. -Y. Chen, J. -T. Lin architecture," 2017 IEEE 15th International
and N. -L. Hsueh, "Version-Based Microservice Conference on Software Engineering Research,
Analysis, Monitoring, and Visualization," 2019 Management and Applications (SERA), London,
26th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering UK, 2017, pp. 283-287, doi:
Conference (APSEC), Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2019, 10.1109/SERA.2017.7965739.
pp. 165-172, doi:
10.1109/APSEC48747.2019.00031.
2. Sänger, Niklas & Abeck, Sebastian. (2023).
User Authorization in Microservice-Based
Applications. Software. 2. 400-426.
10.3390/software2030019.
3. J. Kazanavičius and D. Mažeika, "Migrating
Legacy Software to Microservices Architecture,"
2019 Open Conference of Electrical, Electronic
and Information Sciences (eStream), Vilnius,
Lithuania, 2019, pp. 1-5, doi:
10.1109/eStream.2019.8732170.
4. B. Mayer and R. Weinreich, "A Dashboard
for Microservice Monitoring and Management,"
2017 IEEE International Conference on Software
Architecture Workshops (ICSAW), Gothenburg,
Sweden, 2017, pp. 66-69, doi:
10.1109/ICSAW.2017.44.
5. Zhang, Wei. (2023). Security monitoring of
microservice-based applications.
10.36227/techrxiv.21988703.v1.
6. X. Zheng et al., "SmartVM: A Multi-Layer
Microservice-Based Platform for Deploying SaaS,"
2017 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel
and Distributed Processing with Applications and
2017 IEEE International Conference on
9