Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VERSUS
WITH
O R D E R
Delay is condoned.
Leave granted.
During the course of hearing, the learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the Haryana State
Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.1 has drawn our attention to paragraph 4
of the operative portion of the arbitral award dated 24.03.2020, which reads:
“The Respondent No. 1 shall be entitled to the reimbursement of such amount from
the Claimant which the Claimant would recover from the Respondent No. 2 towards
its outstanding dues pursuant to the order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal or
otherwise. The Claimant Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by shall also be liable
to pay simple interest on such Deepak Guglani Date: 2023.12.05 18:20:51 IST
amount @ 9% per annum if such amount is not Reason:
reimbursed to Respondent No. 1 within 1 month of the recovery of such amount from
Respondent No. 2.” 1 For short, “HSIIDC” The learned Senior Advocate states that
the aforesaid arbitration proceedings were essentially examining the claims inter se
the HSIIDC and IDBI Bank Limited. M/s. KMP Expressways Limited was a proforma
The learned Single Judge has upheld the award dated 24.03.2020 vide order dated
29.03.2022, dismissing the objections filed by the HSIIDC. The appeal preferred by
the HSIIDC under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has also
been dismissed by the Division Bench of the High Court vide impugned judgment
dated 11.07.2023.
M/s. KMP Expressways Limited had also filed objections to the arbitral award dated 24.03.2020,
which were dismissed, and the appeal there-against has also been dismissed. However, the
judgment(s)/ order(s) observe that all pleas and contentions raised by M/s. KMP Expressways
Limited have been left open.
At this stage, we must record that disputes inter se M/s. KMP Expressways Limited and the HSIIDC
are the subject matter of another arbitration. The award is yet to be pronounced in the said
arbitration proceedings.
During the course of the hearing before us, the learned Senior Advocate for the HSIIDC has agreed
that the HSIIDC will make a payment in terms of the award dated 24.03.2020 to IDBI Bank Limited
within two months from today. It is stated that calculations are required to be made as to the
amount payable, which task will be undertaken within the aforesaid period.
On behalf of the HSIIDC, an apprehension is expressed that once payment is made, IDBI Bank
Limited may not pursue the proceedings filed by the said bank against M/s. KMP Expressways
Limited and are pending before the Debts Recovery Tribunal2.
To protect the interest of the HSIIDC, we deem it appropriate to exercise our power under Article
142 of the Constitution of India and direct that the HSIIDC will be impleaded as a party in the
proceedings initiated by IDBI Bank Limited against M/s. KMP Expressways Limited before the
DRT. The HSIIDC will be treated as a co-applicant. However, we clarify that the DRT will not
examine and go into any dispute inter se the HSIIDC and M/s. KMP Expressways Limited. The
subject before the DRT will only pertain to and will be restricted to the claim of IDBI Bank Limited
against M/s. KMP Expressways Limited.
We also clarify that we have not examined any of the pleas and contentions of IDBI Bank Limited or
M/s KMP Expressways Limited raised and are sub judice before the DRT, or the pleas and
contentions raised in the proceedings inter se the HSIIDC and M/s. KMP Expressways Limited
pending before the arbitral tribunal.
This order for impleadment of the HSIIDC will not be treated as an expression of opinion by this
Court concerning the merits of the proceedings pending before the DRT or the arbitral tribunal.
We also do not comment on the right of the HSIIDC to enter into an assignment agreement with
IDBI Bank Limited.
2 For short, “DRT” Recording the aforesaid, the impugned judgment is upheld, and the appeals are
disposed of in the above terms.
..................J.
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 19675/2023 (Arising out of impugned final judgment
and order dated 11-07-2023 in FAO(OS)(COMM) No. 90/2022 passed by the High Court of Delhi at
New Delhi) HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS IDBI BANK LIMITED & ANR. Respondent(s) (IA
No.179676/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA
No.179677/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES) with SLP(C) Diary No(s).
42981/2023 (XIV) (IA No.217885/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA
No.217887/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) Date :
01-12-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI For
Petitioner(s) Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG (N/P) Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv.
Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv. M/s. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, AOR Mr. Raunak Dhillon,
Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay is condoned.
Leave granted.
The appeals are disposed of in terms of the signed order. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand
disposed of.