Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstracts
Abstracts
(1)There has been little research into the impact of textbook costs on higher education in the United
Kingdom. (2) To better understand textbook use patterns and the issues faced by UK students and
educators the UK Open Textbooks Project (2017–2018, http://ukopentextbooks.org/)) conducted
quantitative survey research with United Kingdom educators in September 2018. (3) This article
reports on the findings of this survey, which focused on awareness of open educational resources;
textbook use and rationale; awareness and use of open textbooks; and open licensing. (4) Results
reveal fertile ground for open textbook adoption with potential to support a wide range of open
educational practices. (5) The findings indicate strategies for supporting pedagogical innovation and
student access through the mainstream adoption of open textbooks.
Abstract 4: EduZinc: a tool for the creation and assessment of student learning activities in
complex open, online, and flexible learning environments
(1)This article describes the development of an application for the grading and provision of
feedback on educational processes. (2) The too, named EduZinc, enables instructors to go through
the complete process of creating and evaluating the activities and materials of a course. (3) The
application enables for the simultaneous management of two teaching-related aspects: (a) creation of
individualized learning products (activities, tests and exams) and (b) automatic grading (for every
learning product; automated creation of student, class, and competency-based reports; and delivery
of personalized reports to students, instructors and tutors). (4) The system also has a series of
warnings in place to notify instructors and tutors when a student is falling behind. (5) As a means to
reward the efforts made during the course, the program keeps relevant statistics, notifying when a
student is excelling in the course.
Abstract 6: The impact of online automated feedback on students' reflective journal writing in
an EFL course
(1)The study employed an embedded mixed-method design using reflective journals, survey and
interview to investigate the impact of online automated feedback (OAF) on the quality of students'
reflective journals in a 13-week English as Foreign Language (EFL) course at university level. (2)
One hundred and thirty-eight undergraduate students participated in the study, and they were
divided into two groups: experimental (N = 82) and control (N = 56). (3) Participants in both groups
received the same instruction on reflective writing by the same teacher, but the experimental group
could access a web-based classification system to generate OAF on their second and third reflective
journals while the control group could not. (4) Results show that the experimental group
outperformed the control group in terms of the overall score for the final reflective journal, and the
experimental group also demonstrated a significant improvement in scores across reflective journals.
(5) While data collected from an online questionnaire survey and focus group interviews generally
support the value of OAF for reflective writing, a number of student concerns were noted. (6)
Overall, the findings of this study can contribute to a better understanding of the impact of OAF on
reflective writing and provide a basis for future discussion on how to blend teacher feedback and
OAF to support reflective writing.
Structure Aims-background Methods Findings Conclusion/ implications
Sentence Number (e.g 1 123 45 6
1,2,3..)