Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Instructor’s Name
The case selected for this paper revolves around Edward Snowden’s revelations about
how Americans were losing their right to privacy and other civil liberties as a result of more
intrusive National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance programs. The case presents several
ethical issues, which include whether Snowden had a moral obligation to inform the American
public about how the government violated their privacy and if the American government had a
moral obligation to prevent terrorism and enhance the security of Americans by eavesdropping
on their private communications (Starr & Yan, 2013). The legal issues involved include whether
the American government went against the First Amendment rights by violating the privacy of
Americans, if Snowden’s actions of leaking classified documents violated the Espionage Act of
1917, and whether the surveillance law was just and constitutional (Maniam, 2016).
Snowden’s case presents several privacy concerns. First, it highlights how NSA
surveillance programs provide an enabling environment for the American government to destroy
the privacy, Internet freedom, and basic liberties of Americans domestically and globally (Starr
& Yan, 2013). A second privacy concern embeds in the fact that the surveillance programs
reported by Snowden were being conducted without the knowledge and consent of the American
public. A third privacy concern relates to the trade-off between privacy in the digital age and the
need to be proactive in data collection and surveillance to prevent Americans from terrorism and
adverse outcomes (Pujol, 2020). Several issues about the case relate to national security, which
include Snowden’s act of breaking serious professional obligations by stealing and disclosing
classified documents, undermining crime-fighting efforts and foreign relations vigilantism, and
causing harm to national security interests by disclosing secrets to third parties and leaking
Lastly, one of the broader issues of the case revolves around understanding the trade-offs
between privacy and civil liberties on the one hand and national security interests, on the other.
A second broader issue relates to the ethical and legal implications of disclosing classified
privacy and individual liberties is as important as protecting Americans from terrorism through
targeted surveillance. Since terrorists are increasingly using the Internet to target Americans, a
need exists for national security agencies to continue undertaking surveillance and data mining
without undermining the privacy and civil liberties of Americans. Such a feat, in my view, could
be achieved by imposing certain restrictions to control what data should and should not be mined
interactions. There is also a need for the American government and other interested players to
implement a system of checks and balances with the view to ensuring that surveillance programs
and data mining practices are not abused and are adequately regulated and controlled.
NATIONAL SECURITY, ETHICS, AND LAW
4
References
Blusiewicz, J. (2014). The case of Edward Snowden: A different path. Cornell International
Maniam, S. (2016). Americans feel the tensions between privacy and security concerns. Pew
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/02/19/americans-feel-the-tensions-between-
privacy-and-security-concerns/
Pujol, J. (2020). Is this the end of privacy? Snowden and the power of conscience. Church,
Starr, B., & Yan, H. (2013). Man behind NSA leaks says he did it to safeguard privacy, liberty.
snowden-profile/