Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ChemistrySelect doi.org/10.1002/slct.202002481
The oxidized derivative of graphene named Graphene oxide to 0.11 eV. Theoretical predictions of the energy band-gap
(GO) are attractive materials as optoelectronic devices due to variations with the oxide coverage obtained via density func-
their optical response in the mid-infrared wavelength spectral tional theory (DFT) computational simulations agree well with
range; however, very large-scaled synthesis methods and the experimental results, providing evidence of oxygen-medi-
optical characterization are required. Here, GO thin films are ated charge-transport scattering. Interestingly, in the optical
fabricated on quartz by implementing simple two-step pyrol- response, increased TCA results in a blue-shift of the absorption
ysis processes by using renewable bamboo as source material. and the absorbance spectrum can be correlated with the large
The effect of carbonization temperature (TCA) on the composi- size distribution of the graphitic nano-crystals of the samples.
tional, vibrational, and optoelectronic properties of the system These results suggest that graphene oxide-bamboo pyrolig-
are investigated. It was found that as TCA increases, graphite neous acid (GO) thin films exhibit optoelectronic response
conversion rises, oxygen coverage reduces from 17 % to 4 %, useful in developing photodetectors and emitter devices in the
and the band-gap energy monotonically decreases from 0.30 mid-infrared (MIR) spectral range.
Figure 3. (a) Absorption spectra of GO /quartz thin film at different TCA. (b) MIR-PL spectra analysis in GO at TCA of 673 K. (c) MIR-PL spectra in GO-BPA for
different TCA. (d) MIR-PL spectral analysis of the band-to-band transition region in GO at TCA of 673 K. The red curve corresponds to the fit by using Equation (1).
Table 1. Comparison between elemental composition measurements by XPS and EDS techniques in GO samples obtained at different TCA.
the electronic structure, mainly by epoxy groups present as excitonic bound energy of 66 meV was obtained, expected for
C O C. Figure 3(b) shows the MIR- photoluminescence (PL) a narrow gap semiconductor.[3] Region-(ii) at an energy range
spectra of GO /quartz obtained at TCA = 673 K and its respective of 0.30–0.34 eV, where excitonic radiative transitions (as accept-
fitting lines by using deconvolution of eight Gaussian functions or (EXA), donor (EXD), EXn1 and EXn2,) could be identified. Region-
as contributions associated to exciton-phonon coupling, ex- (iii) at an energy range of 0.34–0.37 eV, where band-to-band
citon emissions, and band-to-band transition. Also, in Fig- radiative transitions are observed. To obtain the band-gap
ure 3(b) it is indicated as blue arrow the CO2 absorption, which value belonging to the third region, as shown in Figure 3d, we
does not provide any luminescence; however, it provides used the expression for band-to-band transition presented in
absorption within the optical path which is used to measure equation (1):[31]
the emission spectra. Additionally, in Figure 3(c) the same
� �
analysis for the MIR-PL spectra in GO films/quartz measured at �1 �hw Eg
Ið�hwÞ ¼ I0 �hw Eg 2
exp
the different TCA is presented. As observed before, three kT
characteristic regions are distinguished: region-(i) at lower
energies, in a range of 0.20–0.30 eV, different exciton-phonon where E = �hw is the energy measured by the MIR-PL system
(LO, longitudinal optical phonon) emissions (EXA + 1LO, EXD + used (eV as unit), Eg is the band-gap energy value of the
1LO, EXn1 + 1LO, and EXn2 + 1LO) were identified; from here, a material studied (eV as unit), k is the Boltzmann constant, T is
Figure 5. a) Comparison between experimental data and theoretical calculus of the oxygen coverage dependence on the band-gap energy in GO samples.
Theoretical results were performed under DFT-6-31G/B3LYP quantum theory level. b) Visualization of surface charge screening density, as predicted by the
conductor-like screening model for real solvents (COSMO-RS) for the GOs under study. c) The GO σ profile.
multilayers, as shown in Figure 5(a). Band-gap energy values different oxygen coverages varying from 4 % to 17 % through-
(green circles) show a variation from 0.30 to 0.11 eV by out the molecule. The surface charge density, as calculated by
decreasing oxygen content, as expected for a narrow-gap the COSMO-RS model, is represented by green, blue, and red
semiconductor behavior and it was determined by using zones, representing neutral, negative, and positive charge
equation (2). The red fit curve is the general quadratic depend- density values, respectively, or, in other words, the specific
ence of the bandgap with the scatter center X applied for polarity on the molecular surface. As such, the negative surface
semiconductors.[41,42] The theoretical predictions of the energy charge density of the molecule is located on the right side of
band-gap variations with the oxide coverage obtained via DFT the σ profile graph and has positive σ-values, while the
computational simulations agree with the experimental results, positively charged parts are located on the left side and feature
providing evidence of oxygen-mediated charge-transport scat- negative σ-values (Figure 5(c)). It was observed that increasing
tering. oxide coverage increases the number of electron-hole pairs in
In Addition, the conductor like screening model for real the GO molecules, as expected. In general, the central region of
solvent (COSMO-RS) implicit solvation model was employed to the σ profile is associated with nonpolar or weakly polar parts
visualize the surface charge screening density throughout the of the molecule, while strongly polar and potentially hydrogen
molecule.[37–40] Figure 5(b) shows surface charge screening bonding acceptor regions appear on the right-hand side and
density for a representation of 12 % oxygen at GO. Figure 5(c) donor regions on the left-hand side of the σ profiles. The
presents the quantity of the electrical surface charge screening carbon zones consist predominantly of nonpolar regions (green
density (better known as the σ profile) of GO structures for in the surface charge screening density visualizations in
Figure 5(b), which can be linked to exposed surfaces of carbon Supporting Information Summary
atoms. The peaks located in the hydrogen bonding acceptor
zones correspond to oxygen atoms (red areas in the surface Experimental section including synthesis, sample preparation,
charge density), for the GOs this red region is due to the epoxy and characterization techniques, in addition to the computa-
groups in Figure 5(b). Conversely, the peaks located in the tional methodology are given in the supporting information.
hydrogen bonding donator region of the σ profile correspond
to hydrogen atoms of the alkyl side chain and hydroxyl groups
Acknowledgments
(light blue regions). Furthermore, it was found that increasing
oxygen coverage increases electron-hole pairs and electron This work was funded in part by Interdisciplinary Institute of
acceptor-donor abilities. Therefore, DFT simulations show that Sciences of Universidad del Quindío and the Center of Excellence
in GO sheets the electron donor abilities are more abundant on Novel Materials at Universidad del Valle under project
than electron acceptor abilities, like p-type narrow gap semi- IC10024. A part of this work was performed at the “Energy
conductor behavior and these results suggests that the main Campus Nürnberg” where it was supported by the “Aufbruch
contribution of the band-gap energy can be attributed to Bayern” initiative of the State of Bavaria. Prof. Dr. Christoph J.
epoxy group presence in GO films. Understanding the effect of Brabec (CJB) acknowledge funding by the Deutsche Forschungs-
epoxy groups in electrical and optical properties of molecular gemeinschaft (DFG)- Projektnummer 182849149- SFB 953. As well
GO is of great interest in the basic interpretation of rGO as, CJB and Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Heiss and Dr. Niall Killilea
behavior in many applications, like energy storage, catalyst acknowledge funding through the state of Bavaria for the Energy
binder, batteries, and micro-lattices among others.[44–52] Also, Campus Nurnberg (EnCN II). Jose Dario Perea acknowledge the
some challenges of GO thin films in organic photovoltaic solar University of Toronto and the Ministerio de Ciencias y Tecnologia
cells may be, the evaluation of film versatility as interface Colombia-Colciencias.
material for electronics, the device compatibility of solvents
and the influence of film homogeneity in the electronic
Conflict of Interest
devices.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
3. Conclusions
Keywords: graphene oxide · band-gap energy · oxygen
In summary, we have reported the first experimental inves- coverage · HR-TEM images · Photoluminescence · UV-Vis · DFT
tigation of UV-VIS, FTIR, MIR-photoluminescence (PL), XRD, and computational simulations · COSMO-RS
Raman in GO films/quartz. These results have shed light on the
mechanism involved in light-absorption processes of GO films
[1] F. Li, X. Jiang, J. Zhao, S. Zhan, Nano Energy 2015, 16, 488–515.
on quartz substrates and the optical and conductive effects of [2] X. Wan, G. Long, L. Huang, Y. Chen, Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 5342–5358.
the hole-electron pairs presents in the samples given mainly by [3] S. Park, R. S. Ruoff, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 217.
the presence of C O C multifunctional oxide, suggest that GO [4] A. K. Geim, K. S. Novoselov, Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183.
[5] K. I. Bolotin, K. J. Sikes, Z. Jiang, M. Klima, G. Fudenberg, J. Hone, P. Kim,
samples material can be a possible future candidate material in
H. L. Stormer, Solid State Commun. 2008, 146, 351.
organic photovoltaic solar cells. The experimental and theoret- [6] S. V. Morozov, K. S. Novoselov, M. I. Katsnelson, F. Schedin, D. C. Elias,
ical approach to determine opening band-gap energies in GO J. A. Jaszczak, A. K. Geim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 016602.
multilayers, obtained from bamboo tar as precursor, for low [7] C. Lee, X. D. Wei, J. W. Kysar, J. Hone, Sci. Rep. 2008, 321, 385.
[8] V. Singh, D. Joung, L. Zhai, S. Das, S. I. Khondaker, S. Seal, Prog. Mater.
oxide coverage regimen, less than 17 %, were studied and
Sci. 2011, 56, 1178.
found mainly that C O C bonds can influence this behavior. [9] A. A. Balandin, S. Ghosh, W. Z. Bao, I. Calizo, D. Teweldebrhan, F. Miao,
Graphene oxide multilayered samples exhibit morphological, C. N. Lau, Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 902.
structural, vibrational, and electrical properties, similar to the [10] M. Diba, D. W. H. Fam, A. R. Boccaccini, M. S. P. Shaffer, Prog. Mater. Sci.
2016, 82, 83–117.
same properties exhibited by the rGO obtained through more
[11] W. Cai, Y. Zhu, X. Li, R. D. Piner, R. S. Ruoff, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95,
sophisticated techniques. Experimental and theoretical results 123115.
of electrical properties suggest that GO multilayers exhibit p- [12] Y. Zhu, S. Murali, W. Cai, X. Li, J. W. Suk, J. R. Potts, R. S. Ruoff, Adv. Mater.
type narrow gap semiconductor behavior. A COSMO-RS 2010, 22, 3906.
[13] H. Kim, B. Yang, M. M. Stylianakis, E. Kymakis, S. M. Zakeeruddin, M.
molecular model based on ab initio density functional theory
Grätzel, A. Hagfeld, Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2020, 100053, 1.
quantum chemistry calculations was proposed and agrees with [14] S. Kim, D. D. Kulkarni, M. Henry, P. Zackowski, S. S. Jang, V. V. Tsukruk,
the fine experimental measurements of electrical character- A. G. Fedorov, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 133109.
ization. Hence, our model provides essential ideas of design [15] F. Bonaccorso, Z. Sun, T. Hasan, A. C. Ferrari, Nat. Photonics 2010, 4, 611.
[16] Y. You, V. Sahajwalla, M. Yoshimura, R. K. Joshi, Nanoscale 2016, 8, 117.
criteria and enable identifying suitable processing guidelines
[17] A. Ambrosi, C. K. Chua, N. M. Latiff, A. H. Loo, C. H. A. Wong, A. Y. S. Eng,
for existing and new high-performance blends from the outset. A. Bonanni, M. Pumera, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 2458.
[18] M. R. Rezapour, C. W. Myung, J. Yun, A. Ghassami, N. Li, S. U. Yu, A.
Hajibabaei, Y. Park, K. S. Kim, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 24393–
24406.
[19] K. P. Loh, Q. Bao, G. Eda, M. Chhowalla, Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 1015.
[20] H. Choi, S. Jung, J. MinSeo, D. Chang, L. Daic, J. Baek, Nano Energy 2012,
1, 534.
[21] J. Liu, Y. Xue, M. Zhang, L. Dai, Mater. Res. Soc. Bull. 2012, 37, 1265. [39] Z. Wang, U. Wille, E. Juaristi, Encyclopedia of Physical Organic Chemistry
[22] J. G. Radich, P. J. McGinn, P. V. Kamat, Electrochem. Soc. Interface 2011, Chapter 16, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboker, New Jersey, 2017, pp. 697–730.
20, 63. [40] K. Paduszyński, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 6, 11835–11850.
[23] C. Chung, S. Narra, E. Jokar, H. Wu, E. W. Diau, J. Mater. Chem. A. 2017, 5, [41] J. A. Van-Vechten, T. K. Bergstresser, Phys. Rev. B. 1970, 1, 3351.
13957. [42] I. Vurgaftman, J. R. Meyer, L. R. Ram-Mohan, Appl. Phys. 2001, 89, 5815.
[24] J. S. Yeo, J. M. Yun, Y. S. Jung, D. Y. Kim, Y. J. Noh, S. S. Kim, S. I. Na, J. [43] A. V. Talyzin, G. Mercier, A. Klechikov, M. Hedenström, D. Johnels, D. Wei,
Mater. Chem. A. 2014, 2, 292. D. Cotton, A. Opitz, E. Moons, Carbon 2017, 115, 430.
[25] J. S. Yeo, R. Kang, S. Lee, Y. J. Jeon, N. Myoung, C. L. Lee, D. Y. Kim, J. M. [44] S. Park, R. S. Ruoff, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 217.
Yun, Y. H. Seo, S. S. Kim, S. I. Na, Nano Energy 2015, 12, 96. [45] L. Tang, X. Li, R. Ji, K. S. Teng, G. Tai, J. Ye, C. Wei, S. P. Lau, J. Mater.
[26] Z. Wu, S. Bai, J. Xiang, Z. Yuan, Y. Yang, W. Cui, X. Gao, Z. Liu, Y. Jin, B. Chem. 2012, 22, 5676.
Sun, Nanoscale 2014, 6, 10505. [46] W. M. Qiao, Y. Song, M. Huda, X. Zhang, S. H. Yoon, I. Mochida, O. Katou,
[27] J. K. Kim, S. J. Kim, M. J. Park, S. Bae, S. P. Cho, Q. G. Du, D. H. Wang, J. H. H. Hayashi, K. Kawamoto, Carbon 2005, 43, 3002.
Park, B. H. Hong, Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14276. [47] A. Ejigu, K. Fujisawa, B. F. Spencer, B. Wang, M. Terrones, I. A. Kinloch,
[28] H. B. Sun, J. Yang, Y. Z. Zhou, N. Zhao, D. Li, Adv. Perform. Mater. 2014, R. A. W. Dryfe, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 1804357, 1.
29, 14. [48] B. Koo, S. Byun, S. W. Nam, S. Y. Moon, S. Kim, J. Y. Park, B. T. Ahn, B.
[29] H. Anderson, R. Tito, A. Habermehl, C. Müller, S. Beck, C. R. Nieto, G. Shin, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 1705136, 1.
Hernández Sosa, M. E. Quintana-Caceda, Appl. Opt. 2017, 56, 7774. [49] E. Istif, J. Hernández-Ferrer, E. P. Urriolabeitia, A. Stergiou, N. Tagma-
[30] S. H. Fei, W. Can, S. Z. Pei, Z. Y. Liang, J. K. Juan, Y. G. Zhen, Sci China- tarchis, G. Fratta, M. J. Large, A. B. Dalton, A. M. Benito, W. K. Maser, Adv.
Phys Mech. Astron. 2015, 58, 014202. Funct. Mater. 2018, 1707548, 1.
[31] X. Luo, K. Ma, T. Jiao, R. Xing, L. Zhang, J. Zhou, B. Li, Nanoscale Res. Lett. [50] Y. Gao, Y. Wan, B. Wei, Z. Xia, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 1706721, 1.
2017, 12, 1. [51] S. Wang, F. Gong, S. Yang, J. Liao, M. Wu, Z. Xu, C. Chen, X. Yang, F.
[32] J. J. Prías-Barragán, K. Gross, H. Ariza-Calderón, P. Prieto, Phys. Status Zhao, B. Wang, Y. Wang, X. Sun, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 1801806, 1.
Solidi A. 2016, 213, 85. [52] Y. Jiang, Z. Xu, T. Huang, Y. Liu, F. Guo, J. Xi, W. Gao, C. Gao, Adv. Funct.
[33] K. Gross, J. J. Prías-Barragán, S. Sangiao, J. M. De Teresa, L. Lajaunie, R. Mater. 2018, 1707024, 1.
Arenal, H. Ariza-Calderón, P. Prieto, Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 365708. [53] D. Joung, S. I. Khondaker, Phys. Rev. B. 2012, 86, 235423.
[34] Y. Geng, S. Jun Wang, J. Kim, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 336, 592.
[35] X. Wang, W. Dou, Thermochim. Acta. 2012, 529, 25.
[36] L. Pavessi, M. Guzzi, J. Appl. Phys. 1994, 75, 4779.
[37] A. Klamt, J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 7, 2224–223.
[38] J. R. Reynolds, B. C. Thompson, T. A. Skotheim, Conjugated Polymers:
Properties, Processing, and Applications, Chapter 15, CRC Press – Taylor & Submitted: June 22, 2020
Francis Group, Boca Raton, 2019, pp. 1–30. Accepted: September 25, 2020