Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Final Paper IALCCE2023
Final Paper IALCCE2023
Final Paper IALCCE2023
J. Yu
Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
P.L. Ng
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania
1 INTRODUCTION
Transportation infrastructure such as roads, bridges, ports, airports etc. are an integral part
of the modern landscape. They form the lifeline of cities until they fail to serve the purpose for
which they have been designed leading to a significant surge of social costs or even cata
strophic accidents (National Academies of Sciences et al. (2020)). As per the American Society
of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Infrastructure Report Card released in 2017 (ASCE (2017)), the
U.S. has 614,387 bridges, almost four in 10 of which are 50 years or older. Out of them,
56,007 or 9.1% were structurally deficient. Many of the bridges are approaching the end of
their design life. The estimate of the investment required for bridge rehabilitation in the US
alone is at least US $123 billion.
An estimated 6.3% of the total bridge deck area belonged to structurally deficient bridges in
2016, a small improvement from 9.5% in 2007 (Figure 1a). The situation in Europe is not
much better which was tragically illustrated by the sudden collapse of the Morandi bridge in
August 2018 in Genoa, Italy. Subsequently, it was revealed that a declining investment in rou
tine inspection, repair and maintenance was a leading cause of the failure. The fast-developing
economies of countries like India and China account for the bulk of the worldś construction
activities are also facing the challenge of fast-track building while ensuring durability, resili
ency and sustainability, as illustrated in Figure 1b (Li (2019b)).
DOI: 10.1201/9781003323020-495
4029
1.1 Current challenges in bridge engineering
The challenges faced by the infrastructure sector as a whole be it transportation (land, water,
air), water (irrigation, drinking water), or power generation (thermal, nuclear, renewable etc.) -
all have many common features such as design for long service life, the minimum cost of main
tenance, minimum carbon footprint in both construction and operation etc. (Lepech and Li
(2009)). A specific category of transportation infrastructure such as bridges has specific chal
lenges that must be addressed. Among these, ensuring a long service life of up to and exceeding
100 years is a major challenge faced by engineers all over the world. Keoleian et al (Keoleian
et al. (2005)) discussed a life cycle modelling-based concrete bridge design approach to compare
the use of an ECC link slab to replace conventional steel expansion joint which is often a source
of major damage needing frequent repairs. The demolition, repair, and recycling of materials
and wastes from deteriorated infrastructure remain to be studied in detail. The development of
low life cycle cost, low-carbon modular design is beneficial to the reduction of infrastructure
deficiency (Kaewunruen et al. (2016)). ASCE (2017) recommended the following key actions to
address the challenges of bridge infrastructure, among others.
• Increase funding from all levels of government to continue reducing the number of struc
turally deficient bridges, decrease the maintenance backlog, and address the large number
of bridges that have passed or are approaching the end of their design life.
• Bridge owners should consider the costs across a bridge’s entire life cycle to make smart
design decisions and prioritize maintenance and rehabilitation.
Once the defects in the bridge are identified, the repair and maintenance require the selection of
the right materials and methods for the best results. Innovation in new technologies, especially
the development of materials such as fibre-reinforced composites is enabling bridges to be built
stronger, last longer, require less maintenance and have a lower carbon footprint. As already
discussed, Sensors and robots such as drones are being used in both new and old bridges for
real-time or near real-time structural health monitoring so that problems can be identified and
addressed earlier to improve public safety. To reduce the time for the construction or repair
of bridges, prefabricated elements are being increasingly used. Engineered Cementitious
4030
Composites (ECC) or Strain-Hardening Cementitious Composites (SHCC) is a class of fibre-
reinforced cement-based composites that can be designed for a range of compressive
strength while ensuring a requisite degree of tensile ductility (Li and Mishra (1996); Li (2008)).
As shown in Figure 3, the characteristic material property of ECC is reflected by its tensile
stress-strain behaviour and cracking pattern. In contrast to the brittle nature of plain concrete
which fails with a single crack under relatively low tensile stress, and the characteristic strain-
softening behaviour of ordinary fibre-reinforced concrete, ECC continues to carry tensile stress
beyond the first crack and even exhibits tensile strain-hardening accompanied by multiple
micro-cracking phenomena. As a result, the average and maximum crack width of ECC is typ
ically below 100 microns or less. These two unique properties of ECC, namely the high tensile
strain capacity and inherent crack width control, can be effectively deployed in a number of
structural applications to address major challenges faced by bridges, as discussed in previous
sections. Figure 4 shows the graphical representation of a brief literature review undertaken to
understand the state of progress in terms of the application of ECC/SHCC in real-life bridge
scenarios using the connected papers’ graphical representation. Table 1 gives a list of such appli
cations taken from the textbook by Li (Li (2019a)).
4031
Figure 3. Typical tensile stress–strain behaviour of ECC with average crack-width data (Mishra,
D K Yu, J Das, A Leung 2018).
The bridge deck and Reduce frequency and Tensile ductility to accommo Cast-in-place or
road pavement link-slab cost of bridge deck date thermal deformation; precast
retrofits maintenance; Reduce tight crack width; Fatigue
traffic noise resistance; wear durability
Composite bridge deck Reduce the risk of fatigue Tensile ductility; fatigue Cast-in-place
failure of steel deck; resistance
Reduce cost and weight
Patch repair of bridge Reduce maintenance Tensile ductility; durability Cast-in-place
deck frequency and cost against wheel loads and
chloride environment
Rigid-frame railway Reduce steel reinforce High shear capacity even Precast in factory
bridge beam-column ment congestion without steel reinforcement
joint connection
Figure 4. Connected papers map showing (a) drone inspection of bridges, (b) application of ECC link
slab in bridge deck joint linked to (Lepech and Li (2009)).
SHCC link slabs in place of conventional bridge joints offers an innovative solution to the prob
lem. Lepech and Li (Keoleian et al. (2005)) developed a Life Cycle Assessment model specific
ally for bridge decks accounting for materials production and supply chain, construction and
maintenance processes, construction-related logistics, and end-of-life management. The model
indicated that the ECC/SHCC bridge deck system has significant advantages over conventional
joints. It has 40% less life cycle energy consumption, 50% less solid waste generation, and 38%
less raw material consumption. Based on the findings by (Keoleian et al. (2005)), construction-
related traffic congestion was a dominant factor in life cycle cost assessment. The first ever real-
life application of ECC link slab was launched at a bridge in Grove Street over the inter-state
highway I-94 under the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) (Lepech and Li
(2009)). The performance of this bridge has been monitored ever since and it has been found to
have performed exceedingly well throughout the reporting period up till 2015 (Li (2019a)).
4032
Figure 5 shows a schematic of the link slab and a photograph of a similar bridge where an
ECC link slab was implemented by the Virginia Department of Transport (VDOT) recently in
2018 (Walus and Engineer (2010)). According to (Thorkildsen et al. (2020)), the US Department
of Transportation reports widespread practice of replacing conventional joints in bridge decks
with link slabs by various state departments of transportation in New York, Maryland, Virginia
and Massachusetts etc. Many of these applications including those in Virginia and Maryland
reported successful use of ECC/SHCC and ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) in the
construction of link slabs. Such applications are gaining popularity all over the world not only
for joints at bridge decks (Hou et al. (2018)) but also in regular concrete road pavements
(Zhang et al. (2017, 2010)). Compared to asphalt pavements, the driving comfort of concrete
pavements is normally lower due to the existence of joints. The joints also reduce the durability
of the reinforced concrete pavement due to susceptibility to infiltration of moisture and deicing
salt etc. which in turn causes corrosion of reinforcement. Repair and maintenance cost is thus
likely to increase with the presence of joints. By using low-shrinkage engineered cementitious
composite (LSECC) strips in place of joints of conventional concrete pavement, it is possible to
localize the fine cracks into the LSECC strip and significantly enhance long-term durability and
reduce maintenance cost. This technique has been already applied to real-life projects in Japan
(Rokugo (2010)) and China (Zhang et al. (2017, 2013)).
4033
Figure 5. (a) Schematic of a typical full-depth link slab (Thorkildsen et al. (2020)) (b) Photograph of the
ECC link slab on I-64 over Dunlap creek by VDOT (Walus and Engineer (2010)) (c) Photograph of the
first patch repair using ECC on a bridge deck of Curtis Road in Ann Arbor, Michigan in 2002 (Li (2014)).
4034
FRP is a brittle material and is prone to debonding from the substrate concrete, whereas steel
plates are susceptible to corrosion. In a comprehensive experimental study, (Zhang et al. (2015))
showed the advantage of using ECC in mitigating the reinforcement congestion problem in beam-
column joints designed as per the earthquake-resistant code requirements in Japan. At shear span
to depth ratio a/d = 2.8, the shear capacity of the beams with and without stirrups increased by
20.6% and 107.6% respectively when using ECC in lieu of conventional concrete.
3 CONCLUSIONS
Robotic and drone inspection of bridge structures followed by the application of Engineered
Cementitious Composites (ECC) or Strain-Hardening Cementitious Composites (SHCC) in
repairs and other use in bridge engineering have been illustrated by citing real-life examples.
This study indicates that advanced fibre-reinforced cement composites such as ECC/SHCC
with their high tensile ductility and intrinsic tight crack width control can be utilized in both
new and old bridges effectively. Such application can enhance structural safety and resilience
while making concrete bridges more durable and thereby reducing their life cycle cost. Specif
ically, the following conclusions can be drawn:
• Robotic inspection of structures such as bridges using unmanned aerial vehicles commonly
known as drones is becoming increasingly popular.
• identifying major and critical defects that need urgent attention is easier, less costly and
safer using such methods.
• ECC/SHCC is an excellent material choice for long-lasting and durable repair of concrete
pavements including bridge decks.
• Use of ECC/SHCC link slabs in place of conventional joints at bridge decks, as well as con
crete pavements, can save maintenance costs, reduce traffic disruption and increase service life.
• Using ECC/SHCC in critical structural elements and joints can enhance the ductile per
formance of bridges under dynamic loads such as heavy traffic and earthquakes.
• Further accumulation of laboratory research and field performance data is beneficial to
promote more ECC/SHCC applications in real-life structures.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Prof. Dhanada K. Mishra would like to thank KMBB College of Engineering and Technology
for permitting his sabbatical at HKUST from September 2017 to January 2021. Dr. P.L. Ng
would like to acknowledge the support from the European Regional Development Fund (Pro
ject no. 01.2.2-LMT-K-718-03-0010) under a grant agreement with the Research Council of
Lithuania (LMTLT).
REFERENCES
ASCE (2017). 2017 infrastructure report card. In American Society of Civil Engineers.
Azari, H., O’Shea, D., and Campbell, J. (2022). Application of unmanned aerial systems for bridge
inspection. Transportation Research Record, 2676(1):401–407.
4035
Hou, M., Hu, K., Yu, J., Dong, S., and Xu, S. (2018). Experimental study on ultra-high ductility cemen
titious composites applied to link slabs for jointless bridge decks. Composite Structures, 204:167–177.
Kaewunruen, S., Sussman, J. M., and Matsumoto, A. (2016). Grand challenges in transportation and
transit systems.
Keoleian, G. A., Kendall, A., Dettling, J. E., Smith, V. M., Chandler, R. F., Lepech, M. D., and Li, V. C.
(2005). Life cycle modeling of concrete bridge design: Comparison of engineered cementitious composite
link slabs and conventional steel expansion joints. Journal of infrastructure systems, 11(1):51–60.
Lepech, M. D. and Li, V. C. (2006a). Long term durability performance of engineered cementitious
composites/langzeitbeständigkeit systematisch entwickelter zusammengesetzter zement gebundener
werkstoffe. Restoration of Buildings and Monuments, 12(2):119–132.
Lepech, M. D. and Li, V. C. (2006b). Long term durability performance of engineered cementitious
composites/langzeitbeständigkeit systematisch entwickelter zusammengesetzter zement gebundener
werkstoffe. Restoration of Buildings and Monuments, 12(2):119–132.
Lepech, M. D. and Li, V. C. (2009). Application of ecc for bridge deck link slabs. Materials and Struc
tures, 42(9):1185–1195.
Li, M. (2014). Engineered cementitious composites for bridge decks. In Advanced composites in bridge
construction and repair, pages 177–209. Elsevier.
Li, V. C. (2008). Engineered cementitious composites (ecc) material, structural, and durability
performance.
Li, V. C. (2019a). Engineered cementitious composites (ECC): bendable concrete for sustainable and resilient
infrastructure. Springer.
Li, V. C. (2019b). High-performance and multifunctional cement-based composite material. Engineering,
5(2):250–260.
Li, V. C. and Mishra, D. (1996). Structural applications of engineered cementitious composites.
National Academies of Sciences, E., Medicine, et al. (2020). Critical issues in transportation 2019.
Rokugo, K. (2010). Tension tests and structural applications of strain-hardening fiber-reinforced
cementitious composites. Fracture Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures, pages 1533–1540.
Sahmaran, M., Li, V. C., and Andrade, C. (2008). Corrosion resistance performance of steel-reinforced
engineered cementitious composite beams. ACI Materials Journal, 105(3):243.
Shang, X.-Y., Yu, J.-T., Li, L.-Z., and Lu, Z.-D. (2019). Strengthening of rc structures by using engineered
cementitious composites: A review. Sustainability, 11(12):3384.
Shi, X., Olvera, A., Hamilton, C., Gao, E., Li, J., Utke, L., Petruska, A., Yu, Z., Udpa, L., Deng, Y.,
et al. (2021). Ai-enabled robotic nde for structural damage assessment and repair. Materials Evalu
ation, 79(7).
Thorkildsen, E. T. et al. (2020). Case study: Eliminating bridge joints with link slabs-an overview of state
practices. Technical report, United States. Federal Highway Administration.
Walus, K. R. and Engineer, B. (2010). Dot design construction guidelines recent updates – bridge
specifications. National Steel Bridge Alliance Award.
Zhang, H., Lepech, M. D., Keoleian, G. A., Qian, S., and Li, V. C. (2010). Dynamic life-cycle modeling
of pavement overlay systems: Capturing the impacts of users, construction, and roadway
deterioration. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 16(4):299–309.
Zhang, J., Chen, Q., Wang, Z., Chen, C., Guo, Z., and Fu, Y. (2017). Design and construction of jointless
concrete pavement. Harbin Gongye Daxue Xuebao, 49(03):68–73.
Zhang, J., Wang, Z., and Ju, X. (2013). Application of ductile fiber reinforced cementitious composite in
jointless concrete pavements. Composites Part B: Engineering, 50:224–231.
Zhang, R., Matsumoto, K., Hirata, T., Ishizeki, Y., and Niwa, J. (2015). Application of pp-ecc in
beam–column joint connections of rigid-framed railway bridges to reduce transverse reinforcements.
Engineering Structures, 86:146–156.
Zhang, Z., Hu, J., and Ma, H. (2019). Feasibility study of ecc with self-healing capacity applied on the
long-span steel bridge deck overlay. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20(8):884–893.
4036