Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract—The total dissolved solids and sulphate Exploration of good low cost and non-conventional
in an electroplating industry effluent was removed adsorbent may contribute to the sustainability of the
using Albizia lebbeck pod powder, which was environment and offer promising benefits for the
studied by batch method. The effect of rapid commercial purpose in future. The costs of the
mixing contact time, slow mixing contact time and activated carbon prepared from biomaterials are
adsorbent dosage for removing total dissolved negligible when compared to the cost of commercial
solids and sulphate in an electroplating industry activated carbon. Some of the activated carbons used
effluent have been evaluated. The results of the to treat the industrial wastewater in the recent past
present study indicated that the maximum are, corncob, groundnut husk, rice husk, tea leaves
adsorption capacity of Albizia lebbeckpod powder carbon, saw dust, eucalyptus bark, and agricultural
for removing total dissolved solids and sulphate in wastes. Further, in the laboratory and field studies,
an electroplating industry effluent was 86.4 and seed of moriga oleifera (as a coagulant) was used for
88.8 %. The Langmuir isotherm model was fitted treating water. This paper dealt with effect of initial
to the experimental data of electroplating industry concentration of Albizia lebbeck pod powder for
effluent. Based on experimental and model removing total dissolved solids (TDS) and sulphate in
studies, Albizia lebbeckpod powder is effectively an electroplating industry effluent at different dosages
used as adsorbent for removing TDS and sulphate and different rapid mixing contact time. The
in an electroplating industry effluent. adsorption study is also extended to isotherm points
of view.
Key Words: Electroplating Industry Effluent, Albizia II.MATERIALS AND METHODS
lebbeck Pod Powder, Process Parameters, Isotherm
Model. The entire experimental work was planned in three
distinct phases which include preparation of
I.INTRODUCTION coagulant using Albizia lebbeck pod powder (Phase
I), collection of electroplating industry effluent
Electroplating units have potential to generate the (Phase II) and experiments for determining the
effluent consisting of heavy metals like chromium, suitability of Albizia lebbeck pod powder in removing
copper, zinc, cadmium etc. and various organic TDS and sulphate present in the electroplating
compounds such as phenols, formaldehyde etc. The industry effluent (Phase III).
toxicity of the effluent obviously depends on the
concentration of the respective metals as well as Phase I
duration and type of discharge. With the increasing
use of variety of heavy metals in electroplating Albizia lebbeck pod in dried form was collected from
industry problem may arise from potential toxicity in the Vel Tech High Tech Dr.Rangarajan
the environment to a great extent. With a view to Dr.Sakunthala Engineering College Campus. The pod
recycle and reuse the wastewater, adsorption process was pulverized and sieved through
was adopted as single stage treatment instead of the 0.60 µm sieve (Photo 1) and then powdered form of
existing physical, chemical and biological methods. Albizia lebbeck pod was kept in the refrigerator at a
The greatest advantage of this method is that desired temperature of 5 C for conducting experiments.
materials are separated from a solution by a simple This method was used to avoid the decomposition of
and compact process, producing less secondary powder, because the Albizia lebbeckpod powder is an
waste. Other advantages are large active surface area agro-based product.
for a given mass of particles, and the ability
to process a solution that contains suspended solids.
C64
Fourth National Conference on “Advances and Innovations in Civil and Mechanical Engineering-AICME’14”
Vel Tech High Tech Dr.Rangarajan Dr.Sakunthala Engineering College, Chennai
23rd August 2014
Vol. 3, ISBN 978-81-924827-0-5
performed at different adsorbent dosage of 20 g/l to
140 g/l with an increment of 20 g/l, different rapid
mixing contact time of 10 min. to 60 min. with an
increment of 10 min. and different concentration
dilution from 1 to 5 with an interval of 1).
In the present study, the Phipps and Bird jar test The percentage reduction in concentration of TDS for
apparatus was used for evaluating and optimizing the aAlbizia lebbeck pod powder dosage of 20, 40, 60,
adsorption process. This method consists of batch 80, 100 and 120 g/l respectively were found to be
experiments involving rapid mixing at the rotational 36.8 %, 52.3 %, 65.3 %, 72.2 %, 78.5 % and 70.2 %.
speed of 100 rpm and sedimentation period of 60 Similarly, the percentage reduction in concentration
min. Electroplating industry effluent was filled in of sulphate for the dose of 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 and 120
four glass beakers of 1 litre capacity and was kept in g/l respectively were found to be 42.5 %, 55.3 %,
the Phipps and Bird jar test apparatus for agitation. In 68.3 %, 74.6 %, 81.6 % and 72.8 %. Thus, an
the present investigation, the experiments were optimum dosage for which the maximum removal of
C65
Fourth National Conference on “Advances and Innovations in Civil and Mechanical Engineering-AICME’14”
Vel Tech High Tech Dr.Rangarajan Dr.Sakunthala Engineering College, Chennai
23rd August 2014
Vol. 3, ISBN 978-81-924827-0-5
TDS and sulphate occurs is 100 g/l (Fig.1). Further, dilution ratio of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 respectively were
an optimum dosage (100 g/l), which is corresponding found to be 38.8 %, 54.7 %, 67.8 %, 74.1 %, 79.6 %
to the lowest residual TDS and sulphate obtained for and 86.2 %. Similarly, the percentage reduction in
an electroplating industry effluent were 592.97 mg/l concentration of sulphate a dilution ratio of 0, 1, 2, 3,
and 264.04 mg/l respectively. 4 and 5 respectively were found to be 44.2 %, 56.3
%, 69.8 %, 76.2 %, 83.1 % and 88.8 %.
Effect of Rapid Mixing Contact Time
100.0 TDS Sulphate
Percentage Removal
Fig.2 shows the effect of rapid mixing contact time 80.0
on removal of TDS and sulphate in an electroplating
industry effluent with an optimum adsorbent dose of 60.0
100 g/l and 0 dilution ratios (using initial
concentration). From Fig.3, it may be observed that 40.0
upto50 min., concentration of TDS and sulphate in an
20.0
electroplating industry effluent decrease, beyond
which they increase. In otherwords, the reduction of 0.0
TDS and sulphate in an electroplating industry 0 2 4 6
effluent increase, beyond which they decrease. The Dilution Ratio
percentage reduction in concentration of TDS for a Fig.3 The effect of dilution ratio on TDS and sulphate reduction in
rapid mixing contact time of 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and an electroplating industry effluent
60 min. respectively were found to be 0.0 % 20.5 %,
42.2 %, 64.8 %, 76.5 %, 82.3 % and 75.6 %. Thus, an optimum dilution ratio for which the
Similarly, the percentage reduction in concentration maximum removal of TDS and sulphate occurs is 5.
of sulphate for a rapid mixing contact time of 0, 10, (Fig.2). Further, an optimum dilution ratio (5), which
20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min. respectively were found to is corresponding to the lowest residual TDS and
be 0.0 %, 23.9 %, 45.2 %, 69.3 %, 78.2 %, 84.6 % sulphate obtained for an electroplating industry
and 77.4 %. Thus, an optimum rapid mixing contact effluent were 380.60 mg/l and 160.72 mg/l
time for which the maximum removal of TDS and respectively. The photographic view of before and
sulphate occurs is 50 min. (Fig.1). Further, an after treatment of electroplating industry effluent for
optimum rapid mixing contact time (50 min.), which the parameters TDS and sulphate by Albizia lebbeck
is corresponding to the lowest residual TDS and pod powder in Phipps and Bird jar test apparatus is
sulphate obtained for an electroplating industry shown in Photo 2 and Photo 3 respectively.
effluent were 488.16 mg/l and 220.99 mg/l
respectively.
100.0 TDS Sulphate
Percentage Removal
80.0
60.0
40.0
20.0
0.0
0 20 40 60 80 Photo 2 Photographic View of Electroplating Industry Effluent
Rapid Mixing Contact Time, min. before Treatment by Albizia lebbeck Pod Powder
Fig.2 The effect of rapid mixing contact time on TDS and sulphate
reduction in an electroplating industry effluent
2.0
MohdKheireddineAroua (2007). “Preparation and
1.5 characterization of activated carbon from palm shell by
1.0 chemical activation with K2CO3”. Biores. Technol., 98: 145–
y = 0.0014x + 0.5068 149.
0.5 R² = 0.9984 [4] Muyibi, S.A., and Evison L.M. (1995). “Moringaoleifera seeds
0.0 for softening hard water”. Water Res., 29 (4): 1099–1105.
0 500 1000 1500 2000 [5] Nigam, A., and Rama, O.P. (2002). “Corncob-A promising
Ce adsorbent for the removal of chromium (VI) from wastewater”.
Indian J. of Envi. Prot., 22(5): 550–553.
Fig.4 Longmuir Adsorption Isotherm for TDS [6] Chhikara. S., and Dhankhar., R., (2008). “Biosorption of Cr
4.0 (VI) ions from electroplating industrial effluent using
3.5 Sulphate immobilized Aspergillusniger biomass”. Journal of
3.0 Environmental Biology, 29(5): 773–778.
2.5 [7] Debabrata Mazumder, DebabrataGhosh and Pratip
Ce/qe
C67