Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/299322431
CITATIONS READS
0 3,427
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Dang Anh Tuan on 02 November 2016.
In this note we will give some mean value properties of heat equation:
We will give more detailed proofs for these mean value properties. Then we give some
application of mean value properties: interior gradient estimate and strong maximum
principle as in ”A basic course in partial differential equations” of Qing Han.
Firstly, we rewrite the definitions of heat ball and heat sphere.
Let (x, t) ∈ Rn × R, r > 0:
1
Heat ball Er (x, t) has the north pole (x, t). For s decreasing from t, Er (x, t)∩{s = s0 }
is a ball in Rn with center at (x, s0 ), whose radius
!!1/2
r
4n(t − s0 ) ln p ,
4π(t − s0 )
r2
p n
first grows until it obtains maximum rmax = r 2πe at s = t − 4πe , then starts to
r2
shrink to (x, t − 4π ).
When (x, t) = (0, 0) we denote Er = Er (0, 0), ∂Er = ∂Er (0, 0). Then
We now give the mean value property on heat sphere for heat equation.
Theorem 1. Let (x0 , t0 ) ∈ Rn × R, r > 0 and u ∈ C 2,1 (Er (x0 , t0 )) ∩ C 1 (Ēr (x0 , t0 )) be
a solution of the heat equation in Er (x0 , t0 ). We have
Z
1
u(x0 , t0 ) = n u(y, s)Q(x0 − y, t0 − s)dSy,s ,
2r ∂Er (x0 ,t0 )
2 !−1/2
4s2
2ns
where Q(y, s) = + 1− 2 .
|y|2 |y|
Proof. By dilation and translation (x, t) → ((x − x0 )/r, (t − t0 )/r2 ), without loss of
1
generality we assume that x0 = 0, t0 = 0, r = 1. For ∈ (0, 4πe ), the radius of the
ball E1 ∩ {s = −} is given by
1/2
1
r = 4π ln √ .
4π
Denote K̄(x, t) = K(x, −t) − 1 and the domain
1
D = {(x, t) : − > t > − , K(x, −t) > 1} ⊂ E1 .
4π
It is easy to see that
n
X
(uK̄)t + (uK̄xi − K̄uxi )xi = 0.
i=1
2
and the domain D we get
Z Z
u(y, s)∇K̄(y, s) − K̄(y, s)∇u(y, s) · νy dSy,s + u(y, s)K̄(y, s)νs dSy,s = 0
∂D ∂D
(1)
where (νy , νs ) is the outer, unit normal vector of ∂D at (y, s).
Note that
1
∂D = {(x, t) : − ≤ t ≤ −, K(x, −t) = 1} ∪ {(x, −) : |x| < r } .
| 4π {z } | {z }
S 2
S1
Let → 0+ we obtain
• S1 → ∂E1 so
Z Z
u(y, s)Q(y, s)dSy,s → u(y, s)Q(y, s)dSy,s ,
S1 ∂E1
• r → 0+ so Z
u(y, )dy → 0,
|y|<r
r2
• → +∞ so
Z Z
1 2
K(y, )dy = e−|η| dη → 1.
|y|<r π n/2 |η|≤ 2r√
3
Therefore from (2), let → 0+ we obtain the mean value property on the heat sphere
for heat equation.
Next we will give the mean value property in heat ball for heat equation.
Theorem 2. For (x0 , t0 ) ∈ Rn × R, r > 0, let u ∈ C 2,1 (Er (x0 , t0 )) ∩ C 1 (Ēr (x0 , t0 )) be
a solution of the heat equation in Er (x0 , t0 ). We have
|x0 − y|2
Z
1
u(x0 , t0 ) = n u(y, s) dyds.
4r Er (x0 ,t0 ) (t0 − s)2
Lemma 3.
|y|2
Z
dyds = 4.
E1 s2
Proof. Using Fubini theorem we get
1
rs
|y|2
Z Z Z Z
4π 1
I= dyds = ds dt |y|2 dSy ,
E1 s2 0 s2 0 St
1/2
1
where rs = 4ns ln √4πs . Note that the area of the unit n−dimensional sphere
2π n/2
is ωn = , we have
Γ(n/2)
Z 1 (n+2)/2
2π n/2
4π
−2 1
I= s 4ns ln √ ds.
(n + 2)Γ(n/2) 0 4πs
1
Changing variable ζ = n ln √4πs we get
∞
2π n/2 4n/2+2
Z
I= × e−ζ ζ n/2+1 dζ = 4.
(n + 2)Γ(n/2) (4π)n/2 n 0
4
Consider the following function ψ : [0, 1] → R defined
by
|y|2 |y|2
Z Z
1
ψ(r) = n u(y, s) 2 dyds = u(ry, r2 s) 2 dyds.
r Er s E1 s
We have
n
!
|y|2
Z X
ψ 0 (r) = yi uyi (ry, r2 s) + 2sus (ry, r2 s) dyds
E1 i=1
s2
n
!
|y|2 |y|2
Z
1 X
= yi uyi (y, s) + 2us (y, s) dyds. (3)
rn Er i=1
s2 s
5
Appplying Divergence Theorem for the field F and domain Er noting that ϕ = 0 on
∂Er , we obtain Z
divF (y, s)dyds = 0. (5)
Er
From (3)-(5) we are done.
Note that ϕ(0, s) → +∞, s → 0− . So we want
Z
lim+ ϕ(y, −)(y · ∇u(y, −))dy = 0.
→0 |y|<r
Questions:
(i) Can the above theorems be proved when u ∈ C 2,1 (Er (x0 , t0 )) ∩ C(Ēr (x0 , t0 ))?
(ii) Can mean value properties be a characterization of heat equation?
We now use mean value property in heat ball to prove interior gradient estimate.
Denote
Qr (x0 , t0 ) = Br (x0 , t0 ) × (t0 − r2 , t0 ], (x0 , t0 ) ∈ Rn × R, r > 0.
Theorem 4. Let (x0 , t0 ) ∈ Rn × R, r > 0, and u ∈ C 2,1 (Qr (x0 , t0 )) ∩ C 1 (Q̄r (x0 , t0 ))
be a solution of the heat equation in Qr (x0 , t0 ). Then
C
|∇x u(x0 , t0 )| ≤ sup |u|.
r Qr (x0 ,t0 )
Proof. Without loss of generality, we assume that
x0 = 0, t0 = 0, r = 1.
Note that uxi satisfies heat equation, so by mean value property in heat ball we have
Z r02
|y|2
Z Z
1 1 4π ds
uxi (0, 0) = n uy (y, s) 2 dyds = n uyi (y, s)|y|2 dy
4r0 Er0 i s 4r0 0 s2
Brs
1/2
r
where rs = √0
4ns ln . Because of (u(y, s)|y|2 )yi = uyi (y, s)|y|2 +2yi u(y, s),
4πs
applying integration by part we have
Z r02 Z Z
1 4π ds
uxi (0, 0) = n u(y, s)|y|2 νi dSy − 2 yi u(y, s)dy .
4r0 0 s 2
∂Brs Brs
6
So the interior gradient estimate is proved by
Z
|u(y, s)|y|2 νi |dSy ≤ rsn+1 ωn sup |u|,
Q1
∂Brs
rsn+1 ωn
Z
|yi u(y, s)|dy ≤ sup |u|.
n Q1
Brs
Next we will give the strong maximum principle. We need the following lemmas.
The first lemma is mean value property in heat sphere for supersolution of heat
equation.
Lemma 5. For (x0 , t0 ) ∈ Rn × R, r > 0, let u ∈ C 2,1 (Er (x0 , t0 )) ∩ C 1 (Ēr (x0 , t0 )) be a
supersolution of the heat equation in Er (x0 , t0 ), i.e.
ut − ∆u ≥ 0 in Er (x0 , t0 ).
We have Z
1
u(x0 , t0 ) ≥ n u(y, s)Q(x0 − y, t0 − s)dSy,s .
2r ∂Er (x0 ,t0 )
• so (1) is replaced by
Z
u(y, s)∇K̄(y, s) − K̄(y, s)∇u(y, s) · νy dSy,s +
∂D
Z
+ u(y, s)K̄(y, s)νs dSy,s ≥ 0;
∂D
7
Lemma 6. Let (x0 , t0 ) ∈ Rn × R, R > 0, T > 0, and Q = BR (x0 , t0 ) × (t0 − T, t0 ].
Suppose u ∈ C 2,1 (Q) ∩ C 1 (Q̄) satisfies
ut − ∆u ≥ 0 in Q.
If u ≥ 0 in Q and
u(x0 , t0 − T ) > 0
then u > 0 in Q.
Proof. Take an arbitrary (x1 , t1 ) ∈ Q. We will prove that
u(x1 , t1 ) > 0.
i = 0, 1, . . . , N.
We have
i = 0, 1, . . . , N − 1.
8
Using Lemma 5 we get
Z
1
u(γ(si+1 )) ≥ n u(y, s)Q(x̄i+1 − y, t̄i+1 − s)dSy,s .
2r ∂Er (γ(si+1 ))
ut − ∆u + cu ≥ 0 in Q.
If u ≥ 0 in Q and
u(x0 , t0 − T ) > 0
then u > 0 in Q.
ut − ∆u + cu ≤ 0 trong ΩT .
then
u(x, t) = u(x1 , t1 ), (x, t) ∈ Ωt1 .
vt − ∆v + cv = −(ut − ∆u + cu) + cM ≥ 0 in ΩT .
9
Let (x0 , t0 ) ∈ Ω × (0, t1 ) we will prove that
u(x0 , t0 ) = M or v(x0 , t0 ) = 0.
by disproof, i.e. assume that u(x0 , t0 ) < M or v(x0 , t0 ) > 0 we will show that there
is a contradition. Then by continuity of u we are done.
Since Ω is connected, there is a continuous curve γ : [0, 1] → Ω, γ(0) = x0 , γ(1) = x1 .
By compactness we get
Ti = t0 + i(t1 − t0 )/N, i = 0, 1, . . . , N,
and
BR (γ(si )) × (Ti , Ti+1 ] ⊂ ΩT , i = 0, 1, . . . , N − 1,
(γ(si+1 ), Ti+1 ) ∈ BR (γ(si )) × {Ti+1 }, i = 0, 1 . . . , N − 1.
Appplying Lemma 7 for BR (γ(si )) × (Ti , Ti+1 ], i = 0, 1, . . . , N − 1, and
10