Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Friday 3rd July
Friday 3rd July
Day 9
Question 1:
𝑥 𝑛 −𝑦 𝑛
Let x, y be reals such that is an integer for
𝑥−𝑦
some four consecutive positive integer n. Prove that
𝑥 𝑛 −𝑦 𝑛
is integer for all positive integer n.
𝑥−𝑦
Solution 1:
𝑥 𝑛 −𝑦 𝑛
Let tn = . Then,
𝑥−𝑦
So, b is rational.
Claim: There exists a polynomial fn ∈ ℤ[x] such that
fn has leading coefficient 1 or (–1), deg(fn) = n – 1
and fn(b) = tn.
Proof of claim:
t1 = 1. So, we have f1(x) ≡ 1.
t2 = x + y. So, we have f2(x) = –x.
t3 = x2 + xy + y2 = (x + y)2 – xy. So, we have
f3(x)=x2 – c.
We approach by induction:
Assume, for all n =1, 2, …, k, our claim holds.
So, tk+1 = (–b)tk + (–c)tk-1 = –bfk(b) – cfk-1(b).
So, let us select fk+1(x) = –xfk(x) –cfk-1(x).
fk+1 ∈ ℤ[x] with degree = deg(fk) + 1 = k and
fk+1(b)=tk+1.
Hence, by induction, our claim is true.
So, finally, for the polynomial g(x) = fm(x) – tm, we
see that b is a rational root.
Furthermore, g(x) ∈ ℤ[x] and has leading coefficient
1 or (–1). Therefore, by rational root theorem, we
conclude that b ∈ ℤ.
This completes the proof.
Question 2:
Let ℝ+ be the set of all positive reals. Find all
functions f: ℝ+→ ℝ+ such that
f(x)2 ≥ f(x + y) (f(x) + y)
holds for all x, y ∈ ℝ+.
Solution 2:
The given inequality can be rewritten in the form
f(x) 𝑦
f(x)– f(x + y) ≥ . . . . . . . (∗)
f(x) + 𝑦
Note that f(x) > f(x + y) for all x, y > 0
⇒ f is strictly decreasing.
1
Claim: f(x) – f(x + 1) ≥
2
Proof of Claim:
Fix x > 0. There exists n ∈ ℕ such that n.f(x+1) ≥ 1
𝑘 1
Replace (x, y) by (x + , ) where k ∈ {0, 1, …, n – 1}
𝑛 𝑛
in (*):
𝑘 1
𝑘 𝑘+1 f (x + )𝑛 1
f (x + ) – f (x + )≥ 𝑛 ≥
𝑛 𝑛 𝑘 1 2𝑛
f (x + ) +
𝑛 𝑛
where the last inequality follows from the fact that
𝑘
n.f(x+ ) ≥ n.f(x+1) ≥ 1.
𝑛
Adding these inequalities, we get
1
f(x) – f(x+1) ≥
2
So, our claim is true.
Now, pick a natural number m such that m ≥ 2f(x).
f(x) – f(x+m)
𝑚−1
Hence proved.
Question 5:
Find all functions f : ℝ+ → ℝ such that
x
f(x) – f(x + y) = f ( ) f(x + y)
y
holds for all x, y > 0.
Solution 5:
Let’s look at a different problem:
Suppose g : ℝ+ → ℝ such that
g(x + y) = g(x) + g(y)
and
g(xy) = g(x).g(y)
What can we conclude about g?
From the first condition, we conclude that
g(x)=g(1)x for all x ∈ ℚ+. The second condition
implies g(1) = 0 or 1.
If g(1) = 0, then g(x) ≡ 0. So, assume g(1) = 1.
For x>0, g(x) = g(√x)2 ≥ 0.
So, g has a lower bound.
Pick any a ∈ [0, 1]
1 = g(1) = g(a) + g(1 – a) ≥ g(a) ≥ 0
So, g is bounded in [0, 1].
Now, pick any x ∈ ℝ+. Let N ∈ ℕ such that Nx > 1.
Consider the interval In = (nx – 1, nx) for n≥ N.
Let xn be a rational in this interval.
g(x – y) =g(x) – g(y) for all x>y. Also, nx – xn ∈ [0, 1].
|g(nx – xn)|
= |g(nx) – xn|
= |ng(x) – xn|
= |n(g(x) – x) + (nx – xn)| ≥ n|g(x) – x| – |nx – xn|
≥ n|g(x) – x| – 1
If g(x) ≠ x, then {g(nx – xn)}n≥N is unbounded which
contradicts the fact that g is bounded in [0, 1]
Hence, g(x) = x for all x>0.
Let P(x, y) denotes the assertion
x
f(x) – f(x + y) = f ( ) f(x + y)
y
First, suppose, there exists a>0 such that f(a)=0.
Then for all b<0, P(b, a – b) implies
b
f(b)– f(a) = f ( ) f(a)
a−b
⇒ f(b) = 0
So, f(a) = 0 ⇒ f(b) = 0 for all b < a . . . . . . . . . . (*)
Now, P(a, 1) implies:
f(a) – f(a + 1) = f(a) f(a + 1)
⇒ f(a + 1) = 0
This, in turn, implies, f(a + 2) = 0. In general, we
obtain, f(a + n) = 0 for all n ∈ ℕ.
Hence, by (*), we conclude f(x) = 0 for all x < a+n
for all n ∈ ℕ. Hence, f(x) ≡ 0.
So, we assume f(x) is non-zero for all x > 0.
Claim: f(1) = 1.
Proof of claim:
P(x, 1): f(x) – f(x + 1) = f(x) f(x + 1)
1
Define g(x) =
f(x)
P(4, 2):
f(4) – f(6) = f(2)f(6)
1 1 1 1
⇒ − =
c+3 c+5 c+1c+5
2 1
⇒ = ⇒ 2c + 2 = c + 3
(c + 5)(c+3) (c + 1)(c + 5)
So,
1
1+𝑎 1 + a
= 2 ⇒ ab = 1
2 + 2b 1 + 2b
x y
Therefore, f ( ) f ( ) = 1
y x
x
f(x) [1+ f( )] 1+a x
y
Hence, = y = 1 = a = f( )
f(y) [1+ f( )] 1+ y
x a