walbcall
el iny «Bey — ay fj ASN LS ge ar ae La Ss
ety «RIN LN Ly gS LN le ge ow a ake
SR Ay CRIT) a ey hoy «Hh sn a La
Tat 8 a4 MOR pt ye HS A AL AS yl As pn
2 Tt ae aol pe «ALN Lo yt sang acy ly
AGM Lo Gg on geal A ye
«ll oth pl BL he any lady La gag pall es Jy
nj yg «Rl he Lie Oy ¢ AM) Gla pi
oie ad ig els ly pe ll 6 TAN TL AAS go at nL SA ga
DO ey ea Bp ge «NG pe
BY aly mens GH al oe RL Sage aly ily oi gil ex el
ray gat
Bet lo oe ey eI al «Li Hs yi Ay
BP By «RA Lp IM Saf Ie a
ef a a AL hy LL Ago ep ie gt Ja
DRL ag py gs Ly SOL LI A ge Bye a eA
pL UI AS go egg gay pt
ae tans Sie ae il 2 Wis el eyo ag Li gy
Ea eg CMTS) hy Wa nt IP Bly « AR ALI A ow gg fA Ae ae
a Ug ~ n Bloe Ga ea e Gale g aAABSLUANS
el ey «pe pg pl Jo of = ty Lg
«i ENB oA gl ly 9 TAM j Lt al
ere SEL ha ty «eR J te ala Uns‘ABSTRACT
This study 1 a comparative study discussing the Governments’ responsibilty towards
‘Judicial Authority mistakes in SA's lepsation. s Importance Hes in shedding ght on the
‘Zovernment responsibly towards the mistakes ofits Juda Author. als, Introduces
‘the trend that cals for Gov responsibilty for Judicial Asthority mistakes displaying the
Justfiations and exceptions of the origral principle of Govermental waranty, playing
fundomental schools supporting governmental responsiity and focusing on the Saudi
{government inthis respect. The study utlizes the comparative method with the Inductive
approach referring to certain issues such as theology and the evolution of administrative
responsibilty the jurisprudence and jurisdictional tendercies which simulate the principle
‘of Government responsibly: towards the mistakes of Judcll Authority. Ths methodology
Inducts and cals portions. to derive the fact that works with the whole, consiering that
What applies toa single shal apply to the mass. Alo the study uses the comparative
approach by comparing the French Egyptian and Algerian laws inatempt of making use
(of Comparative Laws in the Improvement and development of KSA Laws, The study is