Professional Documents
Culture Documents
History
• Presenting complaint
• History of presenting complaint
○ Ask about the current pregnancy- LMP, EDD
T1 – hyperemesis [IUGR lead to LSCS]
T2 – GDM, PIH [macrosomic baby, IUGR]
T3 – growth scan large baby /small/normal size, USS finding of placental location after
34 Weeks, abnormality of location, multiple pregnancy [risk of rupture], abnormal
presentation, History of
vaginal bleeding
○ VBAC counselling - 36 weeks
• Past obstetric Hx
○ Previous section
When and Where
Indication – Fetal/Maternal
Recrrent or non recurrent
Elective/emergency & how long was she in labour (To find-out the stage of labour)
Scar - location and type
Type of CS
Number of previous CS
Gestation (preterm labour likely upper segment)
Type of anaesthesia
Birth weight
NVD following LSCS [less likely to rupture]
Perineal tears
Post-partum hemorrhage
Infected scar
Endometritis following LSCS [severe abdominal pain, high fever, purulent vaginal
discharge, vaginal bleeding, given IV antibiotics]
Hx of uterine supture
○ Previous miscarriage with surgical management
• Gynaecological History
○ Myomectomy
○ Hysterotomy done [opened endometrium]
○ Hx of subfertility
○ Previous pelvimetry
○ Surgery for incontinence repair
Examination
• Abdominal examination
o Type of scar, tenderness over scar
o SFH for IUGR or macrosomia
o Abnormal lie/presentation
o Multiple pregnancies
o EFW
Discussion
In your patient who has a previous uterine scar, how would you manage?
o I would go for a Trial Of Labor (TOL). This is considered in the absence of contraindications,
in women who present for prenatal care with a history of previous uterine scar
What are the contraindications to vaginal birth?
o Absolute contraindications
Previous classical or inverted ‘T’ uterine scar
Previous hysterotomy or myomectomy entering the uterine cavity
presence of 2 or more uterine scars
Previous uterine rupture.
The presence of a contraindication to labour such as placenta previa
Malpresentation
o Relative contraindications
Previous surgery for stress urinary incontinence
Previous 3rd-4th degree perineal tears
What are the problems of TOL?
o Uterine rupture
o Maternal morbidity
o Perinatal mortality and mortality morbidity
What is the success rate of trial of labor after C-section?
o It ranges between 50%-85%. If there are predictors of successful TOL the rate increase upto
82%
What are the predictors of a successful TOL?
o History of previous vaginal delivery
The risk after
0 - 1.6%
1 - 0.3%
2 - 0.2%
3 - 0.35%
o Non recurring indications for c-section
Malpresentation
Gestational hypertension
What should be done at the booking visit of a patient with a previous uterine scar?
o All clinical records of previous C-section, myomectomy and uterine perforations should be
looked for and recorded in the present clinical records
o At the 1st visit the woman should be seen by the most senior member of the clinic team
o If it’s a non specialist unit, the woman should be referred to a specialist unit at the earliest
opportunity for management or shared care
o USS scan should be performed for
Accurate dating
Assessment of placental localization
Exclusion of abnormal placentation (morbid adherence)
o Patient should be assessed for contraindications for Vaginal birth.
o If there are no contraindications, a women with 1 previous transverse LSCS should be
offered a TOL after a discussion about maternal and fetal risks vs benefits
o If the mother requests a elective c-section, even in the absence of contraindications, her
wishes should be respected
What are the special considerations about TOL regarding these problems?
o As there is a small risk of uterine perforation, TOL should only be considered in a unit where
a immediate c-section can be performed, so that intrapartum emergencies can be managed
o If such an emergency occurs, the obstetric, anesthetic and pediatric teams should attend to
such emergency. They should be pre-warned when there is such a patient in labor
What is the risk of uterine rupture according to type of scar?
o Transverse lower uterine scar - 0.2-1.5%
o Vertical incision 1-1.6%
o Classical or ‘T’ incision 4-9%
What are the factors that increase the risk of uterine rupture during TOL?
o Medical Induction of labor
o TOL in more than 1 previous uterine scar
o Inter delivery interval <18 months - 3 fold rise of risk
What is the predictor of uterine rupture?
o There is evidence that USS measurement of lower uterine segment myometrial thickness
measured at 36 to 38 weeks is a predictor of uterine rupture
<3.5mm - risk is 11.8%
>3.5mm - risk is minimal
How do you counsel a patient for TOL?
o I would tell the advantages of this procedure, versus the disadvantages. I would tell her
about the complications that she might have to face following TOL
Compared to C-section, there is less blood loss, shorter hospital stay and rapid recover
with a successful trial of labor
In a C-section Scarring of uterus - increased risk of placenta previa and placental
abruption.
Repeat C-section - increased risk of placenta previa and placenta accreata in
subsequent pregnancies
o Risk of febrile morbidity is less in mothers who undergo a TOL and it’s minimum in patients
who have a successful TOL. But it is increased in those attempting a TOL and ultimately
delivering via C-section
Discussion
Factors in deciding the mode of delivery in previous history of LSCS
o Strength of scar
o Size of the baby
o Pelvis & maternal factors
Strength of scar
Well formed scar
Less number of scars - <2 scars
Types of scar (Strength more in LSCS than classical) Previous incision > 15
months
Previous evidence of uterine, scar infection
Myomectomy with opening into endometrium
LSCS