Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Introduction
In the northern part of Venice sits an unassuming bookstore aptly named Libreria Acqua
Alta. Walking inside reveals isles crammed with books piled high, resembling the tight alleyways
that brings customers to the store in mention. But the eclectic collection is not what makes this
store unique, it is the “shelves” that hold them up: gondolas, boats, and bathtubs (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Libreria Acqua Alta, located a few centimeters above high tide, keeps it’s books in various watertight
vessels: barrels, bathtubs, boats, and even a gondola. Everything is also elevated ~50 cm off the ground with plastic
crates.
The city of Venice is seated in the middle of the Venice lagoon, protected by narrow
strips of land from the Adriatic Sea. Due to its location, it is susceptible to flooding. Venetians
are no stranger to flooding, but over the past 50 years the events have become exceedingly
more common due to rising sea level from global climate change. The relative sea level in the
lagoon has been increasing 2.5 mm per year, measured from 1871 to 2014, at an accelerating
rate (Camuffo, Bertolin, & Schenal 2017). During these high-water events, the streets start to
resemble canals and become difficult to navigate. Residents have vacated the first-floor
apartments to move to higher ground for the risk of property damage. Businesses invest in
large door jams to keep the water from getting in. Libreria Acqua Alta took it one step further
and keeps their merchandise out of harms way in watertight vessels. The store’s name
translates directly to “High Water Library”.
A protection project titled MOSE, nearing completion, has the lofty goal of protecting Venice
and its lagoon from the symptoms of a rising sea-level. The MOSE project is composed of
several parts: the largest being a set of mobile barriers installed at the mouth of the lagoon and
other environmental reclamation projects. With the future so uncertain with global climate
change, it is difficult to picture this project fixing problems that haven’t been foreseen yet.
This project will chronicle the MOSE project and each component function in protecting the
lagoon. I will then follow with a critique of the project, specifically how it deals with the big
problem of a changing climate change.
An intervention needed to happen, or these events would make Venice uninhabitable. 2011
hosted 18 high tide events, the most on record (Figure 3). The water slowly comes in with the
high tide and only lasts 3-4 hours.
Figure 3. The number of acqua alta over the past 150 years in Venice. The year 2011 hosted the same number of
events as the total that occurred from 1870 to 1930.
Citta’Di Venezia. (2017). Distribuzione annual delle alte maree[graph].
It’s the damage from these events that makes them the largest threat to the Venetian way of
life. Venice was built on a system of wooden piles driven into the clay below. Due to technology
at the time, the piles do not interact with bed-rock and the city remains in place from friction
between the sediment and the piles, an indirect foundation (Tour). When the foundation of a
building meets the water in the canal, a large brick wall is built to encase the sediment and keep
it in place. This technology worked for hundreds of years, but with the wave pollution from
motorized boats and a rising sea level, the infrastructure is degrading. Traditional clay bricks
won’t degrade underwater since they are always submerged. However, they will fail in a dry-
wet environment that occurs with the rising and falling of the tide. Bricks are made of porous
clay that can absorb saltwater with capillary action. Once the brick dries out, such as after a
high-water event, the salt recrystallizes and expands within the brick, rendering it useless
(Figure 3).
Figure 3.1 Crumbling brick from the expansion of salts as they crystallize.
Figure 3.2 Salt forming on the brick face.
This was designed for and a waterproof Istrian stone was laid within the foundation to prevent
water from raising up the wall of the buildings there. Nowadays, these stones lie well below the
water line, leaving the water free to make its way up brick walls causing severe structural
damage (Insula Spa 2011). As the brick fails, it can make it’s way into the sediment foundation.
Slowly, the sediment below these buildings is washed out with the tide in a positive feedback
loop as even more brick becomes exposed. When the sediment transports out of the
foundation, the piles don’t have enough friction to support the force of the structure above it
and it subsides into the clay to equilibrate the forces. Without intervention, the islands that
compose Venice would slowly fail and become too dangerous to inhabit.
That is why the Italian government devised the MOSE project: to decrease the frequency of
high-water events in the city of Venice through the development of barriers at the inlets of the
lagoon.
3. MOSE
MOSE stands for Modulo Sperimentale Elettromeccanico or more romantically an
allusion to Moses parting the Red Sea to protect the Hebrews from the Egyptians and water.
MOSE is a collection of interventions, from local to lagoon wide, to respond to high-water
events. Consorzio Venezia Nuova (CVN), on behalf of the Venice Water Authority, is responsible
from the implementation of MOSE (Figure 4). The largest part of the project, 60% of the budget,
is devoted to implanting four mobile barriers at the three inlets to the lagoon. The project is
designed to be a local, diffused, and large-scale engineering intervention. Local projects protect
the exposed “minor” islands while diffused interventions involve natural environments around
the lagoon. Other components include rebuilding and reinforcing the coast, securing polluted
materials, and gathering data about the complex lagoon.
Figure 4. The Consorzio Venezia Nuova office and control room located in the Venetian Arsenale.
Figure 5. A diagram of the mobile barriers: gate (1), hinge (2), cassion (3), maintenance entrance (4), and
foundation (5). (CVN 2019).
The final design is a series of 78 gates that lie at the bottom of the three inlets of the lagoon
(Lewin and Scotti 1990). Located at the Lido, Malamocco, and Chioggia inlets, the barriers
would completely block off the lagoon from the ocean in a high-water event. The system is
made of two parts the caisson and the gate (Figure 5). The caisson is a large 25,000-ton housing
structure for the gates. Installation of the caissons in the seabed required extreme 1 cm
precision which is challenging when the structure is around the same size as an apartment
building (Enerpac 2016). The caissons get cemented into the bed and then the gates can be
lowered into place. The watertight gates size depends on the inlet. Each gate has a pipe for the
introduction and expulsion of compressed air, measurement devices, anti-corrosive anodes,
and a complex set of hinges. The hinges allow the gate to move out of the caisson when they
are filled with air causing it to rise to the surface (Consorzio Venezia Nuova 2019). They were
designed to resist forces well in excess of what is capable from the underwater marine
environment. To install the gates, a specially made barge called the “jack-up” is used (Figure 6).
It positions itself over the caisson, lowers legs to attach itself to the structure for stability, and
the gates are lowered into place.
Figure 6. The Jack-Up barge used to install and remove gates form the caisson. Notice the four black legs that allow
the structure to support itself on the caisson.
To deploy the gates, the Control Centre constantly monitors weather and will identify storm
surges 5 to 7 days in advance. 36 hours before the event, the decision-making process is
launched, and series of deployment protocols is initiated. The gates are filled with compressed
air, evacuating them of water causing them to rise to the surface. The barriers act as a dam and
keep any water from entering or leaving the bay. Each inlet is equipped with a lock system to
allow the follow of boats and economic activity relative constant during deployment. It is
projected that the locks will only be used around 5 times a year isolated in the winter months
when many of the events occur, but there is skepticism on whether this will be upheld (Fletcher
and Da Mosto 2004).
The regular maintenance of the gates will occur every 5 years with extraordinary maintenance
every 15 years. Maintenance tasks include washing, painting, and fixing any damaged structural
steelwork (CVN 2019). A large problem with the mobile barrier system is the sediment transport
out of the lagoon mentioned earlier. When they are deployed, sediment is going to continue
to travel to the inlet but will be stopped and settle at the gates. The act of deploying and
retracting the gates also transfers energy into the water that will move more sediment. It is
unclear how the barriers will change the amount of sediment lost from the lagoon since they
haven’t been used to their entirety yet. It is known, however, that particles will collect in the
caisson of the gates and so cleaning it out will also be apart of maintenance. How frequently
this dredging will need to occur is unclear.
3.2 Protecting the “Minor” Islands
Many cities beside Venice lie within the Venice lagoon. Being smaller and more exposed,
they can be more susceptible to flooding than the larger city. MOSE has managed many local
interventions in these areas. In many places, the quayside (the pathway located directly on the
open water) needed major work because that is the surface the absorbs the energy form
battering waves. The walkways were raised and reinforced to supplement the large project: the
mobile barriers. Piazza San Marco, which has been raised several times already, cannot be
raised anymore with affecting the architectural style of the buildings around it. The MOSE
project, in 2003, redid all the drainage in the square with the addition of one-way valves and
underground rainwater basins (Fletcher and Da Mosto 2004). With the Piazza flooding to this
day, local interventions are insufficient at addressing the problem for the time scale needed
(Figure 7).
Figure 7. Flooding in Piazza San Marco during high tide in September 2019.
4. Critiques of MOSE
With large-scale projects like MOSE, decisions are going to be met with opposition form
the public. I will discuss several large critiques returning to the specifications made by the Italian
government: the system could “not significantly modify flushing between the sea and lagoon,
create any visual impact or interfere with the landscape and local economic activities” (CVN
2019). The mobile barrier system costs in excess of €6 billion of the €9 billion budget. Some
people will ask if this money was better off somewhere else. An enormous budget for a wall
with a life span of 100 years at most with projections suggesting ineffectiveness way before
that. In the case of the Venice lagoon, intervention needed to occur at the local, diffused, and
large-scale engineering levels so it was a necessary cost. Without it, Venice’s wouldn’t last long
enough to consider next steps of action.
There is also concern about the effectiveness of the Venice government at running the system
effectively. CVN will only realize the project and run it for two years before it is passed off to be
used by the municipality. With a history of corruption in MOSE and other government works,
the public does not trust their ability to use this tool effectively to avoid the anoxic scenario
mentioned earlier.
5. The Future
The MOSE project has bought Venice time. The barriers have a projected lifespan of 100
years or less and are not a final solution. Other solutions involve injecting expansive material to
lift the city out of the water, with a trial are conducted on the island of Poveglia. This led to
heterogeneous uplift so injecting seawater deeper underground may be a better option.
Looking forward, we must ask “Who is the future of Venice for?” Is it for Venetians, nature, or
the world? As tourism overtakes the city and the Venetian pollution dwindles, the city feels
further from the traditional Venice that captured the world to begin with. There needs to be a
socio-economic intervention with inhabitants as well as an environmental one to help preserve
their way of life.
The natural environments of the lagoon tend to fall to the wayside, but it is crucial to the
success of Venice. UNESCO gave the title of World Heritage Site to “Venice and its Lagoon”, the
future of the city is bound to the future of the lagoon. It is evident that the natural environment
of the lagoon does need to change slightly to be preserved, but it is a small price to pay.
All the world has a stake in the future of Venice. “Venice symbolizes the people’s victorious
struggle against the elements as they managed to master a hostile nature” (UNESCO 1987). The
lagoon has challenged its inhabitants from hundreds of years and yet the city remains (Figure
9). MOSE is just another form of protection in modern times. The harmonious relationship
between natural and built environments in the Venice lagoon is an example for the rest of the
world. With the threat of Global Climate Change at everyone’s doorstep, our solution must
work with nature and not against it.
Figure 9. Previously, Venetians have filled in the ground and moved higher ground to combat flooding. The second
door is also reinforced with a water barrier.
6. Works Cited
Bettinetti, A., Mattarolo, F. & Silva, P. 1995. Reconstruction of saltmarshes in the Venice Lagoon. Proc.
MEDCOAST 94 Conf., 22-27 October 1995, p. 921-935, Tarragona, Spain.
Bezzi, A., Fontolan, G., Nordstrom, K.F., Carrer, D., and Jackson, N.L. (2009) Beach Nourishment and
Foredune Restoration: Practices and Constraints along the Venetian Shoreline, Italy. Journal of Coastal Research.
56, pp. 287-291.
Camuffo, Dario & Bertolin, Chiara & Schenal, Patrizia. (2017). A novel proxy and the sea level rise in
Venice, Italy, from 1350 to 2014. Climatic Change. 143. 1-14. 10.1007/s10584-017-1991-3.
Consorzio Venezia Nuova – Ufficio Comunicazione e Relazioni estrene. (2019). Venice/Mose- Technology,
development and innovation for environmental and coastal protection. Venice, Italy: Author.
Day, J., Rismondo, A., Scarton, F., Are, D., & Cecconi, G. (1998). Relative Sea Level Rise and Venice Lagoon
Wetlands. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 4(1), 27-34.
Del Bello, L. (2018) Venice anti-flood gates could wreck lagoon ecosystem. Nature. 564, 16. Retrieved
from https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07372-3?WT.feed_name=subjects_environmental-sciences
Enerpac. Hajian, Christopher. (2016) Installation of Venice MOSE Caissons | Enerpac. Italy. Retrieved from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljEjyL0O9vY
Fletcher, C. and Da Mosto, J. (2004). The Science of Saving Venice. Turin, Italy: Umberto Allemandi e C.
Insula Spa. Scibilia, N. (2011). Venice Backstage. How does Venice work? Italy: Venice Municipality.
Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/21688538
Lewin, J. and Scotti, A. (1990). The Flood-Prevention Scheme of Venice: Experimental Module. Journal of
the Institution of Water and Environmental Management, 4, pp.70-77.
Muraca, A. (1982). Shore Protection at Venice: A Case Study. Coastal Engineering. pp. 1078-1092.
PENNING-ROWSELL, E. (2000). Has Venice Crossed the Rubicon? Geography, 85(3), 233-240.
Turismo Venezia. (2019) High Water Information Centre. Provincia Di Venezia. Retrieved from
http://en.turismovenezia.it/Venezia/High-Water-Information-Centre-7442.html
UNESCO. (1987). Venice and its Lagoon. Retrieved from https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/394/