Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EXPERIMENTAL
TABLE I
Composition of Amino Acid Mixture
I I
Final
per cent
in diet
gm. gm.
l- 9 1.25% homocystine 4.7 0.0
9-23 1.25% “ + 25 mg. choline chloride 5.0 +1.2
2 3-31 1.25% “ + 1 “ “ “ 5.5 +0.2
3 l-44 1.25% “ 4.1 f0.3
4 4-69 1.25?$ “ + 50 mg. creatinine 4.3 -0.2
l-17 1.25% “ 2.9 -0.5
1’7-57 1.25% “ + 5 mg. choline chloride 4.7 f1.2
I- 4 1.25% “ 3.0 -0.7
4-17 1.25% “ + 50 mg. choline chloride 4.3 f1.3
1’7--25 1.25% “ 3.1 -1.5
2,5-29 1.25oj, “ + 10 mg. ephedrine 4.2 f0.2
2’9-37 1.25% “ + 10 “ “ (in- 3.4 -0.4
jected)
3 7-39 1.25% homocystine 3.7 -0.5
3!9-41 1.25yo “ + 10 mg. triethylcholine 4.0 -1.0
chloride
4 148 1.25ojc homocystine + 20 mg. triethylcholine 2.7 f0.1
chloride
4:9-65 1.25% homocystine + 40 mg. methanol 3.7 f0.2
l-57 1.4% methionine + 50 “ choline chloride 5.1 t1.0
1-38 1.25% homocystine 3.6 -0.1
3:5-48 Homocysteine, 60 mg. daily 3.5 -0.3
4:3-65 1.25% homocystine 3.0 -0.6
l-67 Casein 5.9 +1.1
l-57 1.25% homocystine + 50 mg. choline chloride 5.7 t1.1
l- 57 1.4% methionine 6.3 i-O.8
l- 9 1.25% homocystine + 5 mg. p-alanino 4.1 -0.1
,Q-17 4.0 -0.9
1’7-23 25 mg. choline chloride 4.5 -0.5
2:3-25 1.25% homocystine + 5 mg. betaine chloride 3.0 0.0
2.5-39 1.25% “ + 25 “ “ “ 3.8 fl.1
3!Q-44 1.25yo “ 3.1 -1.2
4‘4-56 1.25’% “ + 50 mg. sarcosine 3.0 -0.8
516-73 1.25ojn “ +25 “ betaine chloride 3.8 i-O.6
I- 9 1.25% “ + 1 “ methionine 4.6 i-o.2
t9-18 1.13% cystine 4.2 -0.6
1:5-31 1.13% “ + 25 mg. choline chloride 2.6 0.0
62 Choline and Homocystine
TABLE II-Concluded
Aver- AVW
Rat age we
No. daily daily
and DlQJS Supplement to basal diet food
sex con- !h?:ge
;ump might
tion
!Jm.
10 CT 31-34 1.13% cystine + 1.25% homocystine + 25 mg. 6.0
choline chloride
34-39 1.25% homocystine + 25 mg. choline chloride 3.6 f1.2
39-97 1.25yo “ 4.8 to.4
11 0 l-57 1.4yo methionine 5.3 j-1.2
12 0 1-18 Casein 6.0 f2.5
18-30 3.3 -2.3
30-32 1.25% homocystine 3.3 -0.5
32-34 1.25% “ + 5 mg. ergothioneine 3.3 -2.5
34-39 1.25% “ + 10 “ “ 3.5 0.0
39-44 1.25% “ 2.1 -1.2
44-75 1.25% " + 40 mg. methanol 3.0 0.0
A second litter was placed on a diet like that used for Litter I.
Although the results in general corroborated those of Litter I,
they were sufficiently lacking in uniformity to warrant a thorough
investigation of the diet and the experimental conditions. Some
choline was present in the diet, as we shall discuss later, and we
therefore set about to devise a diet as free of choline as possible.
Owing to unavoidable circumstances the two litters, Nos. I
and II, were from different stock. Litter I was from the same
stock which had been used in the previously mentioned investiga-
tion (1)) and was from a highly inbred colony which had originally
come from the colony of Professor Rose at the University of
Illinois. Litter II was a cross between this stock and Wistar
stock. We record this as there may possibly be a variation in the
ability of different strains of rats to utilize minimal amounts of
choline, or in the extent to which refection may occur, or in the
tendency towards indulging in coprophagy. It will be recalled,
however, that even in Litter I Rat 10 grew somewhat after
removal of choline from the diet.
The data of Litter II are not presented in detail, since the
results served merely to bring about a considerable revision in the
dietary regime, and led to the elaboration of a diet which we feel
du Vigneaud, Chandler, Moyer, Keppel 63
-5 6 (103)
~20 DAYS+
11 p 035)-
7 fl (87)
2 0 09)
5 8 (82)
L
FIG. 1
gm.
III,30 0 I- 15 0.62% homocystine + 10 mg. trimethylamine 4.2
hydrochloride
15- 32 0.62yo homocystine 4.7
32- 40 0.62% “ + 25 mg. choline chloride 3.7
III,31 fl I- 25 0.62% “ +20 (‘ triethylcholine 3.8
chloride
III,32 0 l- 14 0.62% homocystine + 10 mg. methylamine 4.0
hydrochloride
14- 25 0.62% homocystine + 10 mg. choline chloride 4.7
2% 32 0.62% “ + 25 “ “ “ 4.1
32- 40 0.62% “ 3.8
III,33 3 I- 17 0.620/, “ + 50 mg. caffeine 3.9
17- 24 0.620/, “ + 50 “ choline chloride 4.5
III,34 0 l- 8 0.62% “ + 100 “ creatinine 3.4
8- 25 0.62% “ + 10 I‘ choline chloride 4.3
25- 32 0.62% “ + 25 “ “ “ 4.3
32- 40 0.62% “ 4.8
III,35 61 I- 15 0.62% I‘ + 10 mg. ethanolamine 4.4
15- 25 0.62% “ + 10 “ choline chloride 5.4
(no ryzamin-B)
25- 40 0.62% homocystine + 25 mg. choline chloride 4.1
(no ryzamin-B)
IV,36 0 l- 4 0.62% homocystine + 25 mg. choline chloride 4.5
4- 96 0.62% “ + 50 “ “ “ 4.4
IV,37 3 l- 4 0.62% “ + 25 “ “ “ 5.0
4- 11 0.62% “ + 50 “ “ “ 4.7
11-100 1.250/, “ + 50 “ “ “ 5.7
IV,38 c7 l- 11 0.62% “ 4.9
11-100 1.25’% “ 4.5
IV,39 0 I- 16 0.620/, “ 4.5
16-100 1.25% “ + 50 mg. choline chloride 5.0
IV,40 0 l-100 0.62% “ 3.8
IV,41 0 l- 39 0.797, methionine 4.7
39- 81 0.7% “ + 20 mg. methionine 5.5
81-109 0.7% “ 5.3
v,57 3 l- 4 0.62% homocystine + 50 mg. choline chloride 4.8
4- 28 1.25% ‘I + 50 “ I‘ “ 4.2
66 Choline and Homocystine
TABLE III-Concluded
4ver-
gm.
V,58 3 l- 4 0.62% homocystine + 50 mg. choline chloride 5.3
4- 28 1.25% ‘I + 50 “ “ “ 4.6
v,59 0 I- 4 0.620/, “ + 50 “ “ “ 4.8
4- 28 1.25% “ + 50 “ “ “ 4.1
V,60 8’ I- 4 0.62% “ 5.0
4- 16 1.25% “ 3.7
6- 31 1.25yo “ + 50 mg. choline chloride 4.4
V,61 ‘2 l- 4 0.62% “ 4.2
4- 16 1.25% “ 3.8
6- 31 1.25% “ + 50 mg. betaine chloride 2.9
V,62 0 l- 4 0.62’% “ 4.5
4- 31 1.25% ” 3.0
V,64 8’ I- 8 0.7% methionine 5.3
8- 32 1.4yo I‘ 4.1
VI,65 0 l- 28 1.25’% homocystine + 5 mg. choline chloride 4.3
VI,66 0 l- 28 1.25% “ + 10 “ “ “ 4.0
VI,67 0 l- 28 1.25% “ + 50 “ “ “ 4.7
VI,68 0 l- 7 1.25% “ 1.7
VI,70 8’ l- 16 1.25’% “ 4.7
6- 28 1.25% “ + 100 mg. betaine chloride 4.3
VI,71 0 l- 11 1.4% methionine 3.7
l- 33 1.4% “ + 20 mg. methionine 4.6
c 10 DAYS+
cl0 DAYS-
I I
NUMBER AND SEX DIF RAT SHOWN
ON EXTREME LEFT. T
IN PARENTHESES DENC
INITIAL AND F
THE RATS. AR ROWS INDICATE
THE POINTS OF CHANGE.
‘$
? (73j
p (73) MG CHOLINE -
-+y s:
TABLE IV
Liver Fat Analyses
er eenij gm.
I, 4 P Methionine 6.7 4.2
I, 8 0 I‘ 4.4 3.3
“ 4.1 3.0
I,11 0
I‘
IV,41 0 5.4 3.0
“ 6.1 3.8
V,64 fl
VI,71 o I‘ 4.1 2.7
I, 1 3 Homocystine 21.8 7.6
I,10 3 ‘I 23.4 6.7
IV,38 61 ‘I 24.0 7.3
“ 19.1
V,62 0 3.0
I, 2 0 I‘ + 5 mg. choline chloride 17.4 5.1
VI,65 0 L‘ + 5 “ “ “ 21.1 4.2
“
VI,66 0 + 10 “ “ “ 9.8 2.9
I, 7 3 I‘ + 50 “ “ “ 3.8 5.3
IV,36 P ‘I
+ 50 ‘I “ “ 4.3 2.7
IV,37 3 ‘I 5.9
+ 50 “ ‘I “ 4.1
IV,39 9 I‘ + 50 iL “ “ 4.9 3.4
v,57 c7 I‘ + 50 “ “ “ 6.1 3.3
V,58 c7 “ 7.2
+ 50 “ “ “ 3.5
V,59 0 “ 6.1 3.2
+ 50 “ “ ‘(
V,60 c7 “ + 50 “ cL “ 6.7 3.6
VI,67 0 “ 5.6
+ 50 “ (‘ “ 3.6
DISCUSSION
SUMMARY
1. du Vigneaud, V., Dyer, H. M., and Kies, M. W., J. Biol. Chem., 130,
325 (1939).
2. Rose, W. C., and Rice, E. E., J. BioE. Chem., 130, 305 (1939).
3. Osborne, T. B., and Mendel, L. B., J. Biol. Chem., 37, 572 (1919).
4. Funk, C., The vitamines, Baltimore, 2nd edition, 168 (1922).
5. Bergmann, M., J, Biol. Chem., 110, 471 (1935).
6. Fletcher, J. P., Best, C. H., and Solandt, 0. M., Biochem. J., 29, 2278
(1935).
7. Best, C. H., Channon, H. J., and Ridout, J. H., J. Physiol., 81, 409
(1934).
8. Virtue, R. W., and Lewis, H. B., Proc. Am. ROC. BioZ. Chem., J. BioZ.
Chem., 160, p. xcv (1933); J. BioZ. Chem., 104, 59 (1934).
9. du Vigneaud, V., Dyer, H. M., and Harmon, J., J. BioZ. Chem., 10.1,
719 (1933).
10. Tucker, H. F., and Eckstein, H. C., J. Biol. Chem., 121, 479 (1937).
Il. Channon, H. ,J., Manifold, M. C., and Platt, A. P., Rio&em. J., 32,
969 (1938).
12. Best, C. H., and Ridout, J. H., Canad. Med. Assn. J., 39, 188 (1938),
as quoted in Luck, J. M., Annual review of biochemistry, Stanford
University, 8, 352 (1939).
13. Channon, H. J., Manifold, M. C., and Platt, A. P., Chem. and Id.,
67, 600 (1938).
14. Singal, S. A., and Eckstein, H. C., Proc. Sot. Exp. BioZ. and Med., 41,
512 (1939).
15. Channon, H. J., and Smith, J. A. B., Biochem. J., 30, 115 (1936).
16. King, C. G., in Luck, J. M., Annual review of biochemistry, Stanford
University, 8, 389 (1939).
17. Dann, W. J., Proc. Am. Sot. BioZ. Chem., J. BioZ. Chem., 128, p. xviii
(1939).