Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scorecard PH Road Sector Final
Scorecard PH Road Sector Final
Use SCORECARD worksheet to calculate SCORE and CLASSIFICATION RATING for each
project
Instructions for Design Assessment:
1 Fill in the project name and Registration No. in DESIGN tab for Design Assessment.
2 Select type of project: "NEW ROADS" or "UPGRADING ROADS". Maximum points will be allocated
according to the type of project selected.
3 Insert TARGET point for each criteria (from drop down selection / key in).
4 Core criteria which is not mandatory and not applicable to the project may select "NA" as target point.
Point will be autamatically deducted from the total maximum core point.
5 Mandatory core criteria will not have option to select "NA" as target point. Choose "0" if criteria not
fulfilled.
6 Facilitator need to make sure that target point are selected for all criteria and to make sure that completed
submittal documents are submitted together with this scorecard for assessment purpose.
8 Point under ASSESSMENT will be given by the panel of pH Assessor according to the submittal
documents.
9 Final Score for the assessment are based on the following formula:
Max 15
2 Core criteria which is not mandatory and not applicable to the project may select "NA" as target point.
Point will be autamatically deducted from the total maximum core point.
3 Mandatory core criteria will not have option to select "NA" as target point. Choose "0" if criteria is not
fulfilled.
4 Facilitator need to make sure that target point are selected for all criteria in the scorecard.
6 Point under ASSESSMENT will be given by the panel of pH Assessor according to assessment on site
and proof of implementation.
7 Final Score for the assessment and Classification rating are similar in the Design Assessment.
DESIGN
ASSESSMENT
pH JKR
ROAD SECTOR
PROJECT NAME
REG. NO.
RESPONSIBILIT
DESIGN
CODE CRITERIA ASSESSMENT COMMENT BY
Y MAX POINT TARGET POINT
POINT ASSESSOR
SM SUSTAINABLE SITE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
SM 1 REQUIREMENTS FOR ROAD WORKS DESIGN 5 0 0
Traffic Study 1
Site Investigation Data 1
Flood records 1
Response to public complaints or requests from public, local authority
CJ 1
& etc.
Value Management (VM) 1
Survey Drawing 1
As built drawings NA NA NA
Accident reports CSFJ NA NA NA
Cut slope not steeper than 1:1.5 or Rock slope not steeper than 4:1 1
CKG
Fill slope not steeper than 1:2 1
Height of slope not more than 6m 1
Maximum grade less than 7% 1
No reclamation involved to existing water bodies 1
CJ
Provide added uphill lane (climbing lane) where the length of critical
1
grade exceeds 5%
To ensure that all site equipment are in using low decibel to control CJ
2
noise pollution
To ensure using all machinery on site are low decibel to minimize the
2
amount of noise generated
SUB TOTAL SM POINT 16 0 0
RESPONSIBILIT
DESIGN
CODE CRITERIA ASSESSMENT COMMENT BY
Y MAX POINT TARGET POINT
POINT ASSESSOR
PT PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES
PT 1 EXISTING PAVEMENT EVALUATION 3 0 0
Surface Condition Survey 1
Coring & Dynamic Cone Penetrometer test 1
Deflection test CSFJ 1
Trial pit & Laboratory test 1
Surface Regularity Test (International Roughness Index, IRI) 1
PT 2 PERMEABLE PAVEMENT 3 0 0
Use of permeable (porous) pavement mix design with higher range of
1
air void (18 -25%)
Pavement crossfall 2.5% and min unpaved shoulder to drain gradient
1
0.7%-4% CJ
Drainability of porous asphalt wearing course having a minimum
thickness of 50mm shall not be less than 10 litre/minute through a 1
discharge area of 54cm2
PT 3 PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE TRACKING 2 0 0
PT 4 LONG-LIFE PAVEMENT 4 0 0
Meet the requirements of Arahan Teknik Jalan 5/85 (Pindaan 2013):
1
Manual for the structural design of flexible pavement
CA 6 HOUSEKEEPING 2 0 0
CA 7 CONSTRUCTION SUSTAINABILITY 4 0 0
Perform scheduled maintenance of construction machineries 2
Use high performance machineries with low fuel consumption and
2
low air emission CJ
Provision of ESCP and Environmental Monitoring Report (EMR) –
2
(eg. Water/ Air/ Noise Quality ) in the contract
SUB TOTAL CA POINT 19 0 0
MR MATERIAL & RESOURCES
MR 1 MATERIAL REUSE 5 0 0
RESPONSIBILIT
DESIGN
CODE CRITERIA ASSESSMENT COMMENT BY
Y MAX POINT TARGET POINT
POINT ASSESSOR
Reuse at a minimum 30% of existing pavement materials by
2
estimated volume
Reuse of existing material other than pavement materials 1
Earthwork balance 1
CJ
Fiber Roll Netting using biodegradable material at site for erosion
1
control (eg. Wooden dust, coconut fiber)
Tac tile on the pedestrian pathway and access for disabled users CJ 1
SM 6 - EC NOISE CONTROL 2 0 0
The pavement mix design by using quiet pavement CJ 2
Buffer Zone CJ 2
EW 3 - EC ECOLOGICAL CONNECTIVITY 5 0 0
AE 2 - EC SCENIC VIEWS 2 0 0
Provide designated parking area for road user to stop and experience
CJ 2
the scenic views at strategic location.
AE 3 - EC PEDESTRIAN ACCESS 5 0 0
AE 6 - EC BICYCLE ASSESS 2 0 0
CJ
ANY 5
SCORE SUMMARY
DESIGN
TOTAL POINTS (CORE) MAX TARGET ASSESSMENT
SM SUSTAINABLE SITE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT 16 0 0
PT PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES 12 0 0
EW ENVIRONMENT & WATER 4 0 0
AE ACCESS & EQUITY 3 0 0
CA CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES 19 0 0
MR MATERIAL AND RESOURCES 11 0 0
EC ELECTIVE CRITERIA 27 0 0
IN INOVATION 5 0 0
TOTAL CORE POINTS 65 0 0
TOTAL ELECTIVE & INNOVATION POINTS 15 0 0
0 0
pH JKR RATING
NO RECOGNITION NO RECOGNITION
Assessed by:
Signature:
Date:
SCORING
VERIFICATION
pH JKR
ROAD SECTOR
PROJECT NAME 0
REG. NO. 0
DATE OF VERIFICATION ASSESSMENT:
ASSESSMENT
Cut slope not steeper than 1:1.5 or Rock slope not steeper than 4:1 1
CKG
Fill slope not steeper than 1:2 1
Height of slope not more than 6m 1
Maximum grade less than 7% 1
No reclamation involved to existing water bodies 1
CJ
Provide added uphill lane (climbing lane) where the length of critical
1
grade exceeds 5%
To ensure that all site equipment are in using low decibel to control CJ
2
noise pollution
To ensure using all machinery on site are low decibel to minimize the
2
amount of noise generated
SUB TOTAL SM POINT 16 0 0
PT PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES
PT 1 EXISTING PAVEMENT EVALUATION 3 0 0
Surface Condition Survey 1
Coring & Dynamic Cone Penetrometer test 1
CSFJ
VERIFICATION
RESPONSIBILIT
CODE CRITERIA ASSESSMEN COMMENT BY
Y MAX POINT TARGET POINT
T POINT ASSESSOR
PT 4 LONG-LIFE PAVEMENT 4 0 0
Meet the requirements of Arahan Teknik Jalan 5/85 (Pindaan 2013):
1
Manual for the structural design of flexible pavement
EW 2 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 2 0 0
CA 6 HOUSEKEEPING 2 0 0
CA 7 CONSTRUCTION SUSTAINABILITY 4 0 0
MR 2 GREEN PRODUCT 4 0 0
Green Products Scoring System (GPSS) of 70% - 100% 4
Green Products Scoring System (GPSS) of 50% - 69% 3
CASKT
Green Products Scoring System (GPSS) of 40% - 49% 2
Use Green Product Scoring System (GPSS) 1
MR 3 ROAD INVENTORIES 1 0 0
Provide updated master inventory of road asset / warranty of
1
material/product after completion of road works
CSFJ
Provide established master inventory of road asset / warranty of
NA NA NA
material/product of existing road
MR 4 EFFICIENT ROAD LIGHTINGS 1 0 0
All systems should be designed to use energy efficient road lightings,
while complying to standard and specification for road lightings (eg. CKE 1
MS 825 part 1:2007)
SUB TOTAL MR POINT 11 0 0
TOTAL CORE POINT 66 0 0
EC ELECTIVE CRITERIAS
SM 5 - EC SERVICES FOR DISABLED USERS 3 0 0
Tac tile on the pedestrian pathway and access for disabled users CJ 1
SM 6 - EC NOISE CONTROL 2 0 0
The pavement mix design by using quiet pavement CJ 2
Buffer Zone CJ 2
EW 3 - EC ECOLOGICAL CONNECTIVITY 5 0 0
AE 2 - EC SCENIC VIEWS 2 0 0
Provide designated parking area for road user to stop and experience
CJ 2
the scenic views at strategic location.
AE 3 - EC PEDESTRIAN ACCESS 5 0 0
AE 5 - EC REST AREA 2 0 0
AE 6 - EC BICYCLE ASSESS 2 0 0
CJ
ANY 5
SCORE SUMMARY
VERIFICATION
TOTAL POINTS (CORE) MAX TARGET ASSESSMENT
SM SUSTAINABLE SITE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT 16 0 0
PT PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES 12 0 0
EW ENVIRONMENT & WATER 5 0 0
AE ACCESS & EQUITY 5 0 0
CA CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES 22 0 0
MR MATERIAL AND RESOURCES 11 0 0
EC ELECTIVE CRITERIA 27 0 0
IN INOVATION 5 0 0
TOTAL CORE POINTS 71 0 0
TOTAL ELECTIVE & INNOVATION POINTS 15 0 0
0 0
pH JKR RATING
NO RECOGNITION NO RECOGNITION
Assessed by:
Signature:
Date: