Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Worth The Price of The Musurgia Universalis - Athanasius Kircher On The Secret of The
Worth The Price of The Musurgia Universalis - Athanasius Kircher On The Secret of The
"metabolic style"
Author(s): Jeffrey Levenberg
Source: Recercare , 2016, Vol. 28, No. 1/2 (2016), pp. 43-88
Published by: Fondazione Italiana per la Musica Antica (FIMA)
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Fondazione Italiana per la Musica Antica (FIMA) is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve
and extend access to Recercare
Verum hoc arcanum solis peritioribus magistris notum est quem nos non incongruè
stylum metabolicum appellamus. Verum operae pretium faciam, si hic aliquot hui
us metabolici styli paradigmata inseram, ut quid intendam, lector facilius intelligere
possit.
[Truly, this secret, which we name not incongruously the metabolic style, was known
only to the most skilled masters. Truly, I will make the price of the work if I insert
several examples of this metabolic style, so that the reader might more easily under
stand what I will try to prove].
Kircher was not being hyperbolic. Under obligation to his patrons, peers,
and readers, he would earn his keep (so he imposed upon himself) only
if he could elucidate and exemplify this most obscure matter of how cer
tain modern musicians had re-instated the "metabolisms" of ancient Greek
I am pleased to acknowledge the support for this research from a Mellon Fellowship at the
Vatican Film Library at St. Louis University. The work described in this paper was also partially
supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative
Region, China (CUHK 24608916). All reproductions in the examples are with permission from the
Biblioteca Nacional de Espana.
l. Athanasius kircher, Musurgia universalis sive ars magna consoni et dissoni in 10. libros di
gesta, qua universa sonorum doctrina & philosophia, musicaeque tarn theoricae, quam practicae sci
entia, summa varietate traditur, 2 voll., Roma, Eredi di Francesco Corbelletti, 1650, 1, bk. VII, ch.
8, p. 672. Unless otherwise specified, all subsequent Kircher citations refer to vol. 1 of the Musurgia
universalis.
music.2 Ostensibly wo
er's extraordinary-sou
metabolico, featured
modal terminologies
mixed, and so forth c
Représentative of the
sical examples for the
oretical discourse, exc
Heraclitus (Ex. 1), Dom
Della Valle's Esther (Ex
al discourse) F Ionian t
the opposition betwe
The second example e
("lagrime"), such as F
the first example in ter
as indicated above the
their ancient Ptolemai
("sdegni") that ought n
latter. Whether for K
seem to be rather str
ie, considering Kirche
What precisely, then,
such a discourse on th
--;;==
E feffi ±E ZZ~—
dcrc
^ ^ ' b' ^ jj
—
11 gerc, tr.tr,
gere, tr,
tr, tr. epurd
tr. cpurdapian*
iiillliisfiiii
— 1
I —,
1
cpurdari ^erc>
b 43 43 b
:i '.zz
►t"ZZ
fp::r z::* :::::: p..
b
--
V.""
"if::
Is: d
iL\
icj: fe .1:: :2:: ==3
•4—
-y -< > —1
En vuol'fanarla i| Red
L
0 : —Vv
dS=== tu
ofo rio lata per lei di quel bo ato fangue fenza ildogliofb humor del
*<►*
—„
II 11 II II I i II II II 11
F-tj 1—J U|_! t
FT—172——
M
!1i
izj
lliiliiliiflliilillliii? pian
pian to mi o.
•l-«
•1—r—c£
Ex. 2: Kircheibs second example of the metabolic style, Domenico Mazzocchi's Lagrime
amare
Paradigma III.
Phrygio
Giialtri tuo'imperi fpefio auuic chc fdegni No c piu da foffrire (I temcrario ardi rc
Ex. 3: Kircher's third example of the metabolic style, taken from Pietro della V
interms of common us
and expression: 1. the m
3. the mode's species (d
tive altération of mode
tal gamut inevitably h
or enharmonie instrum
conceived and realized.8
Still other scholars have mentioned the metabolic style in passing for its
colorfulness in metaphor,10 while most have implicitly dismissed it as eso
teric (perhaps understandably so) and inconsequential for understanding
musical practices of the time." The many scholars who have examined the
universalness of Kircher's musical knowledge have not probed deeply into
the metabolic style, presumably on account of its highly technical musical
theoretical components.12
I propose here a new revised reading of the metabolic style. While I agree
with Barbieri and Kirnbauer's interprétation of the mutation of mode,
transposition of final, and change of species, I disagree that all of the mu
sic in the metabolic style was intended for and performed exclusively with
chromatic and enharmonie instruments. While comparing and contrasting
Barbieri and Kirnbauer's readings of Kircher's and Doni's treatises to my
own, I underline overlooked passages that indicate some of the metabolic
music was performed with non-extended instruments (just twelve pitch
es per octave). I argue that the "practical" music in the metabolic style by
Mazzocchi, Carissimi, and others was originally conceived as employing out
of tune mean-tone tempered sonorities as expressive text-setting devices,
13- For the historical context of these musical theoretical inquiries and performan
erick hammond, Music and spectacle in Baroque Rome: Barberini patronage under U
Häven, Yale University Press, 1994.
14- See Carl Dahlhaus, Studies on the origin of harmonie tonality, trans. Robert Gjerdingen,
Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1990.
15. A historically informed performance of this repertoire is La tavola cromatica: un'accademia
musicale dal cardinale Francesco Barberini, The Earle his Viols, with Evelyn Tubb, soprano; Marie
Nishiyama, harp, Raumklang, RK 2302, 2004.
16. At this point, the reader may like to have a copy of the Musurgia universalis (readily available
in digitalization) at hand. Although I présent quotations with translation here, the reader may wish to
follow along and compare my parsing of the text to the originai.
17. kircher, Musurgia, p. 635.
18. Kirnbauer, Vieltönige Musik, pp. 200-210.
19. kircher, Musurgia, p. 658.
Recercare xxvm/1-2 2016
20. kircher, Musurgia, p. 658. I paraphrase "Multi veterum de genere enarmonico var
ia tradiderunt, & in nonnullis quidem conueniunt, in quibusdam discrepant. Conveniunt omnes,
quod ad cantandum sit difficile, adeo ut fere derelictum sit; & quod non nisi a peritioribus in arte
cantantaretur".
21. kircher, Musurgia, p. 658. "Omnes conveniunt, quod in tetrachordo enarmonico procede
batur per diesin & ditonum, diesin plerique exhibent sub proportione 125:128".
22. While I otherwise abstain from the mathematics of tuning and tempérament in this paper
in favor of a practical perspective, I presume a working fluency with the various tunings and tem
péraments of the time (Pythagorean, just, mean-tone and its extensions, equal tempérament). While
the literature on this subject is vast, perhaps the foundational reference is still J. Murray barbour,
Tuning and tempérament: A historical survey, 2nd ed., East Lansing (mi), Michigan State College
Press, 1953.
23. kircher, Musurgia, p. 659.
24. kircher, Musurgia, p. 659. "Sed iam videamus, quantum intervallorum varietatem exhi
beant tetrachorda sic disposita".
25. kircher, Musurgia, pp. 659-660. "Ex hisce patet omnia intervalla consonantiasque tum dia
tonici chromatici generis in enarmonico genere contineri; prçterea propria intervalla quae nihil cum
praedictis duobus generibus commune habent possidere, qae hic separatim apponenda duximus".
in practice features
cannot obtain; ancien
Ex. 4a: Kircher's list of intervais that may be formed by enharmonie tetrachords
Ex. 4b: Kircher's list of enharmonie intervais not formed by diatonic and chrom
tetrachords
26. kircher, Musurgia, p. 660. "Atque haec sunt intervalla, quae in triplici tetrachordo enar
monico erui [sic] possunt, patetque hoc genus multo reliquis duobus laxiores habenas obtinere; cum
omnia reliquorum, & alia prœterea hic recensita propria contineat". Kircher here continues with a
metaphorical reference to "loose" "reins" or "lashes" [laxiores habenas] in the relationship between
these enharmonie intervais and the two other species. This metaphor, tangential to the présent study,
ought to be contextualized.
That is to say, the D El? diatonic semitone has substituted for the
matic semitone, where, on mean-tone tempered instruments, t
between Dit and El> is one enharmonie diesis. For Kircher's next
cites a minor third lowered by one enharmonie diesis. This is t
enharmonie interval not found in Ex. 4b: "Habemus praeterea sem
diminutum A, quo in instrumentis utimur F Gli loco F Ak' ("M
have a minor third diminished by a A, which [occurs] on instrum
we use F G# in place of F Ak').29 Again, the Gli is one diesis lower t
Kircher then temporarily deviates from his listing of practical
ie intervais and reports that Galeazzo Sabbatini demonstrated t
enharmonie keyboard, which was exhibited in the preceding bo
Musurgia universalis.30 There, Kircher détails Sabbatini's Vicen
27. kircher, Musurgia, p. 660. Whereas Kircher uses (as was common at the tim
"diesis" in a two-fold manner, one for the enharmonie diesis and another for the sem
translate "diesis chromaticœ" as "chromatic semitone" to avoid confusion. Such potent
terminological confusion will arise again shortly.
28. Kirnbauer, Vieltönige Musik, p. 205. His translation stops here and does not c
next sentence.
board with whole-tones divided into five enharmonie dieses. One can im
agine Sabbatini demonstrating the F G# substitution for F At», versus the F
At> in and of itself, among other enharmonie intervais. Perhaps Kircher's
discourse on enharmonicism is not as independent as he would lead us to
believe.
zu mis pomi, naving dui nsreu excnanges or snarps anu nais separaieu uy
one enharmonie diesis, Kircher passes his aesthetic judgment on this p
cal enharmonicism. He does not censure these out of tune sonorities as one
Having first understood that Kircher indicated the use of Et in place of D#,
Kirnbauer here understands Kircher as reporting that both Et and D# (et
al.) are distinctly in use in this enharmonie practice. I believe Kirnbauer was
misled by Kircher's reference to Sabbatini's enharmonie keyboard (as well
as the non-keyboard string instruments, which he presumed to be in the
manner of the enharmonie ones invented by Doni). Kircher's writing in
deed says otherwise; the translation of the préposition "pro" ("for") as "und"
("and") is erroneous. In each of the pairs of pitches given, the first Substi
tutes for the second. All of the indicated substitutions are consistent with
those that would have to be performed with the common-practice mean
tone tempered gamut of two flats (B and E) and three sharps (F, C, and
G). In other words, the substitution of Et» for DU is the enharmonie music,
because the two pitches differ by one diesis. Enharmonicism is of course
also the use of Et> and DU as two distinctly tuned pitches—but that is not the
enharmonicism Kircher is describing here ab authore intento.
For want of a rational explanation of the affective powers of these enhar
monie intervais, Kircher simply continues enumerating enharmonie appli
cations in practice:34
Hinc in cantibus subindè utimur diesi enarmonica, nam saepè in cadentijs deprim
imus vocem post dissonantiam ad # auctam A ut E Et. pro E Dit. & F# B [sic], pro Fx
[sic] AS; Patet & hoc in infra ponendis clausulis, ubi eadem diesis tam in acuto quàm
gravi ponitur; & tarnen G# ab At per diesin enarmonicam distat. huius generis est
tertia clausula.
[Hence, we presently use the enharmonie diesis in songs, for offen on cadences we
suppress the voice after the dissonance from increasing the I to A, as E Et for E Dit and
F# Bt for F[tt] Alt. It is clear this is to be placed below the cadences, where the same
Kircher's allusion to
and FU major triads
sharp leading-tones is
The precise meaning b
for G# is less plausib
these cadences for su
deny the possibility
wards his musical exa
Kircher next enquires into the historical origins of this practical enharmon
icism.41 In an elaborate panegyric, he names Domenico Mazzocchi as its
inventor:42
39- kircher, Musurgia, p. 675. On Kircher's sélection of Gesualdo to lend credence to his own
"amateurish" musicality, see kirnbauer, Vieltönige Musik, p. 156 and p. 211.
40. colonna, La sambuca lincea, p. 3. Translation by Patrizio Barbieri.
41. In fact, as aptly as Kircher's désignation "enharmonie" fits this music, he would have found
that many of the précédents were called "chromatic". For example, Lasso's renowned Prophetiae Sib
yllarum has a B major triad on the "chro" of "Carmina chromatico" (which is followed by c-sharp
minor on "ma" and E major on "tico"). If one understands it to be part of this practice, Kircher would
have had to include it in this chapter as a "Carmina enarmonico". Among numerous studies of Lasso's
chromaticism, the first proposais for mean-tone tempérament were notably put forward by Martin
rhunke, "Lassos Chromatik und die Orgel-stimmung", in Convivium musicorum: Festschrift Wolf
gang Boetticher, ed. Heinrich Hüschen, Berlin, Merseburger, 1974, pp. 291-308.
42. kircher, Musurgia, p. 660.
_ 1J ! S 4_ J H ' 4 JX +
?j|e J lEE?EE5jE~lr-~ ':f.=p|- EE
r ""i? s
pliiiiiiilipiliil
of tunc ilia scneclj seramca: re quics? po tu i fti lin.
% 6 \X 7Za ZS
gj-jjjAS
£
js_j_~s J:
—7
76
ilfSliiiBllliiiiii
-3f
fl-S—F— + PI r::::
'Mr$. —
Eli: in
:S EE "ZZZ
Enafmoaicnm
CV yA
tsferae
riculamiftu af fari cxtremu, mi datadata
copia,
copia,matt
matti ? Hcu, terra i
76 S4 S 4 4
S ,76
76
t-z:z2
WWM
iillllililiiiiiS:
' gnota canibusdataprcdalatinis, alt tibusqueia ccs nec tctu a
^ *^j- 6 — . A *76
Ex. 5: Kircher's first example of enharmonie music, Mazzocchi's Planctus ma
(abridged)
48. See richard englehart, "Domenico Mazzocchi's Dialoghi e sonetti and Madrigali a cinque
voci (1638): a modem édition with biographical commentary and new archivai documents", Ph.D.
diss., Kent State University, 1987, p. 311. For an excellent diagram and discussion of Mazzocchi's tun
ing, see, also, kirnbauer, Vieltönige Musik, pp. 23-25.
49. There are several omissions from Mazzocchi's printed notation as reprinted in Kircher's
treatise. These, however, do not undermine Kircher's discussion. The most notable omission is that
the messa di voce signs (V's), which indicate a graduai increase of both volume and pitch, are missing
in bar five (the V's should not be mistaken with A's). Mazzocchi included these in his définition of
practical enharmonies. In that same bar, the E should be an Ex.
50. kirnbauer, Vieltönige Musik, p. 207, passes over Kircher's critique of Mazzocchi's division
of the whole-tone. Barbieri and I agree on the interprétation of this passage. See patrizio barbieri,
"Cembali enarmonici e organi negli scritti di Kircher. Con documenti inediti su Galeazzo Sabbatini",
in Enciclopedismo in Roma barocca. Athanasius Kircher e il Museo del Collegio Romano tra Wunder
kammer e museo scientifico, ed. Maristella Casciato - Maria Grazia Ianniello - Maria Vitale, Venezia,
Marsilio, 1986, p. 128, fn. 32.
$
av: ■ft—:x
v^;J
Scmitunanin: Scmiton.-maitis Semtton:msnus Scmjminimum.
Kircher first asks his readers to "Note that in this dialogue the character x
is an enharmonie diesis". In the next clause, he contrasts Mazzocchi's and
his définitions of the diesis. Kircher's terminology, here, is unfortunately in
consistent; he equates (as was common at the time) the term "comma" and
"diesis". The clause reads as follows: "The character x is an enharmonie die
sis, in which direction a comma (i.e. a diesis) increases a minor semitone".
The increase of a minor semitone is part of Mazzocchi's définition (i.e. BU
was increased a minor semitone from Bl> en route to forming a major third
with G#, notated as Bx). However, the value of a comma for the enharmonie
diesis is Kircher's définition. For Mazzocchi, the enharmonie diesis equaled
the minor semitone in value. Kircher next points out that Mazzocchi was
mistaken: "Although, if you look at the value, the author of this [dialogue]
confuses it [i.e.: the enharmonie diesis] everywhere with this chromatic sign
According to Kircher, Mazzocchi should have used the # sign to indicate
the rise of one enharmonie diesis, not only on the major third of the given
C# major triad, but elsewhere. Why? Reading on, Kircher's clarification is
unfortunately a bit convoluted: "[This chromatic sign #] on a b pitch increas
es the [minor] semitone one comma [i.e.: one enharmonie diesis], changing
fa into mi, in which manner #, t>, and t) might truly be distinguished, as was
already exhibited in Book Five". That is to say, in répétition of Kircher's
previous explanations, placing a minor semitone Dit above D raises the Dtt
one enharmonie diesis when El? is used in its stead. For the C# major triad
in Planctus matris Euryali, Mazzocchi should have indicated EU mi, which
would be sounded by F fa, and thereby raised a diesis. However, "In order
Whole-Tone
52. Having here evinced Kircher's theoretical adeptness with mean-tonal practice, I must also
point out that he evidently misunderstood Vicentino's divisions of the whole-tone. Whereas Vicenti
no's whole-tone was theoretically divided into fifths, his practice only made use of five of the six pitch
es at a time, alternating, for example, G# and Al>. This was evidently a source of confusion for Kircher,
who misread Vicentino's whole-tones as being divided into fourths; see kircher, Musurgia, p. 638.
53. kircher, Musurgia, p. 664.
n fo vvrnn /
[If the practice is tolerated in any way, then it can be whatever it may be
[Mazzocchi] has shown himself not ignorant of theory, and thus to have
ulation to practice, so as not to produce an unpleasant effect].
but ir Mazzocchi cieariy knew enougn tneory to correctly rorm tue major
third justly over G#, albeit with an unconventional enharmonie discourse,
one wonders why he could not similarly state the actuality that Bx was
sounded by C. Likewise, why could he not state that G# is used for Al- and
then formulate, in the manner of Kircher, a succinct affective doctrine for
such substitutions? Furthermore, if he wanted to form a justly intoned major
third over Gît used as At, he even had the theoretical tools and discourse at
his disposai. He would simply have had to subtract his "minimal sentitone"
or "minor enharmonie diesis" front C. Yet he did not provide a symbol for
this interval. Clearly, Mazzocchi's enharmonie theory was not completely
worked out (as one would expect from a practitioner) and Kircher, having
recognized this problem, was working out the correct theoretical discourse
for the practice.
At this point, we may set the Musurgia universalis to the side and ascertain
whether or not there are précédents for this discourse on enharmonicism
in the writings of Doni. It is well-known that Kircher was indebted to Doni,
even if he did not always cite his sources.54 One expects Kircher's report of
practitioners using out of tune accidentais on mean-tone tempered instru
ments to conflict violently with Doni's théories. Doni, after all, conceived an
enharmonie instrument to obviate precisely that problem in tuning. As seen
in Ex. 8a, which is taken from Barbieri's excellent synopsis of Doni's "triha
rmonic" harpsichord,55 Doni adopted a syntonic just tuning. The first round
on the circle of fifths ranged on the sharp side to CU and on the fiat side to Al
(not G# and El-, as on the common keyboard). The pitches in brackets and
beyond are enharmonie. Starting from Dl> and G#, these pitches were clas
sified by Doni as "metabolic", as they could mutate smoothly from mode to
mode on the triharmonic harpsichord. Doni devised an elaborate notation
and coloring scheme on his keyboard to indicate the various functions of
B2 a2
Ftt2 [Gtt2] [Dtt2]...
D A E" B'
Bt° F° c° G° D°
At" Et"
Ex. 8a: Patrizio Barbieri's diagram of the diatonic, chromatic, and (in brackets) enharmonie
metabolic pitches on Doni's triharmonic enharmonie keyboard. The superscripts refer to
syntonic commas
Ex. 8b: The same, rearranged to common mean-tone tempérament, to match Kircher's prac
tical enharmonie scheme. Pitches beyond G# and Et are not tuned (n.a.) and substituted for
by their closest enharmonie équivalent
D
T1
-1
c§' ££1-%
o'
n
-7 —r-(- —
-w— AM I—
56. Giambattista doni, Annotazioni sopra il compendio de' generi, e de' modi della musica,
Roma, Andrea Fei, 1640.
57. doni, Annotazioni, pp. 76-177: "Trattato primo de' tuoni o modi veri. Al signor Pietro della
Valle".
58. doni, Annotazioni, pp. 172.
cioè la naturale, che si serve delle corde d'alcun tuono fondamentale, & poco o
niente adopra le corde peregrine, o segni accidentali: & questa si riferisce alla specie
hesychastica o quieta; l'alterata co' segni d'abbassamento o b. molli, molti o pochi che
siano; la quale si rapporta alla specie systaltica & malinconica, & la variata col segno
d'alzamento detto diesi, che si referisce alla specie diastaltica & allegra.
First is the "natural, in which one uses the pitches of any fundamental
mode and rarely or never adopts wandering pitches or accidentai signs".
As Doni does not speli these out either in pitch letters or musical notation,
let us take the simplest hypothetical example as a point of reference. A nat
ural modulatione uses the pitches A, B, C, D, E, F, G and the Dorian mode
(Doni's Phrygian mode) is built naturally upon D. Second is "its [i.e.: the
natural's] altération with signs of réduction, or soft-b's, whether there are
many or few of them". These accidentais pertain to the "systaltica" or "mel
ancholy" species. On our D Dorian reference, this simply might transpose it
to Dt, among other possibilities on the flat-side. Third is "its [i.e.: the natu
ral's] variation with the raising sign called the diesis [it], which one refers to
the diastaltica and cheerful species". With our D Dorian reference, we might
simply transpose it to Dtt, among other possibilities on the sharp-side.
So far, so simple. But, Doni's three kinds of molulationi then take a twist
towards Kircher's practical enharmonicism:61
59- doni, Annotazioni, p. 173. "Aggiungo in riguardo della pratica un ricordo utile per quelli che
vorranno comporre con diversità di tuoni [...] le tre sorti di modulationi. alle quali si riducono tutte
l'altre". I have omitted via the ellipsis Doni's reference to using three modes (Dorian, Phrygian, and
Lydian) and three types of cadences (on the syllables ut, re, and mi).
60. doni, Annotazioni, pp. 173-4.
61. Doni's désignations for these three kinds of modulationi also resonate with Monteverdi's
discourse; see barbara russano hanning, "Monteverdi's three genera: A study in terminology", in
Musical humanism and its legacy: Essays in honor of Claude V. Pulisca, ed. Nancy Kovaleff Baker -
Barbara Russano Hanning, Stuyvesant (ny), Pendragon, 1992, pp. 160-161.
Or, benché nella vera & légitima connessione de' tuoni, non sempre i più
naturale, o fondamentale, si servino de' b. molli, & i più acuti de' diesi; ma
riesca al contrario, tuttavia (per accomodarmi alla poca intelligenza de' mer
dico che, senza tante avvertenze & regole, si possono comporre bellissime
osissime cantilene, praticando solo le tre differenze dette; & osservando c
parte della compositione che è sparsa di diesi, si comprenda fra corde più
la naturale; & per il contrario quella che adopra i b. molli, sia più grave di t
corde, benché le distanze fra loro & le cadenze di ciascuna siano irregolari &
63. doni, Annotazioni, p. 174. "Per essempio quella affettuosissima modulatìone del signor Do
menico Mazzocchi, con la quale ha messo in musica il lamento della madre d'Euryalo, H une ego te
Euryale aspicio, è mescolata con le corde del tuono lidio; perché usa quasi per tutto il segno d'alza
mento o diesi 11, benché non sia stata composta con questo fine. Per il contrario quell'altra così bella
& patetica compositione, Lagrime amare, perché abbassa quasi tutte le corde col b. molle, si serve
dell'armonia iastia; benché senza pensarvi; & fà buonissimo effetto". I take up Doni's désignations of
mode in these works in conjunction with Kircher's metabolic analyses in section 2c.
64. doni, Annotazioni, pp. 174-175. "Or se alcuna compositione si servirà di queste tre varietà,
cioè in qualche luogo procederà con le sole corde naturali del tuono, in altre con quelle del sopradetto
lamento, modulando allora più acuto, & altrove sarà variata, con la modulatione del sonetto, Lagrime
amare, cantata in tuono più grave, riuscirà senza dubbio benissimo, purché sia composta con giuditio,
ma non già così bene, se quella parte che si serve de' diesi tornerà più nel grave, & quella che adopra
i b. molli più nell'acuto".
65. kircher, Musurgia, p. 664.
66. kircher, Musurgia, p. 664.
Recercare xxvin/1-2 2016
& ne nimis ardua praecepisse videamur, hic in gratiam curiosi lectoris appone
phonium iuxta triplex genus exacte compositum; ex quo veluti ex prototypo
lector cognoscere poterit modum in huiusmodi compositionibus procedendi
[And lest we may be seen to have excessively and arduously instructed, for th
the curious reader, I will add here a triphonium with the three species nearly
composed, from which that certain reader will be able to learn, as though fr
exemplar, the way in which such compositions are to be advanced.]
in intelligence and pe
ie music and his the
complete study of his
note is that one of the nine treatises/discourses in Doni's Annotazioni was
dedicated to Sabbatini, but, oddly, Doni did not there address this practical
enharmonicism.71
The motet occupies ten pages of Kircher's treatise, but the text is aban
doned after the first line, leaving readers to infer how the wicked returns to
God's favor via the three species. It has been previously analyzed by Barbieri,
who, in his study of the enharmonie keyboards in Kircher's Musurgia, read
Derelinquat impius viam suam in view of Sabbatini's Vicentinian keyboard
(Book VI of the Musurgia).72 Such a reading maintains that ali of the notated
accidentais should sound in tune as notated.73 My reading differs and argues
that the motet is "enharmonie" in Kircher's sense of the term ab authore
intento. A représentative excerpt of the motet appears in Ex. il. The excerpt
is the third system of the motet, which was highlighted by Barbieri.
3ll|?pf|iz:z=EE= iff:
US viam fu^ am flc^vir m.quus
. W T ^4-5 .i4i ,_U—X_,—4.
3+9 ( •
:zB~
70. kircher, Musurgia, p. 664. "Non dubito quin insignis ille Galeazzus a
eo, quo pollet ingenij perspicacitate componendas prae coeteris animum adi
71. doni, Annotazioni, pp. 234-252: "Discorso primo dell'inutile osservan
Al signor Galeazzo Sabbatini".
72. barbieri, "Cembali enarmonici e organi negli scritti di Kircher", pp.
73. barbieri, "Cembali enarmonici e organi negli scritti di Kircher", p. 1
76. kircher, Musurgia, p. 672: "De mutatione modi, sive toni, sive stylo metabolic
(Quos diesatos et
(Whìch bemollatos
the igno
vos politioresyou being
exharmonios, more e
opinor) non and metabolic,
generis esse, seda
quicumque intra
of hos
genus, centum
but of
melodijs the
usurpare past
eoshundred
ceperu
ceteris (which
Venusinus more
Princeps tha
f
matici Venosa
generis sonituswas won
atque
quaedam locasounds and
exceperis) inter
mul
enarmonia; sed metabolicos
(except in a fewp
peregrini enharmonie,
cuiusdam atque bu
ext
compositos. composed of no
ied and dissimilar tonoi.
Thus, the metabolic style has many accidentais that are chromatic and/or
enharmonie, but the music cannot simply be designated as such.80 Kircher
next defines metabolicism in more precise terminologies, explaining how
it is a two-fold mutation of modus and tonus. In so doing, he opens for us
Hoc loco quidam discrimen ponunt inter modum & tonum mutationem toni di
cunt; quando systema toni penitus mutatur, modi mutatio dicitur, quando sit proces
sus a chorda naturalis toni ad non naturalem, ut cum processus fieri debet a tono in
tonum, is fiat in semitonium, aut diesin, uti paulo ante dictum est.
ural one when, "in which advancement, that which ought to be made into
whole-tone from a whole-tone, might be made into a semitone or diesis, as
was said a little before". This does not indicate that any particular octave
species are naturai or unnatural in and of themselves, but simply différent;
the original octave species is taken as natural, its mutation unnatural.
Kircher compacted on
one paragraph. Recogn
in the margin at the o
summarizing the mea
ier définition justice:
("The metabolic style,
mean something more
condense a thorough d
perhaps the reader oug
is in fact much to be
ing metabolicism with
unacknowledged sourc
source was not Doni.
Although Kircher likely first learned of the metabolic style from corre
sponding with Doni, he must have read into the subject more than we have
suspected. In fact, the origins of the metabolic style in theory are earlier
than previously thought.83 In a passage of Le istitutioni harmoniche, Zarlino
first introduced the term metabolic in conjunction with the transposition o
modes. This passage has been overlooked on account of the fact it does not
appear in the first édition (1558) or the second (1573) of Le istitutioni har
moniche; it was only added to the third édition, part of Zarlino's collected
works (1588). As seen in the below excerpt of hook four, chapter seventeen,
Zarlino writes that the ancient Greeks called transposition metabolism, re
ferring readers to what he had written in his pinnacle work, Sopplimenti
musicali. The bolded words are those added in the third édition to the first
and second éditions (which were otherwise invariant between each oth
er). Zarlino then warns composers to take heed of instrumental limitations
when transposing the modes, which impinge on the freedom of the human
voice to justly intone pitches. But he acknowledges that not all musicians
follow this advice; instead they compose "capricious" music. Not wanting
to proliferate this theoretically unsound practice further, Zarlino did not
Following Zarlino's re
should have referred
latter). These chapters
on the metabolic style
in these chapters, wit
their contents, so tha
bolicist thought. In ch
peTdßoXtj". He quotes
tured upon and parap
da Euclide in cotal m
peTà9eaic;. cioè muta
simile" ("mutation is a
[place])".85 This mutat
3. Mode, and 4. Melop
style detailed by Doni
on poetic meter from
diatonic, chromatic,
stitution", Zarlino ref
Greater Perfect System
the system remains c
after the mutation. Th
which he devotes the en
+ Cjt.
What was Kircher's rationale for this example? His analysis is as follows:
"ubi frequentia b mollia nihil chromaticum aut enarmonicum habent, ut
imperiti sibi persuadent" ("inexperienced readers will persuade themselves
that the frequently encountered soft-b accidentais have no chromaticism or
enharmonicism"). That is to say, the transposition from F to Bt- is not chro
matic, just transposed diatonic. We can not concur with this statement, as
we found numerous enharmonicisms among the many weeping soft-b ac
cidentais. Kircher would retract them? He continues: "sed tonum tantum
-g
,• r p_
£"
P* I
< - I
sfLt
- £
tc
^ a
,0*
^ j
tnwf
Ex. 14: Doni's Ptolemaic system (diagram abridged from Barbieri)
ìoi. The complete score is available in The Italian oratorio, 1650-1800, i, ed. H
New York, Garland, 1986, pp. 1-35.
102. barbieri, "Pietro della Valle", p. 77.
Sed lector modum ex paradigmate facile colliget, in quo est transitus dorij
ium tonum, dum auribus insolitam mutationem adfert; fieri quoque non
animus huiusmodi alteratione immutatus, affectiones non sentiat vehement
[While [this transition from Dorian to Phrygian] brings an unusual mutati
ears, there is also no way that the soul would remain unchanged by a mutati
kind and would not feel furious affections.]
3. Conclusion
Did Kircher make the price of the Musurgia universalis worthwhile after
all? His erudite writing on the metabolic style verged on the incompréhen
sible, if not the esoteric; even now, despite our best efforts, it remains not
wholly understood. His musical examples were provocative, but déficient;
sometimes they lacked enough annotation, other times they did not quite
match the principles Kircher himself had set forth, and one was just down
right misprinted. Not a practical musician or, for that matter, even a music