2 skipped
3: Mo stage is ever stant transformation of the stage before it
4. Each later stage incorporated the earlier stages into itself.
Basically, this is a *staircase” model of development. Piaget proposed
four major stages of cognitive development, and called them (1)
sensorimotor intelligence, (2) preoperational thinking, (3) concrete
formal operational thinking. Each stage is
operational thinking, and (4) "1
correlated with an age period of childhood, but only approximately.
The Sensorimotor Stage: Birth to Age 2
In Piaget's theory, the sensorimotor stage occurs first, and is defined as
the period when infants “think” by means of their senses and motor
actions. As every new parent will attest, infants continually touch,
manipulate, look, listen to, and even bite and chew objects. According to
Piaget, these actions allow children to learn about the world and are
crucial to their early cognitive development.
The infant's actions allow the child to represent (i.e., construct simple
concepts of) objects and events. A toy animal may be just a confusing
array of sensations at first, but by looking, feeling, and manipulating it
repeatedly, the child gradually organizes her sensations and actions into
a stable concept: toy animal. The representation acquires a permanence
lacking in the individual experiences of the object, which are constantly
changing. Because the representation is stable, the child “knows,” or at
least believes, that toy animal exists even if the actual toy animal is
temporarily out of sight. Piaget called this sense of stability object
permanence, a belief that objects exist whether or not they are actually
present. Object permanence is a major achievement of sensorimotor
development, and marks a qualitative transformation in how older
infants (~24 months) think about experience compared to younger
infants (~6 months).
During much of infancy, of course, a child can only barely talk, so
sensorimotor development initially happens without the support of
language. It might therefore seem hard to know what infants are
thinking. Piaget devised several simple, but clever, experiments to get
around their lack of language, and these experiments suggest that
infants do indeed represent objects even without being able to talk
(Piaget, 1952). In one, for example, he simply hid an object (like a toy
animal) under a blanket. He found that doing so consistently prompts
older infants (18-24 months) to search for the object, but fails tonts (less than Six re hee to do so. (You can try
a happen to have access to in
this experiment yourself if you young
infant.) Something motivates the search by the older infant even
without the benefit of much languag’ and that “something” is
presumed to be a permanent concePt OF Tepresentation of the object.
prompt younger infa
The Preoperational Stage: Age 2to7
In the preoperational stage, children use their new ability to represent
objects in a wide variety of activities, but they do not yet do it in ways
that are organized or fully logical. One of the most obvious examples of
this kind of cognition is dramatic play, or the improvised make-believe
e ever had responsibility for children of
of preschool children. If you hav
this age, you have likely witnessed such play.
Children engaged in imaginative activities are thinking on two levels at
once—one imaginative and the other realistic. This dual processing of
experience makes dramatic play an early example of metacognition, or
reflecting on and the monitoring of thinking itself. Because
metacognition is a highly desirable skill for success in school, teachers of
young children (preschool, kindergarten, and even first or second grade)
often make time and space in their classrooms for dramatic play, and
sometimes even participate in it themselves to help develop the play
further.
The Concrete Operational Stage: Age 7 to 11
As children continue into elementary school, they become able to
represent ideas and events more flexibly and logically. Their rules of
thinking still seem very basic by adult standards and usually operate
unconsciously, but they allow children to solve problems more
systematically than before, and therefore to be successful with many
academic tasks. In the concrete operational stage, for example, a child
may unconsciously follow the rule: “If nothing is added or taken away,
then the amount of something stays the same.”
This simple principle helps children understand certain arithmetic tasks
(such as adding or subtracting zero from a number) as well as perform
certain classroom science experiments (such as ones that involve
calculating the combined volume of two separate liquids). Piaget called
this period the concrete operational stage because children mentally
“operate” on concrete objects and events. They are not yet able,(or think) systematically about representations of
ating representations is a more abstract skill
‘adolescence.
however, to operate
objects or events. Manipul
that develops later, during
ational thinking differs from preoperational thinking in two
mavehecet ot which renders children more skilled as students. One
difference is reversibility, or the ability to think about the steps of a
process in any order. Imagine a simple science experiment, for example,
Such as one that explores why objects sink or float by having a child
place an assortment of objects in a basin of water. Both the
preoperational and concrete operational child can recall and describe the
steps in this experiment, but only the concrete operational child can
recall them in any order (e.g-, chronological, reverse chronological, etc).
This skill is very helpful for any task involving multiple steps—a common
feature of tasks in the classroom. In teaching new vocabulary from a
story, for another example, a teacher might tell students: "1) Every
time you come across a word you don’t know, write it down. 2) Then
find and write down the definition of that word before returning to the
story. 3) After you have a list of all the words you don’t know, have a
friend test you on your list.” These directions involve repeatedly
remembering to move back and forth between a second step and a
first—a task that concrete operational students—and most adults—find
easy, but that preoperational children often forget to do or find
confusing. If the younger children are to do this task reliably, they may
need external prompts, such as having the teacher remind them
periodically to go back to the story to look for more unknown words.
The other new feature of thinking that develops during the concrete
operational stage is the child’s ability to decenter, or focus on more than
one feature of a problem at a time. There are hints of decentration in
preschool children’s dramatic play, which requires being aware on two
levels at once—knowing that a banana can be both a banana and a
“telephone.” But the decentration of the concrete operational stage is
more deliberate and conscious than preschoolers’ make-believe.
The other new feature of thinking that develops during the concrete
operational stage is the child’s ability to decenter, or focus on more than
one feature of a problem at a time. There are hints of decentration in
preschool children’s dramatic play, which requires being aware on two
levels at once—knowing that a banana can be both a banana and a
“telephone.” But the decentration of the concrete operational stage is
more deliberate and conscious than preschoolers’ make-believe. Now
the child can attend to two things at once quite purposefully. Suppose
you give students a sheet with an assortment of subtraction problems 5
on it, and ask them to do this: “Find all of the problems that involveam jon and that involve borrowing from the next column.
Gea arid solve only those pro er ae these instructions is.
quite possible for a concrete operational student (as long as they have
been listening!) because the student can attend to the two subtasks
simultaneously—finding the two-digit problems and identifying which
actually involve borrowing. (Whe' student actually knows how to
“borrow” however, is a separate question.)
In real classroom tasks, reversibility and decentration often happen
together. A well-known example of joint presence is Piaget's
experiments with conservation, the belief that an amount or quantity
stays the same even if it changes apparent size or shape (Piaget, 2001;
Matthews, 1998). Imagine two identical balls made of clay. Any child,
Whether preoperational or concrete operational, will agree that the two
indeed have the same amount of clay in them simply because they look
the same. But if you now squish one ball into a long, thin “hot dog,” the
preoperational child is likely to say that the amount of clay has
changed—either because its shape is longer or because it is thinner, but
at any rate because it now looks different. The concrete operational
child will not make this mistake, thanks to new cognitive skills of
reversibility and decentration: for him or her, the amount is the same
because “you could squish it back into a ball again” (reversibility) and
because “it may be longer, but it is also thinner” (decentration). Piaget
would say the concrete operational child “has conservation of quantity.”
Notice the difference between the two younger (preoperational) and the
slightly older (concrete operational) child in this video as they perform
the conservation task:
The classroom examples described above also involve reversibility and
decentration. As already mentioned, the vocabulary activity described
earlier requires reversibility (going back and forth between identifying
words and looking up their meanings); but it can also be construed as
an example of decentration (keeping in mind two tasks at once—word
identification and dictionary search), And as mentioned, the arithmetic
activity requires decentration (looking for problems that meet two
criteria and also solving them), but it can also be construed as an
example of reversibility (going back and forth between subtasks, as with
the vocabulary activity). Either way, the development of concrete
operational skills supports students in doing many basic academic tasks;
in 2 sense, concrete operational skills make ordinary school work
possible.
The Formal Operational Stage: Age 11 and Beyondthe child becomes able to reason not
nd events, but also about hypothetical or
abstract ones, Hence, It has the name formal Operational stage—the
period when the individual ca” »perate” on “forms” or representations.
With students at this level, the teacher Can pose hypothetical (or
contrary-to-fact) problems: “What if the world had never discovered
oll?” or “What if the first Eu in explorers had settled first in
California Instead of on the East Coast of the United States?” To answer
sath guestions, students must use hypothetical reasoning, meaning that
they must manipulate ideas that vary In several ways at once, and do so
entirely in their minds.
and the young woman in this video and notice the
ason hypothetically:
In the last of the
only about tanglb
Compare the child
difference in their abilities to re
The hypothetical reasoning that concerned Piaget primarily involved
scientific problems. His studies of formal operational thinking therefore
often look like problems that middle or high school teachers pose in
science classes. In one problem, for example, a young person is
presented with a simple pendulum, to which different amounts of weight
tan be hung (Inhelder & Piaget, 1958). The experimenter asks: "What
determines how fast the pendulum swings: the length of the string
holding it, the weight attached to it, or the distance that it is pulled to
the side?”
erson is not allowed to solve this problem by trial-and-error
t must mentally reason a way to the
he or she must imagine varying each
the other factors that are held
cility at manipulating mental
id actions—precisely the skill
The young p
with the materials themselves, bul
solution. To do so systematically,
factor separately, while also imagining
constant. This kind of thinking requires fat
representations of the relevant objects an
that defines formal operations.
spect, students with an ability to think hypothetically
ge in many kinds of school work: by definition, they
"to solve problems. In this sense they can
who rely only on
As you might su:
have an advanta'
require relatively few ‘props’
in principle be more self-directed than students
concrete operations—certainly a desirable quality in the opinion of most
teachers. Note, though, that formal operational thinking is desirable—
but not sufficient for—solving all academic problems, and is far from
being the only way that students achieve educational
thinking skills do not ensure that a student is motivated or well-
behaved, for example, nor does they guarantee other desirable skills,
such as ability at sports, music, or art, The fourth stage in Piaget's
theory is really about a particular kind of formal thinking: the kind
| success. Formalneeded to solve scientific problems and devise scientific
Sree TRenY people'de nat normally deal with such problems in the
Rormal course of their lives, it should be no surprise that research
that many people never achieve or use formal thinking fully or
consistently, or that they use it only in selected areas with
are very familiar (Case & Okomato, 1996). For teachers, the
Of Piaget's ideas suggest a need for additional theories about
development—ones that focus more directly on the social and
interpersonal issues of childhood and adolescence. The next
describe some of these.eochonrrrrtn
i
Be ae
Dose Waaad
sero sgcoi
r
Maslow's hierarchy of needs
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs is a theory by Abraham Maslow, which puts
forward that people are motivated by five basic categories of needs:
physiological, safety, love, esteem, and self-actualization.
Key Takeaways: Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
= According to Maslow, we have five categories of needs:
physiological, safety, love, esteem, and self-actualization.
In this theory, higher needs in the hierarchy begin to emerge
when people feel they have sufficiently satisfied the previous
need.
Although later research does not fully support all of Maslow’s
theory, his research has impacted other psychologists and
contributed to the field of positive psychology.
What Is Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs?
In order to better understand what motivates human
beings, Maslow proposed that human needs can be organized into a
hierarchy. This hierarchy ranges from more concrete needs such as food
and water to abstract concepts such as self-fulfillment. According to
Maslow, when a lower need is met, the next need on the hierarchy
becomes our focus of attention.
These are the five categories of needs according to Maslow:Physiological
like drinking when thirsty or eatin
ic physical needs Y or eating
Tse refer to as ng, to Maslow, some of these needs involve our
Beate ae J for homeostasis; that is, maintaining
forts to meet the body's nee‘ ntain
Boia levels in different bodily systems (for example, maintaining a
body temperature of 98.6°).
i hysiological needs to be the most essential of our
i a Ras aie 8 Mee in more than one need, they're likely to try
to meet these physiological needs first. For example, if someone is
extremely hungry, it’s hard to focus on anything else besides food.
Another example of a physiological need would be the need for adequate
sleep.
Safety
Once people's physiological requirements are met, the next need that
arises is a safe environment. Our safety needs are apparent even early
in childhood, as children have a need for safe and predictable
environments and typically react with fear or anxiety when these are not
met. Maslow pointed out that in adults living in developed nations,
safety needs are more apparent in emergency situations (e.g. war and
disasters), but this need can also explain why we tend to prefer the
familiar or why we do things like purchase insurance and contribute to a
savings account.
Love and Belonging
According to Maslow, the next need in the hierarchy involves feeling
loved and accepted. This need includes both romantic relationships as
well as ties to friends and family members. It also includes our need to
feel that we belong to a social group. Importantly, this need
encompasses both feeling loved and feeling love towards others.
Since Maslow’s time, researchers have continued to explore how love
and belonging needs impact well-being. For example, having social
connections is related to better physical health and, conversely, feeling
isolated (i.e. having unmet belonging needs) has negative consequences
for health and well-being,2
Esteem+ esteem needs involve the desire to feel good about ourselves.
Aassralilg to Maslow, esteem needs include two components. The first
Involves feeling self-confidence and feeling good about oneself. The
second component involves feeling valued by others; that is, feeling that
surachievements and contributions have been recognized by other
people. When people's esteem needs are met, they feel confident and
eee their contributions and achievements as valuable and important.
.em needs are not met, they may experience
However, when their este rein ma
what psychologist Alfred Adler called feelings of inferiority.”
Self-Actualization
Self-actualization refers to feeling fulfilled, or feeling that we are living
ne unique feature of self-actualization is that it
up to our potential. O'
looks different for everyone. For one person, self-actualization might
involve helping others; for another person, it might involve
achievements in an artistic or creative field. Essentially, self-
actualization means feeling that we are doing what we believe we are
meant to do. According to Maslow, achieving self-actualization
and his examples of famous self-actualized individuals
is relatively rare,
include Abraham Lincoln, Albert Einstein, and Mother Teresa.
How People Progress Through the Hierarchy of Needs
Maslow postulated that there were several prerequisites to meeting
these needs. For example, having freedom of speech and freedom of
expression or living in a just and fair society aren’t specifically
mentioned within the hierarchy of needs, but Maslow believed that
having these things makes it easier for people to achieve their needs.
In addition to these needs, Maslow also believed that we have a need to
learn new information and to better understand the world around us.
This is partially because learning more about our environment helps us
meet our other needs; for example, learning more about the world can
help us feel safer, and developing a better understanding of a topic one
is passionate about can contribute to self-actualization. However,
Maslow also believed that this call to understand the world around us is
an innate need as well.
Although Maslow presented his needs in a hierarchy, he also
acknowledged that meeting each need is not an all-or-nothing
phenomenon. Consequently, people don't need to completely satisfy one
need in order for the next need in the hierarchy to emerge, Maslow
suggests that, at any given time, most people a to have each of theirneeds lower on the hierarchy are typically
—and thal
needs partly met—and t he most progress towards.
the ones that people have made t
it that one behavior might meet t
Additionally, Maslow pointed ou! al wo oF
ite fake: For example, sharing a meal with someone meets the
physiological need for food, but it might also meet the need of
imi id caregiver would provid
belonging. Similarly, working as 2 pal Provide
Berreone ith inestns (which allows them to pay for food and shelter),
but can also provide them a a sense of social connection and fulfillment.
Erik Erikson’s 8 Stages Of Psychosocial Development
By
Saul Mcleod, PhD
Updated on
May 1, 2023
Reviewed by
Olivia Guy Evans
Erikson maintained that personality develops in a predetermined order
through eight stages of psychosocial development, from infancy to
adulthood. During each stage, the person experiences a psychosocial
crisis which could have a positive or negative outcome for personality
development.
For Erikson (1958, 1963), these crises are of a psychosocial nature
because they involve psychological needs of the individual (i.e., psycho)
conflicting with the needs of society (i.e., social).
According to the theory, successful completion of each stage results in a
healthy personality and the acquisition of basic virtues. Basic virtues are
characteristic strengths which the ego can use to resolve subsequent
crises.
Failure to successfully complete a stage can result in a reduced ability to
complete further stages and, therefore, a more unhealthy personality
and sense of self. These stages, however, can be resolved successfully
at a later time. 4| | Developmental |
Stage tieure) ‘Task Description |
| Z [nae ae |
Trust (or mistrust) that basic |
1 o-1 Trust vs. mistrust | Needs, such as nourishment and)
| affection, will be met |
| | |
i Autonomy VS: | Develop a sense of independence |
1-3 | shame/doubt in many tasks
|
Take initiative on some activities—
; may develop guilt when |
3 3-6 _| Initiative vs. 9UlE_ | unsuccessful or boundaries
overstepped |
|
| “ Pe
Develop self-confidence in abilities |
4 7-11 an ve: when competent or sense of
| ! y inferiority when not |
| — =
| Identity vs. | Experiment with and develop
5 12-18 |
| confusion identity and roles |
— = — — =!
6 19-29 Intimacy vs. Establish intimacy and
isolation relationships with others
7 30-64 Contribute to society and be part
| stagnation of a family
8 Son | Integrity vs. Assess and make sense of life and
| despair meaning of contributions
peerbar f
Stage 1: Trust Versus Mistrust
r af ¥ iIn the first stage of Erikson’s
psychosocial model, infancy is crucial to our psychosocial development.
During our initial 18 months, we are uncertain about the world in which
we find ourselves and must develop basic trust.
After all, we are entirely reliant on our caregivers for warmth, love,
stability, and nurturing. If reliable and predictable, we gain confidence, a
sense of security, and a feeling of safety in the world (Syed & McLean,
2018).
If care is inconsistent and unreliable, then trust will fail. For example,
when caregivers reject us, fail to meet our needs, or are emotionally
detached, we may conclude that we cannot rely on adults.
Failure in stage one results in the development of fear, mistrust,
suspicion, anxiety, and, ultimately, a belief that the world is
unpredictable. We may become anxious, believing we have no control or
influence on our environment.
A good balance between trust and mistrust means We remain open to
experience and yet aware of the potential for danger. After all, it is
unlikely and ill advised for a child to become entirely trusting or entirely
lacking in trust.
Success within stage one leads to the virtue of hope - the sense that
whatever crisis we meet, there will be someone around to provide
support and help.
Stage 2: Autonomy Versus Shame and Doubtuses on early childhood 4 18 months to three years -
ndependence and an increased perception of
‘al skills (Erikson, 1958, 1963). me
Stage two foc
when we are gaining i
contro! over our physic
Though early on in development, we begin to develop a heightened
sense of personal control and acquire feelings of independence.
Typically around this time, parents, teachers, and caregivers begin
giving children some degree of choice, letting them perform actions on
their own. Therefore, we become increasingly mobile and develop
physically, asserting our independence, putting on clothes, and playing
with other children and toys.
According to Erikson, potty training is crucial to learning physical control
and, ultimately, the development of autonomy.
Success over bodily functions and taking control of simple choices leads
to a sense of personal power, feelings of autonomy, increased
independence, and a greater sense of being able to survive in the world.
During stage two, parents should expect and encourage their child to
explore limits, gently stretching them, while avoiding criticism when
they fail. The resulting feeling of security and confidence are crucial for
our progress in subsequent stages and leads to the virtue of will.
However, if we are overly criticized and controlled, or prevented from
asserting ourselves, we may feel unable to survive, lacking in self-
teem, and excessively dependent on others. Indeed, feeling a sense
of shame over toilet accidents can impact our sense of personal control
and increase levels of doubt.
An appropriate balance between shame, doubt, and autonomy is
essential to the virtue of will - the child believing they can act with
intention, rather than experience a sense of inadequacy and doubt.
Stage 3: Initiative Versus Guiltro. Erikson’s third stage of
psychosocial development occurs during preschool, between the ages of
three and five years.
At this point in our psychosocial development - when conflict occurs
between initiative and guilt - we learn to assert ourselves and typically
begin to direct play and social interactions.
To our parents, our behavior may seem vigorous, overly assertive, or
even aggressive, and yet we are exploring our interpersonal skills.
If overly restricted from such exploration ~ either by parental control or
through increased criticism - we can develop a sense of guilt. Similarly,
while constant questioning in this stage can be tiring at times, if it is
curtailed by caregivers, we may see ourselves as a nuisance, inhibiting
our interactions with others.
And yet, if we are successful in stage three, we learn to feel capable,
secure, and able to use our initiative.
If we fail, we may suffer guilt and self-doubt and become less likely to
lead.
Success in stage three is vital to building the virtue of purpose as
opposed to feelings of guilt. However, a balance between initiative and
guilt remains key to developing a healthy mindset.
Stage 4: Industry Versus Inferiority
In stage four of Erikson’s psychosocial theory - ages 5 to 12 years - we
are immersed in a world of education, learning to read, write, and solve
math puzzles (Erikson, 1958, 1963).
Teachers play an essential role in our continued growth within this
stage. At the same time, peer groups and social interactions are
increasingly relevant in the development of our self-esteem, and
feelings of pride arise as we successfully perform or complete tasks.Indeed, winning approval is @ motivating factor, and we soon learn to
associate it with displaying specific competencies valued by our peers
and adults.
Over these years, demands on us increase considerably; it becomes
essential for us to learn how to handle the many social and academic
expectations (Syed & McLean, 2018).
If successful, development leads to the virtue of competence, while
failure can result in a sense of inferiority, where we feel unable to
perform specific skills.
Balance in stage four leads to a sense of accomplishment and
competence, and we start to believe in our ability to handle existing and
novel situations.
Indeed, learning to fail can be a crucial element in our maturation -
leading to the development of modesty - while success meets our
basic psychological need for feelings of competence (Ryan & Deci,
2018).
Stage 5: Identity Versus Role Confusion
\ Teenage years can be daunting,
both to the adolescents and parents.
New opportunities, experiences, and changes to the body and mind in
stage five are crucial to our sense of who we are and have a
considerable bearing on our adult years.
These formative years - ages 12 to 18 - provide a valuable adil
depth exploration of beliefs, goals, and values while searching for
personal identity and a sense of self,
The transition between childhood and adulthood is crucial. We become
increasingly independent and begin to consider careers, family, friends,
and our place in society,h stage of
According to Erikson (1963), the fift '9¢ of Psychosocial development
exists “between the morality learned by the child, and the ethics to be
developed by the adult.”
As such, it is vital for young adults to learn the roles that we may adopt
once mature - including sexually ~ aS our body image transforms.
Success leads to the belief that we are staying true to who we are,
expressed by virtue of fidelity. Erikson claims that we grow into our
bodies and begin to form our identity as a result of our ongoing
explorations. And, with appropriate encouragement and reinforcement,
we move toward increasing independence and a stronger sense of
control and self (Marcia, 2010).
Otherwise, our inability to create a sense of identity within society
(“Who am I? I don’t know what I want to do when I am older”) results
in confusion and a poor sense of self. This failure can only lead to
insecurity and unsureness of ourselves, our future, and where we fit.
Success in stage five, according to Erikson, leads to fidelity - alignment
with the standards and expectations of the social group to which we
belong. After all, our conscious sense of self results from this social
interaction and is crucial in our balance between identity and confusion.
Ultimately identity provides us with our integrated sense of self -
avoiding identity crisis - that will last throughout our lives, guiding how
we behave and what we believe.
Download 3 Free Positive Psychology Exercises (PDF)
Enhance wellbeing with these free, science-based exercises that draw on
the latest rae from positive psychology.
Stage 6: Intimacy Versus Isolation
As young adults, we are motivated to explore personal relationships and
our desire to form intimate relationships.
In the sixth stage of Erikson’s psychosocial development theory, young
adulthood takes place between the ages of 18 and 40. During this time,
major conflict can arise as we attempt to form longer term
commitments outside of our family, with varying degrees of success.outcomes result in healthy, happy relationships that
developing the virtue of love. Erikson’s (1963)
marks the ultimate success of stage six -
ful and lasting,
And yet, positive
are secure and enduring,
view is that the ability to love
when relationships are meaning!
Failure ~ whether beyond or within our control ~ to form appropriate
bonds or the avoidance of intimacy may result in loneliness, a sense of
isolation, and depression.
Those with a poor sense of self are typically emotionally isolated and
less committed to relationships.
The intimacy versus isolation stage builds upon the success or failure of
stage five. After all, a strong sense of personal identity is crucial to
developing relationships that are intimate and strong.
Stage 7: Generativity Versus Stagnation
f ‘a The seventh stage of psychosocial
development occurs between 40 and 65 years of age.
During middle adulthood, we display our need for longevity, not
necessarily in a physical sense, but as life’s continuation in our children
or the long-term impact we have on others.
We aim to make a mark on the world, to nurture things that will outlive
us. We may look for ways to be more productive and valuable to our
society, with an eye on the bigger picture.
Success is exemplified by virtue of care - the feeling of being useful in
life, accomplishing something, and contributing to society. We are proud
of who we are, what we have achieved, our children and who they have
become, and the strong relationship we have with our partner.
Failure looks quite different. We feel we have had little impact on the
world, failing to make that dent in the universe as the late Steve Jobs
described. If so, we feel unproductive, uninvolved, disillusioned, and
disconnected from the world in which we live.Stage 8: Integrity versus Despair
Unlike previous theories, Erikson’s Model Covered the entirety of life
‘rom the cradle to the grave."
Our final stage of psychosocial development takes us from 65 years of
age to death ~ known as maturity,
This stage is one of reflection. We slow down, are less productive, and
spend time reviewing our accomplishments throughout life.
Success is in the belief that we have achieved our goals and found
happiness, leading to the feeling of integrity, “a sense of coherence and
wholeness” (Erikson, 1982). We feel we have achieved much and are
ready to meet our end with a sense of peace, Success leads to the
virtue of wisdom - a sense of completeness,
On the other hand, failure may be experienced as despair and regret
over things not done, completed, or mistakes made. We are bitter about
the past and present, frightened about coming to the end of our life
without a sense of having lived well.
2.1 Cognitive Development: The Theory of Jean Piaget
Cognition refers to thinking and memory processes, and cognitive
development refers to long-term changes in these processes. One of the
most widely known perspectives about cognitive development is the
cognitive stage theory of a Swiss psychologist named Jean Piaget.
Piaget created and studied an account of how children and youth
gradually become able to think logically and scientifically.
Piaget believed that learning proceeded by the interplay of assimilation
(adjusting new experiences to fit prior concepts) and accommodation
(adjusting concepts to fit new experiences). The to-and-fro of these two
processes leads not only to short-term learning, but also to long-term
developmental change. The long-term developments are really the main
focus of Piaget’s cognitive theory.
After observing children closely, Piaget proposed that cognition
developed through distinct stages from birth through the end of
adolescence. By “stages” he meant a sequence of thinking patterns with
four key features:
1. The stages always happen in the same order. :