Dashboard / Subject / SUBJ889_SP222 / Sections

/ Check for Understanding quizzes - Simone / CFU Models of FR

Started on Thursday, 13 October 2022, 10:22 AM

State Finished
Completed on Thursday, 13 October 2022, 10:23 AM
Time taken 20 secs


Question 1
Correct
Marked out of 1.00

FR models 1
The Bruce and Young (1986) model of face recognition:
Select one or more:
Stands in contrast to Haxby, Hoffman & Gobbini’s (2000) neurological model
of face recognition
Is a connectionist model
Has independent processing paths for identity, expression and facial 
speech
Is most highly specified for familiar face recognition 

Is a heirarchical stage model 

Clearly indicates how low level face processing occurs 

The correct answers are:

Is a heirarchical stage model,
Has independent processing paths for identity, expression and facial speech,
Is most highly specified for familiar face recognition


Question 2
Not answered
Marked out of 1.00

FR models 2
Facial identity and facial expression are processed independently
Select one or more:
in line with Haxby, Hoffman & Gobbini’s (2000) neurological model of face
recognition
consistent with findings that face familiarity does not influence expression
recognition performance
as indicated by double dissociations with prosopagnosics and patients with
impaired expression recognition
in contradiction to what the Bruce and Young (1986) model predicts

The correct answers are:

as indicated by double dissociations with prosopagnosics and patients with
impaired expression recognition,
consistent with findings that face familiarity does not influence expression
recognition performance,
in line with Haxby, Hoffman & Gobbini’s (2000) neurological model of face
recognition


Question 3
Not answered
Marked out of 1.00

FR models 3
Haxby, Hoffman and Gobbini's (2000) neurological model of face recognition
Select one or more:
maps different aspects of face processing to different brain regions
is consistent with the Bruce and Young (1986) model of face recognition
has distinct pathways for the processing of identity and expression of faces
has distinct pathways for the processing of invariant and changeable aspects
of faces

The correct answers are:

has distinct pathways for the processing of invariant and changeable aspects of
faces,
has distinct pathways for the processing of identity and expression of faces,
is consistent with the Bruce and Young (1986) model of face recognition,
maps different aspects of face processing to different brain regions


Question 4
Not answered
Marked out of 1.00

FR Models 4
Which option accurately describes the contents of the stages of the Bruce and
Young (1986) model?

Image of
face Choose...
Semantic Choose...
information
Description Choose...
of face
Face
recognition Choose...
units
Names Choose...

The correct answer is:

Image of face → Low level visual properties of the face, a viewer centred image,
Semantic information → Information about who the person is and what they do
including occupation, relationships, etc,
Description of face → Visual information from an image that is invariant across
image change (e.g. expression or view),
Face recognition units → Visual and structural information pertaining to the face
stimulus,
Names → Name of the person


Question 5
Not answered
Marked out of 1.00

FR Models 5
Young, Hay and Ellis (1985) conducted a diary study of face recognition errors,
the results of which helped develop the stage structure of the Bruce and Young
(1986) model. Match each of the 4 error types to the component of the model it
supports.
Failure to
recognise
familiar
person, that
is, where a
perceived Choose...
face does
not match
up with a
face stored
in memory
Tip-of-the-
tongue
phenomenon
where all
details but Choose...
the name of
a person are
known
Erroneously
recognising
an unfamiliar Choose...
person as
someone
you know


Know a
person is
familiar but
cannot
identify who Choose...
they are or
how they are
known to
you

The correct answer is:

Failure to recognise familiar person, that is, where a perceived face does not
match up with a face stored in memory → Evidence for a stage that stores visual
face representations (FRUs),
Tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon where all details but the name of a person are
known → Evidence for semantic information and names being represented in
different stages,
Erroneously recognising an unfamiliar person as someone you know → Evidence
for the separation and link between FRUs and a stage with semantic information,
Know a person is familiar but cannot identify who they are or how they are known
to you → Evidence for FRUs and semantic information being represented in
different stages


Question 6
Not answered
Marked out of 1.00

FR models 6
The order of decision timing about faces from fastest to slowest is
Select one or more:
Familiarity, Semantic, Naming
Accounted for by both the IAC model and the Bruce & Young (1986) model of
face recognition
Familiarity, Naming, Semantic
Naming, Semantic, Familiarity

The correct answers are:

Familiarity, Semantic, Naming,
Accounted for by both the IAC model and the Bruce & Young (1986) model of face
recognition


Question 7
Not answered
Marked out of 1.00

FR models 7
Semantic priming effects in face recognition
Select one or more:
Occurs across domain
Are better explained by IAC model than the Bruce & Young (1986) model
Can occur within and across domain
Occur due to stronger links between FRUs and semantic information
Occur due to shared semantic information
Are all adequately explained by the Bruce & Young (1986) model

The correct answers are:

Occurs across domain,
Are better explained by IAC model than the Bruce & Young (1986) model,
Occur due to shared semantic information


Question 8
Not answered
Marked out of 1.00

FR models 8
The IAC model of face recognition
Select one or more:
Accounts for semantic priming
Is a connectionist model
Is a stage model
Accounts for cross-modal semantic priming
Is a face-space model
Improves on the Bruce & Young (1986) model of face recognition

The correct answers are:

Improves on the Bruce & Young (1986) model of face recognition,
Is a connectionist model,
Accounts for semantic priming, Accounts for cross-modal semantic priming


Question 9
Not answered
Marked out of 1.00

FR models 9
The links in the IAC model
Select one or more:
Are inhibitory within the pools of units
Are excitatory within the pools of units
Are excitatory between the pools of units
Are inhibitory between the pools of units

The correct answers are:

Are inhibitory within the pools of units,
Are excitatory between the pools of units


Question 10
Not answered
Marked out of 1.00

FR models 10
Patient PH (de Haan et al.,1987; Young et al., 1988) is a prosopagnosic who
cannot recognise faces but shows evidence of associative processing (eg, can
pair familiar faces, show normal name interference effects). The IAC model can
account for PH’s pattern of behaviour by
Select one or more:
Removing the connections between the FRUs and PINs
Weakening the connections between the FRUs and PINs
Weakening the connections within the pool of the FRUs
Weakening the connections between the PINs and SIUs

The correct answer is:

Weakening the connections between the FRUs and PINs