Project: Not Project no: Author: Materials Conert Name 15000 psi Reinforcement Name Grade 60 Cross-sections Name 2- Rectangle 2100, 450 DRM1 [[nJ==) StatiCa® fe E MPa} MPa} 345 278014 fy E Unit mass [MPa} [MPa] (gin 4137 1999380 7850 f51= 1000.0 10-4, f5¢ = 1000.0 to-4, Material Picture z 1 soon gsi oR: Mt g ~ 450Project: Not Project ne (a=) StatiCa” Author: ees Geometry z 1 10 ooo — L M1 100 “st Ls2 oto 1 200 3.0 400 300 00 Overview table Name Type Properties Position M1 Beam (55.60 m; Cross-section: 2 ©t opening Rectangular, W: 1.207: H:0.80m REMI: SMP 5: LS1 Line support X;Z (Pressure only); Local; L: 0.70m Mt: NI1, Edge 1; Part of edge; From beginning; X: 0.00 m LS2 Line support X;Z (Pressure only); Local;L:0.70m Mt: M1, Edge 1; Part of edge; From beginning; X: 4.90 m Loads SDL Low, LL LowProject: Not Project no: Author: DL L+U, SDL Up 780 27.0 ct,c2 287.0 32 c3,c4 205.0 so cs 205.0 9 Load case SDL Low - Permanent Line loads lame Begin N i] SOL Low 2a Load case LL Low - Variable Line loads Begin End Name ry 1) uw 46 End iM Direction 23. GlobalZ Direction 46 GlobalZ 246, 40.4 205.0 9 Position Mt: Edge 1 Whole length Position Mt: Edge 1 ‘Whole length [[aJ=F) StatiCa® Length [m) 5.60 Length Im 5.60Project: Not Project no: [[nJ==) StatiCa® ‘Author: ce sr in Load case DL L+U - Permanent Line loads Begin End Length Nam Direction Position “me KN] KN] rection esitio Im) “7a | copa M1: Edge 3 ou 780 78.0 GlobalZ hon oe 560 Load case SDL Up - Permanent Line loads Begin End rect i Length Narn Direction Position fame x] KN] rection sition tr] 4 . obal Mi: Eage 3 soLUPt 1270 127.0 Global Z Who oe 560 Combination Namo Type Content cr us 1.40°SDL Low + 1.40°DL L+U + 1.40°SDL Up co us 1.20°SDL Low + 1.60°LL Low + 1.20°DL LU + 1.20°S0L Up 63 SLS-Crack with SOL Low + LL Low + DL L+U + SOL Up C4 SLS- Deflection SOL Low + LL Low + DL L+U + SDL Up 65 SLS- Crack wiath + Deflection SOL Low + LL Low+ DL L+U + SDL Up Reinforcement ‘Scheme of reinforcement Concrete: 5000 psi; Steel: Grade 60Project: Not Project no: StatiCa® Author: — Results Summary Overview table Check item Combination Increment Item us ct 610.0% Strength of concrete 7) Check item Item Utiization Strength of concrete ma aclac,im: 95.2% 7) Strength of reinforcement Skin bot tsles,im: 0.4%, osfasim: 42.4% 7) Anchorage length Skin bot Tod: 99.9% °° sis c3 (LT) 610.0%, V100.0% Crack width oO Check item Combination Increment Criticalcheck tem ——_Utlization Crack width c3 (LT) G100.0%, V100.0% ‘wil Skin bold 43.3% oO ULS - Summary Stress flow 1b / fod Cl 100. oso Al os /os,lim I 100.6 30.0 00.0 40.0 200 oo oc /oc,lim oa oo 200 406 60.0 20.0 100.0 Avove ils Compression Explanation Yl | Thickness proportional farce ‘Summary of reactions and applied loads: C1, Load increment: G100.0% Fy FE My, kN) [kN] {kN ‘Summary of reactions 00 16252 4550.6 ‘Summary of applied load 00 1625.2 4550.6 Check of equilibrium oo 00 00 TypeProject: Not Project no: StatiCa’ Proect ———— ULS - Strength Detailed concrete strength results: C1, Load increment: G100.0% « eae Member a ra [MPa] t “en mi 075 0.00 “88 84 1.00 952 0K mi 1950.00 00 00s 00 OK Detailed reinforcement strength results: C1, Load increment: G100.0% Member mo Ma) tte ona “ai” skin bot2 oa 035577 38 424 04 OK Skin bott 030 = 0701505 32 404 03 OK sti 10 = 00st 2a 543 03 OK Skin bott 199035122 23 355 02 OK TOP Rebar 2351.00 423 24 14 02 ok sta 22021 1705 20 458 02 oK kin bot2 059 000 259 43 69 01 ok 80 Rebar ose 095 456 10 123 01 OK Skin bots 187070 928 os 249 00 ok TOP Reber om 4.00 ou 03 a4 00 ok kin bot3 230 0.00 sia 03 138 00 OK Concrete stress/strength ratio. oc / acim i oz o73 703 me es 555 a8 397 317 238 158 7 00Project: Not Project no: [[aJ=F) StatiCa® hath ce sr in Conerete principal stress (MPa) CConerete principal strain ¢¢ ec tea) 09 a2 25 38 50 63 75 38 10.0 13 125 138 “154Project: Not | Project no: (a=) StatiCa® Author: ce sr in Directions of principal stresses Compressive strength reduction factor ke2 ke2 8 4.00 992 083 075 067 058 050 042 033 025 oar 0.08 0.00Project: Not | Project no: [[al=) StatiCa® Author: Reinforcement strain/imit strain ratio ttm [%) Reinforcement stress/strength ratio - 64/65,uim [%)Project: Not Project no: [[nJ==) StatiCa® Author: —= Reinforcement stress - 0, [MPa] 42.3 MP 102.1 MPa Reinforcement strain -¢, [10-4] 61e4 anProject: Not Project no: [[nJ==) StatiCa® Author: —— ULS - Anchorage Detailed anchorage results: C1, Load increment: G100.0% Member x z » Fa Frot FeotFiim Tolfpa im im MPa] [kN] KN] Pal (6) ‘Skin bot3 on 0.00 18 64 54 37 999 OK ‘Skin bot3 oss 0.00 07 64 40 ar 368 OK ‘Skin bot3 2.30 0.00 00 64 203 181 21 OK ‘Skin bot3 059 0.00 06 64 102 69 338 OK ‘Skin bot3 2.18 0.00 08 64 184 205 414 OK stt 010-033 24 03 450 478 999 OK stt 010 -1.00 24 03 45 48 999 OK sti 0.10 0.03 o4 03 512 543 34 0K sti 010-088 02 03 73 17 10.0 OK ‘Skin bot2 065-035 18 280 443, 672 99.9 0k ‘Skin bot 0120.36 13 280 213 148 688 OK ‘Skin bot2 047 0.36 03 280 624 ns 156 OK ‘Skin bot2 348 -0.36 00 28.0 06 04 04 0k ‘kin bot2 053-036 14 280 55.4 ns 740 OK sta 2.20 0.88 22 142 120 tar 14 OK st2 220-003 14 142 345 36.6 58.0 OK sta 2.20 0.21 0014.2 43.2 45.8 49 0K sta 520-082 01 142 64 65 27 OK ‘Skin bot 1.00 0.35 18 83 TZ ne 999 OK ‘Skin botd 0.50 0.35 “4 83 164 108 624 OK ‘Skin botd 1.99 0.35 00 83 524 355 03 0K ‘Skin botd 075 0.35 04 83 12 08 62 0K ‘Skin bot os9 070 18 237 335 437 999 OK ‘Skin bot 012-070 1837 363 2468 975 OK ‘Skin bot 030-070 02 aT 596 497 93. OK ‘Skin bot 224 070 0087 13 os 12 0K ‘Skin bot oat 0.70 10 237 a5 523 534 OK ‘Skin bot6 261 0.70 12 104 180 122 636 OK ‘Skin bot6 1.43 0.70 08 104 "7 a0 459 OK ‘Skin bot6 1.87 0.70 01 104 367 249 54 OK ‘Skin bot6 317 0.70 00 104 36 24 03 0K BOT Rebar 012-095 09 386 520 72 588 OK BOT Rebar 216 -1.00 07 386 820 114 450 0K BOT Rebar 062 0.95 02 38.6 88.3 123 117 0K BOT Rebar 500 -1.00 4 386-801 42 95 0k TOP Rebar 41.36 4.00 07 140 236 33 34.5 OK TOP Rebar 031 4.00 04 140 30.5 42 232 OK TOP Rebar 0.74 1.00 00 140 60.1 84 1.8 0K TOP Rebar 2.38 1.00 oo 14.0 818 14 130KProject: Not Project no: [[aJ=F) StatiCa® ‘Author: ce sr in Bond stress check value -ty/fug [%] Force check value - Fo¢Fiim (%1Project: Not Project no: [[nJ==) StatiCa® ‘Author: eer i Total force in the bar - Ftot [KN] 438 Bond stress - 15 [MPa] Settings Creep coefficient ‘Type of input Creep coefficient Input by user 25Project: Not Project no: Author: SLS - Crack Detailed crack results: C3, Load increment: G100.0%, V100.0%, wyim=0-300 mm. Member ‘Skin bots st2 st ‘Skin bot! ‘Skin bot2 BOT Rebar ‘Skin bots ‘Skin bots Skin bot3 TOP Rebar Intermediate crack results Member ‘Skin bot st2 sti Skin bott ‘Skin bot2 BOT Rebar ‘Skin bots ‘Skin botS ‘Skin bot3 TOP Rebar (res 00 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 x Im 131 220 0.10 0.30 oat 0.80 1.80 1.74 am 0.80 tte 2A 1 18 26 28 10 oa oa ou 02 z im [mm] 316 316 316 1 316 316 316 oa 0.38 0.33 0.21 -0.70 0.35 0.95 070 070 0.00 1.00 ° mm) 16 13 13 16 16 29 16 16 16 29 [mm 0.130 0.128 0.098 0.097 0.094 0.066 0.025 0.025 0.015 0.003 Pest va 1.24 1.03 1.03 1.24 4.24 4.02 1.24 1.24 1.24 4.02 ([[a]=E) StatiCa® vein (vl 433. OK 428. OK 327 OK 322 OK 314 OK 220 OK 84 OK 84 OK 5.41 OK 40 OK Wb It oD [mm] a a 0085 0530.00 007s 095187 007s 074487 0083 1040.00 0.080 1020.00 0017 0260.00 0013055 0.00 0013 086 0.00 0.004 0270.00 0.003181 0.00 Note: There are TCM intermediate values displayed in the table above, Adequate POM values are not avaliable in current version of the program. Crack width -w [mm]Project: Not Project no: Author: [[n]==) StatiCa® Crack width check w/wlim I 100.0 “= 90.0 oo SLS - Deflection Detailed deflection results: C4, Load increment: G100.0%, V100.0% x Zz Upet Usit Au, Us (rm) tm] [mm [mm] [mm [mm Mi 1.95 0.68 08 19 0.0 20. OK Mi 112 1.05 1.0 “04 440K Member Deflection (re oa 09 o4 02 04 08 os 09 “10 14 43 44 45 18 “7 18 20Project: Not | Project no: [[x]=F] StatiCa® ‘Author: ce sr in Bill of material toms numbering 6 ort eecement br Index. © [mm] Material Items Length [mm] Weight [kg] Total length [m] Ta [Samer ea # ni a : tose —, vane Shape ohm = Nbr ties 2 sat z Lon 56 went » ‘Total length (rm) 71.58Project: Not Proet no: (IEE) StatiCa’ sarametr Vans tape we 2 rm ts Lon nt ozs veo ha : ‘Total length [m] 5.55 inex : O [mm] a5 Number f tems 6 5 oe Length [mm] 4039, Weight [kg] 6 Total length [m] 24.23 © [mm] aS Number of items, 4 5537 3 Length (mm) 5814 Weight [ka] 9 ‘otal length (mn 23.26 Value Shape Index. 5 [mm] #4 Material Grade 60 Number of items 2 Length [mm] 5322 Weight ka] 5 ‘Total length {rm} 10.64 Parameter Value Index. 6 © [mm] te Material Grade 60 Number of items 12 Length {mm} 5322 Weight [ka] 5 ‘otal length {rn} 63.87Project: Not Project no: [x7] StatiCa” Author: “ . Overview table 9 tem] “4 # #9 Total length of © m] 7451 5303.71.58 Weight per meter of © [kgm] 1 2 5 Total weight of © fk] 1% 82 362 Total weight of bars [kg] 519 Volume of concrato 3} 4.06 Reinforcement weight per volumo unit of concrete [kom] 407 Explanation ‘Symbol Properties Position FeotFim Told Creep coefficient Pest Explanation Characteristic compressive cylinder strength of concrete at 28 days ‘Secant modulus of elasticity of concrete CCharacterstc yield strength of reinforcement W- Widtn; H- Height; T- Thickness; L- Length; r= Radius; a - Inclination M- Master; MP - Master point; IP - Insert point The extrome value of compressive stross ac of concrete of selected subregion. Minimum compressive strain of concrete cc Compressive strength reduction factor ke2 ‘The ratio of concrete stress and concrete strength. It presents the level of material utilization witn respect to concrete strength Maximum stress along the length of reinforcement bar. Maximum strain along the length of reinforcement bar. ‘The ratio of stress and strength of the reinforcement. It presents the level of material utilization with respect to reinforcement strength. The ratio of strain and limit strain ofthe reinforcement. It presents the level of material utlization with respect to limit strain Bond stress on the surface of reinforcement bar. ‘The anchorage force. Itis developed at the ends ofthe bars due to hooked anchorage. ‘Total force developed along the length of the bar. It consists of the anchorage force due to hooked anchorage and bbond force, which integrates bond stresses acting on the surface of the bar. The ratio of total force in the bar and limit value ofthe force, It presents the level of utlization of the rebar. The limit value of the force is calculated as the minimum of two values: (a) the force calculated as the sum of ultimate anchorage force and the force developed from the end of the bar to the point of interest assuming ultimate bond strength, (b) the ultimate strength ofthe bar. The ratio of bond stress and ultimate bond strength for selected (group of bars and applied portion of the load. It shows the level of utilization with respect to ultimate bond strength between the rebar and adjacent concrete. Final value of creep coefficient at time interval (t 28 days, inf = design working fe) Total crack width including effect of ereep. the mean strain in the conerete between cracks the mean strain in the reinforcement under relevant combination of loads, including the effect of imposed deformations and taking into account the effects of tension stiffening, Only the additional tensile strain beyond the state of zero strain of the concrete at the same level 's considered ‘mean value of axial tensile strength of concrete diameter of reinforcing bar effective reinforcement ratioProject: Not Project no: StatiCa® Author: “ . symbol Explanation ra caleulated crack wiath ®, inclination ofthe cracks (the angle between the global coordinate system and the crack direction) % bar inclination (the angle between the global coordinate system and the axis of enforcement bar) Vest Immediate deflection caused by otal load, calculated with shor-erm stinesses, ven Long-term effects of iong-term load Aue Deflection increment caused by variable load & Total detection including effec of cree. Calculation presumptions + Minimum amount of reinforcement resisting at least the tensile stresses prior cracking has to be provided in cracked zones. + tis assumed that a transverse rebar or adequate overlap Is provided to enable full anchorage of the stirrups. + The analysis and code checks are performed for support conditions as specified in the project. No change of supports in construction/service stages is considered. + Itis assumed that the user has included strength reduction factor (as ils inverted value) into the load factors of all combinations + The crack width is checked in the vicinity ofthe reinforcement only. No control of cracking is performed in non-reinforced + The presentation of crack spacing is schematic only. It does not represent the crack spacing computed for the calculations.