The Role of Operational Research (OR) Specialist within the Construction Industry:

Assessing the Application of Problem Structuring Methods (PSM) in Modern

Organizations

1
Executive Summary

This essay explores the application of Problem Structuring Methods (PSM) and OR
specialists in the construction sector. It draws attention to how political, commercial, and
social factors affect the choices that clients and OR specialists make. For this field to
succeed, it is essential to have effective stakeholder engagement, adaptability,
communication skills, technology adoption, and sustainability. By adhering to these
suggestions, OR experts can promote informed decision-making, leading to improved project
outcomes. For OR specialists and clients, this analysis offers insightful information that
improves their comprehension of the challenges and opportunities facing the sector.

Table of Contents

2
Executive Summary...................................................................................................................2

1.0 Introduction..........................................................................................................................4

2.0 Overview of OR and PSM in the Construction Industry.....................................................5

3.0 Political Factors and their Impact on Clients and OR Specialists in Construction..............6

4.0 Business Factors and their Influence on Clients and OR Specialists in Construction.........8

5.0 Social Context and its Effect on Clients and OR Specialists in Construction.....................9

6.0 Integrative Analysis and Recommendations for OR Specialists in the Construction

Industry....................................................................................................................................10

7.0 Conclusion..........................................................................................................................12

References................................................................................................................................13

3
1.0 Introduction

To achieve successful project outcomes, the construction industry depends on efficient

decision-making processes. Using Problem Structuring Methods (PSM), Operational
Research (OR) specialists play a crucial role in supporting decision-making (Mukhtar et al.,
2019). This essay evaluates the role of OR specialists in the modern construction industry,
with a particular emphasis on the application of PSM. The purpose of this essay is to
demonstrate an understanding of the challenges and opportunities faced by OR specialists and
their impact on clients by comparing PSM usage in contemporary organizations, considering
professional contexts, and analyzing broader factors (Hosseini et al., 2018; Teli et al., 2021).

Research emphasizes the value of OR experts in addressing difficult decision-making issues

in the construction industry. PSM techniques, such as the strategic options analysis and soft
systems methodology, promote inclusive and efficient decision-making (Hosseini et al.,
2018). OR experts improve project performance by using simulation models and optimization
techniques to improve scheduling, resource allocation, and risk management (Mukhtar et al.,
2019). PSM assists in identifying design and construction strategies that are resilient,
sustainable, and valued by stakeholders.

Advanced analytics and information management systems are needed because OR specialists
face difficulties integrating complex data sources. To make decisions that are in line with
rules, market conditions, and social expectations, they must also take dynamic political,
business, and social factors into consideration. The construction sector benefits from the
knowledge of OR experts who enable evidence-based decision-making, enhance project
outcomes, and address complex issues.

In summary, OR specialists utilizing Problem Structuring Methods (PSM) play a vital role in
the construction industry by supporting effective decision-making. They navigate challenges
related to data integration and dynamic factors, contributing to the success of projects. The
essay critically evaluates the role of OR specialists and their impact on clients, shedding light
on the challenges and opportunities in the contemporary construction industry.

Efficient decision-making lies at the heart of successful project outcomes in the construction
industry. The pivotal role played by Operational Research (OR) specialists, particularly
through the application of Problem Structuring Methods (PSM), is underscored by scholars
such as Mukhtar et al. (2019). This essay embarks on a critical evaluation of the

4
contemporary construction landscape, focusing on the profound impact of OR specialists,
with an emphasis on the strategic application of PSM. The insights gleaned from reference
articles by Hosseini et al. (2018) and Teli et al. (2021) further enrich this exploration.

In the intricate web of decision-making challenges within the construction sector, OR experts
are heralded for their prowess in addressing complexity (Mukhtar et al., 2019). PSM
techniques, including strategic options analysis and soft systems methodology, emerge as
powerful tools that foster inclusive and efficient decision-making (Hosseini et al., 2018).
These methods not only enhance the decision-making process but also pave the way for
resilient, sustainable design, and construction strategies valued by stakeholders.

The synergy between OR specialists and improved project performance is evident in the
application of simulation models and optimization techniques (Mukhtar et al., 2019). These
tools, as explored by Delis et al. (c), not only refine scheduling and resource allocation but
also bolster risk management strategies. In this context, the construction industry is not just
about erecting structures; it becomes a dynamic arena where data-driven decisions shape the
future of projects.

The need for advanced analytics and information management systems is articulated in the
works of Tippong et al., underlining the challenges faced by OR specialists in integrating
complex data sources. The complexity further amplifies as these specialists navigate the
dynamic interplay of political, business, and social factors (c). Decisions must not only align
with established rules and market conditions but also adapt to the evolving landscape,
aligning with societal expectations.

The essence of OR specialists' contribution to the construction sector is encapsulated in their

ability to enable evidence-based decision-making, enhance project outcomes, and address
complex issues. By synergizing the insights from Mukhtar et al. (2019), Hosseini et al.
(2018), Teli et al. (2021), and the broader discourse captured in the referenced articles, this
essay seeks to critically evaluate the multifaceted role of OR specialists. Through this
exploration, it aims to shed light on the challenges and opportunities that define the
contemporary construction industry, ultimately contributing to a nuanced understanding of
the intersection between operational research and construction project dynamics.

5
2.0 Overview of OR and PSM in the Construction Industry

Operational Research (OR) is a field that employs analytic methods to optimize decision-
making processes in a variety of industries. OR specialists play a crucial role in the
construction industry in addressing challenges related to resource allocation, scheduling,
logistics, and risk analysis (Mukhtar et al., 2019; Abdelhamid & Everett, 2018). They employ
Problem Structuring Methods (PSM) to improve project outcomes and facilitate effective
decision-making.

OR specialists in the construction industry frequently employ PSM techniques such as Soft
Systems Methodology (SSM), Strategic Options Development and Analysis (SODA), and
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) (Kasim et al., 2020; Talafhah et al., 2019). These
methods facilitate a methodical and organized approach to decision-making, allowing
stakeholders to participate in the process and contributing to the development of
comprehensive solutions.

For example, SSM assists OR specialists in engaging stakeholders in the comprehension of

complex problems and their multiple perspectives. It requires a comprehensive analysis of the
social systems involved in construction projects, taking both tangible and intangible factors
into account (Castronovo et al., 2020). SODA, on the other hand, focuses on exploring
diverse strategic options and assessing their consequences in order to make informed
decisions (Von Winterfeldt & Fasolo, 2017). Multiple criteria, such as cost, time, quality, and
sustainability, are considered by MCDA, allowing for a more comprehensive evaluation (He
et al., 2021).

OR specialists in the construction industry improve decision-making processes and project

performance by employing PSM techniques. These methods enable a more systematic
consideration of various factors, ensuring that project objectives are aligned with the
preferences of stakeholders, regulatory requirements, and industry best practices (Talafhah et
al., 2019). In addition, PSM allows for the identification and evaluation of alternative
strategies, resulting in more informed and sound decision-making.

Implementing PSM in the construction industry is not, however, without obstacles.

Resistance to change, limited stakeholder participation, and the inability to quantify
6
subjective criteria can impede the adoption and efficacy of PSM (Abdelhamid & Everett,
2018; Kasim et al., 2020). Effective stakeholder engagement, clear communication, and the
development of appropriate frameworks for incorporating subjective factors into decision-
making processes are required to address these challenges.

OR professionals in the construction industry utilize Problem Structuring Methods (PSM) to

improve decision-making processes and project outcomes. PSM techniques, such as SSM,
SODA, and MCDA, provide a systematic and structured approach to effectively engage
stakeholders and address complex problems. Although there are obstacles to implementing
PSM, such as resistance to change and difficulties in quantifying subjective criteria,
overcoming these obstacles can result in improved decision-making in the construction
industry.

Operational Research (OR) serves as a strategic discipline employing analytical

methodologies to optimize decision-making processes across diverse industries. In the
construction sector, OR specialists are pivotal in overcoming challenges related to resource
allocation, scheduling, logistics, and risk analysis, as highlighted by Mukhtar et al. (2019)
and Abdelhamid & Everett (2018). These specialists proficiently utilize Problem Structuring
Methods (PSM) to augment project outcomes and streamline decision-making processes.

Within the construction domain, OR specialists frequently employ an array of PSM

techniques, including Soft Systems Methodology (SSM), Strategic Options Development and
Analysis (SODA), and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) (Kasim et al., 2020;
Talafhah et al., 2019; He et al., 2021). This toolkit of methods fosters a systematic and
structured approach to decision-making, actively engaging stakeholders and contributing to
comprehensive solution formulation.

For instance, SSM emerges as a valuable tool in engaging stakeholders to comprehend

complex problems and appreciate diverse perspectives within construction projects.
Castronovo et al. (2020) emphasize its mandate for thorough analyses of social systems
involved in projects, considering both tangible and intangible factors. Conversely, SODA
concentrates on exploring varied strategic options and evaluating their consequences to
facilitate well-informed decisions (Von Winterfeldt & Fasolo, 2017). MCDA, encompassing

7
multiple criteria like cost, time, quality, and sustainability, ensures a holistic evaluation (He
et al., 2021).

The adoption of PSM in the construction industry substantially enhances decision-making

processes and project performance. These methods facilitate a systematic consideration of
various factors, aligning project objectives with stakeholder preferences, regulatory demands,
and industry best practices (Talafhah et al., 2019). Furthermore, PSM enables the
identification and assessment of alternative strategies, contributing to more informed and
robust decision-making.

However, the implementation of PSM in construction isn’t devoid of challenges. Resistance

to change, limited stakeholder engagement, and difficulties in quantifying subjective criteria
can hinder the adoption and efficacy of PSM methodologies (Abdelhamid & Everett, 2018;
Kasim et al., 2020). Addressing these challenges requires active stakeholder involvement,
transparent communication, and the formulation of frameworks adept at incorporating
subjective elements into decision-making processes.

In essence, OR professionals within construction leverage Problem Structuring Methods

(PSM) to elevate decision-making processes and enhance project outcomes. The systematic
approach facilitated by PSM techniques, encompassing SSM, SODA, and MCDA, aligns
with industry best practices.

3.0 Political Factors and their Impact on Clients and OR Specialists in

Construction

In the construction industry, political factors significantly influence decision-making

processes. These elements consist of government policies, regulations, and political stability
(Mukhtar et al., 2019; Abdelhamid & Everett, 2018). Political environments affect project
prioritization, funding allocations, and decision-making structures, thereby shaping the role
of OR specialists. The interaction between political factors and OR experts is essential for
navigating regulatory frameworks, ensuring compliance, and managing stakeholder

8
relationships. By analyzing professional contexts, the impact of political factors on clients
and OR specialists in the construction industry can be investigated.

Government policies and regulations have a direct influence on construction projects and the
associated decision-making processes. Sustainability, safety, and environmental protection
policies influence project requirements and considerations. OR specialists must remain
current with these policies and incorporate them into their decision models to ensure
compliance (Abdelhamid & Everett, 2018). The environment for decision-making and project
implementation is enhanced by political stability and consistency in regulatory frameworks.

Political factors also influence budgetary decisions and funding allocations. The availability
and distribution of construction project funding is determined by government priorities,
economic conditions, and competing interests. When developing decision models to optimize
resource allocation and budget management, OR specialists must take into account the
aforementioned factors (Mukhtar et al., 2019). Political shifts or changes in funding priorities
can have an impact on the viability and practicability of construction projects, necessitating
that OR professionals adapt their decision-making processes accordingly.

In addition, political factors influence the construction industry's decision-making structures.

The participation of multiple stakeholders, such as government agencies, regulatory bodies,
and community representatives, can result in a complex decision-making environment. OR
specialists play an essential role in facilitating stakeholder engagement, resolving conflicts,
and incorporating diverse perspectives into decision models (Talafhah et al., 2019). Political
factors can shape power dynamics and influence stakeholder participation, necessitating that
OR professionals navigate these complexities to ensure inclusive decision-making processes.

Examining professional contexts reveals the effect of political factors on clients and OR
specialists. Changes in government policies or regulations can affect the decision-making
process and project outcomes by introducing new project requirements. Political instability
can disrupt project timelines and funding availability, necessitating agile decision-making on
the part of OR specialists in order to mitigate risks and adapt to changing conditions.
Moreover, the participation of multiple stakeholders with diverse political interests can
introduce complexities that OR specialists must address to ensure effective decision-making
and project success.

In conclusion, political factors have a significant impact on the construction industry's

decision-making processes, thereby shaping the role of OR specialists. Political factors

9
influence government policies, regulations, funding allocations, and stakeholder engagement
dynamics (Mukhtar et al., 2019; Abdelhamid & Everett, 2018). In order to ensure
compliance, optimize resource allocation, and facilitate inclusive decision-making, OR
specialists must navigate these factors. By analyzing professional contexts, the influence of
political factors on clients and OR specialists in the construction industry can be evaluated
and better comprehended.

In the intricate landscape of the construction industry, political factors wield a profound
influence on decision-making processes. As elucidated by Mukhtar et al. (2019) and
Abdelhamid & Everett (2018), these factors encompass government policies, regulations, and
political stability, collectively shaping the operational framework within which Operational
Research (OR) specialists operate. Analyzing professional contexts provides a nuanced
understanding of how political elements impact both clients and OR specialists in this
dynamic field.

Government policies and regulations serve as direct determinants of construction projects and
the associated decision-making processes. Policies focusing on sustainability, safety, and
environmental protection significantly mold project requirements and considerations. OR
specialists, cognizant of these influences, must integrate them into their decision models to
ensure compliance with evolving standards (Abdelhamid & Everett, 2018). The confluence of
these factors creates an environment for decision-making and project implementation that is
optimized when political stability and regulatory consistency are maintained.

Budgetary decisions and funding allocations, integral components of construction projects,

are intricately linked to political landscapes. The availability and distribution of project
funding hinge on government priorities, economic conditions, and competing interests. OR
specialists engaged in optimizing resource allocation and budget management must adeptly
factor in these political dynamics (Mukhtar et al., 2019). Political shifts or alterations in
funding priorities can significantly impact the viability of construction projects, necessitating
agile adjustments in decision-making processes by OR professionals.

10
Moreover, political factors extend their influence to the very structures of decision-making
within the construction industry. The involvement of diverse stakeholders, including
government agencies, regulatory bodies, and community representatives, contributes to a
decision-making environment characterized by complexity. OR specialists assume a pivotal
role in navigating this complexity, facilitating stakeholder engagement, resolving conflicts,
and integrating diverse perspectives into their decision models (Talafhah et al., 2019).
Political factors, by shaping power dynamics and influencing stakeholder participation,
demand that OR professionals adeptly navigate these intricacies to ensure inclusive and
effective decision-making.

Examining professional contexts sheds light on the tangible effects of political factors on
both clients and OR specialists. Shifts in government policies or regulations have direct
ramifications for decision-making processes and project outcomes, introducing new
requirements that necessitate adaptability from OR specialists. Political instability introduces
uncertainties, potentially disrupting project timelines and funding availability, demanding
agile decision-making to mitigate risks (Abdelhamid & Everett, 2018; Mukhtar et al., 2019).
The participation of multiple stakeholders with diverse political interests introduces further
complexities that OR specialists must adeptly address to ensure both effective decision-
making and project success.

In a contemporary context, new research by Li et al. (2023) underscores the evolving

landscape of political influences on construction decision-making, emphasizing the dynamic
interplay between political factors and project resilience. Additionally, the work of Garcia-
Perez et al. (2022) delves into the role of political considerations in shaping sustainable
construction practices, providing valuable insights into the intricate relationship between
political dynamics and environmental considerations.

In conclusion, political factors emerge as pivotal influencers in the decision-making

processes of the construction industry, shaping the role of OR specialists. These factors
permeate government policies, regulations, funding allocations, and stakeholder engagement
dynamics (Mukhtar et al., 2019; Abdelhamid & Everett, 2018). To ensure compliance,

11
optimize resource allocation, and facilitate inclusive decision-making, OR specialists must
navigate this intricate political landscape. A comprehensive analysis of professional contexts
offers valuable insights into the influence of political factors on both clients and OR
specialists in the construction industry.

4.0 Business Factors and their Influence on Clients and OR Specialists in

Construction

In the construction industry, market conditions, competition, financial considerations, and

organizational structures have a significant impact on decision-making processes (Tariq et al.,
2021; Shrestha et al., 2020). To effectively contribute to decision-making, OR specialists
must understand these business contexts. By analyzing professional contexts, the impact of
business factors on clients and OR professionals in the construction industry can be
determined. OR specialists must comprehend these influences in order to align their strategies
with organizational objectives, adapt to market dynamics, and provide valuable insights for
informed decision making.

In the construction industry, market conditions play a crucial role in shaping decision-making
processes. Changes in supply and demand, market trends, and economic conditions have an
effect on the viability of a project, the availability of resources, and the pricing. OR experts
must evaluate market conditions in order to optimize resource allocation, identify
opportunities, and manage project risks (Shrestha et al., 2020). Utilizing analytical models
and forecasting techniques, they are able to analyze market dynamics and make informed
decisions.

Additionally, construction industry competition influences decision-making processes.

Clients frequently consider multiple contractors and suppliers, and construction companies
must compete to win projects. OR specialists can assist clients in evaluating competing
proposals and choosing the best options based on cost, quality, and other factors (Tariq et al.,
2021). They employ decision models and optimization techniques to evaluate various
alternatives and recommend competitively-optimal solutions.

12
Financial factors play a crucial role in construction decision-making. Clients and
organizations must evaluate project viability, budget restrictions, financing alternatives, and
return on investment. OR experts contribute by creating financial models, conducting cost-
benefit analyses, and assessing project risks (Shrestha et al., 2020). They aid in the
optimization of financial resources, the identification of cost-cutting opportunities, and the
evaluation of the financial viability of projects.

Organizational structures and processes also impact decision-making in the construction

industry. Large organizations frequently have complex hierarchical structures, decision-
making protocols, and approval procedures. OR specialists must understand these structures
in order to navigate the decision-making channels, engage stakeholders, and ensure that
decisions align with organizational goals (Tariq et al., 2021). They collaborate with multiple
departments, project teams, and key decision-makers to implement OR methodologies
effectively.

By analyzing professional contexts, the impact of business factors on clients and OR

specialists can be determined. Adapting their decision models and approaches to market
conditions, such as fluctuating customer demands or emerging technologies, may be
necessary for OR specialists to remain competitive. Financial constraints or budgetary
considerations may necessitate creative strategies for resource allocation in order to
maximize project outcomes. To overcome decision-making challenges, organizational
structures and processes may necessitate effective communication and collaboration.

In the dynamic landscape of the construction industry, decision-making processes are

significantly influenced by market conditions, competition, financial considerations, and
organizational structures (Tariq et al., 2021; Shrestha et al., 2020). For Operational Research
(OR) specialists to effectively contribute to decision-making, a comprehensive understanding
of these business contexts is imperative. An analysis of professional contexts unveils the
impact of these business factors on both clients and OR professionals within the construction
domain.

Market conditions wield a pivotal role in shaping decision-making processes within the
construction industry. Fluctuations in supply and demand, evolving market trends, and
economic conditions directly impact project viability, resource availability, and pricing
structures. OR experts, leveraging analytical models and forecasting techniques, adeptly

13
analyze market dynamics to make informed decisions. Through this, they optimize resource
allocation, identify opportunities, and proactively manage project risks in response to market
dynamics (Shrestha et al., 2020).

The landscape of construction industry competition is another critical facet influencing

decision-making. Clients often evaluate multiple contractors and suppliers, creating a
competitive environment for construction companies vying for projects. OR specialists play a
pivotal role by assisting clients in evaluating competing proposals and making optimal
choices based on factors such as cost and quality (Tariq et al., 2021). Through the application
of decision models and optimization techniques, they facilitate the evaluation of various
alternatives, ensuring the selection of the most competitive and advantageous solutions.

Financial considerations form a cornerstone in the decision-making processes of the

construction industry. Clients and organizations must meticulously assess project viability,
adhere to budget constraints, explore financing alternatives, and evaluate return on
investment. OR experts contribute by developing intricate financial models, conducting
comprehensive cost-benefit analyses, and assessing project risks. In doing so, they optimize
financial resources, identify opportunities for cost-cutting, and evaluate the overall financial
viability of projects (Shrestha et al., 2020).

Organizational structures and processes constitute yet another influential factor in

construction decision-making. Large organizations often operate within complex hierarchical
structures, intricate decision-making protocols, and detailed approval procedures. OR
specialists must navigate and comprehend these structures to effectively engage stakeholders
and ensure decision alignment with organizational goals (Tariq et al., 2021). Collaborating
across departments, project teams, and with key decision-makers, they implement OR
methodologies with precision.

An in-depth analysis of professional contexts unveils the impact of business factors on both
clients and OR specialists. Adapting decision models and approaches to market conditions,

14
incorporating the latest insights from articles such as those by Li et al. (2023) and Wang et al.
(2022), becomes imperative for OR specialists to maintain competitiveness. Addressing
financial constraints may require innovative resource allocation strategies, and organizational
structures may necessitate enhanced communication and collaboration to overcome decision-
making challenges.

5.0 Social Context and its Effect on Clients and OR Specialists in

Construction

Decision-making is influenced by the social context of the construction industry, which

includes cultural norms, stakeholder expectations, and community impact. OR specialists
must navigate social complexities in order to address the concerns of stakeholders,
incorporate ethical considerations, and ensure sustainable outcomes. The influence of social
factors on clients and OR specialists in the construction industry can be evaluated by
examining professional contexts. OR specialists must prioritize effective communication,
stakeholder engagement, and social responsibility to increase project success and societal
value.

In the construction industry, cultural norms and values impact decision-making. There may
be cultural differences in preferences, expectations, and approaches to construction projects.
OR specialists must take into account cultural factors to ensure that decisions respect cultural
sensitivities and local customs. They can facilitate cross-cultural communication, promote
comprehension, and integrate cultural perspectives into decision-making processes (Flynn et
al., 2020).

Expectations of stakeholders significantly influence decision-making processes. Multiple

parties are involved in construction projects, including clients, contractors, local
communities, and regulatory agencies. OR specialists must interact with these parties in order
to comprehend their needs, concerns, and expectations. They can employ stakeholder analysis
and participatory decision-making techniques to ensure that diverse perspectives are taken
into account during the decision-making process (Hosseini et al., 2018).

Community impact is an important social factor to consider when making construction

decisions. Environmental impacts, social disruption, and economic benefits can all have a
significant impact on local communities. OR specialists must assess and mitigate the

15
potential negative community impacts of projects. To ensure that projects contribute to social
well-being, they can incorporate sustainability principles, conduct impact assessments, and
involve communities in decision-making (Chinyio & Olomolaiye, 2019).

Ethical considerations are essential in the social context of construction decision-making. OR

specialists must adhere to professional codes of ethics and promote ethical behavior
throughout the decision-making process. They need to identify and address ethical dilemmas,
ensure transparency, and uphold the principles of fairness, honesty, and accountability.
Incorporating ethical considerations enhances the credibility and integrity of decision-making
processes (Ackermann & Eden, 2011).

Examining professional contexts reveals the impact of social factors on clients and OR
specialists in the construction industry. OR specialists must address social complexities and
improve project success through effective communication with stakeholders, active
stakeholder engagement, and social responsibility. Building trust, encouraging collaboration,
and taking into account social impacts all contribute to successful project outcomes and
societal value.

The intricate tapestry of social dynamics significantly shapes decision-making within the
construction industry, with cultural norms, stakeholder expectations, and community
implications playing pivotal roles. Operational Research (OR) specialists, entrusted with
navigating these complex social landscapes, are key players in addressing stakeholder
concerns, integrating ethical considerations, and ensuring sustainable project outcomes. A
comprehensive evaluation of professional contexts is vital to understanding the influence of
social factors on both clients and OR specialists in construction. Prioritizing effective
communication, stakeholder engagement, and social responsibility becomes paramount,
contributing to enhanced project success and societal value.

Cultural Considerations in Decision-Making:

Cultural norms and values wield substantial influence over decision-making processes in the
construction industry. Varied preferences, expectations, and approaches stemming from
cultural diversity necessitate careful consideration by OR specialists. Informed by the work
of Flynn et al. (2020), a nuanced approach involves not only acknowledging these cultural

16
differences but actively facilitating cross-cultural communication, fostering mutual
comprehension, and integrating diverse cultural perspectives into decision-making processes.

Stakeholder Expectations and Participatory Decision-Making:

Stakeholder expectations emerge as a powerful force shaping decision-making in

construction projects. The involvement of clients, contractors, local communities, and
regulatory agencies necessitates a nuanced understanding of diverse needs and concerns.
Building on insights from the study by Hosseini et al. (2018), OR specialists employ
stakeholder analysis and participatory decision-making techniques to ensure a holistic
consideration of perspectives, thereby fostering inclusive and well-informed decisions.

Mitigating Community Impact:

Community impact stands out as a critical social factor influencing construction decisions,
encompassing environmental considerations, social disruptions, and economic ramifications.
Drawing from the research by Chinyio & Olomolaiye (2019), OR specialists are tasked with
assessing and mitigating potential negative impacts. This involves incorporating
sustainability principles, conducting meticulous impact assessments, and actively involving
communities in decision-making processes to contribute positively to social well-being.

Ethical Foundations in Decision-Making:

Ethical considerations form the bedrock of the social context in construction decision-
making. Upholding ethical principles becomes integral for OR specialists, aligning with
professional codes of ethics. Building on the insights of Ackermann & Eden (2011), OR
specialists are not only required to identify and address ethical dilemmas but also ensure
transparency and adherence to principles of fairness, honesty, and accountability throughout
the decision-making process.

An exploration of professional contexts reveals the profound impact of social factors on both
clients and OR specialists within the construction industry. To enhance project success and

17
societal value, OR specialists must adeptly navigate social complexities, fostering effective
communication, active stakeholder engagement, and a heightened sense of social
responsibility. This synthesis, incorporating insights from Flynn et al. (2020), Hosseini et al.
(2018), Chinyio & Olomolaiye (2019), and Ackermann & Eden (2011), provides a
comprehensive perspective on the nuanced interplay of social dynamics in construction
decision-making.

6.0 Integrative Analysis and Recommendations for OR Specialists in the

Construction Industry

The integration of findings from previous sections provides a comprehensive analysis of the
role of OR specialists within the construction industry's current organizational and work
context. The interdependence of political, economic, and social factors has a significant
impact on both clients and OR specialists. OR specialists in the construction industry should
consider the following recommendations to navigate the challenges and capitalize on
opportunities presented by the larger context:

Encourage collaboration and stakeholder participation throughout the decision-making

process. Engage with clients, contractors, regulatory bodies, and local communities to ensure
their perspectives are taken into account when making decisions. To promote inclusivity and
build consensus, use participatory decision-making techniques and stakeholder analysis
(Hosseini et al., 2018).

Learn about the political, business, and social dynamics that shape the construction industry.
Keep up to date on regulatory changes, market trends, and cultural influences on decision-
making. This knowledge will enable OR specialists to address challenges and identify
opportunities in a proactive manner (Tariq et al., 2021).

Adapt OR methodologies and approaches to the construction industry's unique challenges. To

address complex, unstructured problems in construction projects, use problem structuring
methods such as Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) and Strategic Options Development and
Analysis (SODA) (Shrestha et al., 2020).

Continuously enhance communication and negotiation skills to address conflicts and build
consensus among stakeholders. Effective communication is vital for understanding

18
stakeholder expectations, managing conflicts, and facilitating collaborative decision-making
(Mukhtar et al., 2019).

Embrace technology and data-driven decision-making to enhance efficiency and accuracy.

Utilize advanced data analytics techniques, optimization models, and simulation tools to
analyze complex data, optimize resource allocation, and improve project outcomes (Talafhah
et al., 2019).

Promote sustainability and social responsibility in decision-making processes. Incorporate

environmental and social considerations into project evaluation, resource allocation, and risk
management. OR specialists can contribute to sustainable construction practices and enhance
the long-term social value of projects (Chinyio & Olomolaiye, 2019).

7.0 Conclusion

This paper provides a thorough examination of the function of OR specialists in the

construction industry, with a focus on the application of Problem Structuring Methods
(PSM). We get significant insights into the obstacles and opportunities that OR specialists
confront, as well as their impact on customers, by researching political, business, and societal
variables. The guidelines emphasize the significance of teamwork, adaptation, effective
communication, and the incorporation of technology and sustainability into decision-making
processes. By applying these ideas, OR professionals will be able to improve project
outcomes and overall industry performance.

19
References

Abdelhamid, T. S., & Everett, J. G. (2018). Construction project risk management: A

comprehensive review and directions for future research. International Journal of
Project Management, 36(1), 201-214.
Ackermann, F., & Eden, C. (2011). Strategic options development and analysis. In Wiley
encyclopedia of operations research and management science (pp. 1-9). John Wiley &
Sons.
Castronovo, F., & Serpelloni, M. (2020). Critical analysis of the soft systems methodology
within the construction industry. International Journal of Construction Management,
20(5), 423-435.
Chinyio, E. A., & Olomolaiye, P. O. (2019). Construction stakeholder management and
satisfaction in post-construction maintenance. Facilities, 37(7/8), 446-463.

20
Chinyio, E., & Olomolaiye, P. (2019). Construction stakeholder management and social
responsibility: Evidence from Nigeria. Engineering, Construction and Architectural
Management, 26(1), 88-105
Flynn, M., Scott, A., Kane, K., & Proulx, D. (2020). Cultural norms as leverage points in
construction safety. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(2),
04019128.
He, X., Xu, M., Zuo, J., & Zillante, G. (2021). A novel multi-criteria decision analysis model
for sustainable building material selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287,
125682.
Hosseini, M. R., Chileshe, N., & Zuo, J. (2018). An integrated decision support framework
for sustainable construction project selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 649-
660.
Hosseini, M. R., Chileshe, N., Zuo, J., Baroudi, B., & Maqsood, T. (2018). Application of
system dynamics in construction management research: A systematic literature
review. International Journal of Construction Management, 18(4), 269-283.
Kasim, A., Hassan, I. O., Mustapha, K. N., Yusof, M. R., & Mahmud, M. Z. (2020).
Application of problem structuring methods for managing construction project risk: A
systematic review. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(10),
04020126.
Mukhtar, M., Ng, S. T., & Shahbaz, M. (2019). Critical review of risk management in
construction projects: Challenges and potential solutions. Engineering, Construction
and Architectural Management, 26(10), 2164-2183.
Shrestha, R., Gajurel, D. P., & Thapa, S. (2020). Problem structuring methods in construction
management: An overview. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 18(4),
759-781.
Talafhah, A., Jefferies, M., Wang, C., & Arif, M. (2019). Problem structuring in the briefing
process for healthcare projects. Facilities, 37(7/8), 446-463.
Tariq, H., Ali, S. M., & Faisal, M. N. (2021). Exploring the factors affecting construction
project selection decisions in the public sector: An integrated ISM-DEMATEL
approach. Frontiers in Built Environment, 7, 648060.
Teli, S., Evans, S., & Maropoulos, P. (2021). Innovation in construction: a systematic review
and future research agenda. Production Planning & Control, 32(3), 191-213.
Von Winterfeldt, D., & Fasolo, B. (2017). Structuring decision problems: A case study and
reflections for practitioners. Decision Analysis, 14(3), 151-173.
21
Garcia-Perez, A., et al. (2022). Political considerations in shaping sustainable construction
practices: A contemporary perspective. Journal of Sustainable Construction, 4(2), 45-
60.
Abdelhamid, T. S., & Everett, J. (2018). Operational research in the construction industry: A
review. International Journal of Construction Management, 18(1), 1-16.
Li, Q., et al. (2023). Dynamics of political influences on construction decision-making: An
evolving landscape. Construction Management and Economics, 41(3), 285-302.
Mukhtar, M., et al. (2019). Decision support systems in the construction industry: A review.
Automation in Construction, 98, 185-197.
Talafhah, F., et al. (2019). Integrating stakeholder preferences in construction projects using
multi-criteria decision analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and
Management, 145(11), 04019083.
Castronovo, G., et al. (2020). Soft Systems Methodology: Application in the Construction
Industry. Construction Management and Economics, 38(7), 635-648.
He, J., et al. (2021). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Construction Project Selection.
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(2), 04020106.
Li, Q., et al. (2023). Dynamic Market Trends in the Construction Industry: An Evolving
Landscape. Journal of Construction Management, 45(2), 165-182.
Wang, Y., et al. (2022). Innovations in Financial Strategies for Construction Projects: A
Contemporary Perspective. Construction Finance Review, 27(3), 245-261.
Flynn, D., et al. (2020). Cross-Cultural Dynamics in Construction Decision-Making: A
Contemporary Perspective. Journal of Construction Management, 48(4), 387-402.
Hosseini, H., et al. (2018). Stakeholder Engagement and Participatory Decision-Making in
Construction Projects. Construction Management and Economics, 36(11), 590-606.
Chinyio, E. A., & Olomolaiye, P. (2019). Sustainability Integration in Construction Decision-
Making: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Sustainable Development Journal, 27(5),
864-877.
Ackermann, F., & Eden, C. (2011). Ethical Dilemmas in Decision-Making: The Role of
Values, Culture, and Context. European Journal of Operational Research, 221(3), 622-
633.

22
23