Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Welding-Different Metals
Welding-Different Metals
50 m
Trace impurities of Ir, Os, Rh, Ru, Fe Trace impurities of Ir, Os, Rh, Ru, Fe
Melting point (solidus) ~1015˚C Melting point (solidus) ~925˚C
Both alloys have are single phase fcc at high temperature. Both can be
precipitation hardened (age hardened) to high strength levels.
®Paliney and Neyoro are registered tradenames of Deringer-Ney Inc., Bloomfield, CT
2
Material Properties
Paliney®-7 Neyoro®-G
Property Annealed Heat Property Annealed Heat
(typical) treated (typical) treated
YS (ksi) 45-90 145 YS (ksi) 60-70 130
UTS (ksi) 55-130 180 UTS (ksi) 75-115 170
% Elong. 15-25 1-10 % Elong. 12-20 2-10
Elastic 17 17 Elastic 16 16
modulus (Msi) modulus (Msi)
Vickers 185-255 330-400 Vickers 180-250 285-370
hardness hardness
Note: Properties will vary slightly with wire diameter or sheet thickness.
Sources:
1. K. E. Pitney, Ney Contact Manual, The J.M. Ney Company, 1973.
2. ASTM B540-97 (2008), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2008.
3. ASTM B541-01 (2012), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012.
4. 3. S. Brooks and G. Reed, Ney Scope, Vol. 22, No. 1, The J.M. Ney Company, Bloomfield, CT, 1980.
5. 4. T.V. Nordstrom, IEEE Trans. Parts, Hybrids, Packaging, March 1975.
3
Why weld these two alloy together?
Paliney
contact pin
4
Initial Concerns with Paliney® 7/Neyoro® G
Dissimilar Welds
~∆100˚C in manufacturer-quoted solidus temperatures
5
Resistance Welding
6
Resistance Welding (Brazing) Trials
Resistance welding
produces good bonding
between round (Pal7)
and flat (NeyG).
Ramp up .10kA, weld .80kA,ramp down.10kA, 6lb. force
Evidence of partial melting
is found; increasing amount
of melted material with
increasing applied current.
7
Resistance Welding (Braze) Trials: Cross-sections
NeyG
Sheet
(COLD WORKED AND AGED)
8
Microhardness Mapping, Resistance Weld
9
Laser Welding
- fillet welds
- piercing lap welds
10
Multi-Component Thermodynamic
Assessment of Dissimilar Alloy System
Thermodynamic simulations were performed to help predict the
solidification behavior of Paliney 7 and Neyoro G dissimilar welds.
Solidification path and solidification temperature range (STR)
predictions were used to assist in weldability evaluation
Solidification cracking susceptibility is highly influenced by solidification
path and STR
2 solidification cases were considered
Best case: equilibrium solute redistribution during solidification
Worst case: non-equilibrium solute redistribution as per Scheil-Gulliver
model
Infinite liquid diffusion with limited solid diffusion while maintaining
thermodynamic equilibrium at the S-L interface
Actual solute redistribution during weld solidification falls
somewhere in between, but often is better described by non-
equilibrium case due to rapid cooling rates in laser welds
11
Paliney 7/Neyoro G STR Prediction
• Thermodynamic predictions of Pal7/NeyG STR reveals no concerning behavior across all dilutions levels
• All solidification occurs via primary austenite: e.g., L L + γ γ
• Equilibrium STR for all dilution levels is ~100ºC, which is within range for weldable engineering alloys
• Neyoro G solidus temperatures are in agreement with published Deringer-Ney technical data; calculated
Paliney 7 solidus deviates ~100ºC from reported value
• Prediction suggests Scheil (worst case scenario) STR increases considerably for Paliney 7-rich weld
dilutions; however, simulation artifacts are apparent near the end of solidification
STREquil.
STRScheil
SNOB3 Database
No interstitial back diffusion considered 100% Paliney 7 100% Neyoro G
12
Some Artifacts are Revealed When Examining
Microsegregation Behavior during Solidification
• 100% Paliney 7 • 100% Neyoro G
• Scheil microsegregation profile during cooling shows
• Scheil microsegregation profile during cooling is not realistic partitioning behavior
realistic and is an artifact of the calculation
THERMO-CALC (2015.01.22:09.00) :FCC Composition vs. T - Paliney 7 THERMO-CALC (2015.01.22:08.46) :FCC Composition - Neyoro G
DATABASE:SNOB3 DATABASE:SNOB3
W(AG)=0.3, W(CU)=0.14, W(AU)=0.1, W(PT)=0.1, W(ZN)=1E-2, P=1E5, N=1; W(CU)=0.14, W(PT)=8E-2, W(AG)=5E-2, P=1E5, N=1;
0.7 1:T-273.15,W(FCC_A1,AG)
0.8 1:T-273.15,W(FCC_A1,AG)
2:T-273.15,W(FCC_A1,AU) 2:T-273.15,W(FCC_A1,AU)
1 3:T-273.15,W(FCC_A1,CU) 3:T-273.15,W(FCC_A1,CU)
0.6 4:T-273.15,W(FCC_A1,PD) 0.7 2 (Au) 4:T-273.15,W(FCC_A1,PT)
5:T-273.15,W(FCC_A1,PT)
6:T-273.15,W(FCC_A1,ZN)
33
0.6
0.5
0.5
W (F C C ,* )
4 2
41 0.4 4
0.3
5 unrealistic 0.3
2
2 elemental
0.2 partitioning
11 3 0.2 3
4 342 32 1 behavior 43
4
0.1 0.1
5 2
1
6565 65 6 6 1
0 0
700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 900 930 960 990 1020 1050 1080
TEMPERATURE_CELSIUS TEMPERATURE_CELSIUS
Scheil Tsolidus – end of solidification T
liquidus – start of solidification Scheil Tsolidus – end of solidification Tliquidus – start of solidification
13
Initial Trials: Pulsed Nd-YAG Laser Spot Fillet Welds
Single set of weld parameters utilized to produced pulsed No deleterious cracking observed for initial fillet welds
Nd:YAG spot welds
1.6 J/pulse; 2.0 ms pulse duration,; weld at sharp focus; square
waveform
Pal-7 pin
Ney-G sheet
Transverse light optical weld micrograph Longitudinal light optical weld micrograph 14
SEM Examination of Dissimilar Welds
Unmixed Neyoro
G ‘swirls’
observed in weld
metal
15
SEM Examination of Dissimilar Welds
17
Piercing Lap Laser Welds: Initial Trials
Transverse view: Although good mixing is observed, the welds display
Ag Au
unacceptable levels of porosity (and some cracking)
Both large keyhole
porosity and spherical
gas porosity
Manual welds
(LaserStar system)
Cu Pd
Pt Zn
18
Piercing Lap Laser Welds: Lower Energy Input
(conduction mode)
20
Longitudinal View
2.13 J/pulse
Ag Au Cu
Pal7 Pal7 Pal7
Pal7 Pd Pal7
Pt Zn
Pal7
21
SEM: Evidence of Au-rich alloy
penetration from the NeyG side into the
Pal7 alloy.
22
Microhardness Mapping: Laser Welds
23
1.87 J/pulse
2.0 J/pulse
2.13 J/pulse
24
Microhardness map: As-welded
Effect of Post-Weld
Heat Treatment (PWHT)
• Direct aging
treatment after
welding
2.0 J/pulse fillet weld
• NeyG responds with
significant hardness
Microhardness map: PWHT 371˚C, 30 min.
increase. Hardness
within the weld also
increases.
• Paliney-7 base metal
not affected
significantly.
2.0 J/pulse fillet weld
25
Summary
Dissimilar welds between Paliney-7 and Neyoro-G can be produced by both
resistance welding and laser welding.
For flat-to-round resistance welds, melting of the NeyG sheet was observed
with little/no melting of Pal7 pin. Joints have low porosity.
For laser welds, both fillet welds and piercing lap welds were successful.
For fillet welds, incomplete mixing is observed. Very small cracks observed
only in regions of highest tensile stress (long fillet bridges).
For piercing lap welds, high pulse energy produces good mixing but very
high porosity, possibly due to Zn vaporization, and some cracking. Lower
pulse energy (conduction mode) produces primarily melting of NeyG sheet,
low porosity, low mixing but evidence of good metallurgical bonding.
Microhardness mapping shows smooth transition in properties across the
weld interface and uniform (low) hardness within the welds. A steeper
hardness gradient is observed in the HAZ of the NeyG (cold worked and
heat treated) sheet. NeyG responds to PWHT with significant hardness
increase.
26
Acknowledgements
Peter Duran, Danny MacCallum, Alex Barr: resistance and laser welding
Mark Reece: fixture development
Alice Kilgo: metallography
Bonnie McKenzie and Amy Allen: SEM
27
Extra slides
28
SEM Examination of Dissimilar Welds
29