The Kyoto Protocol was one of the original greenhouse treaties that has inspired and provoked new

planning to prevent further pollution to the environment in the present day. Unfortunately, the honor
system doesn’t work as well in the U.S. as it does in Japan.

Highly developed nations around the globe need tangible motivation. In other words, developed
countries need a treaty that holds them accountable for their carbon footprint in order to make a
proper effort to decrease their greenhouse gas emissions.

What was the Kyoto Protocol?

The Kyoto Protocol, created in Kyoto, Japan in 1997 – was a previous international agreement that
proposed to reduce carbon emissions and lower the amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) in the
atmosphere. The primary reason for the creation and establishment of the Kyoto Protocol was to
provide incentive to industrialized nations that didn’t take cautionary measures to significantly reduce
their carbon emissions.

The Kyoto Protocol utilized the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change by requesting
industrialized countries with strong economies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in correlation with
their individual environmental goals. The treaty itself only asked those countries to adopt policies and
measures on mitigation and to report periodically.

Although the Kyoto Protocol is now obsolete in the present day, the original mission is carried out
through other treaties and concepts, and the effects of high industrial production on greenhouse gas
emissions is still a topic of interest.

What was the purpose of the Kyoto Protocol?

The purpose of the Kyoto Protocol was to softly demand that highly developed countries with high levels
of industrialization lowered the amount of greenhouse gas emissions they produced.

The Kyoto Protocol succeeded in this by implementing tough, thorough regulations for the developed
countries that signed the Kyoto Protocol.

How did the Kyoto Protocol work?

The Kyoto Protocol worked by providing the countries who signed the treaty with a multitude of
resources to assist and encourage them to meet their environmental goals.

Countries that signed and participated in the Kyoto Protocol were allowed a threshold of carbon
emission levels for certain periods of time, and also contributed to carbon credits. If a country
contributed to a higher level of carbon emissions allotted for the current time period, they were
penalized and their limit for the next period would have been adjusted accordingly to further prevent
greenhouse gas emissions.

These strongly recommended environmental incentives were later measured to ensure each country
involved in the treaty was fully-engaged in the Kyoto Protocol.

What targets must each country meet?

So, what were some of the carbon emission reducing targets that each country a part of the Kyoto
Protocol were expected to meet?
One method of the Kyoto Protocol was to utilize natural resources, one of them called, “sinks” – in order
to remove greenhouse gas emissions from the atmosphere. The Kyoto Protocol also encouraged the
planting of trees to absorb carbon dioxide emissions from the air.

Another approach of the Kyoto Protocol was to prompt developed countries involved to partake in an
international program called the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). The Clean Development
Mechanism motivated developed countries to contribute to funding for the necessary technology and
infrastructure for less-developed countries, with the goal in mind to help reduce carbon emissions
where lack of financial resources prevented these countries from reducing their carbon emissions.

The developed country that invested in infrastructure to reduce carbon emissions for the under-
developed country could have claimed a credit towards meeting their requirements for the Kyoto
Protocol.

A third practice put in place by the Kyoto Protocol was trading emissions. This permitted participating
countries to buy and sell greenhouse gas emissions, which functioned as a method to work towards
meeting the requirements of the Kyoto Protocol. If countries a part of the Kyoto Protocol were not
successful in meeting their carbon emission reduction goals, they were required to offset the difference
between their original targeted emissions and their real carbon emissions.

How did emission targets get monitored?

All of these mechanisms and requirements of the Kyoto Protocol are what made it so successful and
effective at reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

The Kyoto Protocol insisted that industrialized and developed countries aimed to reduce several of their
greenhouse gas emissions : including carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons,
perfluorocarbons and sulphur hexafluoride.

The Kyoto Protocol expected, at minimum, for each country that signed the treaty to reduce their 5.2 %
below their current level of greenhouse gas emissions during their first period of commitment.

These regulations were updated to be even more numerically demanding after the Kyoto Protocol was
extended in 2012.

There were no emission targets for developing countries, as the Kyoto Protocol recognized the financial
disadvantages of developing countries to fully fight against climate change.

But was the Kyoto Protocol useful to under-developed countries around the world, who didn’t have the
financial resources to follow the strict measures of the Kyoto Protocol?

Was the Kyoto Protocol good for developing countries?

While the Kyoto Protocol had a high standard in order to be deemed effective at emitting greenhouse
gas emissions, it wasn’t an equal opportunity for all nations.

Due to the fact that the Kyoto Protocol was based on strong principles and required stringent
regulations to meet the Kyoto Protocol’s objectives – it placed an unrealistic expectation on developing
countries. In other words, the Kyoto Protocol was only feasible for developed countries – which
hindered its global capability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
However, it is important to note that while the Kyoto Protocol wasn’t suitable for developing countries,
given developed countries are often the greatest contributors to greenhouse gas emissions – the Kyoto
Protocol still remained an advantageous and influential tactic to reduce carbon emissions by placing high
expectations on these developed countries to employ concrete action to reduce their carbon emissions.

Which countries signed the Kyoto Protocol?

When the Kyoto Protocol was first introduced to the public for signatures in March 1998, Antigua and
Barbuda, Argentina, the Maldives, Samoa, St. Lucia and Switzerland were the first to sign the Kyoto
Protocol.

The Kyoto Protocol was later signed and ratified by 192 nations or territories around the world.
However, one leading nation refused to participate in the Kyoto Protocol – the United States.

The United States 🇺🇸 withdrew from their initial agreement to the Kyoto Protocol in 2001 contingent on
the belief that it placed too much financial responsibility on developed nations.

Since the Kyoto Protocol was garnered towards developed nations using their fiscal capabilities to assist
less developed countries that struggled without the resources necessary to reduce greenhouse
emissions, the U.S. decided it wasn’t a fair, fruitful trade-off – and came to the conclusion that it would
ultimately inhibit the growth of their own economy.

Why Did the Kyoto Protocol End?

If the Kyoto Protocol was successful in reducing greenhouse gas emissions for developed countries, then
why did the Kyoto Protocol end?

At the 18th Conference of the Parties, which took place in Doha, Qatar in 2012 – the delegates decided
to extend the Kyoto Protocol until 2020. However, despite their decision to extend the Kyoto Protocol –
they also confirmed that they would expand on their proposition to create a new, legally intensive
climate treaty by 2015.

Why was a more rigorous, comprehensive treaty necessary if the Kyoto Protocol was successfully
encouraging developed countries to reach their greenhouse gas emission reductions?

Many nations deeply benefited and were inspired to prevent climate change by the Kyoto Protocol. The
best example of this is many countries in the European Union, and the EU as a whole – who planned to
reach, and even succeed their environmental goals under the Kyoto Protocol by 2011.

Despite the fact that the Kyoto Protocol became an international law in 2005 in attempts to further
establish the importance of the greenhouse gas reduction techniques provided by the treaty – global
emissions continued to rise.

For example, two nations that did not ratify the Kyoto Protocol, the United States and China, who are
simultaneously two of the world’s greatest contributors to excessive greenhouse gas emissions – were
producing such a high level of carbon emissions, that it completely counteracted any progress made by
other countries that were successfully participating in the Kyoto Protocol.
Therefore, this new treaty to prevent climate change, initially suggested at the 17th Conference of the
Parties in Durban, South Africa – would demand the largest greenhouse-gas producing countries
(including those not abiding the Kyoto Protocol, such as China, India, and the United States) to restrict
and reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.

This new treaty, later to be known as the Paris Climate Agreement, was set to be employed by 2020 –
and to take place ahead of the expiration date of the Kyoto Protocol.

Was the Kyoto Protocol successful?

While the Kyoto Protocol was classified and recognized as one of the most efficacious environmental
treaties to ever have been signed and employed, many critics have questioned its overall productivity.

The Kyoto Protocol served as a successful baseline for future treaties to fight against climate change to
come. Due to the fact that the Kyoto Protocol was contingent on the efforts of developed nations, the
beneficial impact of the Kyoto Protocol wasn’t guaranteed.

For instance, countries like the United States, which chose to not participate in the Kyoto Protocol –
ultimately hindered the success of other countries that were meeting the greenhouse gas emission
targets provided by the treaty.

If all the developed countries that produced the greatest amount of carbon emissions participated in the
Kyoto Protocol – it would have ultimately yielded greater success. However, since this was not the case
or compulsory facet of the Kyoto Protocol – the treaty was not able to fully reap the benefits of the
countries efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Also, various critics claimed that the regulations put in place by the Kyoto Protocol were too easy to
achieve, and therefore wouldn’t make an overall difference in combating climate change – even if a
country like the United States had agreed to participate.

The Kyoto Protocol vs The Paris Climate Agreement

As explained earlier, the Kyoto Protocol didn’t end permanently when the treaty wasn’t renewed – but
rather the Kyoto Protocol and its original premise has been carried out, updated, and established in
other treaties or countries around the world.

The most well-known example being The Paris Climate Agreement.

At the 21st Conference of the Parties, which took place in Paris, France 🇫🇷 in 2015 – delegates at the
conference signed a unilateral agreement to mitigate climate change and rising global temperatures.

The Paris Climate Agreement officially replaced the Kyoto Protocol at this conference. The Paris Climate
Agreement, dedicated to further reducing greenhouse gas emissions than the Kyoto Protocol –
demanded a progress report every five years and requested an exorbitant fund of $100 billion by 2020,
to be provided anually to assist developing countries to employ technologies to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions.

As the most paramount global climate agreement to date, the Paris Agreement demands all countries,
whether intrinsically motivated or not – to contribute to reducing their own greenhouse gas emissions.
The biggest difference between the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Climate Agreement? The Kyoto
Protocol only made reducing greenhouse gas emissions obligatory for developed nations, whereas the
Paris Agreement realizes that climate change is a global predicament, and calls for the attention and
dedication of all countries to set goals to reduce their carbon emissions.