Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Administrative Law
Like 8 Tweet 0 0 12
From LawNotes.in
aw
1 of 7 5/9/2013 3:25 PM
Administrative Law - LawNotes.in http://www.lawnotes.in/Administrative_Law
Bureaucracy
Bureaucracy with special focus on the India Bureaucratic system
Organisation of civil services
Powers and functions
Disciplinary proceedings
Prosecutions under Prevention of Corruption Act
Maladministration
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Ombudsman
Ombudsman in England
Ombudsman in USA
Ombudsman in India
Institution of Ombudsman in the States
Right to Know
Discretion to Disobey
Parliamentary Commissioner
Lokpal
Lokayukta
Central Vigilance Commission (CVC)
Congressional and Parliamentary Committees.
2 of 7 5/9/2013 3:25 PM
Administrative Law - LawNotes.in http://www.lawnotes.in/Administrative_Law
3 of 7 5/9/2013 3:25 PM
Administrative Law - LawNotes.in http://www.lawnotes.in/Administrative_Law
Courts are empowered to take up action for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights
Courts as final authority of determine legality of administrative action-problems and perspectives
Exhaustion of administrative remedies
Laches or unreasonable delay
Res judicata says that the matter cannot be raised again, either in the same court or in a different court
(of the same level).
Grounds of Judicial Review of Administrative Action
Jurisdictional error / ultra vires
Abuse and non exercise of jurisdiction
Error apparent on the face of the record
Violation of principles of natural justice
Violation of public policy
Primary jurisdiction
Doctrine of legitimate expectation
Doctrine of public accountability
Doctrine of proportionality
Methods of Judicial Review
Statutory appeals
Public Interest Litigation
Writs
Mandamus
Certiorari
Prohibition
Quo Warranto
Habeas Corpus
Declaratory judgments and injunctions
Specific performance and civil suits for compensation
Fact-finding commissions
Finality Clause - clauses that put acts outside judicial review
4 of 7 5/9/2013 3:25 PM
Administrative Law - LawNotes.in http://www.lawnotes.in/Administrative_Law
Statutory immunity
Contractual liability of government
Government privilege in legal proceedings-State
Secrets, public interest, etc.,
Right to information and open government
Estoppel and Waiver
Related Acts
Judicial Officers Protection Act, 1850
Related Rules
Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal Rules of Practice, 1995
5 of 7 5/9/2013 3:25 PM
Administrative Law - LawNotes.in http://www.lawnotes.in/Administrative_Law
Court held that it would not be just and proper to recover any excess amount paid.
Sahib Ram v. State of Haryana [1995 Supp (1) SCC 18]
Appellants did not possess the required educational qualification and consequently would not be
entitled to the relaxation but having granted the relaxation and having paid the salary on the
revised scales, it was ordered that the excess payment should not be recovered applying the
principle of equal pay for equal work.
Yogeshwar Prasad and Ors v. National Institute of Education Planning and Administration and Ors.
[(2010) 14 SCC 323]
The grant of higher pay could be recovered unless it was a case of misrepresentation or fraud.
On facts, neither misrepresentation nor fraud could be attributed to appellants therein and
hence, restrained the recovery of excess amount paid.
Col. B.J. Akkara (retd.) v. Government of India and Ors. [(2006) 11 SCC 709]
A Government servant, particularly one in the lower rungs of service would spend whatever
emoluments he receives for the upkeep of his family. If he receives an excess payment for a
long period, he would spend it genuinely believing that he is entitled to it. As any subsequent
action to recover the excess payment will cause undue hardship to him, relief is granted in that
behalf.
But where the employee had knowledge that the payment received was in excess of what was
due or wrongly paid, or where the error is detected or corrected within a short time of wrong
payment, Courts will not grant relief against recovery. The matter being in the realm of judicial
discretion, courts may on the facts and circumstances of any particular case refuse to grant such
relief against recovery.
Syed Abdul Qadir and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Ors. [(2009) 3 SCC 475]
Undoubtedly, the excess amount that has been paid to the appellants - teachers was not because
of any misrepresentation or fraud on their part and the appellants also had no knowledge that
the amount that was being paid to them was more than what they were entitled to.
..the Finance Department had, in its counter affidavit, admitted that it was a bona fide mistake
on their part. The excess payment made was the result of wrong interpretation of the rule that
was applicable to them, for which the appellants cannot be held responsible.
Rather, the whole confusion was because of inaction, negligence and carelessness of the
officials concerned of the Government..
..that majority of the beneficiaries have either retired or are on the verge of it.
Keeping in view the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case at hand and to avoid any
hardship to the appellants-teachers, we are of the view that no recovery of the amount that has
been paid in excess to the appellants-teachers should be made.
Varanaseya Sanskrit Vishwavidyalaya and Another v. Rajkishore Tripathi (Dr.), (1977) 1 SCC 279: In
matters of discipline or administration of the internal affairs of a University, the courts should be most
reluctant to interfere.
S D Joshi vs High Court of Bombay (2011) 1 SCC 252, para 62: Judges are not employees of the State.
As members of the judiciary, they exercise sovereign judicial powers of the State. The Judges, at
whatever level they may be, represent the State and its authority unlike the bureaucracy or the
members of other services.
It is inappropriate for Courts to issue a mandate to legislate an Act and also to make a subordinate
legislation in a particular manner
Where the High Court issued directions for inserting certain additional words into a notification
of exemption issued by the U.P. Government, it exceeded its jurisdiction in passing said
directions - [2011] 10-344 (SC)
Maharashtra v. Milind (2001) 1 SCC 4: The appellant was entitled to the protection of continuance in
service (of being admitted into a Professional course), no matter ‘Halba-Koshtis’ were not recognised
as ‘Halbas’.
The Constitution Bench of this Court was examining whether Koshti was a sub-tribe within the
6 of 7 5/9/2013 3:25 PM
Administrative Law - LawNotes.in http://www.lawnotes.in/Administrative_Law
High Court held that it was permissible to examine whether any sub-division of a tribe was a
part and parcel of the tribe mentioned therein and whether ‘Halba-Koshti’ was a sub-division of
the main tribe ‘Halba’ within the meaning of Entry 19 in the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes)
Order, 1950.
The High Court further held that Halba-Koshti was indeed a sub-tribe of Halba appearing in the
Presidential Order.
Related Topics
Definition of Administrative Law
Authority for Advance Rulings
Retrieved from "http://lawnotes.in/Administrative_Law"
Category: Administrative Law
7 of 7 5/9/2013 3:25 PM