Professional Documents
Culture Documents
oà ajïäna-timirändhasya/ jïänäïjana-çaläkayä
cakñur unmélitaà yena /tasmai çré-gurave namaù
Contents
Preface
Introduction
1. There is proper kértan and improper kértan…
Proper kértan is not of this material world
2. The kértans of the acarya and anyone who emulates
him are proper kirtans
3. Prabhupäda wanted his followers to perform kirtan
the way he did
4. “No hard and fast rules for chanting” misunderstood
5. The kirtans of actually advanced devotees should not
be imitated
6. “Traditional Bengali kértan”
7. Entertainment-style kértans are only limitedly useful
8. Kali-yuga is worshipable because perfection is
achievable simply by performing proper Saìkértan
9. Proper, effective kértan, has objective, scientifically
appreciable characteristics
10. Unless there is proper hearing and chanting the
whole process of Krishna consciousness will fail
11. Establishing or reestablishing, proper kirtana.
Appendices
Introduction
In India shortly after Prabhupada’s departure, our – the
author’s – modicum of design and building skills that had
been engaged on our first joining the movement were
“rediscovered” by one of the ISKCON India managers and
we were immediately commissioned to build a ratha –
festival chariot – in Madras (now Chennai). That completed
and appreciated by the local leaders, requests from other
temple and ISKCON regional leaders to build rathas in their
respective cities or zones started to come in. Not that we
were so satisfied with all aspects of the Society’s functioning
at the time – significantly including the quality of the
kirtans being performed in public and in the temples – but
considering rathayatra festivals to be perhaps the best
platform for spreading Krishna consciousness, and
designing and building rathas being something I (“we”)
could pursue with minimal anxiety, any reservations about
other issues took a secondary position in our mind.
After completing two or three more rathas and realizing
that the work of preparing the required construction
drawings afresh for each one was unnecessarily great, the
idea of producing a manual for building rathas of various
sizes and styles came to mind. Such a handbook would
necessarily include not only some material on the history
and architecture of rathas but also on the conduct of
rathayatra… including, significantly, the proper
performance of kirtan. We eventually succeeded at the task
of producing such a manual, with the “Notes on the
Conduct of Rathayatra” section including a few words on
the subject of kértan… Years later, we expanded upon these
words in the form of the article “Kértana: are there rules?”
that appeared (in 2016) on several Krishna consciousness
websites. This book, “Proper Kértan” represents the still
further expansion on the subject.
Our plans to research and write about proper kértan (as
opposed new forms, which might be called “pop kértans” –
received encouragement from a few contemporary
godbrothers with whom we were in contact: Sriman
Naranarayan, Sriman Bharadraj, Sriman Janaladha, Sriman
Bhakta das and others… all sharing the unhappiness over
the prevailing deviations from the potent, simple style and
tunes of kértan that Srila Prabhupada performed and
taught… and which were intended by him to remain the
standard for all time to come.
Over fifty years ago, in 1971, we were asked by the ISKCON
Africa GBC to go to the Nairobi to look after the temple’s
maintenance. After a year of two there, we came to India,
where we have been to present. In those days, before the
internet, it was not possible for most of the Society’s
members to keep up with developments in a timely way, so
it was only slowly that we came to understand that the
changes, almost all being deviations from the way kirtans
were performed by Prabhupada, had started early, and that
even some of the sannyasis and senior most members were
involved. It was also before affordable portable tape
recorders and audio cassettes players – what to speak of
digital audio devices – and it seemed to us even in at that
time that many, if not most, of the Society’s younger
members, appeared unaware of the tunes and style of kértan
performed by Srila Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada and
meant by him to be practiced by all his followers for all time
to come.
From a philosophical point of view this situation should in
hindsight not be considered surprising in view of the fact
that the world is – in this Kali Age – predominantly
governed by the tamas and rajas, the ignorance and passion
modes of Krishna’s external, material energy. Among the
duties of this personified external energy of the Lord,
Mayadevi, is the presentation of hindrances in the path of
those showing inclination to accept the supremacy of Lord
Krishna and of service to Him as the supreme occupation.
In any case, deviations from the standards of kértan as
personally taught by Srila Prabhupada started as far back as
the early seventies. At present they remain widely in place
throughout the Movement’s various branches. Proper kirtan
continues to be performed in isolated places here and there,
in groups led by early disciples of Srila Prabhupada, but
judging by what we see and hear in our own area, via the
internet, and by what others report after visiting various
centers, at the time of this writing, proper kértan is rarely to
be seen and heard.
It is hoped that Proper kértan, citing Srila Prabhupada’s
teachings and çästras, will help present and future members
understand first of all the distinguishing features of proper
kirtana and the great necessity for it, and that proper kirtan
will before long, again resound everywhere.
For the sake of persons new to the chanting of the Hare
Krishna Maha Mantra, who perhaps heard it only very
briefly through the electronic media or by personally being
present where some kirtan was going on, it should be
mentioned that they can easily access and listen to some of
the kirtans preformed by the Founder-Acarya of the Hare
Krishna movement himself by typing the words
“Prabhupada” and “kirtan” into the search window of their
internet search engine on their computer, smart phone or
other device and listen to and download the transcendental
sound.1 The “Happening Album” was a long-playing record
album, later on an MP3 CD and later still online – of the
chanting as performed by Prabhupada and a few of his
earliest followers in the first public kirtan to be performed
in the west, personally led by Srila Prabhupada in
Thompson Square Park in New York City in 1966.
1
A few links are listed at the end of the book
try to spread it all over the world to the best of their ability
(SB 10.3.22, purport). By chanting the Name, one associates
directly with the Lord, and is certainly delivered, but just as
an artist depicting the form of the Lord must learn details of
His features from authorized scriptures and His
representatives in disciplic succession, a kértan singer must
first hear the form of His name from authority… from the
äcarya.
The subject of rules for kértan is dealt with further on in
this book, but in general, understanding the defining
characteristics – the laksana – of proper kirtan, is of highest
importance… because, as will be explained, the power to
enact spiritual transformation in the hearts of hearers is
present only in proper kértan.
Though there are good numbers of articles on the subject of
kértan on the internet, in the present author’s opinion, none
of them deal sufficiently with the topic of what constitutes
proper kértan. Those who lack the time or other facilities to
do their own research will therefore benefit by carefully
considering the contents of this book. Also, the phrase
“proper kirtan” is not to be thought of as one invented by
the author to advance some personal thesis of his. It is used
by Caitanya Mahaprabhu Himself: “saìkértana-ärambhe
ämära avatära || karäimu sarva-deçe kértana pracära”: “I
have incarnated to inaugurate the saìkértana movement,
and I will preach this process of chanting throughout the
world. Çréla Bhaktisiddhänta Sarasvaté Öhäkura says in his
Sri Caitanya Bhagavata Gaudiya Bhasya commentary on this
verse: “Gaurasundara said, “When many persons gather
together and properly chant the names of Kåñëa, I will
certainly appear there. I will preach throughout the world
the glories of chanting the holy names through the process
of kértana.”” (CB Adi, 5.151).
The word “proper” in reference to kértan is also used by
Çréla Sarasvaté Öhäkur in his commentary on Bhaktivinode
Thakur’s Sanmodan Bhasya commentary on Sri
Siksastakam, first verse.
“Proper kértan” aims in part to present authoritative
evidence that there are in fact rules… standards… for
kértan, and to impress on readers that understanding them
is of utmost importance in the matter of spreading Caitanya
Mahaprabhu’s Saìkértan Movement and thereby .
Though we received praise for the perceived thoroughness
of the research that underlay the the present book’s
forerunner (the article entitled “Kirtan: Are there rules?”),
we were not aware of the article “Hari Näma Eva Kevalam –
A Manual for Performing Public Harinäma-saìkértana”, by
Indradumnya Swami and Sri Prahlada das. In that article,
the authors say, (weakly in our opinion): “Despite the
importance of harinäma-saìkértana, since Çréla
Prabhupäda’s physical departure from this world the
quantity and quality of harinäma-saìkértana has greatly
decreased, as observed in an article by GBC Minister for
Communications Mukunda Goswami”. To quote the latter:
“Çréla Prabhupäda gave great emphasis to distributing three
features of Kåñëa’s mercy: his books, the holy name through
harinäma-saìkértana, and prasädam. ISKCON has excelled
admirably throughout the world in book distribution, with
the printing and distribution of millions of books in dozens
of languages. Prasädam distribution has been a pervasive,
ever-increasing phenomenon at Sunday feasts, festivals,
Hare Kåñëa Food for Life programs, restaurants, cooking
classes, congregational and FOLK programs, conferences
and seminars, and in dozens of other preaching arenas.
ISKCON’s daily or weekly harinäma-saìkértana in many
parts of the world, however, has not seemed to keep pace
with our generally constant expansions of book and
prasädam distribution. The number of devotees who
participate in harinäma, and the quality of most of the
parties, need addressing.”2 Similarly, Jayadvaita Swami, in
his 2005 seminar on kirtan standards, does not go far
enough to emphasize that Prabhupada wanted – for all time
– that kirtans be in the tunes and styles in which he
performed them.
“Proper Kértana” addresses the presently prevailing
deficiencies in kértan by unambiguously presenting kértana
standards that have apparently evaded recognition – or been
forgotten – by members of the Movement. (It does not deal
with which songs and prayers are to be sung at the different
äratis throughout the day. That subject is dealt with in an
article “Kirtan Rules” by Harikesa Swami and those wishing
to peruse its contents can find a video by that name on the
internet.) As it relates somewhat to the purposes of this
book however, here are a few words on the subject: All
kértans should begin with the chanting, three times, of the
Guru Pranam mantra (nama oà viñëu-pädäya kåñëa-
preñöhäya bhü-tale çrémate bhaktivedänta-svämin iti nämine
…) followed by the Pancatattva Mahamantra (çré-kåñëa-
caitanya prabhu-nityänanda çré-advaita gadädhara çréväsädi-
gaura-bhakta-vånda, also three times), followed by the
mahämantra. Mangala ärati kirtan consists of these three,
preceded by Sri Guruvastakam. Sandhyä-ärati consists of
the same three preceded by the Gaura aroti song. Gurupuja,
when it was instituted in 1973, consisted of the three
mantras preceded by Çréla Narottama däsa Öhäkura’s Çré-
guru-vandanä: “çré-guru-carana-padma… ”, Chanting of
“jaya gurudev”, “jaya Prahbhupada”, “jaya Nrsimhadeva”,
“jaya Prahlada Maharaj”, “jaya Jagannatha… jaya
Baladeva… jaya Subadra… or “hari bol, hari bol” to
conclude any ärati is a concoction. These are not in fact
2
since the 1970s, book distribution has also diminished
greatly
mantras at all as they are not found as such in çästras. Nor
are they approved by äcärya… and they don’t appear in the
ISKCON song book, published with Srila Prabhupada’s
forward. (Prabhupada once scornfully, mockingly, asked in
connection with one of these unauthorized additions “Who
is this “gurudev”?”) No devotee, no conditional devotee,
can invent a mantra.
The book’s conclusions – supporting by çästras and relevant
statements by äcäryas – previously presented by the author
in various forums have so far been well received by good
numbers of devotee practitioners of bhakti-yoga. When
research uncovered multiple aspects, or instances, of a
point, the author has in some cases presented two, three or
more of them, resulting of course in an increase in the size
of the work… but it was felt that the comparative lack of
discussion in the worldwide community of devotees of the
very important topic of kértan necessitated more than a brief
presentation. As Srila Prabhupada says in Bhagavad Gita As
It Is (2.25, purport), “Repetition of something is necessary
in order that we understand the matter thoroughly, without
error”. We therefore don’t feel that some repetition of a
point or two that readers of the book may detect requires
any apology.
There are different levels of çästra for different levels of
people – the Upanisads for example are meant for the
scholarly and philosophical set of followers of the Vedic
system; the Itihasas (histories such as the Mahabharata and
the Ramayana), and the Puranas, are, on the other hand,
more for the people in general, and all these scriptures
contain various kinds of statements about chanting the holy
names of the Lord. It is hoped that Proper Kértana, in
addition to establishing its main thesis, will also resolve
some uncertainties and reconcile some apparent
contradictions between statements from different sources.
Some may see the book as critical of reputed performers of
kértan in ISKCON, other organizations, or independents.
Certain forms of kirtan and their performers are indeed
rejected, not with intent to dishonor but to bring some of
the truths about proper kirtan to light for the benefit of the
greater assembly of devotees, potential devotees and
perhaps some scholars who read the book. Evidence is
presented and facts about proper as opposed to deviant
kirtans are simply brought to light.
“Proper kirtana” can be seen as an elaboration or
enlargement of an article by the present author: “Kirtana:
Are there rules?” that appeared on issuu.com,
dandavats.com (which later twice republished it on their
own) and other websites in 2016 and was subsequently
picked-up by several other sites popular among devotees.
3
The ten offenses to the holy Name are: 1) To blaspheme the devotees
who have dedicated their lives for propagating the holy name of the Lord;
2) To consider the names of demigods like Lord Shiva or Lord Brahma to
be equal to or independent of the name of the Lord, Vishnu; 3) To
disobey the orders of the spiritual master; 4) To blaspheme the Vedic
scriptures or scriptures in pursuance to the Vedic version;. 5) To consider
the glories of chanting Hare Krishna to be imaginary; 6) To give some
interpretations to the holy name of the Lord; 7) To commit sinful
activities on the strength of the Holy Name; 8) To consider the chanting
of Hare Krishna to be one of the auspicious ritualistic activities offered in
the Vedas’ Karma kanda as activities for obtaining personal pleasure; 9)
To instruct a faithless person about the glories of the holy name; and 10)
To not have complete faith in the chanting of the holy name and maintain
material attachments, even after understanding so many instructions on
this matter. It is also an offense to be inattentive while chanting.
qualities… Brajendanandana for example refers to His being
the son of the king of Vrindaban; Trivikram refers to His
covering the universe in three paces; Gopala refers to His
tending cows in the forests of Vrindaban. …There are
practically unlimited numbers of such names. Vedic
literatures such as Srimad Bhagavatam, the other sattvic
Puranas, the Brahma Samhita and other agama sastras, the
Mahabharata, the Ramayana, and others, indicate certain
names – Rama, Govinda, Murari, Hari, Mukunda, Madhava
as Primary Names, any of which can be chanted as kirtan.
But Kåñëa is the origin of them all and scriptures such as
the Kalisantaran Upanisad, recommend chanting of the
Hare Krishna mahamantra, Hare Kåñëa, Hare Kåñëa, Kåñëa
Kåñëa, Hare Hare / Hare Räma, Hare Räma, Räma Räma,
Hare Hare. Chanting names of devatas, demigods, such as
Lord Siva, Ganesh, Hanuman, Kali and others is
recommended in certain rajasic and tamasic scriptures but
kértana properly means singing the primary names of the
Supreme Personality of Godhead. Chanting of names of
devatas is not accepted as kirtana by the sattvic sastras.
Constant chanting and singing of the names of the Lord
Hari, Kåñëa is recommended: “kértanad sadha hari”.
Lastly, the question of how a person busy with family,
work, friends and relatives and so on can “always chant” as
the çästras enjoin. The äcäryas acknowledge that these are
difficulties but advise that chanting is to go on
simultaneously with other activities… that by practice, the
chanting – the superior energy – will prevail. Çréla
Prabhupäda says that “As māyā is forcing you to drag you
from this Kṛṣṇa consciousness, you also force māyā by
chanting Hare Kṛṣṇa, if you do not stop, if you chant
loudly... This is tug of war. … don't be afraid of māyā. …
Nārāyaṇa-parāḥ sarve na kutaścana bibhyati (Srimad
Bhagavatam 6.17.28). With practice, chanting becomes part
of breathing, the mahamantra vibrating at least in the throat
with every breath, incoming and outgoing. Lord Kṛṣṇa says,
kaunteya pratijānīhi na me bhaktaḥ praṇaśyati: "My devotee
will never be vanquished by māyā." (Bhagavad Gita 9.31).
One simply has to become strong by chanting Hare Kṛṣṇa
Hare Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa Hare Hare loudly.” It is the process
recommended in all the Vedic literatures for clearing the
consciousness of the contaminations of material existence
accumulated since time immemorial. It is the prime
benediction for the present age… It is much more than a
means to get temporary relief from various kinds of material
distress.
4
Some say that the Sri Siksastakam verse’s “no hard and fast rules” refers
to the situation at the time of Lord Caitanya’s advent in relation to the
influence of the caste Brahmins - who claimed exclusive authority in all
religious matters - including how mantras are to be chanted. This view
however neglects the evidence presented elsewhere in Proper Kirtan that
their efforts to dominate society were not basically spiritual but
motivated by their desire to dominate others for their personal material
benefit.
already mentioned and as explained further on in this book,
“Proper Kértana”, entertainment style kértanas have their
place: they may attract more of the public... but if saìkértan
parties, festivals and rathayatras include only such kértans,
and such kértanas are also all that is found in the
Movement’s temples and ashrams, then the benefit to the
people attracted by them will be only the little bit of relief
from anxiety that a common man’s listening to a few
minutes of pleasurable music might bring. Such chanting
cannot yield spiritual liberation – permanent relief from the
pangs of material existence. For spiritual emancipation to
be a dependable outcome, proper chanting – chanting in the
prescribed manner by devotees free from material desires –
is required… such chanting at least replicates the mood and
style of the äcärya’s kértans.
It can be mentioned here that as far as spreading Krishna
consciousness to the public is concerned, children’s’
chanting, because of their high pitched voices, even if in
proper tune, falls in the category of entertainment. Children
are natural objects of pleasure for audiences of adults and
therefore an adult audience’s perception of them as being
children rather than the spiritually advanced souls that
some of them may in fact be acts as an impediment to their
chanting having greater potency. For this reason, though
amongst themselves, in the gurukulas and other situations,
children should be encouraged to chant, at temple
programs for the public and at rathayatras and other public
festivals, giving them the microphone to lead kirtan is not
the best policy.
Prabhupada says: “Unless there is life of çravaëaà
kértanam, these big, big building, temples, will become
burden. So if we are... if we want to create burden for
future, then we may give up this hearing and chanting and
sleep very nicely. It will be burden. Galagraha. Not çré-
vigraha, but galagraha. Galagraha. Çré-vigraha means
worshipable Deity. So if we give up this çravaëaà kértanaà
viñëoù [SB 7.5.23], then it will be thought that "Our Guru
Mahäräja has given a burden in the neck, galagraha." This is
the danger. So we must be very much alert in çravaëaà
kértanam. Otherwise, all this labor will be futile. This
building will be only the nest, nest for the doves and the
pigeons. That is the danger. That is being done. Nobody is
interested... who can understand Kåñëa? There are so many
impediments. One side, there is curtain of mäyä; another
side, everyone is a rascal and fool; and another side, Kåñëa
is beyond your sense perception. This is the position. How
much one must be alert. Then one can understand. … who
can understand Kåñëa? There are so many impediments.
One side, there is curtain of mäyä; another side, everyone is
a rascal and fool; and another side, Kåñëa is beyond your
sense perception. This is the position. How much one must
be alert. Then one can understand. Just like the Gosvämés.
Is Kåñëa is so easy thing to be understood? But there is
process. So if we do not adopt the process, then how we can
understand Kåñëa? These are the so many difficult things.
One side, one thing is the mäyä is checking. Mäyä is trying
to put stumbling block for your advancement of spiritual
life. Mäyä-javanikäcchannam. And the other side, we are all
fools and rascals. And the, again, Kåñëa is adhokñaja,
beyond the range of sense perception. This is the position.
So unless we become very serious to understand Kåñëa, it is
very, very difficult to understand Kåñëa. Mäyä-
javanikäcchannam. … mäyä-javanikäcchannam … “Being
beyond the range of limited sense perception, You are the
eternally irreproachable factor covered by the curtain of
deluding energy. You are invisible to the foolish observer,
exactly as an actor dressed as a player is not recognized.”
(SB 1.8.19)
Devotee means one who performs saìkértan
as a matter of duty
One may argue: “people who want can listen to Çréla
Prabhupäda’s bhajans and kértanas on any sound device”.
But how are they supposed to know these kértanas even
exist unless they have experienced them in the streets,
parks, temples and ashrams? And is Lord Caitanya’s
mission only for those in the position of being able –
economically or otherwise – to possess and use the internet
or modern digital audio devices? A life of poverty or
itinerancy does not preclude spirituality and devotion… in
fact spiritually advanced souls in many traditions have been
poor and itinerant… the Six Goswamis of Vrindaban were
mendicants owning no more that their kaupinas and a
water vessel. … It is Kali-yuga and people are restless, lazy
and always disturbed. They don’t know that the purpose of
human life is self realization. The Lord wants the living
entities to satisfy His senses and Lord Caitanya’s saìkértan
movement means that those who have received His mercy
in the form of the pure Holy Name have to go out to spread
it to others, as much as possible in the same form in which
they had encountered it. Bhärata-bhümite haila manuñya-
janma yära janma särthaka kari' kara para-upakära (Cc. Ädi
9.41) … especially those born in India are meant to first
perfect themselves by hearing and chanting and then go and
spread the fortune of Kåñëa consciousness to others... not
that ‘devotee’ means stay in your circle, in your temple,
perform some rituals and be comfortable. Having even a
little genuine faith, hearing from pure devotees and thereby
increasing that faith, one must perform saìkértan as a
matter of duty… for the continuation of one’s own
purification, for the benefit of others and for the satisfaction
of the Lord.
Devotee means “always hearing
transcendental sound”. The processes
(çravaëa) hearing and kértana (explaining, or
reiterating), are of primary importance for
progressive spiritual life to flourish
His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupäda
says: “The äcärya or the gosvämé must be well acquainted
with all these (the revealed scriptures, or Vedas, including
the Puräëas, Itihasa, and so on). To hear and explain them
is more important than reading them. One can assimilate
the knowledge of the revealed scriptures only by hearing
and explaining. Hearing is called çravaëa, and explaining is
called kértana. The two processes of çravaëa and kértana are
of primary importance to progressive spiritual life. Only one
who has properly grasped the transcendental knowledge
from the right source by submissive hearing can properly
explain the subject.” (Srimad Bhagavatam, 1.1.6, purport)
Hearing is most important and Çréla Prabhupäda said that
there should be always be transcendental sound vibrating in
all temples. At home, even if one does not have a circle of
like-minded devotees to do kértana with, one can play Çréla
Prabhupäda’s bhajans and kértanas or proper kértanas by
devotees on any of the now easily and inexpensively
available sound systems. Everyone can hear – even while in
public, while walking or travelling in a vehicle. Devotee
means one who always is hearing and remembering the
transcendental vibrations and thinking of how to give them
to others.
Proper chanting must be learned from pure
devotees
Chanting must be heard and the ways of proper chanting
learned from pure devotees in disciplic succession. The
Padma Purana says “sampradaya-vihina ye mantras te
nisphala matah”… “If your mantra does not come through
the disciplic succession, it will not be effective.” Çréla
Jagadänanda Paëòita, a close and confidential associate of
Lord Caitanya from His childhood, also says in his Prema
Vivarta: “One cannot chant the holy name of Lord Kåñëa
purely in the company of nondevotees. The sound and
syllables of the name may be uttered, but that is not real
chanting. Chanting of this nature is at best the clearing
stage or nämäbhäsa. … If you want to chant Lord Kåñëa's
holy name purely, then earnestly seek the company of pure
devotees of the Supreme Lord, Çré Kåñëa. Reject all the
unwanted desires for sense enjoyment, liberation, mystic
powers, and other material desires.” (Prema Vivarta,
Chapter 7)
Intelligent persons understand things by hearing or reading,
but even an illiterate person or one who doesn’t understand
the language in which the transcendental message is being
spoken or sung, can be greatly purified simply by
receptively hearing. Formerly in South India and still to
some extent at old temples and on the occasion of various
rites in their communities, people qualified by the
traditional training chant Vedic mantras or other mantras
and stotras, such as the Alvars’ Divya Prabhandams, and
because by their training, their chanting is with the proper
pronunciation, rhythm and intonation, it has a purifying
effect on the chanters and the hearers… even if the latter
are outsiders. At the present moment, in this age of Kali, it
is not possible to widely chant the Vedic mantras. The
çästras ordain rather the yuga dharma, namely, harer nama
saìkértan, the congregational chanting of the Hare Krishna
maha mantra: “dhyäyan kåte yajan yajïais tretäyäà dväpare
'rcayan yad äpnoti tad äpnoti kalau saìkértya keçavam” …
“Whatever is achieved by meditation in Satya-yuga, by the
performance of sacrifice in Tretä-yuga, and by the worship
of Lord Kåñëa's lotus feet in Dväpara-yuga is obtained in the
age of Kali simply by glorifying the name of Lord Keçava."
(This verse is found in the Viñëu Puräëa, the Padma Puräëa
(Uttara-khaëòa), the Båhan-näradéya Puräëa and is quoted
by Çréla Prabhupäda in his purport to Srimad Bhagavatam
12.3.52.)
Kértana means the maha-mantra
Besides introductory chanting of the pancatattva maha
mantra three times, only the mahamantra, in tunes sung by
Çréla Prabhupäda, or other simple tunes that can easily be
followed and responded to by the people, should be
chanted in public. And generally, in street saìkértans,
public programs and rathayatras, no other mantras but the
Maha Mantra need to be chanted. Even the Narasimha
mantra is not for public kértana. Devotees who say they are
chanting for protection can chant
kåñëa kåñëa kåñëa kåñëa kåñëa kåñëa kåñëa he
kåñëa kåñëa kåñëa kåñëa kåñëa kåñëa kåñëa he
kåñëa kåñëa kåñëa kåñëa kåñëa kåñëa rakña mäm
kåñëa kåñëa kåñëa kåñëa kåñëa kåñëa pähi mäm
räma räghava räma räghava räma räghava rakña mäm
kåñëa keçava kåñëa keçava kåñëa keçava pähi mäm
As for “Jai Jagannath, Jai Baladev, Jai Subhadra”, It is
nowhere to found in çästras or the writings of äcäryas and
so can not be accepted as a bonafide mantra and therefore
has no place in kértana. As already indicated, the çästras, Çri
Padma Purana in particular, is emphatic in its statement
that if some combination of syllables or words has not been
received in disciplic succession from an authoritative source
then it has no power to liberate the hearer and is therefore
cannot be accepted as mantra. Mantra means ‘capable of:
man–mind; tra–release As far as which mantras are
acceptable for chanting in kértana, in the section to follow,
they are enumerated. Anyone not familiar with Çréla
Prabhupäda’s kértanas can find them on the internet.
Proper chanting
When kirtan is proper, the Lord is personally manifest at
that place: “Gaurasundara said, "When many persons
gather together and properly chant the names of Kåñëa, I
will certainly appear there."” (Caitanya Bhagavat, Adi
Kanda 5.151, Çréla Bhaktisiddhänta Sarasvaté Öhäkura’s
Gaudiya Bashya purport)
Imperfect kértana is unable to bring about
optimum spiritual change in living entities
and will lead them to doubt the potency of
kértana
Saìkértana means 'complete kértana’. Partial or imperfect
kértana is not real saìkértan. The word saìkértan means
saivatobhavena-kértana… complete kértana or kértana that is
performed with knowledge of sambandha-jnana5 and free
from anarthas and aparadhas. The performance of
saìkértana is independent of, or requires no assistance from,
any other forms of devotional service. Partial or imperfect
kértana of Lord Kåñëa's holy name is not called saìkértana.
Partial or imperfect chanting of the holy name of Sri Kåñëa,
is unable to cause the optimum spiritual change in the
living entities. This will lead many people to doubt the
potency of kértana.” (Çréla Bhaktisiddhänta Sarasvaté's
commentary on Bhaktivinoda Thakur's Çré Çikñäñöakam
Sanmodana Bhäñyaà commentary, sloka 1) Therefore, let
there be all victory for the perfect and complete chanting of
the holy name of Sri Kåñëa.
5
The knowledge, at least theoretical, that “I am part-and-
parcel and eternal servant of the Lord”
satisfied or not. By your chanting some public is satisfied –
no, we are not concerned with that. He may be satisfied or
not satisfied. But if I chant in the proper way, then my
predecessors, the äcäryas, will be satisfied. That is my
business, finished, if I don’t invent in my own way.”
(Lecture on Çréla Bhaktisiddhänta Sarasvaté Prabhupäda’s
Appearance Day, Los Angeles, Feb. 7, 1969)
6
Shyamasundar prabhu, personal communication
disciples to sing and play instruments in a specific way.
Someone should learn to play the harmonium properly
following the melody, not simply pumping it, as the
devotees had been doing for years. And the Sanskrit
mantras and bhajanas should be pronounced properly and
the melodies sung correctly. Some melodies were to be
sung in the morning, others in the evening. Each word was
to be pronounced correctly and with the right intonation.
“Prabhupäda liked Yamunä's singing, and Mukunda was an
expert musician for organizing the party. The spacious
Montreal temple was a suitable place for them to practice.
Ideally, Prabhupäda said, the party should have two
mridanga players, one harmonium player, one tamboura
player, and at least six karatäla players. He talked about
sending the group not only to London but to the European
continent and then to Asia also. So he wanted them to
become expert at kértana.”
7
tilaka, neck beads, çikhä and brahmin thread
Anyone who is chanting Hare Kåñëa, jihvägre, with the
tongue, even if he is born in a family of dog-eaters he is
glorious. That is... He is glorious. Yaj-jihvägre näma
tubhyam. So we give this chance. As soon as he chants Hare
Kåñëa, immediately he becomes glorious. Immediately
become glorious. Aho bata çva-pacato 'pi garéyän yaj-
jihvägre nä..., tepus tapas te”. (SB 3.28.19, Nairobi, Oct. 29,
1975)
8
transcendental
The six ragas and thirty-six raginis are servants of Krishna-
kértana."
(Çréla Prabhupadera Goloka-vani, Vol 1, p 1.300-304)
Other instruments
Srimati Pälikä dasi recalls that Prabhupäda did not like
harmoniums played during the kértana. His comment was
that it would “drag” the kértana. Prabhupäda used to say
that his Guru Mahäräja, Bhaktisiddhänta Sarasvaté Öhäkura,
banged the karatälas together and would only have
karatälas and mådaìga played for kértana. The point is that
artistic musicianship can sometimes be distracting from
chanting the holy name. (Adapted from: Srila Prabhupada
Nectar 22, “Prabhupäda Said: On Kértana and Music”)
“The harmonium may be played during bhajana if there is
someone who can play melodiously. But it is not for kértana
and ärati.” (Prabhupäda letter to Bahudak, Bombay, 11
January, 1976)
“Electric guitar, if it is, they chant Hare Kåñëa only, nothing
else, then it is all right. But as far as possible, simply
mrdanga and kartal. But if GBC thinks that it attracts more
people so they give donations, that is a different thing.
Otherwise there is no need.” (Room Conversation, London,
August 15, 1971)
If someone has well developed musical abilities, in whatever
genre or tradition, he can use those abilities in devotional
service. At the same time it should be understood that
certain types of music, jazz, or “heavy metal” for example,
are tamasic by their nature and cannot be offered, just as
meat or liquor cannot to be offered to the Lord.
10
devotional poetry
Caitanya Mahaprabhu and His associates and which
Narottama das Thakur and the others great devotee poets
and singers taught, were lost. What at present passes for
traditional kértana in Bengal, Orissa, Assam and Manipur,
includes elements from apa-sampradayas opposed to the
teachings of the äcärya, and even elements taken from
commercial music. What at present is considered to be
traditional Bengali kértana is therefore in fact not so.
Mundane scholars and historians of music, while talking
about the musical embellishments used by modern singers,
use phrases that may impress: “the latent beauty of” or “the
hidden meanings of” a song, but Srila Prabhupada points
out that because of the subject matter, the songs of the
vaisnanva acharyas are as good as Vedic mantras – not
understood by mundane scholars. Srila Viçvanätha
Cakravarté Öhäkura for example said of the songs of Srila
Narottama däsa Öhäkura that they are fully approved as
completely corresponding with Vedic instruction. So-called
embellishments added by contemporary professional
singers reflect their lack of knowledge of the actual
tradition and meaning. They simply inject their own “ragas”
and “talas” into the old Padavali kértana songs in an effort
to make them more complex and attractive. In fact though,
by doing so they are only polluting and diminishing the
purificatory potency of these compositions. Their
embellishments are not authorized by äcäryas and can only
succeed in deepening the passion and ignorance of singers
and hearers alike. Knowledgeable devotees do want the
kértans that they themselves perform to be attractive but
they understand that attracting masses of mediocre people
by elaborate music is not the purpose of songs in praise of
the Lord. Rather, by understanding that kértana is for the
pleasure of Krishna and by practice of the art of kértana
according to the example and instructions of the äcäryas,
the Lord Himself reveals to sincere singers how their kértans
can be simultaneously attractive to the people in general
and pleasurable to Himself. This requires on the part of
kirtana singers, sincerity, renunciation, and thoughtful
consideration of the precepts and the examples set by the
äcäryas. It cannot be achieved on the basis of one’s birth in
a certain geographical area or by musical skills learned from
ordinary teachers lacking adhikara, spiritual qualifications.
In his purport to Caitanya Caritamrita, Adi Lila, 13.42, Srila
Prabhupada relates that the Lord “used to read the books of
Vidyäpati, Jayadeva and Caëòédäsa, relishing their songs
with His confidential associates like Çré Rämänanda Räya
and Svarüpa Dämodara Gosvämé.” Srila Prabhupada
explains that Vidyäpati, a famous composer of songs about
the pastimes of Rädhä-Kåñëa, hailed from a brähmaëa
family in the province of Mithilä and that he composed his
songs during the reign of King Çivasiàha and Queen
Lachimädevé in the beginning of the fourteenth century of
the Çaka Era (almost one hundred years before the
appearance of Mahäprabhu)… that his songs about the
pastimes of Lord Kåñëa express intense feelings of
separation from Kåñëa, and that Çré Caitanya Mahäprabhu
“relished all those songs in His ecstasy of separation from
Kåñëa”. Jayadeva Goswami was born during the reign of
Mahäräja Lakñmaëa Sena of Bengal in the eleventh or
twelfth century of the Çaka Era. His father was Bhojadeva,
his mother was Vämädevé and he lived for many years in
Navadvépa. His birthplace was the village of Kendubilva in
Birbhum district.11 He passed the last days of his life in
Jagannätha Puré. One of his famous books is Géta-govinda,
full of transcendental mellow feelings of separation from
Kåñëa. As mentioned in Çrémad-Bhägavatam, the gopés felt
separation from Kåñëa before the räsa dance and the Géta-
11
In the opinion of some authorities he was born in Orissa.
Still others say that he was born in South India.
govinda expresses such feelings. … Caëòédäsa was born in
Nännura village also in Birbhum district, in a brähmaëa
family, also in the beginning of the fourteenth century of
the Çakä Era. The writings of both Jayadeva and Caëòédäsa
profusely express the gopis’ transcendental feelings of
separation from Kåñëa and Çréla Bhaktisiddhänta Sarasvaté
Öhäkura comments that the feelings of separation that Lord
Caitanya Mahäprabhu enjoyed by hearing the books of
Vidyäpati, Caëòédäsa and Jayadeva are reserved for intimate
associates of the Lord like Çré Rämänanda Räya and Svarüpa
Dämodara because of their advanced spiritual
consciousness and are not subject matter to be discussed by
ordinary persons imitating the activities of Caitanya
Mahäprabhu.
Referring to Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Goswami’s words, our
Srila Prabhupada says in the same above-quoted Caitanya
Caritamrita purport (Adi Lila, 13.42), that “For critical
students of mundane poetry and literary men without God
consciousness who are after bodily sense gratification, there
is no need to read such a high standard of transcendental
literature. Persons who are after sense gratification should
not try to imitate rägänuga devotional service. The songs of
Caëòédäsa, Vidyäpati and Jayadeva describe the
transcendental activities of the Supreme Personality of
Godhead. Mundane reviewers of these songs simply help
people in general become debauchees, and this leads only to
social scandals and atheism in the world. One should not
misunderstand the pastimes of Rädhä and Kåñëa to be the
activities of a mundane young boy and girl. The mundane
sexual activities of young boys and girls are most
abominable. Therefore, those who are in bodily
consciousness and who desire sense gratification are
forbidden to indulge in discussions of the transcendental
pastimes of Çré Rädhä and Kåñëa.”
One should understand that Vaishnavism in Bengal as a
movement started only in the eleventh and twelfth centuries
CE (while in South India, Srivaisnavism existed practically
from the beginning of Kali Yuga, Nammalwar taking birth
just after its start). One may also remember that Lord
Buddha appeared and had great influence throughout India
about 2,900 years ago at a time when superficially, people
were performing Vedic sacrifices. Their so-called sacrifices
of course were actually a kind of cheating, the actual
purpose of their being performed being that these
brahmans-in-name-only satisfied their taste for the meat of
the animals being so-called sacrificed. Lord Buddha
appeared in Gaya, in Bihar, directly adjacent to Bengal, and
in the absence of any geographical barriers between the two
provinces, it can be safely considered that his influence was
also strongly felt in Bengal. After the advent and spread of
Buddhism, Candragupta Mauriya’s empire had its influence
around 300 BCE followed by the foreign occupations first of
the Muslims and then of the British. Earlier invaders of
India included the Persians (circa 600 BCE) and the Greeks
under Alexander (300 BCE).12 Candragupta Maurya’s
empire expanded under Açoka who initially encouraged the
spread of Buddhism throughout the whole of the Indian
subcontinent. After him, assorted northern tribes invaded
India until the ascendancy of another Gupta dynasty that
for several centuries united a section of the country. In the
seventh century, Arab Muslims began conquering India and
various Muslim leaders developed empires that continued
up to the establishment of the Mogul Empire, the chief ruler
12
A famous pillar erected by the Greek ambassador to the Sunga
kingdom next to a Vishnu temple in the village of Vidisa, Madhya
Pradesh in the late 3rd century BCE - the Besnagar pillar - testifies to
the influence of vaisnavism in North India at the time. The ambassador,
Haileo Darris, erected this pillar as the Garuda Stambha of the temple
declaring himself, in the inscriptions on it, to be a devotee of Krishna.
of which was Akbar, and during the reign of whose son
Jahangir (1605–1627), the British established their first
trading station in India. The Portuguese had been the first
Europeans to arrive, and they competed with the French
and British for commercial control of port cities. Through
treaties with local rulers, the trading companies became
more powerful than Akbar’s Empire, the companies
receiving official monopolies from their governments and
held huge armies of mercenaries. By defeating an Indian
army at the Battle of Plassey, in 1757, the British East India
Company finally gained supremacy. Throughout the
eighteenth century, the Company made treaties or annexed
areas by military campaigns and when finally in full control
of India, ceded the country to the British government.
The essential point to be understood from these historical
events is that there was no externally appreciable Gaudiya
vaisnava movement until the advent of Srila Jayadeva
Goswami and that it started by his influence in Orissa
several hundred years before its beginnings in Bengal.
Vrindavana das Thakura, writes in Sri Caitanya Bhagavat
(Adi, Ch. 2), that Ananta, Siva, Brahma, and the great sages
took birth in the form of great devotees to serve as the
Lord's personal associates. Some took their birth in
Navadvipa, some in Catigram, some in Radhadesa, some in
Orissa, some in Srihatta, and some in Western India, later
assembling in Navadvipa. Srivasa Pandita, Sri Rama Pandita,
and Sri Candrasekharadeva, Pundarika Vidyanidhi,
Caitanya Vallabha, and Vasudeva Datta appeared in
Catigrama, Haridasa in Budhana, Lord Nityananda in
Radha-desa in the village of Ekacakra and Paramananda
Puri appeared in Trihut.
Srila Vrindaban das asks rhetorically “The banks of the
Ganges are most sanctified. Why then would a Vaiñëava
take birth at an impious place? The Lord appeared on the
bank of the Ganges, so why did His associates appear in
distant places?” (äpane hailä avatérëa gaìgä–tére, saìgera
pärñade kene janmayena düre?) Aside from places on the
banks of the Ganges, all other places were “düre: distant,
impious or lamentable places”. Verses 46 and 47 of Sri
Caitanya Bhagavat, Adi-lila, Ch. 2, state that Kåñëa sent the
Pandavas and other great devotees to take birth where
where the Ganga did not flow and where chanting of the
holy names of Lord Hari were absent. In the preceding verse
Vrindaban das asks: “Why then did the Lord’s personal
associates take birth in “other, distant” places? He answers
the question himself: “Because He loves all living entities as
a father loves his children, the Supreme Lord ordered these
great devotees to take birth in these different places. To
deliver the residents of the material world, Lord Caitanya
descended to the world of matter. Thinking them equal to
holy places, these great Vaisnavas took birth in lamentable,
impious countries and lamentable impious families. In this
way they delivered everyone. In whatever country and
whatever family they have descended to this world, with
their great power these Vaisnavas delivered everyone in an
area of eight-hundred thousand miles. Any place where the
Vaisnavas manifest their glories becomes very pure and
sacred, a place of pilgrimage.” (CB, Adi 2.47–51)
Vrindavana das Thakura, the Vedavyasa of the Lord’s
incarnation as Lord Caitanya, appeared in the twenty first
year of Mahaprabhu’s presence and was sixteen years of age
when He disappeared. Being the great vaisnava that he was,
he was very well aware of the conditions, social, political,
cultural and religious, of society at the time. His Sri
Caitanya Bhagavat biography of Mahaprabhu contains
copious statements regarding these conditions, so
statements of his to the effect that places in all parts of the
then Bengal other than those on the banks of the Ganges
were “impious and lamentable”, and assertions that there
were numerous non-devotee karmis, yogis, jïänés,
sannyäsés and tapasvés in Navadvépa at the time should
establish in the understanding of readers that Bengal –
except for those parts located directly on the banks of the
Ganges – was an uncultured, undesirable place. He quotes
the few devotee residents of Navadwipa that participated in
the Lord’s nocturnal kirtans in the house of Srinivasa
Acarya: “May those fallen persons who ridicule the
performance of kértana drown in the transcendental
mellows of Kåñëa consciousness.” (CB, Madhya 2.62) He
continues: “In this Navadvépa (…) the teachers all act dumb
when there is opportunity to glorify the devotional service
of Kåñëa. All the great sannyäsés, ascetics, and learned
scholars that reside in Navadvépa never explain that the
purport of the scriptures is to glorify Kåñëa, rather they
constantly engage in blasphemy. All the sinful listeners are
captivated by their words, and therefore they consider us no
better than straw.” (CB, Madhya 2.66–69) Çréla
Bhaktisiddhänta Sarasvaté comments: “When the desireless
devotees heard the most heart-rending envious statements
of persons opposed to the chanting of Kåñëa’s names and
excessively afflicted by both the famine of kåñëa-kértana and
the formidable threefold miseries, they passed their time in
constant mental distress.” (Commentary on CB, Madhya
2.70)
Srila Vrindaban Dasa Thakur continues: “By the merciful
glance of Sarasvaté, the goddess of learning, hundreds of
thousands of children, youths, and old people were expert
in the scriptures.” Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati
comments: “The words trividha-vayase indicate children,
youths, and old people. By the mercy of Sarasvaté, they were
all expert in the scriptures.” (CB, Ädi-khaëòa 2.59) “They
were all proud of being great scholars. Even a young boy
would challenge his teacher.” “The cultivation of
knowledge was so mature that people all considered
themselves matchless scholars. By the power of their
learning, even young students who were still studying
competed with elder mature teachers with hopes of
winning.” “By the merciful glance of Ramä, the goddess of
fortune, everyone lived happily there, but they wasted their
time in mundane activities.” Çréla Bhaktisiddhänta
Sarasvaté’s commentary: “Although by the mercy of
Lakñmédevé, Navadvépa was full of opulences and the abode
of happiness, people who were maddened by material
happiness were simply interested to increase their material
knowledge in order to gratify their senses. Thus they
uselessly spent their time in ordinary worldly dealings.”
(CB, Ädi 2.62) “Favoured by Goddess Laksmi's glance,
everyone was happy. Still, interested only in the taste of
material things, they wasted their lives. No one was
interested in devotional service to Lord Krishna and Lord
Rama. From the beginning of Kali-yuga, this disinterest had
grown more and more. The only religion the people knew
was keeping an all-night vigil and singing songs to Goddess
Mangala-Candi (Durga). Some proudly worshipped the
snake-goddess Manasa. Others offered great wealth to the
deities of demigods and demigoddesses. Spending for the
weddings of their sons and daughters, they lost great
wealth. In this way they wasted their time in this world.
Even the Bhattacaryas, Cakravatis and Misras13 did not
know the true meaning of the scriptures. Although they
taught the scriptures, they were materialistic. Yama's noose
already rested around the necks of both them and their
students. No one would discuss Krishna-kértana, which is
the true yuga-dharma. If they could not mock the faults of
others, no one was interested to speak. No one wanted to
praise others. The holy names of Lord Hari could not be
found in the mouths of persons proud to be renounced and
austere. The most deeply pious persons would perhaps say
the name “Govinda” or “Pundarikaksa” as they bathed.
13
Brahmin families
Descriptions of devotional service did not appear on
tongues explaining Bhagavad-gita and Srimad-Bhagavatam.”
(CB [Krishna Library Edn.] Adi 2.62–72)
Vrindaban das Thakur continues: “Everyone was mad after
the taste of material happiness. No one was eager to
worship and serve Lord Krishna. Some worshipped Goddess
Vasuli (Durga) with many offerings. Others worshipped the
yaksas with offerings of flesh and wine. Again and again
they danced, sang, and played musical instruments, making
a great noise. Still, they would not hear the supremely
auspicious name of Lord Krishna. (CB, Madhya 2.86–88)
“The entire world was devoid of spiritual practice, for
everyone was attached to insignificant sense gratification.”
Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakur commentary:
“During the time of Gaurasundara, the living entities of this
material world were extremely maddened by the
insignificant taste of sense objects. Instead of realizing that
the only purpose of life was to make spiritual advancement,
people were eager for their own sense enjoyment and averse
to the service of Kåñëa. In fact, the community of sense
enjoyers, who glorify religiosity, economic development,
and sense gratification, and the community of renunciates,
who aspire for liberation from material existence, became
completely devoid of devotional service to Kåñëa. Not even
the slightest propensity for serving Kåñëa could be found in
their hearts at any time. Even those who recited or heard
Bhagavad-gétä or Çrémad Bhägavatam never engaged in
saìkértana.” … “Even if some persons exhibited an attempt
to teach Bhagavad-gétä or Çrémad Bhägavatam, in spite of
studying these devotional scriptures, they never engaged in
congregational chanting of the holy names, nor did they
realize that such chanting was the only purport of the
devotional scriptures, nor did they induce others to engage
in congregational chanting.” (CB, Ädi 16.8–9)
Further on in Caitanya Bhagavat we find the following
words spoken by the vaisnava devotees of Navadvip to Lord
Caitanya while He played the role of scholar: “In Navadvipa
there are many big, big sannyasis, tapasvis, and jnanis. But,
O my son, they will not talk about Lord Kåñëa. They will
not glorify Lord Kåñëa. Instead, at every moment they insult
Lord Kåñëa. The sinners hear their words and accept them.
In that way the people do not think us as good as blades of
straw. O my son, for this reason our bodies burn with pain:
We do not anywhere hear the chanting of Lord Kåñëa's
names.” (CB [Krishna Library edition] Madhya 2.67–70)
In his purport to the song Çré Kåñëa Caitanya Prabhu by
Srila Narottama däsa Öhäkura, Srila Prabhupada says (Los
Angeles, January 11, 1969): “Advaita Prabhu saw the fallen
souls, they are all engaged simply in sense gratificatory
processes without understanding Kåñëa consciousness, He
felt very much compassionate upon the fallen souls, and He
felt Himself as incapable of claiming all these fallen souls.
He therefore prayed to Lord Kåñëa that "You come Yourself.
Without Your personal presence, it is not possible to deliver
these fallen souls." So by His invitation Lord Caitanya
appeared. In this song and others composed by Narottama
däsa Öhäkura, we don’t find any praise or glorification of
the culture of Bengal at the time. On the contrary, as did
Vrindaban das Öhäkura, he points out the materialistic and
envious nature of the people there at the time.
Need any more be said about whatever kértana “tradition”
some seem to think once existed? Whatever utterances of
the Lord’s names that took place were not at all devotional
or authorized by acaryas and çästras. Srila Vrindaban das,
speaking about the situation of the few vaisnavas of the
time, says: “Devotees felt endless suffering, performed their
devotional duties, worshipped Lord Krishna, bathed in the
Ganga, and discussed topics of Lord Krishna and prayed for
the Lord to give His mercy to everyone. Advaita Acarya was
the glorious leader of the Navadvipa Vaisnavas, the best
teacher of jnana, bhakti and vairagya–renunciation who,
thinking in this way, with great determination served Lord
Krishna's feet and caused Him to descend.” (CB [Krishna
Library edition])
Vrindaban das Thakur writes: “Srivasa Pandita, at whose
home Lord Caitanya enjoyed many pastimes, resided in
Navadvipa. The four brothers (Srivasa, Srirama, Sripati and
Srinidhi) always chanted Lord Krishna's holy names. Three
times daily they bathed in the Ganga and worshipped Lord
Krishna. By the Supreme Lord's order, many liberated souls
took birth in this world and, their true identities concealed,
resided in the district of Nadiya. These devotees were Sri
Candrasekhara, Jagadisa, Gopinatha, Sriman, Murari, Sri
Garuda, and Gangadasa. I have mentioned the names only
of some of the great souls I personally knew. If I described
all of the Lord's associates, this book would become very
large.” (CB, 2.96–100) “All these great souls were noble and
generous. They were attentive to their proper duties. They
did not know anything but devotional service to Lord
Krishna. They thought of each other as friends. They did
not know that they were liberated souls who had descended
from the spiritual world. When they saw that there was no
devotion to Lord Visnu in the entire world, their hearts
burned with grief. They did not hear anyone discuss topics
of Lord Krishna. Therefore amongst themselves they
glorified Lord Krishna. They would meet in Advaita's home
and talk about Krishna for an hour or two. In this way all
their sufferings would go away. Seeing everyone burning in
the flames of materialism, the devotees could not speak.
They could only weep. Meeting with Advaita, the devotees
tried to make the people understand all this, but the people
could not understand. Filled with grief, Advaita began to
fast. The Vaisnavas breathed with long and heavy sighs.
“Why dance for Krishna? Why chant His names? What is
this 'saìkértana' the Vaisnavas talk about?” Speaking these
words, the people in general could not understand
anything. They desired only money and children. Gathering
together, they would mock the Vaisnavas. At night the four
brothers (Srivasa, Srirama, Sripati and Srinidhi) would meet
in Srivasa's house and loudly sing Lord Hari's holy names.
Hearing this, the impious neighbours would declare, “That
mad brahmana will ruin our village.” “When he hears this
chanting, the ferocious Muslim king will become wildly
angry at the people of Nadiya.” Someone said: “This
brahmana should be driven out of our village. We should
tear his house into pieces and send the pieces floating down
the river. “If this brahmana is chased away, then our village
will be peaceful and prosperous. If he is not chased away,
Muslim soldiers will occupy our village.” (CB [Krishna
Library edition] 2.96–115)
Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakur in his Caitanya
Bhagavat Gaudiya Bhasya commentary states that literature
such as Bhagavad Gita and Srimad Bhagavatam “is always
discussed among liberated swan-like Vaisnavas. But at that
time, those who studied pure devotional literatures like
Bhagavad-gita and Srimad Bhagavatam never explained that
worshiping the Supreme Lord is the only duty of the living
entities. Their recitation and teaching of Bhagavad-gita and
Srimad Bhagavatam was meant for achieving immediate
sense gratification, and they thus twisted the meanings of
these two books to make them appear like the ordinary
book Saptaśati-Caṇḍī (also known as the Śrī Devī
Mahatmyam), which is meant for satisfying one's senses.
And the nondevotee communities presently recite Gita and
Bhagavata in this way. Such recitation of Gita and Bhagavata
by conditioned souls who are simply interested in sensual
happiness is an obstacle for one's advancement and simply
leads one to hell, because that is never recitation of Gita and
Bhagavata. Rather, such recitation is a collection of ordinary
mundane words for gratifying the senses.” (CB, Adi 2.72,
commentary)
In conclusion regarding the topic of supposed “traditional
Bengali kirtan”, all the above statements from Lord
Caitanya’s principal biographer should establish in the
minds of readers of this dissertation on the subject of
proper kértana that any traditions relating to kértana or any
other aspect of life prevalent among the people of Bengal
around the time that Lord Caitanya advented Himself were
not at all pure vaisnava traditions. Although these words
may disturb the minds of neophyte devotees harbouring
popular notions on the subject, Srila Bhaktisiddhanta
Sarasvati Thakur says about those who are actually
devotees: "A chanter of Hari-kértana is necessarily the
uncompromising enemy of worldliness and hypocrisy. It is
his constant function to dispel all misconceptions by
preaching the truth in its most unambiguous form, without
any consideration of person, place, or time. The form to be
adopted is that which is least likely to be misunderstood. It
is his bounden duty to clearly and frankly oppose any
person who tries to deceive and harm himself and others by
misrepresenting the truth, whether due to malice or
genuine misunderstanding. This will be possible if the
chanter of kértana is always prepared to submit to being
trodden upon by thoughtless people, if such discomfort will
enable him to benefit his persecutors by chanting of the
truth in the most unambiguous manner. If he is unwilling
or afraid out of considerations of self-respect or personal
discomfort to chant kértana under all circumstances, he is
unfit to be a preacher of the absolute truth. Humility
implies perfect submission to the truth and no sympathy for
untruth. Those who entertain any partiality for untruth are
unfit to chant Hari-kértana. Any clinging to untruth is
opposed to the principle of humility born of absolute
submission to the truth." (Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati
Thakur, The Harmonist, 26.249–50, April 1929)
Having read and understood all the above, some readers
may wonder how the Lord’s Saìkértana movement in
Nabadvipa became so influential that, in such a short time
as in fact was the case, He could muster a civil disobedience
demonstration involving a hundred thousand participants
challenging the Muslim ruler’s edict banning Sankirtan?
The following few paragraphs offer the explanation and
further establish that the Hari Nama Sankirtan movement
inaugurated by the Lord was entirely unique and was not
the result of some sort of evolution from any previously
existing musical practices.
After Mahaprabhu married and began to preach the
congregational chanting of the holy Names of the Lord,
some of the brähmaëas of Navadvépa manifested envy of
His popularity and put hindrances in His path, finally
taking their complaint to the Muslim magistrate who
warned the followers of Nimäi Paëòita as the Lord was then
known, not to chant loudly. Lord Caitanya asked His
followers to disobey the orders of the Kazi, and they
continued with their saìkértana. The magistrate sent
constables who interrupted a saìkértana procession and
broke many mådaìgas. When Mahaprabhu heard about
this, He organized a party of one hundred thousand men
with thousands of mådaìgas and karatälas which proceeded
through the streets of Navadvépa in defiance of the Kazi.
Lord Caitanya subsequently met the Kazi in his palace and
had some discussion with him. The Kazi within himself
harboured some favourable feelings toward Mahaprabhu’s
uncle whom he also referred to as “uncle” and the Lord
finally convinced him about the legitimacy and purity of
His Saìkértana movement, the Kazi becoming one His
followers.
Another factor in the Lord’s Saìkértana coming to be so
suddenly accepted by the residents of Nabadvipa was His
defeat and subsequent deliverance of one Digvijayé Paëòita:
When the Lord, Nimäi Paëòita, was residing in Navadvépa
as the topmost of all the teachers, a great Digvijayé Paëòita
who had received a benediction from Sarasvaté arrived
there. The Digvijayé had already defeated in argument the
learned scholars of all provinces and after hearing that the
scholars of Navadvépa were famous throughout India for
their learning, he proudly arrived in the city in order to
defeat them. Hearing about his arrival, the entire scholarly
community of Navadvépa became restless and worried.
When the students of Nimäi Paëòita gave Him the news, He
told them, “The Supreme Lord and destroyer of everyone’s
pride always destroys the pride of arrogant persons. Trees
with fruits and persons with good qualities are always
humble. Because great Digvijayé kings like Haihaya,
Nahuña, Vena, Bäëa, Naraka, and Rävaëa were excessively
intoxicated with pride, the Lord ultimately destroyed their
pride. Therefore the Lord will soon destroy the pride of this
Digvijayé who has come to Navadvépa.” After speaking in
this way, that evening the Lord sat on the bank of the
Ganges and began to contemplate how to conquer this
Digvijayé. At that time, as the full moon shone in the sky,
the Digvijayé arrived before the Lord and was informed by
the students about the identity of the wonderfully effulgent
Nimäi Paëòita. The Lord first exchanged a few words with
the Digvijayé and then respectfully and tactfully requested
him to describe the glories of the Ganges. Thereupon the
Digvijayé began to quickly and incessantly compose and
recite verses in glorification of Gaìgädevé like the rumbling
of hundreds of clouds. Everyone there was struck with
wonder on seeing the amazing poetic ability of the great
Digvijayé. When the Digvijayé stopped after incessantly
reciting verses for three hours, the Lord requested him to
explain the verses. As soon as Digvijayé began to explain,
the Lord pointed out innumerable faults in alaìkära and
other literary rules in the beginning, middle, and end of his
description. The Digvijayé could not reply to any of the
Lord’s challenges; all his ingenuity became overshadowed.
When on seeing this, the Lord’s students were about to
laugh, the Lord checked them and solaced the Digvijayé in
various ways. He told him to go home, take rest, and, after
studying further, return the next day. Being extremely
embarrassed and saddened within, the Digvijayé began to
think, “I have defeated even the extraordinary scholars of
the six branches of philosophy, but due to providence I
have finally been defeated by a young ordinary grammar
teacher! How is it possible? It must be that I have
committed some offense at the feet of Sarasvaté-devé.”
Thinking in this way, he began to chant the Sarasvaté
mantra and soon fell asleep.
That very night, Sarasvaté appeared before Digvijayé Paëòita
and disclosed to him the real identity of Nimäi Paëòita. She
said, “Nimäi Paëòita is not an ordinary worldly scholar. He
is the omnipotent and original Supreme Personality of
Godhead. Sarasvaté-devé is only a shadow of His internal
potency. This Sarasvaté, who is the shadow of the internal
potency of the Lord, is ashamed to stand before Näräyaëa,
therefore she remains in the background.” Devé further told
the Digvijayé Paëòita that he had now actually achieved the
fruit of his worship, because he had the good fortune of
seeing the Lord of innumerable universes. Then, after
instructing the Digvijayé to quickly go to the Lord and
surrender at His lotus feet, she disappeared.
When the Digvijayé awoke from his sleep, he immediately
went to the Lord and informed Him in faltering words of
the details of his dream and the instructions of Sarasvaté-
devé. The Lord, who is the master of Sarasvaté, also
instructed Digvijayé about the superiority of spiritual
knowledge, which is favorable for worshiping the Supreme
Lord, and the abomination of material knowledge, which is
the source of false pride and domination. The Lord said,
“The fruit of cultivating knowledge is to fix the mind at the
lotus feet of Kåñëa, and devotion to Viñëu, or spiritual
knowledge, is the only truth and desirable object.” After
speaking these words of instruction, the Lord particularly
forbade Digvijayé from revealing to anyone the truths that
he had heard from Sarasvaté, which are confidential to even
the Vedas.
By the mercy of the Lord, devotion, detachment, and
spiritual knowledge simultaneously manifest in the body of
Digvijayé Paëòita and, being fully satisfied by achieving
pure devotional service, he became tåëäd api sunéca –
“more humble than a straw in the street”.
While describing the nature of Gaura’s mercy, Vrindaban
das Thakur has written, “Even a most proud person
becomes extremely humble by the mercy of Gaura. Even
persons who are intoxicated with pride due to material
wealth give up royal happiness to live in the forest and
worship Hari. If the most alluring objects desired by
materialistic persons are abundantly available to persons
who have received the mercy of the Lord, they can easily
abandon them. What to speak of royal happiness, the
devotees of Kåñëa consider even the happiness of liberation
as insignificant.” When the scholars of Navadvépa saw the
wonderful prowess of Nimäi Paëòita and His victory over
the Digvijayé in this way, they desired to confer on Him the
title of Bädisiàha, and thus His matchless glories were
declared. (CB, Ädi-khaëòa 13.1)
After these incidents Lord Caitanya began to more
vigorously preach and propagate His bhägavata-dharma, the
saìkértana movement, and whoever stood against this
propagation of the yuga-dharma was chastised in various
ways. The Lord daily sent His followers, including Çréla
Nityänanda Prabhu and Öhäkura Haridäsa from door to
door to preach the Çrémad-Bhägavatam. Navadvépa became
surcharged with His saìkértana movement with the Lord’s
headquarters being the houses of Çréväsa Öhäkura and Çré
Advaita Prabhu, two of His chief householder disciples.
They were learned heads of the brähmaëa community and
the most ardent supporters of Lord Caitanya's movement,
Çré Advaita Prabhu being the chief cause of the Lord’s
advent. When Advaita Prabhu saw that the people were
materialistic and devoid of devotional service – which alone
can save mankind from the threefold miseries of material
existence – He, out of compassion, prayed fervently for the
incarnation of the Lord and continually worshiped Him. As
far as preaching work in the saìkértana movement everyone
was expected to do his daily share according to the order of
the Lord.
Nityänanda Prabhu and Çréla Haridäsa Öhäkura, walking on
a main road one day, saw a noisy crowd. Two brothers,
Jagäi and Mädhäi, born in a respectable brähmaëa family,
were drunk and were creating a public disturbance. They
were not only drunkards but also meat-eaters, woman-
hunters, dacoits and sinful in many other ways.
Çréla Nityänanda Prabhu heard some accounts of them and
decided that they should be the first to be delivered, the
good name of Lord Caitanya thereby sure to become still
more glorified. Nityänanda Prabhu and Haridäsa asked the
brothers to chant the holy name of Lord Hari but they
became enraged and attacked Nityänanda Prabhu with foul
words. The next day Nityänanda Prabhu went to see the
brothers but they immediately struck them with a piece of
earthen pot. In spite of this attack, Nityänanda Prabhu
requested them to chant the holy name of Krishna.
Mahäprabhu hastened to the spot, invoking his Sudarshan
weapon to kill Jagai and Madai but Nityananda Prabhu
asked Him to spare them. The Lord agreed to his request on
the condition that the brothers completely give up their
sinful ways. They agreed and promised to do as He
instructed and the Lord accepted them and did not again
refer to their past misdeeds. Subsequently, one of the
bothers dutifully accepted the duty of serving the
brahmanas that daily came to a particular bathing ghat. The
news of the brothers’ reformation was one of the influences
that induced the residents of Navadvip to become
favourable to the Lord and His Saìkértana movement,
enabling the Lord to muster such a large number of
protesters as He did when the Kazi banned their public
performance of saìkértan.
During His householder life, the Lord did not display many
of the miracles which are generally expected from such
personalities but He did once perform a miracle in the
house of Çréniväsa Öhäkura while saìkértana was going on,
asking the devotees what they wanted to eat. When they
informed Him that they wanted mangoes, He sowed a
mango seed in the yard and within no time a full-grown tree
heavy with ripe mangos appeared. The tree remained in
Çréniväsa's yard, and the devotees subsequently would take
as many mangoes from the tree as they wanted.
Caitanya Mahäprabhu once was chanting the names of the
gopés instead of the names of the Lord. Some of His
students advised Him to chant the name of Kåñëa instead.
The Lord, being thus disturbed by the foolish students,
chastised them and chased them away. The students
thought of the Lord as one of their peers, held a meeting
and resolved that they would attack the Lord if He dared to
punish them again in such a manner. This incident
provoked some malicious talk about the Lord on the part of
the general public and when the Lord became aware of this,
thinking of the various types of men found in society, noted
that especially the students, professors, fruitive workers,
yogés, nondevotees, and different types of atheists were all
opposed to devotional service of the Lord. "My mission is to
deliver all the fallen souls of this age," He thought, "but if
they commit offenses against Me, thinking Me to be an
ordinary man, they will not benefit. If they are to begin
their life of spiritual realization, they must some way or
another offer obeisances to Me." The Lord thus decided to
accept sannyäsa, as people in general were inclined to offer
respects to a sannyäsé. Five hundred years ago society was
degraded but not as much as it is today. People would show
respect to sannyäsés – who in those days were still strict in
following the rules and regulations of that order. Very few
sannyäsés in this age of Kali are able to observe the
regulations of sannyäsa life but Caitanya Mahäprabhu
decided to accept the order and become an ideal sannyäsé so
that the general populace would show Him respect. A
sannyäsé is considered to be the master of all varëas and
äçramas. He soon asked Keçava Bhäraté to award Him
sannyäsa although Keçava Bhäraté was not in the Vaiñëava-
sampradäya. The Lord then left Navadvépa for Katwa to
formally accept sannyäsa, accompanied by Çréla Nityänanda
Prabhu, Candraçekhara Äcärya, and Mukunda Datta who
assisted in the details of the ceremony.
Mahaprabhu was at this time twenty-four years of age.
During His householder life His chief assistants were Çréla
Advaita Prabhu and Çréla Çréväsa Öhäkura, but after
accepting sannyäsa, His chief assistants were Çréla
Nityänanda Prabhu, who He deputed to preach specifically
in Bengal, and the Six Gosvämés (Rüpa Gosvämé, Sanätana
Gosvämé, Jéva Gosvämé, Gopäla Bhaööa Gosvämé,
Raghunätha däsa Gosvämé and Raghunätha Bhaööa
Gosvämé), headed by Çréla Rüpa and Sanätana, who He
deputed to go to Våndävana to excavate places of
pilgrimage. The Lord then started for Puré, leaving all the
residents of Navadvépa in lamentation over His separation.
Do all the members of a saìkértana party
have to be formally initiated devotees?
Prabhupada’s statement previously quoted (in the sub-
section “Proper chanting must be learned from pure
devotees”), that “… all the members of the party will be
pure devotees. None of them should be outsiders” may give
rise in the mind of readers to the question of whether or not
the members of a saìkértan party all have to be formally
initiated. The answer is to found many places in the
teaching of Srila Prabhupada and of the Goswamis.
Prabhupada says: “First of all you have to decide whether
you will abide by the rules and regulations and become
Kåñëa conscious. That is your consideration. You have to
decide for yourself whether you are going to take this Kåñëa
consciousness seriously. That is your decision. Initiation is
a formality. If you are serious, that is real initiation. If you
have understood this Kåñëa philosophy and if you have
decided that you will take Kåñëa consciousness seriously
and preach the philosophy to others, that is your initiation.
My touch is simply a formality. It is your determination."
(Conversation with Paul Valliere, July 5, 1972, New York,
BTG #49–1972)
Pure devotee means having no material desires. Material
desire means ultimately sex desire. One who by his dress,
tonsure and behaviour is seen to be interested in attraction
the opposite sex is not a pure devotee and should not be
part of a saìkértan party… at least he should not be the
leader. Material desire also means any desire other than that
of pleasing the Lord, so if devotees are interested in dancing
for their own pleasure – dancing in a circle, or in pairs,
whirling around with their backs to the Deity half the time,
are not pure devotees and should not be part of a kirtan
party… at least they should restricted.
Is the devotional mood being lost? Deviation from
pure Kåñëa kirtan is noticed even by non–Gaudiyas
Even non-Gaudiya vaisnavas notice when the devotional
mood fully manifest in the kirtans and bhajans performed
by Srila Prabhupada is not present… They notice when
there is a departure from his pure Kåñëa kirtan. An article
about Sikh kirtan explains that the Adi Guru Granth – the
principal sacred book of the Sikhs – is written to the ragas
of the Sama Veda and that their kirtans, consisting of
singing of the shabds, or hymns of the Sama Veda,
constitute the core of the Sikhs’ worship. (The chapters of
the Adi Granth are named according to the ragas and are
sung to a specific tala, or numerical notation of rhythm.)
The author of the article laments that the traditional ragas
are disappearing in the gurudwaras (the Sikh temples),
being replaced with non-musical chanting or readings: “The
traditional Nama Shabd sung by Sikh musicians in Raga
style are now sadly being replaced with contrived tunes –
some even set to Bollywood music. This is evidence of the
same sort of deterioration of pure Kåñëa kirtan we find in
the modern so-called “kirtaniya” movement of the bhakti
yoga community.” Elaborating on the “new” Sikh kirtans,
the author of the article says: “Vociferous beating on tablas
and wailing on harmoniums has replaced the refined,
skilled, Vedic musical offering of traditional ragas and so
the devotional mood is being lost.” Replacing “tablas” with
“mrdangas”, the same observation can increasingly often be
made about the situation in the present Krishna
consciousness movement.14
Prabhupada and the earlier Gaudiya äcäryas didn’t teach the
Vedic system of music and chanting for the reason that
perfect saìkértan does not depend on Vedic formulations
14
(https://sanatansikhi.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2012-
04-13T03:26:00-07:00&max-results=7&reverse-paginate=true)
but on surrender and tivrena… concentrated following of
their instructions. Prabhupada said “chant as I chant”, and
if that instruction is followed, perfection of kirtan chanting
can be easily attained.
Considering all the above preceding points and arguments
regarding kirtans in tunes, style and instrumental
accompaniment other than as precisely indicated by the
acarya, Srila Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, the question
arises regarding whether or not kirtans performed by
neophytes, having experience only of the dim reflection of
the Holy Names (namabhasa), should be joined by aspiring
devotees. Srila Bhaktivinode Thakur in his book Jaiva
Dharma (in the 24th chapter) answers the question
“mayavadhi-impersonalists, karmis-fruitive workers, jnanis,
and yogis are all offenders to the holy name. When many of
them gather together and chant, or if the lead singer is a
nama-aparadhi, is it right for a devotee who is not
contaminated by these non-devotional afflictions to join
them?” as follows: “If namaparadhis-offenders to the holy
name are prominent among the chanters, it is not right for a
genuine devotee to join them in chanting, but if the chanters
are mostly devotees free of these contaminations, or devotees
whose chanting is on the level of namabhasa – the reflection
of the holy name – then there is no harm in their taking part.
In fact it is good. That chanting brings them spiritual
happiness.” (Jaiva Dharma, Ch. 24, paraphrase)
16
çåëvan su-bhadräëi rathäìga-päëer, janmäni karmäëi ca yäni loke ||
gétäni nämäni tad-arthakäni, gäyan vilajjo vicared asaìgaù : An
intelligent person who has controlled his mind and conquered fear
should give up all attachment to material objects such as wife, family
and nation and should wander freely without embarrassment, hearing
and chanting the holy names of the Lord, the bearer of the chariot
wheel. The holy names of Kåñëa are all-auspicious because they
describe His transcendental birth and activities, which He performs
within this world for the salvation of the conditioned souls. Thus the
holy names of the Lord are sung throughout the world.
Vaiñëava preacher finds a submissive nondevotee who is
willing to hear about Kåñëa, the preacher will always give
his merciful association to such a person. But a Vaiñëava
should strictly avoid those who are not interested in hearing
about Kåñëa.” (SB 11.2.39 P)
Comments, reviews17
“Thank you for these helpful quotes. I will start sending
them out on my daily posting of Srila Prabhupada quotes. I
have forwarded your mail and the book to the Kértana
Standards Committee. … …basically I support your thesis.”
– His Holiness Bhakti Vikas Swami
“Thank you for your booklet which I have gone thru and
the many pertinent and important points which you make.
– His Holiness Janananda Goswami,
Convener, ISKCON GBC Kértan Standards Committee
17
Some in relation to an early version of the present work
“The issue of kirtana is more vital than any issue facing our
movement today. … I had a very unique insider view of the
matters concerning kértana and I began my relationship
with Srila Prabhupada in full awareness of the need for
authenticity and purity in the matter of chanting. This is a
descending process and nothing on earth can improve upon
it. If it were possible to improve on the means by which the
Äcärya presented the descent of the Holy Name, he would
have mentioned it. A non-initiated person can, and will,
chant any melody he damn well pleases… and there is no
offense in that… but an initiated devotee must understand
that his relationship with the Acharya is absolute and for
that reason there is no wiggle room to either add or subtract
from the initiation vow to neither add nor subtract but to
accept the sound vibration of the äcärya as it is.”
– Sriman Naranarayan das
Comments, reviews
“Brilliant. Excellent quotations from scripture and the
acharyas. … very well researched. … a wonderful book and
I'm relishing every page.” – Sriman Vidura das
(former General Manager, Gita Nagari press)
“I do appreciate what he’s done … painstakingly combining
so many different references…”
– Sriman Riddha das
“Thank you for doing this most valuable service”
– Sriman Padmagarbha das
“A very valuable reference ... the headings and the content
are very enlightening… Highly recommended…”
– Sriman Ajamila das
“… impressive and certainly beautiful that the proper
heritage of kirtan is being taken care of.”
– Adam Dolhaniuk, Nama Hatta, Katowice, Poland
(continued from second to last page)