Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PGY4
General Surgery
Yaw, roll, and pitch
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aircraft_principal_axes
Central Line placement associated with potential major morbidity:
Infection
Arterial injury
Hemo- and pneumothorax
Stroke
Cardiac tamponade
https://openi.nlm.nih.gov/detailedresult.php?img=PMC346876
7_jkms-27-1265-g001&req=4
Central line complications related to placement decrease with:
Clinicians who have performed > 50 line insertions 1
Ultrasound use 2
1. Young MP. (2016). Complications of central venous catheters and their prevention. In: UpToDate, Collins KA (Ed), UpToDate, Waltham, MA. (Accessed on May 17, 2016.)
2. McGee DC & Gould MK. (2003). Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. NEJM, 348: 1123-1133.
3. Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, O’Leary KJ, & Wayne DB. (2009). Simulation-based mastery learning reduces complications during central venous catheter insertion in a medical intensive care
unit. Crit Care Med, 37(10): 2697-701.
Inaugural Multidisciplinary M&M – June 2014
Resident-led
Central line complication resulting in vascular surgery intervention
Resident Task Force formed with assistance from faculty across five
departments:
Anesthesia
Emergency Medicine Why?
Family Medicine
Internal Medicine
Surgery
To develop and implement a
Line placement on
simulator demonstration
http://www.ultrasonix.com/blog/internal-jugular-vein-vascular-access-line-placement
CLeAR lab designed and built
custom-made simulator
perfused, ultrasound-
compatible neck model
pressurized liquid mimics
arterial/venous pressures
capable of multiple sticks
without wear and tear
very affordable compared
to market alternatives ($5K
for 3 vs $6K for 1)
Interns Trained
99 interns in 11 classes
Anesthesia – 12
Emergency Medicine – 10
Family Medicine – 10
Internal Medicine – 35
Surgery – 29
Also, 3 from Neuro
Instructors Trained/Scheduled
12 instructors in 4 “Train the Trainer” classes
Mean: 13.7 Mean: 16.1
95% CI: 13.1-14.3 95% CI: 15.7-16.6
median: 14 median: 16.5
p<0.001
Comfort increased for
line placement with
ultrasound, from 2.29 +/-
1.18 to 3.61 +/-0.79,
p<0.001