You are on page 1of 22

Journal of Asthma

ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ijas20

Factors associated with future hospitalization


among children with asthma: a systematic review

Simran Aggarwal, Tanita Cepalo, Sana Gill, Madhura Thipse, Kerry-Lee


Clifton, Andrea Higginson, James Vu, Vid Bijelić, Nick Barrowman, Sandra
Giangioppo & Dhenuka Radhakrishnan

To cite this article: Simran Aggarwal, Tanita Cepalo, Sana Gill, Madhura Thipse, Kerry-
Lee Clifton, Andrea Higginson, James Vu, Vid Bijelić, Nick Barrowman, Sandra Giangioppo
& Dhenuka Radhakrishnan (2023) Factors associated with future hospitalization among
children with asthma: a systematic review, Journal of Asthma, 60:3, 425-445, DOI:
10.1080/02770903.2022.2070762

To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2022.2070762

View supplementary material

Published online: 06 May 2022.

Submit your article to this journal

Article views: 249

View related articles

View Crossmark data

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at


https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ijas20
Journal of Asthma
2023, VOL. 60, NO. 3, 425–445
https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2022.2070762

Review

Factors associated with future hospitalization among children with


asthma: a systematic review
Simran Aggarwal, MD Candidatea, Tanita Cepalo, BScb, Sana Gill, MDa, Madhura Thipse, MDc, Kerry-Lee
Clifton, MD Candidatec , Andrea Higginson, RN, MScN, CAEd, James Vu, MDa, Vid Bijelić, MScc, Nick
Barrowman, PhDc, Sandra Giangioppo, MDe,f and Dhenuka Radhakrishnan, MDd,g,h
a
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; bFaculty of Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada; cChildren’s
Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; dChildren’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Canada; eUniversity of
Toronto, Toronto, Canada; fThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; gDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa,
Ottawa, Canada; hICES, Ottawa, ON, Canada

ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY


Objective: Asthma is a leading cause of emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations Received 25 September 2021
in children, though many could be prevented. Our study objective was to identify factors Revised 15 April 2022
Accepted 22 April 2022
from the published literature that are associated with future hospitalization for asthma
beyond 30 days following an initial asthma ED visit. KEYWORDS
Data Sources: We searched CINAHL, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase for all studies examining Child; risk factors; readmission;
factors associated with asthma-related hospitalization in children from January 1, 1992 to future risk; predictors
February 7, 2022.
Selecting Studies: All citations were reviewed independently by two reviewers and studies
meeting inclusion criteria were assessed for risk of bias. Data on all reported variables were
extracted from full text and categorized according to identified themes. Where possible,
data were pooled for meta-analysis using random effects models.
Results: Of 2262 studies, 68 met inclusion criteria. We identified 28 risk factors and categorized
these into six themes. Factors independently associated with future hospitalization in
meta-analysis include: exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (OR = 1.94 95%CI 0.67–5.61),
pets exposure (OR = 1.67 95%CI 1.17–2.37), and previous asthma hospitalizations (OR = 3.47
95% CI 2.95–4.07). Additional related factors included previous acute care visits, comorbid
health conditions (including atopy), allergen exposure, severe-persistent asthma phenotype,
inhaled steroid use prior to ED visit, poor asthma control, higher severity symptoms at ED
presentation, warmer season at admission, longer length of stay or ICU admission, and
African-American race/ethnicity.
Conclusions: We identified multiple factors that are consistently associated with future
asthma hospitalization in children and could be used to identify those who would benefit
from targeted preventative interventions.

Abbreviations: BMI: Basal metabolic index; CTAS: Canadian triage and acuity scale; ETS:
Environmental Tobacco smoke; ED: Emergency department; Future hospitalization: Future
hospitalization for asthma; HR: Hazard ratio; ICU: Intensive care unit; OCS: Oral corticosteroids;
OR: Odds ratio; PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses
Protocol; QUIPS: Quality In Prognosis Studies tool; RR: Risk ratio; SES: Socioeconomic status.

Introduction department (ED) visits and hospitalizations (4,5) with


repeat ED visits estimated to account for 22–24% of
Asthma is the most common chronic disease among
children worldwide, ranking among the top 20 con- all asthma ED visits in some countries (5,6) Repeat
ditions for disability-adjusted life years in children ED visits and hospital admissions represent failed
(1). Global estimates for childhood asthma prevalence opportunities for prevention during the first health-
range from 1.72% to 15% (2,3) depending on the age care encounter as well as avoidable healthcare costs
group and country studied. In addition to its high and morbidity related to symptom burden, school
prevalence, asthma can lead to significant morbidity absence and loss of work productivity for care-
and continues to be a leading cause of emergency givers (7).

CONTACT Dhenuka Radhakrishnan dradhakrishnan@cheo.on.ca Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ONK1H 8L1, Canada.
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2022.2070762.
© 2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
426 S. AGGARWAL ET AL.

Previous studies and systematic reviews in children Study selection


have identified factors associated with any asthma
Studies reporting on the following criteria were as
hospitalization or immediate re-admission to hospital
follows: (a) children aged 2 to 16.99 years old and
within 30 days including age, lower socioeconomic
with a previous ED visit for asthma (hereby referred
status, ethnicity, sex, medical comorbidities, exposure
to as the index visit), (b) admission or readmission
to tobacco smoke, family history of asthma and atopy,
to hospital for asthma between 1 and 12 months fol-
allergen exposure, baseline lung function, previous
lowing the index visit as the outcome, (c) any and
ED visits, and hospitalizations (4,6–14). However, rel-
all risk factors excluding those pertaining to specific
atively fewer studies have specifically explored risk
medication, management or education interventions.
factors for future hospitalization for asthma (hereafter
We only included studies that reported on children
mentioned as future hospitalization) beyond 30 days
with a diagnosis of “asthma” and excluded those that
following an initial ED visit for asthma. These future
only reported on “wheeze” or “reactive airways dis-
hospitalizations are less likely to reflect ED manage-
ease”. Studies only examining children <2 years were
ment and may imply the need for more tailored pre-
excluded due to difficulties in diagnosis of asthma in
ventative interventions. Understanding the specific
this age group and potential overlap with bronchiolitis.
risk factors for future hospitalization in this more
Studies that only commented on risk of life threat-
vulnerable subgroup with asthma hospitalization
ening or intensive care unit readmission and not all
30 days following an initial asthma ED visit (which
hospital readmissions were excluded.
may differ from factors that predict overall asthma
We included any completed clinical studies of all
hospitalization risk) would allow for more efficient
design types; however, case reports (i.e. sample sizes less
screening to identify and target this captive population
than five), reviews, and letters to the editor were
while in the ED. In this study, we aimed to identify
excluded. Studies were restricted to the English language
risk factors associated with future hospitalization
and publication date range of January 1, 1992–February
among children beyond 30 days following a prior
7, 2022 to capture the most recent 30 years of the liter-
emergency room visit for asthma through a rigorous
ature which would be most relevant to current practice.
systematic literature review.
After removal of duplicates, citations were uploaded
to InsightScope (www.insightscope.ca) for title/abstract
and full text screening. Insight scope is a systematic
Methods review platform that accelerates the review process
Design of this study was informed by the Preferred through the use of crowdsourcing (18,19). At both levels
Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and of screening, citations were assessed independently in
Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P) checklist duplicate by at least two members of a team of ten
(Appendix 1) (15,16). The protocol has been regis- reviewers that included registered nurses, physicians and
tered with the PROSPERO International Prospective medical trainees. All reviewers were trained and com-
Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO # pleted a test set of up to 20 citations with an achieved
CRD42017060934). sensitivity of at least 80% prior to formal citation review.

Data sources and search strategy Risk of bias assessment

We conducted a comprehensive literature search in Risk of bias for each included study was assessed
MEDLINE including Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process independently by two reviewers using the Quality In
& Other Non-Indexed Citations (January 1, 1992– Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool, recommended by the
February 7, 2022), CINAHL, CENTRAL, and Embase Cochrane Prognosis Methods Group to assess risk of
(1980–February 7, 2022). Reference lists of all included bias in prognostic factor studies (20). The QUIPS tool
primary studies and any identified narrative and sys- considers bias across six domains: participation, attri-
tematic reviews were hand-searched for relevant tion, prognostic factor measurement, confounding
studies. measurement, outcome measurement, and analysis and
The search strategy was developed and conducted reporting (20).
by a librarian experienced in systematic reviews, using
a method designed to optimize term selection (17). Data extraction
No language or study design limits were applied at
this step; however, searches were limited to the pedi- Data was extracted by four separate reviewers using
atric age group. REDCap, a secure online data collection application
Journal of Asthma 427

(21). Disagreements or discrepancies at any stage of Overview of results


the systematic review were resolved by discussion
Risk of Bias across studies varied (see Supplementary
between the reviewers and a clinical expert.
Data 4, Figure S2). There was a range of at least 28
risk factors that were reported on in more than one
Data interpretation and analysis of the included studies, and these were broadly cat-
egorized into six themes with results summarized
All identified variables were categorized according to below (details in Table 2, Figure 3 and Supplementary
themes and their association with future hospitalization Data 1, Table S1). Results of meta-analyses are
and summarized in tables. Variables that demonstrated described below and in Figure 2.
a consistent direction of association with future hos-
pitalization in the majority of studies, (i.e. more than
50% of studies demonstrating either a positive or neg- Theme I—physical and health characteristics
ative association) whether pooled or unpooled, were Age (studies = 22 inconsistent association)
classified as having a “positive association” with this The effect of age on the future risk of ED or hospital
outcome, and others classified as having an “inconsis- readmission was examined in 22 studies (Table 2),
tent association”. For this categorization, each study was with marked variation in the age group classification
treated as having equal weighting to another, irrespec- and statistical methods used for the comparisons.
tive of sample size or duration of observation. All esti- Although the age group classifications varied, out of
mates where 95% confidence intervals crossed 1 were the 11 studies that reported any association (positive
categorized as no association. In order to report on or negative) between age and risk of future hospital-
the independent association of variables with the future ization, 8 demonstrated that younger age at index
hospitalization outcome, where possible, we pooled admission led to increased risk of future ED visits or
studies and performed a meta-analysis for those that hospitalizations. Mitchell et al. (25) found that the
described similar study methodology, variables and adjusted relative risk of future hospitalizations
adjusted analyses. We used the DerSimonian and Laird increased if children were <5 years old at index ED
procedure to fit random effects models for meta-analysis. visit (aRR =1.17, 95%CI 1.41–2.08), and Lasmar et al.
Heterogeneity of studies was determined by calculation (36) found increased future hospitalizations in chil-
of the I2 statistic; data was not pooled when I2 was dren who were <2 years old at first hospitalization.
greater than 75% which would correspond to high
heterogeneity. In all cases where both unadjusted and
Sex (studies = 16; inconsistent association)
adjusted results were reported, only adjusted estimates
There was no clear consensus on whether future hos-
were included.
pitalizations were more frequent in males or females.
Four studies found an association between female sex
Results and future hospitalizations (39,54,61,81) and in three
studies, male sex was found to reduce the risk of
Search results readmission (58,59,63)
The searches yielded 2262 records with 222 retained for A small number of studies demonstrated an inter-
full-text review and 68 included in the final analysis (see action between age and sex, with an association seen
Figure 1 (PRISMA diagram) and Table 1 for details). between future hospitalizations and older female chil-
dren but not older male children. One study (61)
reported increased odds of future hospitalizations in
Study characteristics older females aged 7 or above (aOR =1.3 95%CI
We included a total of 63 cohort, 3 case-control, 1 1.01–1.8) but a decreased odds of future hospitaliza-
cross-sectional, and 1 case-control cohort studies; the tions in younger females aged 2–6 years old (aOR=
majority of them (51) were retrospective. Study sample 0.7 95% CI 0.5–0.8). Similarly, Kao et al. (59) demon-
size varied from 20 to 2.3 million participants and strated increased re-admissions in females aged
originated from 18 countries: USA (40), Canada (7), 5–14 years, as opposed to their male counterparts.
Australia (4), Sweden (1), New Zealand (2), China
(2), and 1 each from Thailand, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, Race and ethnicity (studies = 16; positive
Norway, Colombia, France, Lebanon, Taiwan, association)
Netherlands, England, South Africa, and Japan. Of fourteen (28,31,32,40,42,44,50,53,55,67,71,79,81,8
Publication dates ranged from 1974 to 2022. 4,86,) studies specifically looking at African-American
428 S. AGGARWAL ET AL.

versus Caucasian race, nine studies showed a statis- broadly categorized as hardship and disease manage-
tically significant positive association with future ment (84). In only one study was African-American
hospitalizations. Of these, four adjusted for various race associated with a lower hazard of future hospi-
factors related to socioeconomic status. In one study, talization. Bloomberg et al. (40) reported a negative
a higher degree of African ancestry, as evaluated by hazard of readmission in people of African-American
genetic testing, was associated with a significant race (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.73–0.94, p = 0.0042); how-
increase in asthma readmission (OR= 1.11 for every ever, the analysis in this study also demonstrated a
10% increase in African ancestry, 95% CI 1.05–1.18). significant interaction between race and insurance
The authors also evaluated several socioeconomic type, with individuals of African-American race on
factors alongside ancestry and found that this positive Medicaid or self-pay having the highest hazard of
association was mediated by non-genetic factors, future hospitalizations (HR = 1.28, 95%CI 1.03–1.58).

Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of included and excluded studies.


Table 1. Included studies.
Study design, e.g.
RCT, prospective
cohort, retrospective Sample selection and Sample
No. Study cohort etc. Location setting Age (years) size Years Predictors
1 Bettenhausen Retrospective cross USA Inpatient admission 5 to 17 518 10-2011 to 09 BMI at admission
2015 (22) sectional study for asthma 2012
2 Raymond Prospective cohort. Australia Inpatient admission 1 to 7 103 Severity of attack, past asthma pattern, intention to treat,
1998 (23) Survey for asthma perceived consequence of treatment
3 Visitsunthorn Retrospective Thailand Inpatient admission ≤ 14 20 1-01-2006 to Age, sex, SES, parental history of allergic disease, co-morbid
2013 (24) case-control study for asthma 31-12-2007 diseases, level of asthma control, skin prick test results,
influenza vaccine injection, asthma severity before admission
4 Mitchell Observational cohort New Zealand Inpatient admission 0 to 14 1034 1-03-1986 to Demographics, asthma severity, inpatient treatment at the
1994( study for asthma 28-02-1987 index episode, discharge
(25))
5 Alshehri Retrospective case Saudi Arabia Inpatient admission 0-4 years 28 1-08-1998 to Demographics, route of admission, previous medical history,
2005 (26) control study for asthma and > 4 years 31-12-2002 clinical assessment at admission, hospital treatment and
discharge
6 Brittan Retrospective cohort USA Inpatient admission 2 to 18 9288 1-01-2009 to Post discharge emergency department visits, oral corticosteroid
et al.2017 study for asthma 30-06-2011
(
(27))
7 Hasegawa Case control study USA Inpatient admission 2 to 17 & 18 369 1-01-2012 to Demographics-age, sex, ethnicity, insurance status, chronic
2015 (28) for asthma to 54 31-12-2013 asthma factors-ETS, past ED visits, intubation, asthma
management OCS, ICS.
8 Kenyon 2015 Retrospective cohort USA Inpatient admission 2 to 18 1986 1-01-2006 to Post hospitalization prescription fills for recommended asthma
(29) study for asthma 30-09-2007 discharge medication classes
9 Moncrief Prospective cohort USA Inpatient admission 1 to 16 774 11-08-2010 to Age, sex, race, income, parent’s marital status, number of nights
2014 (30) study for asthma 20-10-2011 spent away from home
10 Kenyon 2014 Retrospective cohort USA Inpatient admission >2 1-07-2008 to Age, sex, race, insurance status, home disposition, complex
(31) analysis for asthma 30-06-2010 chronic condition, past hospitalization and treatment
11 Liu 2009 (32) Retrospective cohort USA Inpatient admission 0 to 18 451 2001 to 2005 Age, sex, race, insurance status, season of index admission,
analysis for asthma length of stay at index admission, residence in the same zip
code as a hospital emergency room
12 Beck 2012 Secondary analysis of a USA Inpatient admission 1 to 16 1-April-2008 to Geographic social risk index
(33) prospective, for asthma 1-May-2009
observational cohort
13 Triasih 2011 Retrospective Cohort Australia Inpatient admission 2 to 18 410 1-01-1990 to Demographics, clinical data prior to the index admission,
(34) Study for asthma 31-12-2004 history of prematurity, atopy, family history of asthma, age
at diagnosis, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay,
history of intubation, baseline asthma pattern
14 Chang 2008 Retrospective Cohort USA Inpatient admission 0 to 18 3983 1-01-2000- Neighborhood traffic burden, local traffic-related air pollution
(35) Study for asthma 31-12-2003 exposure levels
15 Lasmar 2006 Retrospective Cohort Brazil Inpatient admission 0 to 15 202 1-10-1994 to Sociodemographic variables, quality of health care, clinical
(36) Study for asthma 31-12-1995 variables – exacerbations in past 12 months
16 Kocevar 2005 Population-based Norway At risk cohort 0 to 14 795 1998 to 1999 Allergic rhinitis
(37) retrospective cohort
study
17 Wallace 2004 Retrospective Cohort USA Inpatient admission 1 to 14 4808 1994-2000 Demographics- race, sex, age
(38) Study for asthma
Journal of Asthma

18 Chen 2003 Retrospective Cohort Canada Inpatient admission 0 to <20 86863 1-04-1994 to Age and sex
(39) Study for asthma 31-03-1997
(Continued)
429
430

Table 1. Continued.
Study design, e.g.
RCT, prospective
cohort, retrospective Sample selection and Sample
No. Study cohort etc. Location setting Age (years) size Years Predictors
19 Bloomberg Retrospective Cohort USA Inpatient admission 0 to 20 2619 1990-1999 Race/Ethnicity, insurance type
2003 (40) Study for asthma
20 Chen 2003 Retrospective Cohort USA Inpatient admission 4 to 18 260 1-06-1999 to Psychosocial Factors, SES, family environmental scale-conflict,
(41) Study for asthma 31-12-1999 cohesion, expressiveness.
S. AGGARWAL ET AL.

21 Chabra 1998 Retrospective Cohort USA Inpatient admission 1 to 12 4947 1-01-1994 to Age, sex, race, index admission-source, season, length of stay
(42) Study for asthma 31-12-1994
22 Beck 2016 Retrospective Cohort USA Inpatient admission 2 to 17 4638 1-01-2011 to census tract rate of violent crime as recorded by the police, all
(43) Study for asthma or 31-12-2013 crime (violent plus non-violent) rate
emergency
department visit
for asthma
23 Beck 2014 Retrospective Cohort USA Inpatient admission 1 to 16 4355 1-01-2009 to Density of housing code violations in census tracts, in-tract
(44) Study for asthma or 31-12-2012 asthma-relevant violations (such as the presence of mold or
emergency cockroaches
department visit
for asthma
24 Vicendese Other non-included Australia Inpatient admission 2 to 17 251 1-09-2009 to indoor environmental factors, lifestyle
2015 (45) study design for asthma 31-12-2011 characteristics-overcrowding, living in disadvantaged area
25 Moncrief Population-based USA Inpatient admission 1 to 16 774 08 2010 to 10 Caregiver marital status, shift work, child’s race, income,
2014 (46) prospective for asthma 2011 psychological distress,
observational cohort
26 Rodriguez- Prospective cohort Colombia Inpatient admission 1 to 18 109 2013 to 2019 Age, pets, parental knowledge about asthma, maternal
Martinez for asthma depression level, allergic rhinitis, maternal education,
2014 (47) maternal smoking
27 Wu 2016 Retrospective USA Emergency 1 to 17 108 2011 to 2012 Changes in asthma status over the prior 12 months, disease
(48) population-based department visit burden, reports of ED visits, hospitalizations, and oral steroid
cohort for an acute use over the prior 12 months, adherence, asthma control
asthma
exacerbation.
28 Giarola 2014 Population based New Zealand Inpatient admission 0 to 15 200 2005 to 2006 & Indigenous status
(49) retrospective cohort for asthma 2010 to 2011
29 Beck 2014 Prospective cohort USA Inpatient admission 1 to 16 774 11-08-2010 to Child race, SES, hardship, marital status
(50) for asthma 20-10-2011
30 Newman Population based USA Inpatient admission 1 to 16 774 2-08-2010 to Race, viral infections, allergen exposure (in atopic individuals),
2014 (51) prospective for asthma 2-10-2011 medication adherence, and traffic-related air pollution (TRAP)
observational cohort exposure.
31 Howrylak Population based USA Inpatient admission 1 to 18 4774 1-01-2004 to Age, gender, race, tobacco exposure at home, in a secondary
2014 (52) retrospective cohort for asthma 31-12-2008 residence, or in the car.
32 Auger 2013 Prospective cohort USA Inpatient admission 1 to 16 601 1-04-2008 to Child age, race, insurance, household income, maternal
(53) for asthma 31-05-2009 education, and past history of inhaled corticosteroids, access
to medical home
33 Li 2012 (4) Population based Canada Emergency 2 to 17 801 14-04-2006 to Sex, age, SES, follow-Up Care after an ED visit
retrospective cohort department visit 28-02-2009
for asthma.
34 Delmas 2011 Retrospective cohort France Inpatient admission 2 to 44 16628 2002 to 2005 Age, sex, length of stay at index admission
(54) for asthma
(Continued)
Table 1. Continued.
Study design, e.g.
RCT, prospective
cohort, retrospective Sample selection and Sample
No. Study cohort etc. Location setting Age (years) size Years Predictors
35 Carroll 2010 Retrospective cohort USA Inpatient admission 2 to 18 306 1-04-1997 to ICU admission, asthma classification, admission illness severity,
(55) for asthma 31-12-2007 durations of therapy or LOS
36 Tolomeo (56) Retrospective cohort USA Inpatient admission 2 to 15 298 1-01-2006 to Age, sex, race, insurance status, previous ED visit, previous
for asthma 31-12-2006 hospitalization, median household income
37 Delfino 2009 Retrospective cohort USA Inpatient admission 0 to 18 2768 1-01-2000 to Local traffic generated air pollution
(57) for asthma or 31-12-2003
emergency visit
for asthma
38 Kalaajieh Retrospective cohort Lebanon Emergency 6 to 15 288 31-12-1993 to Age, sex, previous admissions for asthma , maternal smoking,
2002 (58) study department visit 1-01-2000 previous URTI, history of allergy
for acute asthma
exacerbation
39 Kao 2001 Retrospective cohort Taiwan Inpatient admission 2 to 14 2283 1990 to 1998 Age, sex, seasonality
(59) study for asthma
40 Wever-Hess Prospective cohort Netherlands 0 to 4 257 Age, sex, history and laboratory tests for atopic status at initial
2000 (60) Study presentation, clinical data on admission
41 Taylor 1999 Retrospective Cohort Canada N/A 16994 Previous ED visit, hospitalization for asthma
(9) Study
42 Hjern 1999 Retrospective Cohort Sweden Inpatient admission 2 to 18 2319176 1-01-1990 to Age, sex, SES, maternal smoking during pregnancy, maternal
(61) for asthma 31-12-1994 education level, number of siblings
43 Minkovitz Nested case control USA Inpatient admission 0 to 14 119 1-07-1994 to Medical history, ambulatory care before and after discharge
1999 (62) study for asthma 31-06-1995
44 Schaubel Prospective Cohort Canada Inpatient admission 0 to 4 1543 1-01-1984 to Age, sex
1996 (63) for asthma 31-03-1985
45 Henry 1995 Prospective Cohort Australia Inpatient admission 1 to 15 263 1-11-1990 to Parental asthma knowledge, age, exposure to smoke, number
(64) for asthma 1-11-1991 of attacks in the past 12 months, father’s occupation
46 Sporik 1993 Prospective Cohort England Inpatient admission 1.1 to 15 73 1-09-1988 to Allergen exposure, exposure/sensitization to dust mite, cat
(65) for asthma 30-04-1989 allergen
47 Roux 1993 Retrospective South Africa Inpatient admission 2 to 15 40 1-01-1974 to Sex, socio-economic status, family history of allergy, pet
(66) longitudinal for asthma 31-12-1987 ownership, passive smoking, age of symptom onset, date of
case-controlled first hospital visit, maintenance therapy, date of first ICU
cohort admission, skin sensitivity and radio-allergosorbent test
(RAST)
48 Beck 2016 Prospective cohort USA Inpatient admission 1 to 16 774 1-08-2010 to Racial difference as regards biologic, environmental, disease
(67) Study for asthma 31-10-2011 management, access, and socioeconomic hardship variables
49 Beck 2017 Retrospective Cohort USA Inpatient admission 1 to 16 1845 01 2011 and 12 Educational, health/environmental, and social/economic
(68) for asthma or 2013. opportunity across census tracts
emergency
department visit
for asthma
50 Giangioppo Retrospective Cohort Canada Emergency visit for 2 to 17 2669 1-09-2012 to Age, sex, frequency of ED visits, Canadian triage and acuity
2019 (69) asthma. 31-08-2015 scale (CTAS) score at ED presentation
51 Lam 2019 Retrospective Cohort China Inpatient admission 0 to 5 6331 1-01-2002 to Meteorological parameters mean temperature, mean relative
Journal of Asthma

(70) for asthma 1-01-2011 humidity and air-pollutants


(Continued)
431
432

Table 1. Continued.
Study design, e.g.
RCT, prospective
S. AGGARWAL ET AL.

cohort, retrospective Sample selection and Sample


No. Study cohort etc. Location setting Age (years) size Years Predictors
52 Molina 2019 Retrospective Cohort USA Inpatient admission 2 to 18 480 1-06 2014 to Medicaid claims data to evaluate prescription fills,
(71) for asthma 31-12 2015 demographics, chronic asthma severity, admission Severity,
viral infection
53 Okubo 2017 Retrospective Cohort Japan Inpatient admission 6 to 18 38679 1-07-2010 to Obesity
(72) for asthma 31-03-2015
54 Sun 2019 Retrospective Cohort China Inpatient admission 0 to 18 205 1-01-2007 to Demographics, previous ED visits, hospitalization, history of
(73) for asthma 31-12-2015 allergy,
55 Tse 2017 Retrospective Cohort Canada Inpatient admission 2 to 17 26168 1-04-2008 to Previous ICU hospitalization
(74) for asthma 31-03-2014
56 Baek 2020 Retrospective Cohort USA Inpatient admission 5 to 18 902 1-01-2010 to Age, sex, ethnicity, insurance status, use of medication, LOS at
(75) for asthma 31-12-2016 index visit, seasonality, SES, Pollutants
57 Pinto 2020 Retrospective Cohort USA Inpatient admission 0.6 to 18 646 1-10-2012 to Insurance status, prior ED visits
(76) for asthma 30-09-2015
58 Baek 2020 Retrospective Cohort USA Inpatient admission 5 to 11 111 1-01-2010 to Environmental tobacco smoke
(77) for asthma 31-12-2014
59 Philips 2020 Retrospective Cohort USA Inpatient admission 2 to 18 613 1-06-2014 to Post discharge follow-up, past ED visit, Pets and allergens
(78) for asthma 31-05-2016
60 Abir 2020 Retrospective Cohort USA Inpatient admission 0 to 17 3170 1-01-2010 to Ethnicity, age, sex, comorbidities
(79) for asthma 31-12-2014
61 Molina 2020 Retrospective Cohort USA Inpatient admission 2 to 12+ 664 1-06-2014 to Area deprivation index, residential instability
(80) for asthma 31-12-2015
62 Jroundi 2020 Retrospective Cohort Canada Inpatient admission 2 to 17 66835 1-01-2005 to Socioeconomic status (SES)
(81) for asthma 31-12-2014
63 Hogan 2021 Retrospective Cohort USA Inpatient admission 5 to 18 1044 01-01-2013 to Insurance type, Socioeconomic status (SES), index
(82) for asthma 12-31-2013 hospitalization, season of discharge
64 Faison 2021 Retrospective Cohort USA Inpatient admission 2 to 17 85 01-01-2016 to Change in address, insurance type, previous healthcare
(83) for asthma 12-31-2018 encounters
65 Mersha 2021 Retrospective Cohort USA Inpatient admission 1 to 16 106 08-01-2010 to Race, global ancestry, insurance, socioeconomic status (SES),
(84) for asthma 10-31-2011 caregiver characteristics
66 Sakai-Bizmark Retrospective Cohort USA Inpatient admission 0 to 18 11202 01-01-2009 to ED, ICU, length of stay
2019 (85) for asthma 12-31-2014
67 Fisher-Owens Retrospective Cohort USA Inpatient admission 2 to 22 15740 07-01-2002 to Race
2006 (86) for asthma 06-30-2003
CTAS: Canadian Triage & Acuity Scale; ED: Emergency department; ICS: Inhaled corticosteroids; OCS: Oral corticosteroids; NHLBI: National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute; ICU: Intensive care unit.
Journal of Asthma 433

Table 2. Summarized quantitative findings of selected variables in relation to future asthma hospitalizations.
Suggestive of
Assessed No. of negative association Suggestive of no association OR/ Suggestive of positive
categories studies Predictors OR/HR/RR < 1 HR/RR =1 association OR/HR/RR > 1
Theme 1 Physical and health characteristics
Age 15 Younger vs. older Chabra; 1998 (42) Henry 1995 (64)
Abir 2020 (79) Wever-Hess 2000 (60)
Carroll 2010 (55) Jroundi 2020 (81)
Delmas 2011 (54) Kalaajieh 2002 (58)
Giangioppo 2019 (69) Kao 2001 (59)
Jroundi 2020 (81) Tolomeo 2006 (56)
Rodriguez-Martinez 2014 (47) Tse 2017 (74)
Sun 2019 (73) Hasegawa 2015 (28)
Tse 2017 (74)
Delmas 2011 (54)
7 Older vs. younger Baek 2020 October Beck 2014. November (44) Hasegawa; 2015 (28)
(75) Delmas 2011 (54)
Li 2012 (4) Hasegawa 2015 (28)
Liu S Y 2009 (32) Kenyon 2014 (31)
Sex 11 Male Li 2012 (4) Kalaajieh; 2002 (58)
Lasmar L M; 2006 (36) Kao 2001 (59)
Chabra 1998 (42) Schaubel 1996 (63)
Beck AF; 2014 (44)
Carroll CL; 2010 (55)
Giangioppo; 2019 (69)
Molina 2019 (71)
Abir 2020 (79)
5 Female Delmas 2011 (54) Delmas 2011 (54) Jroundi; 2020
(81)
Mitchell 1994 (25)
Kao; 2001 (59)
Hjern 1999 (61)
Race and 15 African-American or Bloomberg; 2003 (40) Carroll 2010 (55) Beck 2014 (50)
ethnicity Black Hasegawa 2015 (28) Auger 2013 (53) Kenyon 2014
Liu 2009 (32) (31)
Abir 2020 (79) Molina 2019 (71)
Beck 2014 November (44) Chabra 1998 (42)
Beck 2016 (67) Jroundi 2020
(81) Mersha 2021 (84)
Fisher-Owens 2006 (86)
7 Hispanic Carroll 2010 (55) A. Chabra 1998 (42)
Hasegawa 2015 (28)
Kenyon 2014 (31)
Jroundi 2020 (81)
Baek 2020 October (75)
Abir 2020 (79)
2 Caucasian Carroll CL 2010 (55) Abir 2020 (79)
7 Other + Asian Hasegawa 2015 (28) Chabra 1998(42)
Chabra 1998 (42)
Beck 2014 (44)
Jroundi 2020 (81)
Giarola 2014 (49)
Auger 2013 (53)
Kenyon C:2014 (31)
Comorbidities 12 All comorbidities Visitsunthorn; 2013 (24) Alshehri M A 2005 (26)
including Sun 2019 (73) Kenyon 2014 (31) Kalaajieh 2002
Atopy (allergic Philips 2020 (78) (58)
rhinitis, eczema, Bettenhausen 2015 (22) Minkovitz 1999 (62)
food allergy) Tse 2017 (74) Carroll 2010 (55)
Okubo 2017 (72)
Kocevar 2005 (37)
Kalaajieh 2002 (58)
Sun 2019 (73)
Theme II Family and social characteristics
Income 9 Roux 1993 (66) Beck 2014 (50) Moncrief 2014 (46)
Li 2012 (4) Jroundi; 2020 (81) (Income
Lasmar 2006 (36) within 1st & 2nd quartile)
Hasegawa 2015 (28) Li 2012 (4)
Chen 2003 (39)
Jroundi 2020 (81) (income above
3rd Quartile)
Auger 2013 (53)
(Continued)
434 S. AGGARWAL ET AL.

Table 2. Continued.
Suggestive of
Assessed No. of negative association Suggestive of no association OR/ Suggestive of positive
categories studies Predictors OR/HR/RR < 1 HR/RR =1 association OR/HR/RR > 1
Neighborhood/ 15 Hogan 2021 (82) Liu 2009 (32) Beck, 2014 (50)
Housing Micropolitan Beck 2012 (33) (Percentage of Beck 2012 (33)
households with > 1 person/ Kalaajieh; 2002 (58)
room); Beck 2014 (44) (vacancy rate:
Sun 2019 (73) medium–high & housing
Vicendese 2015 (45) density: medium-high)
Beck 2014 (44) Sakai-Bizmark; 2019 (85)
(Vacancy rate low-medium Molina A; 2020 (80)
and housing density:
low-medium)
Faison 2021 (83)
Change in address in past
12 months
Moncrief 2014 (30)
Abir M 2020 (79)
Chen Y 2003 (39)
Beck 2016 June (43)
Molina 2020 (80)
Insurance status 13 Public/Medicaid Pinto J; 2020 (76) Auger 2013 (53) Carroll 2010 (55)
& primary insurance Hogan; 2021 (82) Hasegawa 2015 (28). Liu 2009 (32)
care access Beck 2014 (44). Brittan 2017 (27)
Bloomberg 2003 Bloomberg 2003 (40)
Jroundi 2020 (81) Faison 2021 (83)
Baek 2020 (75) Hogan 2021 (82)
Kenyon 2014 (31)
Caregiver 7 Henry R L; 1995(64) Rodriguez-Martinez 2014 (47) Lasmar 2006 (36)
education & Beck 2014 (50) (Low education level of mother
occupation Beck 2012 (33) 0–3 years)
Henry 1995 (64) (unemployed/
manual work)
Roux 1993 (66)
Hjern 1999(61)
Caregiver 7 Rodriguez-Martinez 2014(47) Chen 2003 (39)
coping: Mitchell 1994 (25) Alshehri
asthma 2005(26)
knowledge, Henry 1995 (64)
beliefs, and Wu 2016 (48)
perceptions Raymond 1998 (87)
Chen 2003(39)
Family history 5 Visitsunthorn; 2013 (24). Rodriguez-Martinez 2014 (47)
Kalaajieh 2002 (58) Roux 1993 (66)
Triasih 2011 (34) Moncrief 2014 (30)
Other social 7 Beck 2017 (68) (COI-moderate & Beck 2014 (50)
factors low). Beck 2012 (33)
Chen 2003 (41)
Beck 2014 (50)
Beck 2014. November (44)
Hjern 1999 (61)
Baek 2020 October (75)
Theme III Environmental exposures
Air pollution 5 Residence distance Newman 2014 (51) Newman 2014 (51)
to nearest arterial Delfino 2009 (57) Delfino 2009 (57)
road or freeway, Chang 2008 (35) Chang 2008 (35)
PM2.5 & Ozone Baek 2020 October (75) Baek 2020 July (77)
levels Baek 2020 July (77)
Environmental 6 Household smoking Visitsunthorn 2013 (24). Kalaajieh 2002 (58)
Tobacco Hasegawa 2015 (28) Minkovitz 1999 (62)
Smoke (ETS) Henry 1995 (64) Howrylak 2014 (52)
3 Maternal smoking Rodriguez-Martinez 2014 (47)
Kalaajieh 2002 (58) Hjern
1999 (61)
Pets 5 Includes all pets Rodriguez-Martinez 2014 (47)
Visitsunthorn; 2013 (24), Roux P
1993 (66)
Minkovitz 1999 (62)
Vicendese 2015 (45)
Allergens 7 All possible allergens Roux 1993 (66) Vicendese 2015 (45) Sporik R 1993 (65) Sun 2019
(73) Vicendese 2015 (45)
Wever-Hess 2000 (60)
Philips; 2020 (78)
Kalaajieh; 2002 (58)
(Continued)
Journal of Asthma 435

Table 2. Continued.
Suggestive of
Assessed No. of negative association Suggestive of no association OR/ Suggestive of positive
categories studies Predictors OR/HR/RR < 1 HR/RR =1 association OR/HR/RR > 1
Theme IV – Asthma symptom severity and treatments before the index asthma ED visit
Baseline medical 3 OCS therapy Rodriguez-Martinez 2014 (47) Brittan 2017 (66)
therapy Minkovitz 1999 (62)
5 ICS therapy-current Sun 2019 (73) Visitsunthorn 2013 (24)
or past Minkovitz 1999 (62)
Hasegawa 2015 (28);
Auger 2013 (53)
Previous acute 9 ED visits Brittan 2017 (66)
care visits Li 2012 (4) Hasegawa 2015 (28)
Taylor 1999 (9)
Giangioppo; 2019 (69)
Lasmar LM 2006 (36)
Wu 2016 (48)
Tolomeo; 2006 (56)
Philips 2020 (78)
10 Hospital Admission Rodriguez-Martinez 2014 (47) Philips 2020 (78)
Alshehri 2005 (26)
Mitchell 1994 (25)
Wu 2016 (48); Kenyon 2014 (31)
Brittan 2017 (66);
Li 2012 (4)
Triasih; 2011 (34)
Taylor 1999 (9)
6 ICU admission/ Triasih 2011 (34) Visitsunthorn 2013 (24)
mechanical Hasegawa 2015 (28) Philips 2020 (78)
ventilation Minkovitz 1999 (62) Alshehri 2005 (26)
Asthma severity/ 4 NHLBI classification: Beck 2014 (50) Beck 2014 (50)
phenotype Persistent vs. Philips 2020 (78)
intermittent Lasmar 2006 (36)
Molina 2019 (71)
Asthma control 3 Poor or partial Henry 1995 (64) Lasmar 2006 (36) Visitsunthorn
control vs good 2013 (24)
control
Theme V – Index visit characteristics
Characteristics 10 Length of Stay Liu 2009 (32) Chabra; 1998 (42)
related to Sun 2019 (73) Delmas 2011 (54)
index visit Liu 2009 (32)
Tse 2017 (74)
Baek 2020 (75)
Hogan 2021 (82)
Kenyon 2014 (31)
Jroundi 2020 (81)
Hogan 2021 (82)
3 Severe (CTAS 1,2) vs Li 2012 (4)
less severe (CTAS Giangioppo 2019 (69)
4,5) Alshehri 2005 (26)
7 ICU admission/ Tse 2017 (74) Kenyon C; 2014 (31); Sun; 2019 Alshehri 2005 (26);
mechanical (73) Philips 2020 (78); Jroundi 2020
ventilation at (81)
index Triasih 2011 (34)
3 Intravenous steroids Mitchell 1994 (25) Visitsunthorn; 2013 (24) Visitsunthorn2013 (24)
Mitchell 1994 (25)
Alshehri 2005 (26)
5 Index admission Lam 2019 (70) Liu 2009 (32) Liu 2009 (32)
seasonality: warm Brittan 2017 (27) Sun; 2019 (73) Lam 2019 (70)
vs. cold Baek 2020 October (75)
Theme VI – Asthma symptom severity and treatments captured after the index asthma ED
Discharge 6 Discharged with Kenyon C; 2015 (29) Alshehri M A; 2005 (26) Brittan M; 2017(27)
medications/ Minkovitz; 1999 (62) Philips; 2020(78)
medication fills Molina 2019 (71)
post-discharge
7 Post-discharge Philips; 2020 (78) Li 2012 (4) Minkovitz; 1999 (62)
follow-up Visitsunthorn; 2013 (24) Brittan 2017 (27)
Alshehri 2005 (26) Hogan A; 2021 (82)
Brittan 2017 (27)
Minkovitz 1999 (62)
CTAS: Canadian Triage & Acuity Scale; ED: Emergency department; ICS: Inhaled corticosteroids; OCS: Oral corticosteroids; NHLBI: National Heart, Lung
and Blood Institute; ICU: Intensive care unit; OR: Odds ratio; RR: Risk ratio; HR: Hazard ratio.
436 S. AGGARWAL ET AL.

Figure 2. Forest plot for meta-analyses: factors associated with future asthma hospital admission. TE: treatment effect; seTE:
standard error of the treatment effect; OR: odds ratio.

Figure 3. Summary of the number of studies showing an association between selected variables and future asthma
hospitalizations.

A similar effect was seen in one study which showed Data on other races were limited. Of the seven
higher odds of ED revisit within a year for nonwhite studies (28,31,42,55,75,79,81) comparing Hispanic/
children with public insurance compared to white Latino race to non-Hispanic/White race, only one
children with public insurance (aOR = 0.71, 95% CI showed a positive association with future hospitaliza-
0.57–0.88, p < 0.01) (76). tion (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.04–1.72) (42). There was
Journal of Asthma 437

only one reported comparison between Asian and shown to have a protective effect on future hospital-
Caucasian race, which did not convincingly demon- ization in two studies (58,82) (aHR 0.69; 95% CI
strate increased odds of future asthma hospitalization 0.51–0.94, p < 0.05).
(OR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.0–1.4) (42).
Insurance status and primary care access (studies
Comorbidities (studies = 12; positive association) = 13; inconsistent association)
Of the variety of comorbidities studied, the strongest Four studies found a positive association between pub-
associations were seen with allergy or atopy, and lic (32,55,82) or Medicaid (27) insurance plans versus
increased body mass index. A personal history of private insurance and future hospitalizations. As stated
allergic rhinitis was significantly associated with above, when health insurance status was examined in
future hospitalizations in two studies (37,58). combination with race, African-American children had
Similarly, atopic dermatitis (OR = 11.93, 95%CI increased hazard of future hospitalizations if they were
5.81–24.53, p < 0.001) (58) and eczema (OR= 3.122, on Medicaid or self-pay insurance (HR = 1.28; 95%
95%CI 1.473–6.616, p = 0.003) (73) were also asso- CI 1.01 − 1.63 p = 0.042) (40). The same effect was seen
ciated with future hospitalizations. Total serum IgE when race was categorized broadly as white or non-
> 300 (KUI/l) and > 6% eosinophils in peripheral white, with nonwhite children on public insurance
blood were also associated with increased odds of having higher odds of ED revisit as compared to their
future hospitalization (50,58). white counterparts (aOR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.57–0.88,
With regard to obesity, both Carroll and Okubo p < 0.01) (76). In one study, Caucasian children had
(55,72) demonstrated increased odds of future hospi- decreased risk of future hospitalizations with both
talization. Other studied comorbidities including pre- private and public insurance (76).
mature birth, low birth weight <2500 g, and presence
of airway structural abnormalities did not demonstrate
Caregiver education/occupation/(studies = 7;
any association with future hospitalizations.
inconsistent association)
Five studies examined the relationship between low
Theme II—family and social characteristics caregiver education level and future asthma hospital-
ization and did not find any associations. Having an
Income (studies = 9; inconsistent association) unemployed caregiver or living in census tracts with
Measures of factors relating to income varied consid- a higher percentage of persons without a high school
erably, with some studies examining direct household diploma was associated with higher hazards of future
income, and others looking at overall neighborhood asthma hospitalization (33,50).
income centile as a proxy for patient income.
According to three studies (4,46,81), low household
income and belonging to neighborhoods from low Caregiver coping/beliefs/(studies = 7; inconsistent
income quintiles increased future hospitalization. association)
In seven studies, neither caregiver knowledge of
asthma, nor their perceptions or beliefs about their
Neighborhood and housing (studies = 15;
child’s asthma or treatment had any significant
inconsistent association)
impact on future hospitalizations. However, caregiv-
Forty-five geographic areas and housing based
ers who reported being less bothered emotionally by
socio-economic factors were analyzed with several
their child’s asthma were more likely to have a child
positive associations identified. Residential instability,
who was re-hospitalized (OR 1.64; 95% CI 1.99–
as defined by increased frequency in change in pri-
2.70) (41)
mary residence, and homelessness increased the haz-
ard of future hospitalizations in two out of three
studies (53,80,83,85) (aHR = 1.09; 95% CI 1.03 − 1.14 Family history (studies = 5; inconsistent
p < 0.002) (80). Similarly, multiple studies by Beck association)
et al. found various geographic and housing-related Two of three studies examining parental history of
factors which increased the hazard of future hospi- allergic disease showed an increased odds of future
talizations including: not owning a home, housing asthma hospitalization (OR1.3–3.17; 95% CI 1.10–
units with high vacancy rates, crowded housing, and 9.10) (24,88). Maternal-specific factors including death
neighborhoods with extreme poverty (33,44,50,68). from asthma, and caregiver mental health distress or
Residing in a rural versus urban community was depression were not associated (30,47,66)
438 S. AGGARWAL ET AL.

Theme III—environmental exposures using chi-square analysis, four studies found baseline
inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy increased future
Air pollution (studies = 5; inconsistent association)
hospitalizations (total N = 1109) (24,28,53,62).
With respect to air pollution, studies broadly exam-
ined the effects of living near high traffic areas and
exposure to various particulate matter and noxious Baseline oral corticosteroid therapy (studies = 3;
gases with no significant association with future inconsistent association)
asthma hospitalization found. Out of three studies specifically examining oral cor-
ticosteroid (OCS) therapy, only Brittan et al. (27)
found increased odds of future hospitalizations when
Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) (studies = 8;
an OCS prescription had been filled in the prior
positive association)
6 months (OR = 2; 95% CI 1.5 − 2.7) (27). All three
Seven studies examined household smoke exposure
studies used different definitions when evaluating the
and four demonstrated a positive association with
impact of OCS use on future hospitalization and dif-
future hospitalizations. In the pooled, meta-analysis
ferent populations and health care settings. For exam-
that included three studies indoor smoke exposure was
ple, Minkovitz et al. (62) and Brittan et al. (27)
significantly associated (OR = 1.94 95%CI 0.67–5.61,
examined populations in the United States vs.
I2:71%, total N = 88). Maternal smoking was also spe-
Rodriguez-Martinez et al. (47) evaluated population
cifically associated with future hospitalization in three
in Columbia.
studies (47,58,61) and Howrylak et al. (52) (N = 619)
found that the presence of serum or salivary cotinine
in children was positively associated with future hos- Previous acute care visits (ED, hospital or intensive
pitalization (OR = 1.59–2.35, 95% CI 1.02–4.55) (52). care unit (ICU)) (studies = 17; positive association)
A previous history of ED visits was linked to future
Pets (studies = 5; inconsistent association) hospitalizations in nine studies (9,27,28,36,48,56,69,78).
Although when examined individually, no studies Similarly, the higher the number of past hospital
showed a significant association between pets expo- admissions, the stronger the relationship to future
sure and future hospitalization, in pooled meta-analysis hospitalizations (4,9,25–27,31,34,48,78). In pooled
that included four studies (24,66,78), there was a clear meta-analysis including two studies (27,31), the odds
positive association between pets in the home and of future hospitalizations was significantly higher
future hospitalization (random effects OR = 1.59, 95% among children with a previous hospital admission
CI 1.13 − 2.23, I2:0%, total N = 759) (Random effects: OR = 3.47, 95% CI 2.95 − 4.07;
I 2:31%, total N = 16891) Previous history of ICU
admission was also linked to increased odds of future
Allergens (studies = 8; positive association) hospitalizations in three out of four studies (24,26,78).
Indoor allergen exposure was measured using a variety
of methodologies and a number of studies showed a
positive association with future hospitalization. For Asthma severity and phenotype (studies = 4;
example, positive association)
Vicendese et al. (45) (N = 44) found that less fre- In classification of asthma severity according to
quent vacuuming (a few times a week versus daily) National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
significantly increased the odds of future hospitaliza- guidelines, persistent moderate or severe asthma
tions (OR = 15.69 95% CI 2.82 − 87.18 p = 0.002). increased the hazard of future hospitalizations when
Furthermore, having a carpet in the child’s room (OR compared to mild intermittent asthma in three of four
= 4.07 95% CI 1.03 − 16.06 p = 0.04) or having a syn- studies (36,50,78). In a different comparison, Molina
thetic doona (quilt) both significantly increased the et al. (71) (N = 480) found that children with persistent
odds of future hospitalizations (45). asthma, whether moderate or severe, had higher odds
of future hospitalizations when compared to intermit-
tent asthma (intermittent versus moderate persistent
Theme IV—asthma symptom severity and OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24–0.78).
treatments before index visit
Baseline inhaled corticosteroids (studies = 5; Asthma control (studies = 3; positive association)
positive association) When asthma control was classified according to
While Sun et al. (N = 205) reported no association GINA 2011 (89), increased risk of readmission was
between ICS use at baseline and future hospitalizations found in partly controlled asthma (OR = 4.83; 95%
Journal of Asthma 439

CI 1.24–18.88) and uncontrolled asthma (OR = 29; Theme VI—Asthma symptom severity and
95% CI 2.25 − 373.77) (24). Having a history of four treatments after index visit
or more asthma attacks per month was associated
Discharge treatments (studies = 6; inconsistent
with increased odds of future hospitalizations but
association)
not if the attacks were spread over 12 months
Filling a prescription for OCS within 6 days post hos-
(36,64).
pital discharge was associated with increased odds of
future hospitalizations (OR = 3.2 95%CI 2.4 − 4.6)
Theme V index visit characteristics (27). In contrast, patients who filled discharge pre-
scriptions for ICS within 3 days of discharge had
ICU/mechanical ventilation (studies = 7; positive decreased hazards of future hospitalizations (HR =
association) 0.87 95%CI 0.77 − 0.98) (29).
Receiving mechanical ventilation during the index
admission was associated with higher odds of future
Post-discharge follow-up (studies = 7, inconsistent
hospitalizations in two studies (26,34) and a lower
association)
hazard in a study by Tse et al. (aHR = 0.51; 95% CI
From the six studies, only Philips (78) showed that
0.28–0.94) (74), while ICU admission during the index
attending a post-discharge visit (within 14 days of dis-
admission was associated with future asthma hospi-
charge) decreased the odds of future hospitalizations
talization in three studies.
(OR= 50.65; 95% CI 50.43–0.97); however, this effect
was negated when patients attended a post-discharge
Asthma severity (studies = 3; positive association) routine visit (within 3 months of discharge).
Patients characterized with a moderate or severe clin-
ical assessment of asthma in the ED based on the
Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) (90), or physi- Discussion
cian assessment, had increased odds (aOR = 1.12 This systematic review aimed at finding factors asso-
95%CI 1.01 to 2.94 p < 0.05) (26) or hazard of future ciated with increased risk of future hospitalization
hospitalizations in three studies (4,69). among children with a prior asthma ED visit. We
grouped these factors broadly into six different themes
Length of stay (studies = 10; positive association) reflecting a child’s inherent risk for asthma morbidity
The length of hospital stay (LOS) at index admission due to: physical and health characteristics, their family
was positively related to increased future hospitaliza- and social characteristics, environmental exposures,
tions in eight studies (31,32,42,54,74,75,81,82) and and details of their symptoms and severity prior to,
both Jroundi et al. (81) and Hogan et al. (82) further during or following their index asthma visit. We were
reported significantly increased risk of future hospi- able to pool and meta-analyze results for three vari-
talization with increasing length of stay in ICU (aHR ables where study methodology, population and
= 1.04; 95% CI 1.03 − 1.06, p < 0.001[26]; aHR = 1.35 adjusted covariates were similar, and found that indoor
vs. 1.63 for LOS between 2–3 days vs. LOS > 4 days, tobacco smoke exposure, presence of pets in the home,
p < 0.05). and history of previous asthma hospitalization were
independently associated with future hospitalization.
Descriptive analysis of other variables that were too
Asthma medications—intravenous steroids (studies
diverse for pooling showed that comorbid health con-
= 3; positive association)
ditions (particularly atopy), previous ED visits and
Three studies examined the relationship between use
ICU admissions and severe-persistent asthma pheno-
of intravenous systemic steroids during the index
type, allergen exposure, prior use of inhaled steroids
admission and future asthma hospitalization and
or poor asthma control as well as higher severity
found a positive association, though other medications
symptoms at presentation, longer length of stay, use
used such as theophylline and antibiotics were not
of systemic steroids, and ICU/mechanical ventilation
associated (24–26).
during the index visit, a warmer season at admission,
and African American race were also associated with
Asthma season (studies = 5; positive association) future hospitalization.
Being admitted to hospital during a warmer season The majority of studies examining ETS exposure,
(i.e. spring, summer or fall) compared to winter was demonstrated a positive correlation between household
generally associated with future hospitalization in five smoking, maternal smoking and cotinine (as a marker
studies) (27,32,70,75,82). of ETS exposure) and future hospitalization. We were
440 S. AGGARWAL ET AL.

able to demonstrate this association in both pooled both markers of a more severe exacerbation, along
meta-analysis and overall descriptive analysis, despite with ICU admission or mechanical ventilation were
varying definitions of ETS exposure in most included all also associated with future hospitalization. There
studies. This review highlights the lack of uniformity was one contrasting Canadian study by Tse et al. that
in defining ETS exposure or lack of rigor in the reported lower rates of future hospitalization follow-
description of how ETS exposure is assigned in many ing an ICU admission or where ventilation was used;
observational studies. While the quantification of this may be due to the standard practice at most
first-hand smoke exposure in units of “pack-years” Canadian centers where children admitted to the ICU
has aided our understanding of the harmful effects are preferentially referred to asthma specialist care,
of smoking on various health conditions through epi- which may lead to improved outcomes, in contrast
demiologic studies, this is more challenging to do for to other countries (91). Our review would suggest
secondhand smoke. Nonetheless, this will become an that previous ED visits or hospitalizations should
increasingly important exposure to delineate as new likewise be considered as key variables in triggering
devices for inhaling and vaping nicotine, such as elec- referral to asthma specialist care. One unexpected
tronic cigarettes become more prevalent. Based on finding in this review is that ICS use prior to the
this review, we recommend that global and national index ED visit was associated with future asthma
respiratory organizations develop a uniform method hospitalization. This may be reflective of either poor
to assign secondhand smoke exposure in children. adherence to daily ICS use (which was not measured
We identified a positive association between pets in these studies), or a more severe asthma phenotype
in the home and future asthma hospitalization, but that was sub-optimally controlled despite ICS use and
this relationship is more likely a marker of atopy as warrants a step-up in treatment or improved man-
an important driver of asthma morbidity. In fact, the agement to avoid future acute health care visits.
most important comorbidity associated with future In this review we found a positive association
hospitalization in this study was atopy. Reviewed stud- between African-American race and future asthma
ies included multiple measures of atopy, including hospitalization which is consistent with multiple pre-
allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, elevated serum vious studies that show higher asthma symptom sever-
markers of atopy, and even family history of allergic ity and morbidity in this group (92). However, a few
disease which were all associated with future hospi- studies included in this review raise the question of
talization. Pets in the home increased the odds of whether this association with future asthma hospital-
future hospitalization, but so did markers of other ization is related to genetics and absolute differences
allergen exposures, including dust mite burden in the in airway inflammation, or if race is acting as a sur-
setting of less frequent vacuuming, and the use of rogate marker of other social factors which are more
synthetic bedding. Taken together, the reviewed liter- deterministic of future hospitalization risk. For exam-
ature suggests that pets and other types of indoor ple, in the study by Bloomberg et al. (40) factoring
perennial allergens may be important triggers for in insurance coverage, and access to private medical
future hospitalization. insurance negated the effect of African American race
In our pooled meta-analysis, we found a clear on future hospitalization. To further differentiate bio-
association between prior asthma hospitalizations and logic versus sociologic effects of African American
future asthma hospitalization. However, our descrip- race on asthma outcomes, Mersha et al. (84) examined
tive analysis more broadly demonstrated a relation- participants’ degree of African ancestry as determined
ship between measures of increased asthma severity by single nucleotide polymorphisms on a continuous
both prior to and during the index visit and future scale and found a higher rate of readmission in chil-
hospitalization. For example, a moderate to severe dren with >20% African ancestry, where >50% of the
persistent asthma phenotype, poor asthma control, increased risk could be attributed directly to social
and frequent attacks prior to the index asthma ED factors related to hardship and disease management.
visit were linked to future hospitalization. Similarly, Upon adjusting for these factors, African ancestry was
previous acute health care visits for asthma, including no longer significantly associated with readmission.
previous asthma ED visits, hospitalizations and ICU Together, these two studies suggest that race-related
admissions demonstrated a positive association with disparities in asthma outcomes for children are driven
future hospitalization with a dose-response relation- by social factors and cannot be simply attributed to
ship observed in some studies. Higher severity symp- biologic differences.
toms at index presentation, and both intravenous With respect to family and social factors, we iden-
steroid use and increased length of stay, which are tified a number of studies that demonstrated patients
Journal of Asthma 441

experiencing poverty without private insurance or with Regardless of these limitations, our study identifies
poorer access to medical/primary care were more likely several factors, particularly related to environmental
to have future hospitalization. However, we equally tobacco smoke exposure, pet and allergen exposure
included a number of studies that did not show an and atopy, more severe baseline asthma phenotype,
association between these social factors and future severity of the index visit, poor asthma control, pre-
hospitalization. Similarly, housing-related factors in vious asthma acute care visits and African-American
keeping with lower income and socioeconomic status ethnicity/race, which may be a surrogate for other
(SES) were also positively associated with future hos- social factors, that are consistently linked in multiple
pitalization in some studies, but not all. These incon- studies with future hospitalization in children with
sistent relationships with future hospitalization risk asthma. We propose that the information from this
speak to the challenges in characterizing various mark- review could be used to guide the development of
ers of socioeconomic status and family factors in a clinical prediction rules that could be used by ED
standard fashion so as to compare across studies. clinicians at the point of care to tailor preventative
Prior systematic reviews (92,93) have demonstrated interventions to children at higher risk for future
that younger patient age is associated with an overall asthma hospitalization. Future asthma guidelines could
higher risk of asthma ED visits and hospitalizations also use this information to develop more detailed
(69,93). However, in the current study, the relation recommendations to lessen these specific exposures
of age with future asthma hospitalization was incon- where possible, and trigger referral to asthma specialty
sistent. This discrepancy is likely explained by the care for vulnerable children in need of improved
interaction of sex and age with asthma hospitalization asthma management.
risk. The study by Giangioppo et al. (69) characterizes
this interaction and clearly demonstrates the variable
effect of age on risk of asthma morbidity depending Acknowledgements
on sex. That is, in younger age groups, future asthma We thank Dr. Dayre McNally, Katie O’Hearn, Henrietta
hospitalization is increased among males, but in ado- Blinder, Revathi Surapaneni, Daniel Chung, Julia Shen for their
lescents, is higher in females (69). The mechanisms assistance towards this project and Margaret Sampson, MLIS,
for this sex-related difference in morbidity with age PhD, AHIP for developing and updating the searches used.
have not yet been elucidated.
Despite our systematic and rigorous process to
Disclosure statement
identify factors associated with future asthma hospi-
talization in this review, there were limitations to our The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this
study. Due to the large variance in methodological, article to disclose.
statistical and reporting methods used, meta-analysis
was not possible in most cases. This highlights the Systematic review registration
need for more rigorous and standardized methods to
define exposures even in observational studies, par- PROSPERO #CRD42017060934
ticularly for the assignment of secondhand smoke
exposure, and various social factors. Though many Prior presentation
studies reported on the association of race/ethnicity
with future hospitalization, the methods used to assign The findings of this study were presented as a poster at
the Canadian Respiratory Conference on 8–10 April, 2021
and classify race/ethnicity were often not well
described. Suboptimal collection and classification of
this important variable may have led to bias in the Funding
various studies’ results and in this review. Inclusion
The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with
of such as broad timeframe in this review prevented
the work featured in this article.
missing exposures of interest, but may have diluted
some study findings as asthma management practices
may have changed over time. Finally, despite searching ORCID
a number of databases, we may have missed some
Kerry-Lee Clifton http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9028-
relevant articles, particularly those that were not pub- 7727
lished in English, that could have added to our Dhenuka Radhakrishnan http://orcid.org/0000-0002-
findings. 8637-1480
442 S. AGGARWAL ET AL.

Data availability statement 13. Ungar WJ, Cope SF, Kozyrskyj A, Paterson JM.
Socioeconomic factors and home allergen exposure in
The data supporting the findings of this study are available children with asthma. J. Pediatr Health Care.
within the article and its supplementary material. 2010;24(2):108–115. doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2009.03.002.
14. Schatz M, Rachelefsky G, Krishnan JA. Follow-up after
acute asthma episodes: what improves future out-
References comes?. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2009;6(4):386–393.
doi:10.1513/pats.P09ST6.
1. Asher I, Pearce N. Global burden of asthma among 15. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A,
children. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18(11):1269– Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA, PRISMA-P Group.
1278. doi:10.5588/ijtld.14.0170. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and
2. Johnson LH, Chambers P, Dexheimer JW. Asthma-related meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.
emergency department use: current perspectives. Open Syst. Rev. 2015;4(1):1. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
Access Emerg Med. 2016;8:47–55. doi:10.2147/OAEM. 16. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and
S69973. meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration
3. Uphoff EP, Bird PK, Antó JM, Basterrechea M, von Berg and explanation | The BMJ. https://www.bmj.com/con-
A, Bergström A, Bousquet J, Chatzi L, Fantini MP, tent/349/bmj.g7647. [accessed 16 July 2020).
Ferrero A, et al. Variations in the prevalence of childhood 17. Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of search-
asthma and wheeze in MeDALL cohorts in Europe. ERJ es for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE,
Open Res. 2017;3(3) doi:10.1183/23120541.00150-2016. and Google Scholar: a prospective study | Systematic
4. Li P, To T, Guttmann A. Follow-up care after an emer- Reviews | Full Text. doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0215-7
gency department visit for asthma and subsequent [accessed16 July 2020).
healthcare utilization in a universal-access healthcare 18. Nama N, Iliriani K, Xia MY, Chen BP, Zhou LL,
system. J Pediatr. 2012;161(2):208–213.e1. doi:10.1016/j. Pojsupap S, Kappel C, O’Hearn K, Sampson M, Menon
jpeds.2012.02.038. K, et al. A pilot validation study of crowdsourcing
5. Rosychuk RJ, Voaklander DC, Klassen TP, Senthilselvan systematic reviews: update of a searchable database of
A, Marrie TJ, Rowe BH. Asthma presentations by chil- pediatric clinical trials of high-dose vitamin D. Transl.
dren to emergency departments in a Canadian prov- Pediatr. 2017;6(1):18–26. doi:10.21037/tp.2016.12.01.
ince: a population-based study. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 19. Nama N, Sampson M, Barrowman N, Sandarage R,
2010;45(10):985–992. doi:10.1002/ppul.21281. Menon K, Macartney G, Murto K, Vaccani J-P, Katz
6. Chen Y, Stewart P, Johansen H, McRae L, Taylor G. S, Zemek R, et al. Crowdsourcing the Citation
Sex difference in hospitalization due to asthma in re- Screening Process for Systematic Reviews: Validation
lation to age. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2003;56(2):180–187. Study. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(4):e12953.
doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00593-0. doi:10.2196/12953.
7. Wang Z, May SM, Charoenlap S, Pyle R, Ott NL, 20. Hayden JA, van der Windt DA, Cartwright JL, Côté P,
Mohammed K, Joshi AY. Effects of secondhand smoke Bombardier C. Assessing bias in studies of prognostic
exposure on asthma morbidity and health care utili- factors. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(4):280–286.
zation in children: a systematic review and meta- doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00009.
analysis. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015;115(5): 21. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N,
396–401.e2. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2015.08.005. Conde JG . Research electronic data capture
8. Jin Y, Seiber EE, Ferketich AK. Secondhand smoke and (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and work-
asthma: what are the effects on healthcare utilization flow process for providing translational research in-
among children? Prev. Med. 2013;57(2):125–128. doi: formatics support . J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–
10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.05.003. 381. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.
9. Taylor BW. The identification of high risk asthmatic 22. Bettenhausen J, Puls H, Queen MA, Peacock C, Burrus
children using the emergency department asthma vis- S, Miller C, Daly A, Colvin JD. Childhood obesity
it count. J. Emerg. Med. 1999;17(6):953–956. and in-hospital asthma resource utilization. J Hosp
doi:10.1016/S0736-4679(99)00122-5. Med. 2015;10(3):160–164. doi:10.1002/jhm.2296.
10. Anderson HR, Gupta R, Kapetanakis V, Asher MI, 23. Raymond D. Predicting readmission to hospital with
Clayton T, Robertson CF, Strachan DP, ISAAC Steering asthma—PubMed. 1998. https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-
Committee. International correlations between indica- gov.proxy.bib.uottawa.ca/9928645/ [accessed 19
tors of prevalence, hospital admissions and mortality February 2021).
for asthma in children. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2008;37(3): 24. Visitsunthorn N, Lilitwat W, Jirapongsananuruk O,
573–582. doi:10.1093/ije/dyn039. Vichyanond P. Factors affecting readmission for acute
11. Fuhrman C, Dubus J-C, Marguet C, Delacourt C, asthmatic attacks in children. Asian Pac J Allergy
Thumerelle C, de Blic J, Delmas M-C. Hospitalizations Immunol. 2013;31(2):138–141. doi:10.12932/AP0247.
for asthma in children are linked to undertreatment 31.2.2013.
and insufficient asthma education. J. Asthma. 2011; 25. Mitchell EA, Bland JM, Thompson JM. Risk factors for
48(6):565–571. doi:10.3109/02770903.2011.580031. readmission to hospital for asthma in childhood.
12. Li X, Sundquist K, Sundquist J. Parental occupation and Thorax. 1994;49(1):33–36. doi:10.1136/thx.49.1.33.
risk of hospitalization for asthma in children and ad- 26. Alshehri M, Almegamesi T, Alfrayh A. Predictors of
olescents. J. Asthma off. J. Assoc. Care Asthma. short-term readmission of asthmetic children. J Egypt
2009;46(8):815–821. doi:10.1080/02770900903141260. Public Health Assoc. 2004;79(3–4):165–178.
Journal of Asthma 443

27. Brittan M, Richardson T, Kenyon C, Sills MR, Fieldston 40. Bloomberg GR, Trinkaus KM, Fisher EB, Musick JR,
E, Hall M, Fox D, Shah S, Berry J. Association between Strunk RC. Hospital readmissions for childhood asth-
postdischarge oral corticosteroid prescription fills and ma: a 10-year metropolitan study. Am. J. Respir. Crit.
readmission in children with asthma. J Pediatr. Care Med. 2003;167(8):1068–1076. doi:10.1164/
2017;180:163–169.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.09.034. rccm.2201015.
28. Hasegawa K, Bittner JC, Nonas SA, Stoll SJ, Watase T, 41. Chen E, Bloomberg GR, Fisher EB, Strunk RC.
Gabriel S, Herrera V, Camargo CA, Multicenter Airway Predictors of repeat hospitalizations in children with
Research Collaboration-37 Investigators. Children and asthma: the role of psychosocial and socioenviron-
adults with frequent hospitalizations for asthma exac- mental factors. Health Psychol Off J Div Health
erbation, 2012–2013: a multicenter observational study. Psychol Am Psychol Assoc. 2003;22(1):12–18.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015;3(5):751–758.e1. doi:10.1037//0278-6133.22.1.12.
doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2015.05.003. 42. Chabra A, Chávez GF, Adams EJ, Taylor D.
29. Kenyon CC, Rubin DM, Zorc JJ, Mohamad Z, Faerber Characteristics of children having multiple
JA, Feudtner C . Childhood asthma hospital discharge Medicaid-paid asthma hospitalizations. Matern Child
medication fills and risk of subsequent readmission. J Health J. 1998;2(4):223–229. doi:10.1023/A:102230
Pediatr. 2015;166(5):1121–1127. doi:10.1016/j. 7423236.
jpeds.2014.12.019. 43. Beck AF, Huang B, Ryan PH, Sandel MT, Chen C, Kahn
30. Moncrief T, Beck AF, Simmons JM, Huang B, Kahn RS. RS. Areas with high rates of police-reported violent
Single parent households and increased child asthma crime have higher rates of childhood asthma morbid-
morbidity. J Asthma. 2014;51(3):260–266. doi:10.3109/ ity. J Pediatr. 2016;173:175–182.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.
02770903.2013.873806. 2016.02.018.
31. Kenyon CC, Melvin PR, Chiang VW, Elliott MN, 44. Beck AF, Huang B, Chundur R, Kahn RS. Housing code
Schuster MA, Berry JG. Rehospitalization for child- violation density associated with emergency depart-
hood asthma: timing, variation, and opportunities for ment and hospital use by children with asthma. Health
intervention. J Pediatr. 2014;164(2):300–305. Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(11):1993–2002. doi:10.1377/
doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.10.003. hlthaff.2014.0496.
32. Liu SY, Pearlman DN. Hospital readmissions for child- 45. Vicendese D, Dharmage SC, Tang MLK, Olenko A,
hood asthma: the role of individual and neighborhood Allen KJ, Abramson MJ, Erbas B. Bedroom air qual-
factors. Public Health Rep 1974. 2009;124(1):65–78. ity and vacuuming frequency are associated with re-
doi:10.1177/003335490912400110. peat child asthma hospital admissions. J Asthma. 2015;
33. Beck AF, Simmons JM, Huang B, Kahn RS. Geomedicine: 52(7):727–731. doi:10.3109/02770903.2014.1001904.
area-based socioeconomic measures for assessing risk 46. Moncrief T, Beck AF, Olano K, Huang B, Kahn RS.
of hospital reutilization among children admitted for Routinely sleeping away from home and the associa-
asthma. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(12):2308–2314. tion with child asthma readmission. J Community
doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300806. Health. 2014;39(6):1209–1215. doi:10.1007/s10900-
34. Triasih R, Duke T, Robertson CF. Outcomes following 014-9880-4.
admission to intensive care for asthma. Arch Dis 47. Rodríguez-Martínez CE, Sossa-Briceño MP,
Child. 2011;96(8):729–734. doi:10.1136/adc. Castro-Rodriguez JA. Predictors of hospitalization for
2010.205062. asthma in children: results of a 1-year prospective
35. Chang J, Delfino RJ, Gillen D, Tjoa T, Nickerson B, study. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014;49(11):1058–1064.
Cooper D. Repeated respiratory hospital encounters doi:10.1002/ppul.22936.
among children with asthma and residential proxim- 48. Wu DJ, Hipolito E, Bilderback A, Okelo SO, Garro A.
ity to traffic. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66(2):90–98. Predicting future emergency department visits and
doi:10.1136/oem.2008.039412. hospitalizations for asthma using the Pediatric Asthma
36. de LM, Lasmar LBF, Camargos PAM, Goulart EMA, Control and Communication Instrument—Emergency
Sakurai E. Risk factors for multiple hospital admissions Department version (PACCI-ED). J Asthma. 2016;
among children and adolescents with asthma. J Bras 53(4):387–391. doi:10.3109/02770903.2015.1115520.
Pneumol 2006;32(5):391–399. doi:10.1590/S1806- 49. Giarola BF, McCallum GB, Bailey EJ, Morris PS,
37132006001300004. Maclennan C, Chang AB. Retrospective review of 200
37. Sazonov Kocevar V, Thomas J, Jonsson L, Valovirta E, children hospitalised with acute asthma. identification
Kristensen F, Yin DD, Bisgaard H. Association between of intervention points: a single centre study. J Paediatr
allergic rhinitis and hospital resource use among asth- Child Health. 2014;50(4):286–290. doi:10.1111/jpc.12470.
matic children in Norway. Allergy. 2005;60(3):338–342. 50. Beck AF, Huang B, Simmons JM, Moncrief T, Sauers
doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00712.x. HS, Chen C, Ryan PH, Newman NC, Kahn RS. Role
38. Wallace JC, Denk CE, Kruse LK. Pediatric hospitaliza- of financial and social hardships in asthma racial dis-
tions for asthma: use of a linked file to separate parities. Pediatrics. 2014;133(3):431–439. doi:10.1542/
person-level risk and readmission. Prev Chronic Dis. peds.2013-2437.
2004;1(2):A07. 51. Newman NC, Ryan PH, Huang B, Beck AF, Sauers HS,
39. Chen Y, Dales R, Stewart P, Johansen H, Scott G, Taylor Kahn RS. Traffic-related air pollution and asthma hos-
G. Hospital readmissions for asthma in children and pital readmission in children: a longitudinal cohort
young adults in Canada. Pediatr Pulmonol. study. J Pediatr. 2014;164(6):1396–1402.e1.
2003;36(1):22–26. doi:10.1002/ppul.10307. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.02.017.
444 S. AGGARWAL ET AL.

52. Howrylak JA, Spanier AJ, Huang B, Peake RWA, Kellogg in children. South Afr Med J. Suid-Afr Tydskr Vir
MD, Sauers H, Kahn RS. Cotinine in children admit- Geneeskd. 1993;83(3):177–179.
ted for asthma and readmission. Pediatrics. 67. Beck AF, Huang B, Auger KA, Ryan PH, Chen C, Kahn
2014;133(2):e355–362. doi:10.1542/peds.2013-2422. RS. Explaining Racial Disparities in Child Asthma
53. Auger KA, Kahn RS, Davis MM, Beck AF, Simmons Readmission Using a Causal Inference Approach.
JM. Medical home quality and readmission risk for JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(7):695–703. doi:10.1001/jama-
children hospitalized with asthma exacerbations. pediatrics.2016.0269.
Pediatrics. 2013;131(1):64–70. doi:10.1542/peds. 68. Beck AF, Huang B, Wheeler K, Lawson NR, Kahn RS,
2012-1055. Riley CL. The child opportunity index and disparities
54. Delmas M-C, Marguet C, Raherison C, Nicolau J, in pediatric asthma hospitalizations across one Ohio
Fuhrman C. Readmissions for asthma in France in Metropolitan Area, 2011–2013. J Pediatr. 2017;190:200–
2002–2005. Rev Mal Respir. 2011;28(9):e115–122. 206.e1, doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.08.007.
doi:10.1016/j.rmr.2011.09.023. 69. Giangioppo S, Bijelic V, Barrowman N, Radhakrishnan
55. Carroll CL, Uygungil B, Zucker AR, Schramm CM. D. Emergency department visit count: a practical tool
Identifying an at-risk population of children with re- to predict asthma hospitalization in children. J Asthma.
current near-fatal asthma exacerbations. J Asthma. 2010; 2020;57(10):1043–1052. doi:10.1080/02770903.2019.16
47(4):460–464. doi:10.3109/02770903.2010.481344. 35151.
56. Tolomeo C, Savrin C, Heinzer M, Bazzy-Asaad A. 70. Lam HCY, Hajat S, Chan EYY, Goggins WB. Different
Predictors of asthma-related pediatric emergency de- sensitivities to ambient temperature between first- and
partment visits and hospitalizations. J Asthma. re-admission childhood asthma cases in Hong Kong—a
2009;46(8):829–834. time series study. Environ Res. 2019;170:487–492.
57. Delfino RJ, Chang J, Wu J, Ren C, Tjoa T, Nickerson doi:10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.002.
B, Cooper D, Gillen DL. Repeated hospital encounters 71. Molina AL, Magruder TG, Aban IB, Ward L, Narayanan
for asthma in children and exposure to traffic-related S, Walley SC. Predictors of Hospital Reuse Among
air pollution near the home. Ann Allergy Asthma Publicly Insured Children Hospitalized for Status
Immunol. 2009;102(2):138–144. doi:10.1016/S1081- Asthmaticus. Hosp Pediatr. 2019;9(3):194–200.
1206(10)60244-X. doi:10.1542/hpeds.2017-0239.
58. Kalaajieh WK. Factors associated with recurrent hospi- 72. Okubo Y, Michihata N, Yoshida K, Morisaki N, Matsui
talizations in asthmatic children. Rev Fr D’allergologie H, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H. Impact of pediatric obe-
D’immunologie Clin. 2002;42(7):640–644. doi:10.1016/ sity on acute asthma exacerbation in Japan. Pediatr
S0335-7457(02)00218-6. Allergy Immunol. 2017;28(8):763–767. doi:10.1111/
59. Kao CC, See LC, Yan DC, Ou LS, Huang JL. Time pai.12801.
trends and seasonal variations in hospital admissions 73. Sun W, Pan L, Zhang W. Risk factors for readmission
for childhood asthma in Taiwan from 1990 to 1998. of children hospitalized with acute asthma attacks in
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2001;19(2):63–68. South China. J Asthma off J Assoc Care Asthma.
60. Wever-Hess J, Hermans J, Kouwenberg JM, Duiverman 2019;1–10. doi:10.1080/02770903.2019.1705334.
EJ, Wever AM. Hospital admissions and readmissions 74. Tse SM, Samson C. Time to asthma-related readmission
for asthma in the age group 0–4 years. Pediatr in children admitted to the ICU for asthma. Pediatr
Pulmonol. 2001;31(1):30–36. doi:10.1002/1099-0496(2 Crit Care Med. 2017;18(12):1099–1105. doi:10.1097/
00101)31:1%3C30::aid-ppul1004%3E3.0.co;2-l. PCC.0000000000001336.
61. Hjern A, Haglund B, Bremberg S, Ringbäck-Weitoft G. 75. Baek J, Kash BA, Xu X, Benden M, Roberts J, Carrillo
Social adversity, migration and hospital admissions for G. Pediatric asthma hospitalization: individual and
childhood asthma in Sweden. Acta Paediatr. 1999; environmental characteristics of high utilizers in South
88(10):1107–1112. doi:10.1080/08035259950168171. Texas. J Asthma off J Assoc Care Asthma. 2020:1–11.
62. Minkovitz CS, Andrews JS, Serwint JR. Rehospitalization doi:10.1080/02770903.2020.1827424.
of children with asthma. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 76. Pinto JM, Wagle S, Navallo LJ, Petrova A. Combined
1999;153(7):727–730. doi:10.1001/archpedi.153.7.727. effect of race/ethnicity and type of insurance on reuse
63. Schaubel D, Johansen H, Mao Y, Dutta M, Manfreda J. of urgent hospital-based services in children dis-
Risk of preschool asthma: incidence, hospitalization, charged with asthma. Child Basel Switz. 2020;7(9):107.
recurrence, and readmission probability. J Asthma. doi:10.3390/children7090107.
1996;33(2):97–103. doi:10.3109/02770909609054537. 77. Baek J, Kash BA, Xu X, Benden M, Roberts J, Carrillo
64. Henry RL, Cooper DM, Halliday JA. Parental asthma G. Effect of ambient air pollution on hospital read-
knowledge: its association with readmission of children missions among the pediatric asthma patient popula-
to hospital. J. Paediatr. Child Health. 1995;31(2):95–98. tion in South Texas: a case-crossover study. Int J
doi:10.1111/j.1440-1754.1995.tb00754.x. Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(13) doi:10.3390/
65. Sporik R, Platts-Mills TA, Cogswell JJ. Exposure to ijerph17134846.
house dust mite allergen of children admitted to hos- 78. Philips KS, Reiss DE, Silver EJ, Rastogi D. Readmission
pital with asthma. Clin Exp Allergy. 1993;23(9):740– and ambulatory health care use after asthma hospi-
746. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2222.1993.tb00361.x. talization among urban minority children. Hosp
66. Roux P, Smit M, Weinberg EG. Seasonal and recurrent Pediatr. 2020;10(4):338–346. doi:10.1542/hpeds.
intensive care unit admissions for acute severe asthma 2019-0148.
Journal of Asthma 445

79. Abir M, Truchil A, Wiest D, Nelson DB, Goldstick JE, 86. Fisher-Owens S, Turenne W, Chavanu K, Slonim A.
Koegel P, Lozon MM, Choi H, Brenner J. Cluster anal- Racial disparities in children hospitalized with asthma
ysis of acute care use yields insights for tailored pe- at Academic Childrens’ Hospitals. Pediatr Asthma
diatric asthma interventions. Ann Emerg Med. Allergy Immunol. 2006;19(3):162–171. doi:10.1089/
2017;70(3):288–299.e2. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed. pai.2006.19.162.
2017.06.024. 87. Raymond D, Henry RL, Higginbotham N, Coory M.
80. Molina AL, Molina Y, Walley SC, Wu CL, Zhu A, Oates Predicting readmission to hospital with asthma. J
GR. Residential instability, neighborhood deprivation, Paediatr Child Health. 1998;34(6):534–538. doi:10.1046/
and pediatric asthma outcomes. Pediatr Pulmonol. j.1440-1754.1998.00297.x.
2020;55(6):1340–1348. doi:10.1002/ppul.24771. 88. Kalaajieh WK. Factors associated with recurrent hospi-
81. Jroundi I, Tse SM. Long-term asthma-related readmis- talizations in asthmatic children. 2002;42(7):640–644.
sions: comparison between children admitted and not doi:10.1016/S0335-7457(02)00218-6.
admitted to the intensive care unit for critical asthma. 89. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention.
J Asthma. 2021;58(1):10–18. doi:10.1080/02770903.20 Global Initiative for Asthma.
19.1663430. 90. Guttmann A, Schull MJ, Vermeulen MJ, Stukel TA.
82. Hogan AH, Brimacombe M, Mosha M, Flores G. Association between waiting times and short term
Comparing artificial intelligence and traditional meth- mortality and hospital admission after departure
ods to identify factors associated with pediatric asth- from emergency department: population based co-
ma readmission. Acad Pediatr. 2022;22(1):55–61. hor t study f rom Ont ar io, C anada. BMJ.
doi:10.1016/j.acap.2021.07.015. 2011;342(jun01 1):d2983–d2983. doi:10.1136/bmj.
83. Faison K, Moon A, Buckman C, Cortright L, Tumin D, d2983.
Campbell C, Beamon B. Change of address as a mea- 91. Bhogal S, Zemek R, Ducharme FM. Written action plans
sure of housing insecurity predicting rural emergency for asthma in children. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.
department revisits after asthma exacerbation. J 2006;(3):CD005306. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005306.
Asthma. 2021;58(12):1616–1622. doi:10.1080/0277090 pub2.
3.2020.1818773. 92. Buelo A, McLean S, Julious S, Flores-Kim J, Bush A,
84. Mersha TB, Qin K, Beck AF, Ding L, Huang B, Kahn Henderson J, Paton JY, Sheikh A, Shields M, Pinnock
RS. Genetic ancestry differences in pediatric asthma H, ARC Group, et al. At-risk children with asthma
readmission are mediated by socioenvironmental fac- (ARC): a systematic review. Thorax. 2018;73(9):813–
tors. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2021;148(5):1210–1218. 824. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210939.
e4. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2021.05.046. 93. Ardura-Garcia C, Stolbrink M, Zaidi S, Cooper PJ,
85. Sakai-Bizmark R, Chang R-KR, Mena LA, Webber EJ, Blakey JD. Predictors of repeated acute hospital atten-
Marr EH, Kwong KY. Asthma Hospitalizations Among dance for asthma in children: a systematic review and
Homeless Children in New York State. Pediatrics. meta-analysis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2018;53(9):1179–
2019;144(2):e20182769. doi:10.1542/peds.2018-2769. 1192. doi:10.1002/ppul.24068.

You might also like