Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 3
Lecture 3
BY
MONTADHER AL-SAEDI
Horizontal and Directional Drilling
Chapter 2
Example 2-2
Given: The survey data for Directional Well No. 1 are shown in Table 2-3.
Determine: The wellbore position at each survey point using the tangential, balanced
tangential, average angle, radius of curvature, and minimum curvature
method.
At 0 and 1,000 feet the inclination is 0°, therefore, the wellbore position is
0.00 North and 0.00 East.
North = 360° or 0°
East = 90°
South = 180°
West = 270º
(
ΔTVD = ( ΔMD ) cos I
2 )
ΔTVD = (100.00 )( cos3°) = 99.86 ft
Calculate ΔNorth
Calculate ΔEast
Calculate the position of the wellbore at the next survey point of 1,200 ft.
The same calculations are made at each survey depth, and the results
are shown in Table 2-4.
Calculate the position of the wellbore at 1,300 feet using the balanced
tangential method given the values at 1,200 feet from Table 2-5.
⎛ ΔMD ⎞
ΔTVD = ⎜ ⎟ ( cos I2 + cos I1 )
⎝ 2 ⎠
⎛ 100.00 ⎞
ΔTVD = ⎜ ⎟ ( cos 9 + cos 6 ) = 99.11 ft
⎝ 2 ⎠
⎛ ΔMD ⎞
ΔNorth = ⎜ ⎟ ( sin I1 × cos A1 + sin I2 × cos A2 )
⎝ 2 ⎠
⎛ 100.00 ⎞
ΔNorth = ⎜ ⎟ ( sin 6 × cos 26.5 + sin 9 × cos 23.3 ) = 11.86 ft
⎝ 2 ⎠
⎛ ΔMD ⎞
ΔEast = ⎜ ⎟ ( sin I1 × sin A1 + sin I2 × sin A2 )
⎝ 2 ⎠
Table 2-4. Survey Calculations for Directional Well No. 1 using the Tangential Method
TRUE VERTICAL
MEASURE INCLIN- COURSE VERTICAL RECTANGULAR SECTION DOGLEG
DDEPTH ATION AZIMUTH LENGTH DEPTH COORDINATES 10 DEG SEVERITY
Table 2-5. Survey Calculations for Directional Well No. 1 using the Balanced Tangential Method
⎛ 100.00 ⎞
ΔEast = ⎜ ⎟ ( sin 6 × sin 26.5 + sin9 × sin 23.30 ) = 5.43 ft
⎝ 2 ⎠
The same calculations are made at each survey depth, and the results
are shown in Table 2-5.
Calculate the position of the wellbore at 1,400 feet using the average
angle method and the survey data at 1,300 feet in Table 2-6.
⎛I +I ⎞
ΔTVD = ΔMD × cos ⎜ 1 2 ⎟
⎝ 2 ⎠
⎛ 9 + 12 ⎞
ΔTVD = 100.00 × cos ⎜ ⎟ = 98.33 ft
⎝ 2 ⎠
⎛I +I ⎞ ⎛ A1 + A2 ⎞
ΔNorth = ΔMD × sin ⎜ 1 2 ⎟ × cos ⎜ 2 ⎟
⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ ⎠
⎛ 9 + 12 ⎞ ⎛ 23.3 + 20.3 ⎞
ΔNorth = 100.00 × sin ⎜ ⎟ × cos ⎜ ⎟ = 16.92 ft
⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠
⎛I +I ⎞ ⎛ A + A2 ⎞
ΔEast = ΔMD × sin ⎜ 1 2 ⎟ × sin ⎜ 1 ⎟
⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠
⎛ 9 + 12 ⎞ ⎛ 23.3 + 20.3 ⎞
ΔEast = 100.00 × sin ⎜ ⎟ × sin ⎜ ⎟ = 6.77 ft
⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠
The same calculations are made at each survey depth, and the results
are shown in Table 2-6.
Calculate the position of the wellbore at 1,500 feet using the radius of
curvature method and the survey data at 1,400 feet in Table 2-7.
ΔTVD =
(180 )( ΔMD )( sin I2 − sin I1 )
π ( I2 − I1 )
ΔTVD =
(180 )(100.00 )( sin15 − sin12 ) = 97.23 ft
π (15 − 12 )
ΔNorth =
π 2 ( I2 − I1 )( A2 − A1 )
ΔNorth =
π 2 (15 − 12 )( 23.3 − 20.3 )
ΔEast =
π 2 ( I2 − I1 )( A2 − A1 )
ΔEast =
π 2 (15 − 12 )( 23.3 − 20.3 )
The same calculations are made at each survey depth, and the results
are shown in Table 2-7.
Calculate the position of the wellbore at 1,600 feet using the minimum
curvature method and the survey data at 1,500 feet in Table 2-8.
For the minimum curvature method, all the data must be changed to
radians.
I1 = 15 ° or
(15 )(π ) = 0.2618 radians
180
I 2 = 18 ° or
(18 )(π ) = 0.3142 radians
180
A1 = 23.30° or
( 23.30 )(π ) = 0.4067 radians
180
A2 = 23.90° or
( 23.90 )(π ) = 0.4171 radians
180
{ }
D1 = cos ( I2 − I1 ) − sin I2 × sin I1 × ⎡⎣1 − cos ( A2 − A1 ) ⎤⎦
{ }
D1 = cos ( 0.3142 − 0.2618 ) − sin 0.1342 × sin 0.2618 × ⎡⎣1 − cos ( 0.4171 − 0.4067 ) ⎤⎦
D1 = 0.9986
⎛ 1 ⎞
D 2 = tan−1 ⎜ 2 ⎟ −1
⎝ D1 ⎠
Table 2-6. Survey Calculations for Directional Well No. 1 using the Average Angle Method
Table 2-7. Survey Calculations for Directional Well No. 1 using the Radius of Curvature Method
TRUE VERTICAL
MEASURED INCLIN- COURSE RECTANGULAR DOGLEG
VERTICAL SECTION
DEPTH ATION AZIMUTH LENGTH COORDINATES SEVERITY
DEPTH 10 DEG
(feet) (degrees) (degrees) (feet) (feet) NORTH EAST (feet) (deg/100’)
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1,000.00 0.00 0.00 1000.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1,100.00 3.00 21.70 100.00 1,099.63 2.56 0.49 2.60 3.00
1,200.00 6.00 26.50 100.00 1,199.63 9.71 3.69 10.21 3.02
1,300.00 9.00 23.30 100.00 1,298.77 21.55 9.19 22.82 3.03
⎛ 1 ⎞
D 2 = tan−1 ⎜ 2 ⎟ − 1 = 0.0538
⎝ 0.9986 ⎠
2 ⎛ D2 ⎞
FC = × tan ⎜ ⎟
D2 ⎝ 2 ⎠
2 ⎛ 0.0538 ⎞
FC = × tan ⎜ ⎟ = 1.0002408
0.0538 ⎝ 2 ⎠
⎛ ΔMD ⎞
ΔTVD = ⎜ ⎟ ( cos I1 + cos I2 ) ( FC )
⎝ 2 ⎠
⎛ 100.00 ⎞
ΔTVD = ⎜ ⎟ ( cos 0.2618 + cos 0.3142 )(1.0002408 ) = 95.87 ft
⎝ 2 ⎠
⎛ ΔMD ⎞
ΔNorth = ⎜ ⎟ ⎡⎣( sin I2 × cos A2 ) + ( sin I1 × cos A1 ) ⎤⎦ ( FC )
⎝ 2 ⎠
⎛ 100.00 ⎞
ΔNorth = ⎜ ⎟ ⎣⎡( sin 0.3142 × cos 0.4171) + ( sin 0.2618 × cos 0.4067 ) ⎦⎤ (1.0002408 )
⎝ 2 ⎠
ΔNorth = 26.02 ft
⎛ ΔMD ⎞
ΔEast = ⎜ ⎟ ⎡⎣( sin I2 × sin A2 ) + ( sin I1 × sin A1 ) ⎤⎦ ( FC )
⎝ 2 ⎠
⎛ 100.00 ⎞
ΔEast = ⎜ ⎟ ⎡⎣( sin 0.3142 × sin 0.4171) + ( sin0.2618 × sin 0.4067 ) ⎤⎦ (1.0002408 )
⎝ 2 ⎠
ΔEast = 11.38 ft
The same calculations are made at each survey depths, and the results
are shown in Table 2-8.
Table 2-8. Survey Calculations for Directional Well No. 1 using the Minimum Curvature Method
TRUE VERTICAL
MEASURED INCLIN- COURSE VERTICAL RECTANGULAR SECTION DOGLEG
DEPTH ATION AZIMUTH LENGTH DEPTH COORDINATES 10 DEG SEVERITY
(feet) (degrees) (degrees) (feet) (feet) NORTH EAST (feet) (deg/100’)
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1,000.00 0.00 0.00 1000.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1,100.00 3.00 21.70 100.00 1,099.95 2.43 0.97 2.56 3.05
1,200.00 6.00 26.50 100.00 1,199.63 9.54 4.27 10.14 3.02
1,300.00 9.00 23.30 100.00 1,298.77 21.40 9.70 22.76 3.03
The results of the survey calculations for Directional Well No. 1 in Example 2-2 are compared in
Table 2-9 and Table 2-10. The comparison shows a significant difference when using the
tangential method. The difference is much less pronounced with the other four methods. Table
2-10 shows the difference in the calculated TVD, North and East assuming the minimum
curvature method is the most accurate. The average angle, balanced tangential and radius of
curvature methods are all within one foot of each other at total depth. It must be remembered
that as the distance between surveys increases, the average angle and balanced tangential
errors will increase significantly.
Table 2-9. Comparison of the Survey Calculation Methods for Example 2-2 Results
Table 2-10. Relative Difference between the Survey Calculation Methods for Example 2-2 Results
The line of closure is defined as "a straight line, in a horizontal plane containing the last station
of the survey, drawn from the projected surface location to the last station of the survey." The
line of closure is identified in Figure 2-10. Simply stated, the closure is the shortest distance
between the surface location and the horizontal projection of the last survey point. The closure
is always a straight line because a straight line is the shortest distance between two points. The
closure is the polar coordinates at a given survey point as opposed to north and east being
rectangular coordinates.
When defining closure, the direction must also be given. Without indicating direction, the
bottomhole location projected in a horizontal plane could be anywhere along the circumference
of a circle with the radius of the circle being equal to the closure distance. The direction and
closure exactly specifies where the bottom of the hole is located in relation to the surface
location.
The closure distance and direction are calculated using the following equations assuming that
the wellhead coordinates and zero feet North and zero feet East:
East
Closure Direction = Tan −1 Equation 2-22
North
( North ) + ( East )
2 2
Closure Distance = Equation 2-23
If the wellhead coordinates are not zero North and East, the wellhead coordinates must be
subtracted from the These are the same equations used for calculating an angle and
hypotenuse of a right triangle.
Example 2-3
Given: To illustrate the use of these equations, the closure and direction of the
Directional Well No. 1 in Example 2-2 for the results of the minimum
curvature method are calculated below
From Table 2-8, the coordinates of the last survey point in the example
well are:
North = 1,543.05 ft
East = 639.80 ft
( North ) + ( East )
2 2
Closure Distance =
⎛ East ⎞
Closure Direction = Tan−1 ⎜ ⎟
⎝ North ⎠
⎛ 639.80 ⎞
Closure Direction = Tan−1 ⎜ ⎟ = 22.52° or 22 31'
o
⎝ 1543.05 ⎠
1,670.43 ft N22.52E
Then, the horizontal projection of the bottom of the hole is 1,670.43 feet
away from the surface location in the N22.52E direction.
VERTICAL SECTION
The vertical section is the horizontal length of a projection of the borehole into a specific vertical
plane and scaled with vertical depth. When the path of a wellbore is plotted, the vertical section
is plotted versus TVD. The closure distance cannot be plotted accurately because the plane of
closure (closure direction) can change between surveys. The vertical plot of a wellbore is in
one specific plane. Figure 2-10 graphically shows the difference between the closure distance
and vertical section. The closure distance and vertical section are equal only when the closure
direction is the same as the plane of the vertical section.
Figure 2-10. Graphic Representation of the Difference between Closure Distance and Vertical Section in the
Horizontal Plane
The vertical section azimuth is usually chosen as the azimuth from the surface location to the
center of the target. If multiple targets are present and changes in azimuth are required to hit
each target, the vertical section azimuth is usually chosen as the azimuth from the surface
location to the end of the wellbore.
The vertical section is calculated from the closure distance and direction. The equations for
calculating the vertical section can be seen in Table 2-1 and are as follows:
Example 2-4
Given: The data of Directional Well No. 1 from the previous examples.
Plan View
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
North, feet
800
600
400
200
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
East, feet
Figure 2-11. Plan View for Directional Well No. 1 of Example 2-2
Vertical Section
500
1000
1500
True Vertical Depth, feet
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
Figure 2-12. Vertical Section for Directional Well no. 1 in Example 2-2
The majority of today's directional well planning is performed on computers. Computers are fast
and can incorporate both changes in build and drop rates and changes in direction. All
directional drilling service companies offer this service; therefore, a final well plan should be
generated by a computer.
However, there are times when a directional driller or engineer may need to estimate the
inclination needed to achieve a specified departure, or he may need to change the well plan
while drilling the well. Sidetracking around a fish is an example. At these times a computer
may not be available. Presented here is a simple method of planning a directional well which
can be used in the office or field. With little practice, this method can be used to plan and plot a
directional well. If possible, the final plan should be processed by the directional drilling
contractor on a computer. In this chapter, we will look at two dimensional planning only. Three
dimensional planning (incorporating direction changes) is beyond the scope of this manual.
It should be remembered that if you can plan a directional well, then you can incorporate
changes to a directional plan in the field. The same equations are used to predict the inclination
and azimuth required to hit the target. The equations are also used to revise the directional
program when the target changes as in geosteered wells.
The first (and simplest) well to consider is a Type I well. The Type I well has a vertical hole to a
relatively shallow depth. Then, at the kickoff point, the well is deviated to a specified inclination.
At the end of built point, the hold or tangent section of the hole is drilled at the specified
inclination until the total depth is reached. Buildup charts can be used to determine the hold
inclination, measured depth (MD), true vertical depth (TVD), and horizontal departure (DEP) in
the building or dropping section of the hole. They can also be easily calculated. The
trigonometric solution of a right triangle is used to determine the MD, TVD, and DEP in the hold
section of the hole. An example problem follows which will demonstrate the procedures.
Example 4-1
Given: Target Depth - 9,800 feet TVD
From the information given, the kickoff point is 2,000 feet. Since this is a
vertical hole, there is no horizontal departure, and the MD is the same as
the TVD. The following shows the data for this section of the hole. In
reality, the hole will not be perfectly vertical but for planning purposes, it si
sufficient to assume that it is vertical.
Section 2 - Build
In 7,800 feet of TVD, the hole must have a horizontal departure of 2,926
feet. Using the 2°/100 feet buildup graph (Figure 4-1), enter the graph at
2,926 feet on the horizontal departure scale (bottom). Draw a line up until
it meets the TVD depth (vertical scale) of 7,800 feet. Read the angle of
inclination running through this point. That inclination is 22°. Therefore, if
the inclination is increased at 2°/100 feet to 22° and then maintained; the
horizontal departure will be 2,926 feet after drilling 7,800 feet of true
vertical depth. When the hole is kicked off at 2,000 feet TVD, the
inclination should be built to 22° at a rate of 2°/100 feet. The 22°
inclination is maintained until a TVD of 9,800 feet is reached which will hit
the target. Drilling is continued at 22° to a total depth of 10,000 feet TVD.
Now determine the MD, TVD, and DEP for the build portion of the hole.
This information can be obtained from the 2°/100 feet buildup table,
included in the Appendix. At an inclination of 22°, the following is the
corresponding MD, TVD, and DEP.
The MD of the hold section of the hole can be calculated using the
geometry of a right triangle with the hypotenuse being the measured
depth. The remaining horizontal departure and true vertical depth can be
calculated by subtracting the TVD and DEP to the end of the build section
from the total.
Figure 4-2 is a right triangle which represents the hold section of the hole
with Angle “A” being the inclination (22°). Side “b” is the TVD (6,726.83
feet). Side “a” is the horizontal departure (2,717.40 feet). Side “c” is the
MD which must be calculated. From the trigonometric functions of a right
triangle, we know that:
opposite side (a )
Sin A =
hypotenuse (c )
2,717.40'
Sin 22° =
c
2,717.40'
c= = 7,254.01 ft
Sin 22°
Therefore, the measured depth of the hold section of the hole to the
target is 7,254.01 feet. Now, the horizontal departure and measured
depth of the well must be calculated from 9,800 feet TVD to 10,000 feet
TVD which is the remaining portion of the well to be drilled. It can also be
calculated using the trigonometric functions of a right triangle. The
inclination is 22° and the TVD remaining is as follows:
In the triangle shown in Figure 4-3, the Angle “A” is equal to the
inclination (22°). Side “b” is equal to TVD (200.00 feet). Side “c” (MD)
and side “a” (DEP) must be determined. The horizontal departure can be
determined from the tangent of Angle “A.”
opposite side(a )
Tan A =
adjacent side (b )
a
Tan 22° =
200'
a = 80 .81 ft
adjacent side (b )
Cos A =
hypotenuse (c )
200'
Cos 22° =
c
c = 215 .71 ft
The well is to be drilled to a vertical depth of 2,000 feet. Then the well is
kicked off at a rate of 2°/100 feet until an inclination of 22° is reached.
The inclination is maintained at 22°, and the well is drilled to a TD of
10,569.72 feet MD or 10,000 feet TVD.
called point "B". Point "A" is the location at the surface. A line is drawn
from 0 to 2,000 feet TVD which represents the wellbore course.
The next point to plot is at the end of the build section. That point can be
located by the TVD and DEP at the end of the build section. From Table
4-1, the TVD is equal to 1,073.07 feet plus 2,000 feet. The DEP is equal
to 208.60 feet plus 0.00 feet. Therefore, the TVD and DEP are 3,073.19
feet and 208.60 feet, respectively. This point can now be plotted on the
graph and is called point "C". Since the inclination increases from 0° to
22°, a smooth curve should be drawn from point "B" to point "C".
The next section is the hold section to the target at a true vertical depth of
9,800 feet. The TVD and DEP can be calculated by summing the values
in Table 4-1 through the hold to target section.
TVD = 9,800'
Note that the TVD and DEP are equal to the values specified in the
problem at the target depth. This point can be plotted and is called point
"D". A straight line is drawn from point "C" to point "D".
The last section is hold to TD. The TVD and DEP are again calculated by
summing all the values of TVD and DEP to total depth. This has already
been done in Table 4-1. Therefore, the TVD is 10,000 feet and the DEP
is 3,006.81 feet. Point "E" can now be plotted. A straight line is drawn
from "D" to "E". The vertical section is labeled as shown in Figure 4-4.
The next step is to determine the closure distance and direction, the
North coordinate, and the East coordinate. The closure direction is given
as N20ºE. The closure distance is the horizontal departure at any point in
the well. At target depth the closure distance is 2,926 feet, and at total
depth, the closure distance is 3,006.81 feet. The North and East
coordinates can now be determined from the solution of a right triangle at
both the target depth and total depths as shown in Figure 4-5 and Figure
4-6. In the right triangle, “b” will represent the North coordinate and “a”
will represent the east coordinate. The closure or horizontal departure is
represented by “c”, and angle “A” is the closure direction and is N20ºE or
an azimuth of 20°. The following are the calculations for the North and
East coordinates.
adjacent side(b )
Cos A =
hypotenuse (c )
Figure 4-4. Vertical Section Well DEF, Happy Oil Company, N20E Plain
b
Cos 20° =
2,926 .00'
b = 2,749.54ft
opposite side(a )
Sin A =
hypotenuse (c )
a
Sin 20° =
2,926 .00'
a = 1,000 .75 ft
Figure 4-5. Right Triangle Representing the Horizontal View of the Well in at Target Depth
adjacent side(b )
Cos A =
hypotenuse (c )
b
Cos A =
c
b
Cos 20° =
3,006.81'
b = 2,825 .48 ft
Figure 4-6. Right Triangle Representing the Horizontal View of the Well in at Total Depth
opposite side (a )
Sin A =
hypotenuse (c )
a
Sin A =
c
a
Sin 20° =
3,006.81'
a = 1,028 .39 ft
CLOSURE CLOSURE
DISTANCE DIRECTION NORTH EAST
(feet) (degrees) (feet) (feet)