{awakening bhārata}

@ancient_bharat

29 Tweets • 2020-11-17 09:54:03 UTC •  See on Twitter

rattibha.com 

15 Cases where True Indology @TIinExile exposed

Devdutt Myth @devduttmyth

Case 1
Case 2 - In this article, Devdutt Myth says that
Prakrit came earlier than Sanskrit.

I would have laughed at his ignorance, his utter lack

of basic linguistic knowledge, and moved on, but
this misconception seems to be very widespread.
Case 3
The Adikavi of Telugu was Nannayya, a Brahmin
The "Adikavi" of Kannada was Pampa, a Brahmin.
The "Adikavi" of Gujarati was Narsinh Mehta, a
Brahmin It was a Brahmin reformist who first
brought Dalits into temples.
Trust this "Myth" guy to turn everything to
Brahmin hate
Case 4
@TIinExile
The correct phonetic sound of "BherunDa"
(भे ड/ ೕರುಂಡ) is labio-velar voiced aspirate
bhe(भे/ ೕ) & NOT voiced labio-velar be(बे/ ೕ)
2."be" does not mean "two" either in Kannada /
Sanskrit. भे ड/ ೕರುಂಡ means 'terrible'
3.The biggest myth is your scholarship
Case 5
If Yudhiṣṭhira was just "character of an Epic
created 2000 years ago"
how did Pāṇini mention Yudhiṣṭhira in
Aṣṭādhyāyī (8.3.95) dating back to atleast 2400
years?
How did Sātavāhanas mention him in inscriptions
dating back to 2100 years?
Dropped ur brain somewhere?
In Aṣṭādhyāyī (8.3.95),Panini explains गिवयु ध यां
थरः Sutra.
Basically,he says that the sibilant *s preceded by
front vowel * I becomes the palatal retroflex *ṣ.
As an example,he cites the name of Yudhiṣṭhira.
What Pāṇini explained is what today's linguists call
"Ruki"
If Yudhiṣṭhira was a "2000-year-old fictional
character" inspired by King Ashoka as Romila
Thapar's and Devdutts of this world claim, how did
Chanakya (c.320 BC), the minister of Ashoka's
grandfather, mention Yudhiṣṭhira in his
Arthaśāstra?
I dare you to answer @devduttmyth

@devduttmyth In Chapter 8 of Arthaśāstra,

Kautilya compares hunting to gambling. Kautilya
says gambling is a bigger vice than hunting and
recounts "the history of Yudhiṣṭhira" who lost
everything in gambling From Arthashastra 8.1
(English translation by Shamsastry).
Buddha praised King Yudhiṣṭhira as " wise,
righteous, greatest alms-giver". Recorded in ancient
Buddhist scriptures. Ashoka was a Buddhist king
who tried to rule like great kings praised by
Buddha. So, who inspired whom? Is it so hard for
this "Eminent historian" to figure out?
Buddha praises Yudhiṣṭhira as "the righteous king
who formerly ruled Indraprastha & set entire
Bhāratavarsha in commotion with alms-giving"
(Dhūmakāri-jātaka, Dasabrahmana Jataka).
Ashoka ruled 200 years after Buddha.
But this genius says Ashoka was born before
Yudhiṣṭhira

Case 6
@TIinExile : Even the word "Urdu' is a foreign
Turkish word meaning "military camp"Urdu was
born in invader camps.
Until 1800,there was no such thing as "Urdu
language"
The language was simply called Hindi.
In 1800,poet Mashafi was the first one to call this
language"Urdu"
Case 7
Hey Mythologist, Please spare us at least on
Dussehra.
Go back and learn your basics.
Ravana is 20 handed,not 10 handed.
He is described as वशत् भुजम् = 20 handed in
Ramayana

वशत् भुजम् दश ीवम् दशनीय प र छदम् |

िवशाल व सम् वीरम् राज ल मण ल तम् ||-3.32.9
Case 8

Rajputs never practiced ambush?

Ever heard of Durgadas Rathore?
He was Aurangzeb's most wanted.
For 28 years,Aurangzeb searched for him without
any success.
Because Durgadas was an expert of ambush &
guerrilla After Aurangzeb died,he kicked Mughals
out & liberated Marwar.
@TIinExile : What they keep telling you: Jain
Marwadis financed East India Company

What they DO NOT tell you: Jain Marwadis also

financed Marathas & Sadhus At one point,they
were desperately trying to finance anyone who
could get rid of their Nawab, Jihadi rapist Siraj-ud-
daulah
@TIinExile
Wrong! Panini never said anything like that.
It was Patanjali who said
"when you need pots,you go to a potter but when
you need words,you don't go to a grammarian. You
go to the people who speak the language"
He also nowhere said "market"
Go back & read up your basics
Case 10
@TIinExile
India's "first empire" was NOT exclusively
Buddhist.
Chandragupta Maurya patronised Vedic Hinduism
& Jainism.
Bindusara patronised Vedic Hinduism Ashoka was
Buddhist.
His descendant Samprati again favoured Hinduism.
Stop writing nonsense &read-only primary src
+
You are factually wrong.
Mauryans DID NOT "value Pali".
In fact, there was not a single inscription issued by
Mauryans in canonical Pali.
In Eastern India, they used Ardha-Magadhi.
In Western India, they used a language closer to
Pali In North West, they used Gandhari.
Case 11

@TIinExile : Sanskrit manuscripts dating back to

6th century CE & written on paper were
discovered in Gilgit (Jammu & Kashmir) in
1931.
Some of these manuscripts are still housed in
Srinagar Museum. These manuscripts were written
on paper even before your Islam was born.
+
Here is a manuscript from the Gilgit collection.
Written with ink on paper recording
Saddharmapuṇḍarīka Sutra.
The language is Sanskrit & the script is (Proto)
Sharada. Dates back to the 6th century CE +
The documents have been dated to the beginning of
the 6thCE
Ancient paper manuscripts were found in remote
arid Gilgit but not in a cultural center like Varanasi.
All thanks to the climate!
Testimony of foreign travelers like Yijing(7th CE)
confirms the widespread use of paper.
Case 12
Fool!You are wrong again!
There is the presence of a veil even in the earliest
Indian temple art.
This is an image of a Yakshi excavated from an
ancient temple site in Gandhara(2nd CE)
One can clearly see her veil.
This was 500 years before Islamic religion was even
born.
And here is another depiction of a Yakshi (folk
goddess) from Bharhut, Madhya Pradesh (2nd
century BCE).
One can very clearly see her head covering.
This was depicted 800 years before Islam I could go
on and on.
The fact is that veils are very prominent in Indian
temple art. +
@TIinExile : Nobody is talking about "covering
face".

Devdutt Myth claimed and I quote

"in no temple art is a woman shown covering her
head".

I just gave a few examples which prove his

statement WRONG.

case 13

It was Gandhi himself who described Savarkar as

Veer (brave)

This is what Gandhi said :

"I met Savarkar in London. He is brave, clever,

patriot, revolutionary.

Saw evil of the British Govt much earlier than I did

He is in Andaman (jail) for having loved India"

@TIinExile :
While Congress and liberals incessantly malign
Veer Savarkar, this is what their father Gandhi had
to say.

When you really have no idea, you must STOP

writing nonsense & maligning national heroes!
Case 14

You are WRONG again!

NO Vedic text (whether Samhita, Brahmana,
Aranyaka or Upanishad) talks about Matsyanyaya.

It is elaborated upon in Arthashastra &

alluded to in Shantiparva of Mahabharata.

But I don't expect a fraud mythologist like you to

know anything about Vedas
Case 15

You are WRONG as always!

There is NO Rgveda manuscript that dates back to
Gupta times!
The one from the Bhandarkar library that you are
citing in your screenshot (5/1875-76) is a Sharada
manuscript that dates back to only 15th century CE!

It was used by Max Mueller!

 @TIinExile :

Punjabi and Odia are indeed from the same Indic

language family but Hurrian has got nothing to do
with the Indic language family!

It is funny to see these illiterates, who think

Hurrian is Indic, teach me linguistics.

@TIinExile :

Does this tongue have any Adhikara to speak about

Dharma and Shastras?

I feel sorry for everyone who considers him an

expert on Hindu scriptures.

I feel sorry for those who have to learn Hinduism

from the mouth of this (you know already!) -
True Indology

These pages were created and arranged by Rattibha services

(https://www.rattibha.com)
The contents of these pages, including all images, videos,
attachments and external links published (collectively referred
to as "this publication"), were created at the request of a user
(s) from Twitter. Rattibha provides an automated service,
without human intervention, to copy the contents of tweets from
Twitter and publish them in an article style, and create PDF
pages that can be printed and shared, at the request of Twitter
user (s). Please note that the views and all contents in this
publication are those of the author and do not necessarily
represent the views of Rattibha. Rattibha assumes no
responsibility for any damage or breaches of any law resulting
from the contents of this publication.