Professional Documents
Culture Documents
00
PSA 100: PHILIPPINE FRAMEWORK FOR ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS
Fundamentals of Auditing and Assurance Services
Assurance
❖ Overview Services
Assurance Services – independent professional services that any
improve the quality of information, or its context, for information
decision makers Attestation
• Attestation services – occur when a practitioner is Services
engaged to issue a report on a subject matter, or primarily FS
an assertion about subject matter, that is the
responsibility of another party.
o Auditing – is a systematic process of Auditing
objectively obtaining and evaluating evidence financial
statements
regarding assertions about economic actions
and events to ascertain the degree of
correspondence between these assertions and
established criteria and communicating the results to intended users
❖ Management’s Assertions
• Existence – verifies assets, liability, & equity exist in the financial statement at a given
date
• Occurrence – used to determine whether the transaction recorded on financial
statements have been taken place
• Accuracy – looks at specific transactions and then checks the accuracy of the recorded
entry to determine whether the amounts are recorded correctly
• Valuation & Allocation – used to determine that the financial statements presented have
all been recorded at the proper valuation
• Cut-off – used to determine whether the transactions have been recorded in the
appropriate accounting period
• Completeness – verifies that transactions for the period being examined have been
properly entered in the correct period
• Rights & Obligations – are used to determine that assets, liabilities, and equity
represented in the financial statements are the property of the entity being audited
• Classification – addresses the financial statements themselves; its acceptable format, all
the necessary information included, understandability, etc.
❖ Accepting an Engagement
A practitioner accepts an assurance engagement only where the practitioner’s preliminary
knowledge of the engagement circumstances indicates that:
• Relevant ethical requirements: Independence & Competence
• Appropriate subject matter
• Criteria to be used are suitable & available to intended users
• Access to sufficient appropriate evidence
• The practitioner’s conclusion, in the form appropriate to either a reasonable
assurance engagement or a limited assurance engagement, is to be contained in a
written report
• Presence of rational purpose of the engagement
❖ Auditing
Audit – derived from Latin word “Audire” which means to hear
- Auditing: is a systematic process by which a competent, In olden days, some experienced
independent person objectively obtains and evaluates people ordinarily judges the
evidence regarding assertions about economic actions accounts of business people for
and events to ascertain the degree of correspondence the purpose of the correctness
of accounts
between those assertions and established criteria and
communicating the results to interested users
(American Accounting Association, AAA)
Systematic Process
This implies a structured, logical, and organized series of steps and procedures.
Degree of Correspondence
Refers to the closeness with which the assertions can be identified with established criteria
Established Criteria
These are the standards against which the assertions or representations are judged
Interested Users
Individuals who use (rely on) the auditor’s findings.
❖ Overall Objectives of Auditing
In conducting an audit of financial statements, the overall objectives of the auditor are
(PSA 200, 11):
a. To obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole
are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, thereby
enabling the auditor to express an opinion on whether the financial statements are
prepared, in all material aspects, in accordance with an applicable financial reporting
framework; and
b. To report on the financial statements, and communicate as required by the PSAs, in
accordance with the auditor’s findings
❖ Audit Process
- Is the sequence of different activities involved in an audit. The emphasis & order of
certain activities may vary depending upon a particular audit, but this process would
basically include the ff:
-
Auditing Process
❖ Materiality
• Material Misstatements – occurred when it could reasonably be expected to
influence the economic decisions of users made on the basis of the financial
statements
Risk Nature Source
Inherent and Control The financial statements Entity
Risks may contain a material objectives/operations and
misstatement management’s
design/implement of
internal control
Detection risk The auditor may fail to Nature and extent of the
detect a material procedures performed by
misstatement in the the auditor
financial statements
❖ Audit Risk
- The risk that the auditor mistakenly give a “clean”
or unqualified opinion on financial statements that
are materially misstated
❖ AASC Pronouncements
Practice
PAPSs PREPs PAEPSs PRSPSs
Statements
2
Philippine Standards on Related Engagements (PSREs) & Practice Standards
Review - Review of Historical Financial Statements
3
Philippine Standards on Assurance Engagements (PSAEs) & Practice standards
Other
- Assurance engagements dealing with subject matters
Assurance
other than historical financial information
Engagements
4
Philippine Standards on Related Services (PSRSs) & Practice Standards
Related Services - Compilation, other related services
Financial statements are ordinarily prepared and presented annually and are directed toward the
common information needs of a wide range of users. Many of those users rely on the financial statements
as their major source of information because they do not have the power to obtain additional information
to meet their specific information needs. Thus, financial statements need to be prepared in accordance
with one, or a combination of:
(a) accounting standards generally accepted in the Philippines;
(b) International Accounting Standards; and
(c) another authoritative and comprehensive financial reporting framework which has been designed
for use in financial reporting and is identified in the financial statements.
Expounded…
Related Services
Auditing
Review Agreed-Upon Procedures Compilation
In a For agreed-upon
In an audit engagement,
Nutshell In a review procedures, as the In a compilation
the auditor provides a
engagement, the auditor simply provides a engagement,
high level of assurance,
auditor provides a report of the factual although the users
but not absolute level of
moderate level of findings, no assurance is of the compiled
assurance that the
assurance that the expressed. Instead, users information derive
information subject to
information subject to of the report assess for some benefit from
audit is free of material
review is free of themselves the the accountant's
misstatement. This is
material misstatement. procedures and findings involvement, no
expressed positively in
This is expressed in the reported by the auditor assurance is
the audit report
form of negative and draw their own expressed in the
assurance. conclusions from the report.
auditor's work.
• The objective of an audit In a compilation
of financial statements is engagement, the
to enable the auditor to accountant is
express an opinion engaged to use
whether the financial accounting
statements are prepared,
expertise as
in all material respects, in
opposed to
accordance with an
identified financial
auditing expertise
reporting framework. The to collect, classify
phrase used to express and summarize
the auditor’s opinion is The objective of a financial
“present fairly, in all review of financial information. This
In an engagement to
material respects.” A statements is to enable ordinarily entails
similar objective applies perform agreed-upon
an auditor to state reducing detailed
to the audit of financial or procedures, an auditor is
whether, on the basis of data to a
other information engaged to carry out
procedures which do manageable and
prepared in accordance those procedures of an
not provide all the understandable
with appropriate criteria audit nature to which the
(par. 20)
evidence that would be form without a
auditor and the entity
required in an audit, requirement to test
and any appropriate third
• In forming the audit anything has come to the assertions
parties have agreed and
opinion, the auditor the auditor's attention underlying that
to report on factual
obtains sufficient that causes the auditor information. The
Objective findings. The recipients of
appropriate audit evidence to believe that the procedures
to be able to draw the report must form
financial statements are employed are not
conclusions on which to their own conclusions
not prepared, in all designed and do
base that opinion (par. 21) from the report by the
material respects, in not enable the
auditor. The report is
accordance with an accountant to
• The auditor’s opinion restricted to those parties
identified financial express any
enhances the credibility of that have agreed to the
financial statements by reporting framework. A assurance on the
procedures to be
providing a high, but not similar objective applies financial
performed since others,
absolute, level of to the review of information.
unaware of the reasons
assurance. Absolute financial or other However, users of
for the procedures, may
assurance in auditing is information prepared in the compiled
misinterpret the results.
not attainable as a result accordance with financial
of such factors as the appropriate criteria. information derive
need for judgment, the some benefit as a
use of testing, the
result of the
inherent limitations of
accountant's
any accounting and
internal control systems involvement
and the fact that most of because the service
the evidence available to has been
the auditor is persuasive, performed with
rather than conclusive, in due professional
nature. (par. 22) skill and care.
❖ Auditor’s Association with Financial Information (PSA 120; parag. 19)
An auditor is associated with financial information when the auditor attaches a report to that
information or consents to the use of the auditor's name in a professional connection. If the auditor is not
associated in this manner, third parties can assume no responsibility of the auditor. If the auditor learns
that an entity is inappropriately using the auditor's name in association with financial information, the
auditor would require management to cease doing so and consider what further steps, if any, need to be
taken, such as informing any known third party users of the information of the inappropriate use of the
auditor's name in connection with the information. The auditor may also believe it necessary to take other
action, for example, to seek legal advice.
LS 1.30
PSA 200: OVERALL OBJECTIVES OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
AND THE CONDUCT OF AUDIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PSA
Fundamentals of Auditing and Assurance Services
❖ Scope of an Audit
• The scope of the auditor’s work and the
opinion provided are usually confined to
whether the financial statements are
prepared, in all material respects, in
accordance with the applicable financial
reporting framework. As a result, an
unmodified auditor’s report does not assure
the future viability of the entity, nor the
efficiency or effectiveness with which
management has conducted the affairs of the entity
o Any extension of this basic audit responsibility, such as that required by local laws or securities
regulations, would require the auditor to undertake further work and to modify or expand the
auditor’s report accordingly
❖ Audit of Financial Statements (PSA 200.4)
• Financial Statements subject to audit are those prepared and presented by management of
the entity with the oversight of TCWG1.
o PSAs do not impose responsibilities on management or TCWG and do not override laws and
regulations that govern their responsibilities.
o However, an audit in accordance with PSAs is conducted on the premise that management and
where appropriate, TCWG have responsibilities that are fundamental in the conduct of the
audit
An audit in accordance with PSAs is conducted on the premise that management and,
where appropriate, those charged with governance have responsibility: To provide the auditor
with:
(i) All information, such as records and documentation, and other matters that are
relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements;
(ii) Any additional information that the auditor may request from management and,
where appropriate, those charged with governance; and
(iii) Unrestricted access to those within the entity from whom the auditor determines
it necessary to obtain audit evidence.
Important Points:
▪ The auditor’s opinion deals with the financial statements as a whole, and therefore
the auditor is not responsible for the detection of misstatements that are not
material to financial statements as a whole.
▪ The form of opinion on the financial statements is based on the conclusions drawn
from the audit evidence obtained
▪ The form of opinion expresses by the auditor will depend upon the applicable
financial reporting framework and applicable laws and regulations
1
TCWG – those charged with governance
❖ Basis of Auditor’s Opinion (PSA 200.5)
• PSAs require the auditor to obtain a reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud and error.
- Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance. It is obtained when the auditor
has obtained sufficient appropriate evidence to reduce audit risk to an acceptably
low level.
o However, reasonable assurance is not an absolute level of assurance, because there are
inherent limitations of an audit which result in most of the audit evidence on which the
auditor draws conclusions and bases the auditor’s opinion being persuasive rather than
conclusive.
14. The auditor shall comply with relevant ethical requirements, including those pertaining
to independence, relating to financial statement audit engagements.
➢ Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants of the Philippines
Integrity
Objectivity
Professional Competence
Confidentiality
Professional Behavior
o Philippine Standard on Quality Control (PSQC) deal with the firm’s responsibilities to establish
and maintain its system of quality control for audit engagements
15. The auditor shall plan and perform an audit with professional skepticism recognizing that
circumstances may exist that cause the financial statements to be materially misstated.
A23. Professional judgment is essential to the proper conduct of an audit. This is because
interpretation of relevant ethical requirements and the PSAs and the informed decisions
required throughout the audit cannot be made without the application of relevant
knowledge and experience to the facts and circumstances. Professional judgment is
necessary in particular regarding decisions about:
• Materiality and audit risk.
• The nature, timing, and extent of audit procedures used to meet the requirements of
the PSAs and gather audit evidence. Evaluating whether sufficient appropriate audit
evidence has been obtained, and whether more needs to be done to achieve the
objectives of the PSAs and thereby, the overall objectives of the auditor.
• The evaluation of management’s judgments in applying the entity’s applicable financial
reporting framework.
• The drawing of conclusions based on the audit evidence obtained, for example,
assessing the reasonableness of the estimates made by management in preparing the
financial statements.
❖ Important Terminologies (see PSA 200.13 for definitions)
24. If an objective in a relevant PSA cannot be achieved, the auditor shall evaluate whether this
prevents the auditor from achieving the overall objectives of the auditor and thereby requires
the auditor, in accordance with the PSAs, to modify the auditor’s opinion or withdraw from the
engagement. Failure to achieve an objective represents a significant matter requiring
documentation in accordance with PSA 230 (Redrafted).
❖ Board of Accountancy
- The Professional Regulatory Board of Accountancy (BOA) has come up with a package of
proposed revisions of Republic Act 9298 (Accountancy Law), which was promulgated way
back in 2004
- In the span of more than 12 years since the passage of the law, there have been several
changes and developments in the accountancy sector, locally and globally, that have
arisen. Thus, the need for the revision of the archaic law of accountants.
Section 4. Scope of Practice. The practice of accountancy shall include, but not limited to the
following:
(a) Practice of Public Accountancy – shall constitute in a person, be it his/her individual capacity, or as
a partner or as a staff member in an accounting or auditing firm, holding out himself/herself as one skilled in the
knowledge, science and practice of accounting, and as a qualified person to render professional services as a
certified public accountant; or offering or rendering, or both, to more than one client on a fee basis or otherwise,
services such as the audit or verification of financial transaction and accounting records; or the preparation,
signing, or certification for clients of reports of audit, balance sheet, and other financial, accounting and related
schedules, exhibits, statements or reports which are to be used for publication or for credit purposes, or to be
filed with a court or government agency, or to be used for any other purpose; or the design, installation, and
revision of accounting system; or the preparation of income tax returns when related to accounting procedures;
or when he/she represents clients before government agencies on tax and other matters related to accounting
or renders professional assistance in matters relating to accounting procedures and the recording and
presentation of financial facts or data.
(b) Practice and Commerce and Industry – shall constitute in a person involved in decision making
requiring professional knowledge in the science of accounting, or when such employment or position requires
that the holder thereof must be a certified public accountant.
(d) Practice in the Government – shall constitute in a person who holds or is appointed to, a position in
an accounting professional group in government or in a government-owned and/or controlled corporation
including those performing proprietary functions, where decision making requires professional knowledge in
the science in accounting, or where a civil service eligibility as a certified public accountants is a prerequisite.
ARTICLE 2. PROFESSIONAL REGULATORY BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY
Regulatory Framework
Practical/Practice/
Subject Theoretical
Competence
Financial Accounting and Reporting 30% 70%
Advanced Financial Accounting and Reporting 30% 70%
Management Advisory Services 30% 70%
Auditing 50% 50%
Taxation 30% 70%
Regulatory Framework for Business Transaction 70% 30%
Section 14. Qualification of Applicants for Examination. Any person applying for examination shall
establish the following requisites to the satisfaction of the Board that he/she:
(a) is a Filipino citizen;
(b) is of good moral character;
(c) is a holder of the degree of Bachelor of Science in Accountancy conferred by a school,
college, academy or institute duly recognized and/or accredited by the CHED or other
authorized government offices; and
(d) has not been convicted of any criminal offense involving moral turpitude.
Section 16. Rating-in the Licensure Examination. To be qualified as having passed the licensure
examination for accountants, a candidate must obtain a general average of seventy-five percent (75%),
with no grades lower than sixty-five percent (65%) in any given subject. In the event a candidate
obtains the rating of seventy-five percent (75%) and above in at least a majority of subjects as provided
for in this Act, he/she shall receive a conditional credit for the subjects passed: Provided, That a
candidate shall take an examination in the remaining subjects within two (2) years from the preceding
examination: Provided, further, That if the candidate fails to obtain at least a general average of
seventy-five percent (75%) and a rating of at least sixty-five percent (65%) in each of the subjects
reexamined, he/she shall be considered as failed in the entire examination.
Section 17. Report of Ratings. The Board shall submit to the Commission the ratings obtained by
each candidate within ten (10) calendar days after the examination, unless extended for just cause
Upon the release of the results of the examination, the Commission shall send by mailing the rating
received by each examinee at his/her given address using the mailing envelope submitted during the
examination.
Section 18. Failing Candidates to Take Refresher Course. Any candidate who fails in two (2)
complete Certified Public Accountant Board Examinations shall be disqualified from taking another
set of examinations unless he/she submits evidence to the satisfaction of the Board that he/she
enrolled in and completed at least twenty-four units of subject given in the licensure examination.
1
BLECPA : Board Licensure Examination for Certified Public Accountants
For purposes of this Act, the examination in which the candidate was conditioned together with
the removal examination on the subject in which he/she failed shall be counted as one complete
examination.
❖ Audit Team
• Audit Partner – concerned about the overall quality of each audit.
- Ultimate responsible for resolving technical matters
- Plan and review all phases of an audit engagement
- Sign the audit report
- Approve the firm’s billing to the client
- Obtain/establish contracts with clients
- Determine office operating policies
• Staff Auditor – performs various audit procedures and gather audit evidence to use as a
basis for the audit reports
- Performs procedures that relate to a variety of aspects of a client’s
activities
- prepares schedules and reports of findings
- Works on tax returns
- Checks the accuracy of findings and extension on books of accounts and
other records
- Checks the postings of entries from the journal to the ledger
- Examines the vouchers supporting minor adjustments
- Serves as an assistant
In summary, Sarbanes-Oxley prohibits professional services firms from performing any client services
for audit clients in which the auditors may find themselves making management decisions or auditing
their own firm’s work.
Specifically, Sarbanes-Oxley prohibits professional service firms from providing any of the following
services to an audit client:
1. Bookkeeping and related services
2. Design or implementation of financial information systems
3. Appraisal or valuation services
4. Actuarial services
5. Internal audit outsourcing
6. Management or human resources services
7. Investment or broker/dealer services
8. Legal and expert services (unrelated to the audit)
Professional firms may provide client tax services (with some restrictions) and other non-prohibited
services to audit clients if the company’s audit committee has approved them in advance.
L.S. 1.50
Overview of Risk-Based Audit Process
Fundamentals of Auditing and Assurance Services
❖ Risk
• Risk - a concept used to express an uncertainty or what can go wrong about events and/or
their outcomes that could have a material effect on the entity
- the possibility of an event occurring that will have an impact on the achievement of
the entity’s objective. It is measured in terms of: impact and likelihood
Entity Level
Risk Appetite
The amount of risk that an entity is prepared to accept, tolerate or be exposed to at any
point in time.
Guidepost/level of risk/acceptable balance
Risk Response
The decision to accept, avoid, reduce, or share a risk
Risk Tolerance
The acceptable variation relative to performance to the achievement of objectives
Risk Management
- Is the process to identify, assess, manage, and control potential events or situations to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of the entity’s objectives
- Is an ongoing process that helps an entity to anticipate negative events, develop a
framework for effective decision-making, and profitably deploy the entity’s resources
❖ Risk-Based Audit Approach Roadmap
▪ Begins with an assessment of the types and likelihood of misstatements in account balance
and then adjusts the amount and type of audit work, to the likelihood of material
misstatements occurring in account balances.
Under this approach, the auditor performs the following:
1. Identification of the client’s strategy and the processes for developing that strategy
2. Examination of the core business process and resource management
3. Identification for each of the key process (as well as sub-processes the objectives,
inputs, outputs, systems and transactions)
4. Assessment of the risks that the processes will not meet the goals and controls related
to those risks
Entity’s Objective: Prepare financial statements that are not materially misstated
Auditor’s Objective: Determine whether entity’s financial statements are free from material
misstatement
Factors to Consider in Implementing the Audit Risk Model
• Existence of large non-routine transactions
• Matters requiring judgment or management intervention
• Potential for Fraud
• High-risk activities
Phases
- Assess predictions for an audit
- Develop common understanding of the
audit engagement with the client
- Identify and assess risks of material
Phase 1: misstatement
Risk Assessment - Respond to identify risks of material
misstatement
▪ Performing risk assessment procedures
to identify and assess the risk of material
misstatement in financial statements
- Select controls to test, if applicable
- Perform tests of controls, if applicable
- Consider the results of tests of controls, if
applicable
Phase 2: - Perform substantive tests
Risk Response ▪ Designing and performing further audit
procedures that respond to identified
and assessed risks of material
misstatement at both the financial
statements and assertion levels
- Complete review and communication
activities
- Determine the type(s) of opinion(s) to
issue
Phase 3:
▪ This involves:
Completing the Audit and Making Reporting
o Forming an opinion based on the
Decisions
audit evidence obtained; and
o Preparing and issuing a report that
is appropriate to the conclusions
reached
Phase 1: Risk Assessment
- Should occur at the business process level as well as the entity level
A simple risk assessment process can be used in any size of firm, even in sole proprietorship. It consists
of the following activities…
Phase 2: Risk Response
Phase 3: Reporting
Audit procedures Further audit procedures are designed to respond to assessed risks.
Focused on Specific Consequently, tests of details that only address risks in general terms may
Risks be significantly reduced or even eliminated