Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Diane Belcher Ed English For Specific Pu
Diane Belcher Ed English For Specific Pu
2: 2, 2010 71
Book Reviews
Diane Belcher. (ed.) English for Speciic Purposes in Theory and Practice.
Ann Arbor, M.I.; University of Michigan Press, 2009, 308 pp.
(ISBN 13-978-0-472-03384-3)
teachers manage a new class. In this respect, the book title may be slightly misleading
to some readers. It is interesting to note that the presentation of the chapters also varies
widely, with each author choosing very different sub-headings, and one author even
avoiding sub-headings altogether. Most likely, the editor’s intention is that each chapter
is read in isolation. But, for those readers who read the book from beginning to end
there is a slightly disjointed feel to its design.
Part One of the book is comprised of four chapters looking at EAP. In Chapter
One, Ken Cruickshank discusses TESOL education to international students as an
example of EAP. He opens the chapter with a rather controversial argument that “all
TESOL in school contexts falls under the umbrella of EAP” (p. 23), and then proceeds
to discuss TESOL programs in the US, Canada, UK, Australia, and New Zealand.
Although the content of the chapter is interesting, many of the described teaching
practices closely resemble those of English for General Purpose (EGP) teachers around
the world. As a result, readers may be confused about the use of the term ESP in this
context, particular when compared with the definition given by Dudley-Evans and
St. John (1998). In Chapter Two, Ann M. Johns considers what the purpose of EAP
education should be at the university undergraduate level. Again, controversially, she
argues that the primary aim should NOT be to identify the speciic needs of learners
based on expected target situations and analyses of target discourses, but instead to
help learners become rhetorically lexible. To defend this view, she reviews the work
on genre and describes exemplar practices before offering a set of goals for EAP
classes based on Carter’s (2007) taxonomy of writing processes in different disciplines.
In Chapter Three, Christine Feak gives a detailed account of why and how graduate
students should be taught critical writing skills. She proposes asking students to write
research commentaries as an effective alternative to writing book reviews. Finally, in
Chapter Four, Ken Hyland looks at writing for scholarly publication. First, he reviews
work plotting the growth of English as the language of academic journal publication,
and then reviews the literature on successful instructional practices that addresses
journal targeting, paper-writing strategies, sentence and discourse structure, and
revising and negotiating.
Part Two of the book is comprised of seven chapters looking at EOP. In Chapter
Five, Brigitte Planken and Catherine Nickerson look at business English and review
work that shows that traditional ESP teaching materials are perhaps too narrowly
deined and do not match real-world practices in the business world. Next, they review
work defining and describing practices of real-world Business English specialists,
suggesting that this work can provide a framework for developing effective ESP
materials. Unusually, Chapter Six is also written by Planken and Nickerson (in reversed
order). Here, they review work defining written business English and then discuss
effective teaching practices for written business English. The focus and mood of
Chapter Seven, by Jane Lockwood, Gail Forey, and Neil Elias is rather different. Here,
the authors look at the problems of using scorecards to assess call-center operators
working for US companies in the Philippines. Next, they perform a discourse analysis
of a call-center interaction to show how current scorecards are ineffective. Chapters
Eight and Nine look at legal English. In Chapter Eight, Jill Northcott reviews work
describing the characteristics of legal English and then discusses some effective
teaching practices. Like most of the reviews in the book, the author here only very
briely introduces the work, expecting the reader to refer to the source text for details as
the example below illustrates,
References
Carter, T. (2007). Ways of knowing, doing, and writing. College Composition and Communication,
58, 385-418.
Dudley-Evans, T. and St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Speciic Purposes: A multi-disciplinary
approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Laurence Anthony
Professor, Director of CELESE
Center for English Language Education in Science and Engineering (CELESE)
Faculty of Science and Engineering
Waseda University, Japan
anthony@waseda.jp