71. Should Heinz have broken into the laboratory to steal the drug for his wife?

Why or why not?

This question is subjective and depends on one's ethical perspective. Some argue that saving a loved one
justifies breaking the law, while others stress respecting property rights and legal boundaries. The main
issue is Heinz's desperate act to save his sick wife. He stole the drug because the chemist refused to
lower the price, leaving him no choice. He wouldn't have resorted to theft if the chemist had agreed to a
more affordable price. It portrays the heartbreaking choice a man makes for the love of his life, even if it
tarnishes his reputation.

72. Should Heinz have stolen the drug? Why or why not?

73. Would it change anything if Heinz did not love his wife? Why?

This explores the part of personal relationships in moral decision-making. The emotional connection can
effect judgment, but the core ethical dilemma remnants: the balance between saving a life and
respecting property rights. But if the situation alternates, without love for his wife, Heinz might not have
taken such drastic actions. The absence of feelings alters the dynamics; without love, there's no basis for
the protective and concerned actions displayed by the man in the story.

74. What if the person dying was a stranger, would it make any difference? Why?

This delves into the influence of personal relationships on moral decision-making. Some argue that the
duty to save a life remains constant, regardless of the relationship, while others assert that personal
connections significantly impact moral considerations. Individual ethical perspectives play a crucial role
in shaping responses to such scenarios.

In the case of Heinz, the extent of actions may not match those taken for a loved one, the basic human
emotions and sympathy might prompt Heinz to provide some level of assistance to the stranger.
Although he may not go to the lengths he did for his wife, the inherent compassion and sense of
humanity could still drive him to offer help to a dying stranger.

75. Should the police arrest the chemist for murder if the woman dies? Why?

The chemist could face legal consequences for selling a life-saving drug at a high price, but labeling it as
murder may not be justified. Murder charges usually involve intent to harm, and the chemist's unethical
pricing, while wrong, might not meet the legal definition of murder. While there could be legal
repercussions for the chemist, determining the appropriate charges requires a careful consideration of
intent and legal definitions.

In Ancient Greece, there resided a very wealthy king, Midas. He had everything he could have ever
asked for and more, along with a beautiful daughter whom he held dear to his heart, even more than his
riches. A day came where Silenus, a satyr loyal to the God of Wine and Celebration, Dionysus, passed out
in Midas’ garden. Since Midas believed that satyrs brought him good luck, he went against the wishes of
his family and let Silenus rest in his palace until he awoke again. When Dionysus heard about Midas’ act
of kindness towards his friend, he decided to grant the wealthy king a wish. Midas wished that anything
he touches must turn to gold. Even though Dionysus was aware that this was a recipe for disaster, he
granted the wish anyway. Midas was ecstatic – he went around touching the most random things in the
garden and palace to turn them into gold. When he picked up an apple, it turned into a shiny gold apple.
All the courtiers were very fascinated. Midas had never been happier…in all his excitement, he hugged
his daughter, forgetting that anything he touched would turn to gold! Hence, his daughter took the form
of a lifeless, gold statue. Realizing what he had done, Midas ran to Dionysus and begged God to save his
daughter. Complying with his wish, Dionysus saved his daughter and took away all of Midas’ powers too,
claiming that it was for the best. Midas had learned his lesson and lived the rest of his days satisfied with
what he had.

76. What motivated King Midas’ decision to let the satyr rest in his palace? Explain his motive and his
action according to the factors that affect one’s moral development.

King Midas' choice to allow the satyr to rest in his palace stemmed from his deep-seated belief in the
good luck brought by satyrs. This decision is a manifestation of factors that influence moral
development, particularly personal values and beliefs. Midas, in this instance, prioritized his individual
conviction over the preferences of his family, showcasing the impact of personal moral reasoning on his
actions.

77. Do you think King Midas’ kindness is pure or based on the universal value: “compassion,” or was it
driven by other interests? Why? Explain what level and stage of moral development affects his decision.

King Midas' kindness toward Silenus, the sleeping satyr, may be interpreted as genuine compassion.
However, his subsequent wish for the golden touch implies the influence of other interests, such as the
allure of wealth or novelty. This dual aspect of his actions reflects a stage in moral development where
personal desires and immediate gratification take precedence over broader ethical considerations.
While compassion may have initially guided his actions, the inclusion of self-serving desires complicates
the purity of his kindness.

78. Do you think he is a good father? Why? Explain based on his actions in the story.

King Midas' actions, particularly the unintended consequence of turning his daughter into gold, raise
questions about his suitability as a father. While his initial act of kindness toward Silenus reflects a
positive trait, the lack of foresight regarding the consequences of his wish suggests a lapse in judgment.
The unintentional harm caused to his daughter challenges the notion of him being a good father. His
decision-making, although influenced by a desire to help, ultimately led to detrimental consequences for
his family.
79. Do you think he is greedy? Or was he just tempted? Did he make things right? Why?

King Midas' actions exhibit a blend of greed and temptation. His wish for the golden touch is driven by a
desire for wealth and the allure of novelty. However, upon realizing the grave mistake with his daughter,
Midas demonstrates remorse and actively seeks redemption. Making amends by pleading with Dionysus
to save his daughter suggests an acknowledgment of his wrongdoing and a genuine attempt to rectify
the situation. While his initial actions may be characterized as greedy, his subsequent remorse and
efforts to correct the situation indicate a capacity for self-reflection and a desire to set things right.

80. YOU, what can you say about contentment? Are you contented of what you have? If so, why do you
still go to school and wish to graduate, have a stable job and earn money? Does this make you greedy?
Why or why not?

Contentment is like savoring a delicious meal; it's about being satisfied with what's on your plate. Yet,
just like adding spice to your favorite dish, pursuing education, a stable job, and earning money adds
flavor to life. It's not greed but a recipe for self-improvement and stability. The key is finding the right
balance—like creating a perfect dish, aligning aspirations with values for a fulfilling life that nourishes
both you and the community.

81. Why do you think Tamara is contented and confident about her skin and herself? What are the
factors that affect her positive disposition?

Tamara's contentment and confidence about her skin and herself stem from a combination of factors.
First and foremost is the positive influence of her mother, who instilled in her a sense of pride in her skin
tone. The nurturing environment at home, where her uniqueness was celebrated rather than criticized,
played a crucial role. Tamara's ability to articulate her reasons for embracing her skin color showcases a
strong sense of self-awareness. Additionally, her resilience in declining the magical offer to change her
skin color indicates a solid foundation of self-worth, unaffected by external pressures or societal
standards. Quote lines phrases verses

82. “A child whose moral development has been disturbed or interrupted, says various studies,
ultimately turn out to be either amoral or immoral both of which can hinder them to lead a normal life.”
Explain why by comparing it to Tamara’s life and character. How did her mother raise her?

Tamara's positive moral development is evident in her story, contrasted with the potential
consequences highlighted in the quote. Her mother played a crucial role in shaping her moral compass
by teaching her to embrace her uniqueness and value herself beyond external appearances. The
supportive environment at home fostered a sense of morality that helped Tamara resist external
pressures and make ethical choices. In contrast, a disturbed or interrupted moral development, as
mentioned in the quote, could lead to a lack of moral orientation or even immoral behavior, hindering
an individual from leading a normal life. Tamara's character demonstrates the importance of positive
moral guidance in a child's upbringing.
83. Are you like Tamara? Do you feel comfortable about yourself? DO you have a high self-esteem or
low? Why? What are the factors that contributed to your view about yourself

Reflecting on one's self-esteem and comfort with oneself is a personal journey. Like Tamara, individuals
who feel comfortable about themselves often have positive influences in their lives, be it from family,
friends, or personal achievements. Factors contributing to one's view about oneself can include positive
affirmations, supportive relationships, and a healthy self-image. On the other hand, low self-esteem may
be influenced by negative experiences, societal pressures, or a lack of positive reinforcement.
Understanding these factors and actively working towards cultivating a positive self-image can
contribute to a healthier sense of self, much like Tamara's upbringing and attitude.

VII. Emotions or feelings have long been derided by purely rationalistic perspectives as having no place
in a properly executed moral decision. Although some emotions or feelings can derail one from the
clear-minded decision in an ethical situation. For Aristotle doing the right thing is being able to manage
one’s feelings so that she is actually driven or propelled to do what she already sees------intellectually----
as right.

84. Narrate an experience of yours when “your mind said one thing, but your heart said another.” How
did you resolve the tension? Were you satisfied with the conclusion? Why or why not?

As a daughter, there was a moment when my mind and heart were in conflict, presenting a personal
ethical dilemma. My momma had set certain expectations for my academic and career path, aligning
with what she believed was best for my future. However, my heart yearned for a different direction, one
that resonated more with my passion and personal goals.

To resolve this tension, I initiated an honest conversation with my momma. I expressed my thoughts,
feelings, and the vision I had for my life. While my mind understood the importance of her guidance, my
heart urged me to pursue my dreams and aspirations.

The resolution involved finding a middle ground. I worked towards demonstrating the feasibility and
viability of my chosen path, providing them with reassurance and evidence of my commitment. It was a
challenging process, but ultimately, the understanding and compromise between my rational decisions
and emotional desires brought a sense of satisfaction.

In the end, navigating this ethical dilemma as a daughter taught me the value of open communication,
compromise, and the delicate balance between honoring parental wisdom and pursuing individual
aspirations.