Professional Documents
Culture Documents
International Trade Law
International Trade Law
Principles of WTO
Non-discrimination.
Fair competition.
Principles of non-discrimination
1. Equal treatment for all importers.
2. Any advantage, privilege, favour or immunity given to any member shall be accorded
to all members ‘immediately and unconditionally’. It is called Most-favoured –nation
Treatment (GATT Article I).
3. National treatment on internal taxation and regulation.
(GATT Art. III) “Once a foreign product is available in any domestic market (after
compliance of all border measures/payment of all tariffs and taxes), it must be
treated equally with national/domestic products (like products) in terms of internal
(indirect) taxation”.
Generalised System of preference (G.S.P.)
GSP is one kind of exception to MFN obligations.
Particular member state or states to promote their economic development as the
uniform application of MFN is viewed as an attempt to create level playing field with
equal rules between unequal players.
The difference of strength between developed and developing countries is obvious,
that calls for positive differential treatment.
GSP is a favourable and special treatment as an exception to MFN enabling
developed countries to provide greater market access to product imported from
developing countries.
The GSP exception is largely a product of developing countries’ insistence
particularly through UNCTAD in the mid-1960s, that less developed economies need
special assistance to overcome the problem of high initial costs in the export market
until they catch up with international standards.
It is a permanent rule, but granted usually on a temporal basis, but may last as long
as the economic disparity between developed and developing countries persists.
The granting of GSP is not comprehensive across all products of developing
countries.
Dispute settlement under GATT
1. GATT Council (Art.22) mediated and resolved the disputes.
2. It was friendly, conciliatory and amicable settlement in lieu of adjudicative
settlement.
3. Cause of action was impairment or nullification of GATT provisions and the
frustration of GATT objective. It was based on violation and non-violation claim.
4. The procedure was based on positive consensus (Art.23)
5. The entire dispute settlement was time driven.
6. Power and diplomacy were the driving force.
Punta del Este Declaration set out fourteen subjects for negotiations including :