Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rohit Final
Rohit Final
EXECUTIVE SUMMERY
The research was focused on organization of Sama Chemo Pharma pvt., ltd.,
Islampur. Therefore the scope of survey is limited to the organization. The study will prove
to be impact of rewards and recognition. A research methodology is a frame work or blue
print for conducting the organization research project as for as its safety is concern. It details
the procedures necessary for obtaining the information needed to a structure or solves the
problem regarding the industrial safety. A research design lays the foundation for
conducting the project. The sample size for the survey was 100 respondents of various
departments.
Objectives of the study to know and understand the level of participation of worker’s in
management of Sama Chemo Pharma management and employee satisfaction.
Sama Chemo Pharma pvt., ltd., Islampur established in January 2008. Sama Chemo
Pharma pvt., ltd., Islampur is an Indian based manufacturer of pharmaceutical intermediate.
The company offers a pharmaceutical intermediate Para Toluene Sulfonyl Urea which is
further used to formation of diabetes tablets. The company’s product is exported in all over
India.
The project derives some findings from Sama Chemo Pharma pvt., ltd., Islampur. It
is clearly found that maximum employees are happy with their job. Most of the employees
are said that worker’s participation is important for achieving organizational goals. It is
found that majority of workers believe that it is important for attending the meetings
conducted by management. It is seen that maximum people agree that there is excellent
relationship of workers with their supervisor and colleges. It is found that most of workers
agree that worker’s participation in management can bring positive impact on the
organization. It is seen that majority of workers believe that worker’s participation in
management is a means of achieving industrial democracy. It is found that most of workers
believe that worker’s participation in management can bring good industrial relations and
increase efficiency in production
INDEX
SR. NO CONTENT PAGE
NO.
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION TO THE
STUDY
&
METHODOLOGY
SHIVAJI UNIVERSITY, KOLHAPUR
Social decisions – hours of work, welfare measures, questions affecting work rules and
conduct of individual worker’s safety, health, and sanitation and noise control.
Technology and organizations today are so complex that specialized work roles are
required, making it difficult for people to participate successfully if they go very far beyond
their particular environment. This means that low-level workers can participate successfully in
operating matters, but they usually have difficulty in participating in policy matters.
2. Workers Incompetence
Another difficulty arises when workers make proposals in areas where they are not competent.
Then, when their idea is rejected, they refuse to support whatever course of action was adopted
and soon become alienated. A related problem is that some workers expect to be consulted on
every issuer, even those to which they cannot contribute. When they are not consulted, they
become angry and uncooperative.
3. Means of Manipulation
A serious drawback with worker’s participation is that it can be used to manipulate employees.
This manipulation is not necessarily by management. It may be manipulation by the union or by
experts who are skilled in group dynamics.
4. Feudalistic Concept
The feudalistic concept of the master and the servants still prevalent among industrial workers.
Workers have a feeling that they are born to serve and not to rule. Participative management
naturally is of little interest to such workers.
5. Lack of Initiative
The study is taken into consideration to know and understand the level ofparticipation of
worker’s in management at Sama Chemo Pharma pvt. Ltd, Islampur.
This study aims knowing, “Worker's participation in management”. It also aims at finding
the employee’s relationship with management.
1. Conceptual scope
This scope helps to understand the perception of employees about worker’s participation in
management.
2. Geographical scope
This scope is restricted to “Sama Chemo Pharma Pvt., Ltd, Islampur” only by collecting the
information Marketing, HR, Account Department etc.
All the information needed for completing was not available at the time.
1. Higher Productivity
The increased productivity is possible only when there exists fullest co-operation between
labour & management. It has been found that poor labour management relations do not
encourage the workers to contribute anything more than the minimum desirable to retain their
jobs. Thus participation of workers in management is essential to increase industrial
productivity.
2. Greater commitment
Participation allows individuals to express themselves at the workplace rather than being
absorbed into a complex system of rules, procedures and systems. If an individual knows that he
can express his opinion and ideas, a personal sense of involvement takes place within him. I am
sure you will agree that participation increases the level of commitment and employees start
relating to the organization.
Industrial conflict is a struggle between two organised groups, which are motivated by the
belief that their respective interests are endangered by the self-interested behaviour of the other.
Participations cuts at the very root of industrial struggle. It tries to remove or at least minimise
the divers and struggling interests between the parties, by substituting it with cooperation,
homogeneity and common interests. Both sides are integrated and decision arrived are mutual
rather than individual.
4. Improved decisions
I am sure that you will agree that communication is never a one way process, also note that
if ever, possible for managers to have knowledge of all alternatives and all consequences related
to the decision which they must take. Because of the existence of barriers to the upward flow of
information in most enterprises, much valuable information possessed by subordinates never
reaches their managers. Participation tends to break down the barriers, and makes the
information available to managers. To the extent such information alters the decisions, the
quality of decision is improved.
2. Research Design
The research design indicates the type of research methodology under taken to collect
the information for the study. The researcher used both descriptive and analytical type of
research design for his research study. The main objective of using descriptive research is to
describe the state of affairs as it exists at present. It mainly involves surveys and fact finding
enquiries of different kinds. The researcher used descriptive research to discover the
characteristics of customer. Descriptive research also includes demography characteristics of
consumer who use the product. The researcher also used analytical research design to analyse
the existing facts from the data collected from the customer.
3. Universe of Study
The area of study is confined to employees of Sama Chemo Pharma pvt. Ltd, Islampur.
And the total numbers of employees are 150.
4. Sample Frame
A finite subset of population, selected from it with the objective of investigating its
properties is called a sample of that population. A sampling frame represents all elements of
population. A researcher has to prepare a sampling frame. It is from this sampling frame that the
items are selected for the sample. The frame comprises the employees of Sama Chemo Pharma
pvt. Ltd, Islampur.
This is the elements or set of elements considered for selection in the stage of sampling. The
sample unit of the study includes male or female employees working in Planning, Operating,
Human Resource, Finance, Marketing, and Quality Assurance of Sama Chemo Pharma pvt. Ltd,
Islampur.
The sample size refers to the number of sample units to be selected from the universe for data
collection purpose. The sample size should always be optimum. The study has a sample size of
100 employees of Sama Chemo Pharma pvt. Ltd, Islampur.
7. Questionnaire Design
The questionnaire framed for research study is a structured questionnaire in which all the
questions are predetermined before conducting a survey. The form of question is of both closed
and open type. The scales used to evaluate questions are:
8. Sampling Techniques
There are two methods of sampling techniques. They are probability sampling and non-
probability sampling. Probability sampling method is used for the study. Simple random
sampling has been adopted here.
Simple random sampling is selected as every member of the population has an equal chance of
being selected and the selection of any individual does not affect the selection of another. The
selection purely depends upon chance.
While deciding about the method of data collection for the study, the researcher should keep in
mind the two types of data, i.e.; Primary and Secondary Data.
Primary Data
Data observed or collected directly from first-hand experience is called primary data.
The primary data are those which are collected for the first time and thus happen to be original
in character. The report is prepared based on data collected through questionnaire method
distribution to the concerned employees.
Secondary Data
The secondary data are those which have already been passed through statistical processes.
Published data and the data collected in the past forms the secondary data. In the course of
preparation of report, the required data were collected from secondary sources like management
related books, magazines, journals, articles and websites.
Questionnaire
Questionnaire is a collection of questions prepared by the researcher for collecting opinions and
suggestions from respondents. The questionnaire supplies to the respondents are returned after
filling.
Interview
Interview method is a direct method of collecting data. It is a verbal method of securing data in
the field of survey. It is a method of social interactions. This is mainly done to extract the
information that was left out in the questionnaire. Opinions and suggestions were asked for the
betterment of the project.
Record Research
Record research is the search of relevant records for collecting the information.
Table
A table is a systematic arrangement of statistical data in rows and columns. Rows are horizontal
arrangements, whereas columns are the vertical arrangements.
Diagrams
One of the most convincing and appealing way of presenting data is through the charts. A chart
can be in shape of either diagram or charts.
The software tools used for the study are MS Word and MS Excel.
Percentage Analysis
Percentage analysis is used for the analysis of primary data collected. Percentages are special
kind of ratios that express the relationship of one variable in comparison to another.
14. Formula
Research methodology
Theoretical background
Company Profile
THEORETICAL
BACKGROUND
2.1 Definitions
The concept of worker’s participation in management is a broad and complex one. Depending
on the socio-political environment and cultural conditions, the scope and contents of
participation change.
According to Keith Davis, Participation refers to the mental and emotional involvement
of a person in a group situation which encourages him to contribute to group goals and
share the responsibility of achievement.
According to Walpole, Participation in Management gives the worker a sense of
importance, pride and accomplishment; it gives him the freedom of opportunity for self-
expression, a feeling of belongingness with the place of work and a sense of
workmanship and creativity.
Clegg says, “It implies a situation where workers representatives are, to some extent,
involved in the process of management decision making, but where the ultimate power
is in the hands of the management”.
It helps in managing resistance to change which is unavoidable for the growth and
development of industry, changes have to be welcomed, otherwise the organization will
be left behind. If the need for change is jointly felt by all partners of production
its acceptance can be high. Worker’s participation in change strategy can facilitate
acceptable solutions with a view to secure effective and smooth implementations of
decisions.
Worker’s participation can encourage communication at all levels. Since both partners
of production are involved in the decision-making there will be fewer changes of
distortion or failure in communicating the decision.
Joint decision- making ensures there will be minimum industrial conflict an economic
Worker’s participation at the plant level can be seen as the first step to establishing
The term “participation” has different meanings for different purposes in different situations.
McGregor is of the view that participation is one of the most misunderstood idea that has
emerged from the field of human relations. Keith Davis has defined the term “participation” as
the mental and emotional involvement of a person in a group situation which encourages him to
contribute to group goals and share responsibilities in them. This definition envisages three
important elements in participation. Firstly, it means mental and emotional involvement rather
than mere physical activity; secondly, participation must motivate a person to contribute to a
specific situation to invest his own resources, such as initiative, knowledge, creativity and
ingenuity in the objectives of the organisation; and thirdly, it encourages people to share
responsibility for a decision or activity. Sharing of responsibility commits people to ensure the
success of the decision or activity.
Collective Bargaining
Collective bargaining results in collective agreements which lay down certain rules and
conditions of service in an establishment. Such agreements are normally binding on the parties.
Theoretically, collective bargaining is based on the principle of balance of power, but, in actual
practice, each party tries to outbid the other and get maximum advantage by using, if necessary,
threats and counter threats like; strikes, lockouts and other direct actions. Joint consultation, on
the other hand, is a particular technique which is intended to achieve a greater degree of
harmony and cooperation by emphasising matters of common interest. Workers prefer to use the
instrument of collective bargaining rather than ask for a share in management. Worker’s
participation in the U.S.A has been ensured almost exclusively by means of collective
agreements and their application and interpretation rather than by way of labour representation
in management.
Works Councils
These are exclusive bodies of employees, assigned with different functions in the management
of an enterprise. In West Germany, the works councils have various decisionmaking functions.
In some countries, their role is limited only to receiving information about the enterprise. In
Yugoslavia, these councils have wider decision-making powers in an enterprise like;
appointment, promotion, salary fixation and also major investment decisions. Joint
Management Councils and Committees
Mainly these bodies are consultative and advisory, with decision-making being left to the top
management. This system of participation is prevalent in many countries, including Britain and
India. As they are consultative and advisory, neither the managements nor the workers take
them seriously.
Board Representation
The role of a worker representative in the board of directors is essentially one of negotiating the
worker’s interest with the other members of the board. At times, this may result in tension and
friction inside the board room. The effectiveness of worker’s representative at the board depend
upon his ability to participate in decision-making, his knowledge of the company affairs, his
educational background, his level of understanding and also on the number of worker
representatives in the Board.
Workers’ participation is possible at all levels of management; the only difference is that of degree
and nature of application. For instance, it may be vigorous at lower level and faint at top level.
Broadly speaking there is following five levels of participation:
1. Information participation
It ensures that employees are able to receive information and express their views pertaining to
the matters of general economic importance.
2. Consultative participation
Here workers are consulted on the matters of employee welfare such as work, safety and health.
However, final decision always rests at the option of management and employee’s views are
only of advisory nature.
3. Associative participation
It is extension of consultative participation as management here is under moral obligation to
accept and implement the unanimous decisions of employees.
4. Administrative participation
It ensure greater share of works in discharge of managerial functions. Here, decision already
taken by the management come to employees, preferably with alternatives for administration
and employees have to select the best from those for implementation.
5. Decisive participation
Highest level of participation where decisions are jointly taken on the matters relation to
production, welfare etc. is called decisive participation.
The pre-requisites for the success of any scheme of participative management are the
following:
Firstly, there should be a strong, democratic and representative unionism for the success
of participative management.
Secondly, there should be mutually-agreed and clearly-formulated objectives for
participation to succeed.
Thirdly, there should be a feeling of participation at all levels.
Fourthly, there should be effective consultation of the workers by the management.
Fifthly, both the management and the workers must have full faith in the soundness of
the philosophy underlying the concept of labour participation.
Sixthly, till the participative structure is fully accepted by the parties, legislative support
is necessary to ensure that rights of each other are recognised and protected.
Seventhly, education and training make a significant contribution to the purposeful
working of participative management.
A. Name of unit
The name of unit is SAMA CHEMO PHARMA PVT LTD, ISLAMPUR.
SHIVAJI UNIVERSITY, KOLHAPUR
the intention of manufacturing Para Toluene Sulfonyl Urea, an intermediate for active
pharmaceutical ingredients.
The plant operates in all the three shifts and throughout the year. The plant is
manufacturing Para Toluene Sulfonyl Urea for supplying to various. Current production
capacity is 300 metric tons per month which is being enhanced to 400 metric tons per
month. The company is managed by Mr. S.R. Yadav and Mrs. M.S. Yadav.
Mr. S. R .Yadav is M.Sc., Analytical Chemistry from Mumbai University having more
than 10 year’s experience in Quality Control in organizations like Gujarat
Insecticides Ltd, Alkyl Amines Chemicals Ltd, In addition to being Managing Director of
SAMA Chemo Pharma, he is the Proprietor of SONA Chemicals and Technical
Consultant to Shubham Inks. Mrs. M.S.Yadav is B.Sc. Chemistry from Shivaji University,
Kolhapur having more than 8 year’s experience in the Industry. In addition to being Director
in this company, she is the Proprietor of SHUBHAM INKS.
The company receives continuous technical and documentation support from Dr.
A.S. Mane, who has vast experience in Indian and multi-national pharmaceutical companies.
Objectives are the backbone of an organization. Any business without ethics cannot win the
trust of customer.
Vision
Quality and reliability is our motto
To create a healthy and a prosperous future for the generations to come.
To share our knowledge with people around the globe for a better tomorrow.
To become consumer’s most trusted brand.
Mission
Deliver satisfaction and quality assurance to our consumers using state of art technology.
Offer a work environment that inspires trust and loyalty in people.
Engage in continuous efforts to explore new horizons in our business.
E. Milestones Achieved
2008 – On this year company is established and company grows rapidly.
2009 - Company gets ISO certification.
2010 – Company achieves its sales target and company going to profitable mode.
2015 – Company’s profit is double than previous year.
F. Marketing scenario
Promotional messages are directed to many pharmaceutical industries. In practice, these
industries can take several forms. Many industries directly contact consumer through mail,
medical events, or through local team sponsorship.
Sulfonylureas were discovered, in 1942, by the chemist Marcel Janbon and coworkers,
who were studying sulphonamide antibiotics and discovered that the compound sulfonylurea
induced hyperglycaemia in animals.
Research and developmentfor sulfonylureas as pharmaceuticals happened in the 1950s and
1960s, as explored at Tolbutamide.
Research and development for sulfonylureas as herbicides happened in the 1970s and
1980s, as explored for example in a volume of the Sloan Technology Series focusing on the
sociotechnological aspects of agriculture (Canine 1995); the DuPont Experimental Station led
this development.
Para Toluene Sulfonic urea is also called as sulphonylureas. It is a class of organic
compounds used in medicine and agriculture, for example as antidiabetic drugs widely used in
the management of diabetes mellitus type 2. They act by increasing insulin release from
UNIVERSITY, KOLHAPUR
the beta cells in the pancreas. A number of sulfonylureas are also used as herbicides, because
they can interfere with plant biosynthesis of certain amino acids.
Medical uses
Sulfonylureas are used primarily for the treatment of diabetes mellitus type 2.
Sulfonylureas are ineffective where there is absolute deficiency of insulin production such as in
type 1 diabetes or post-pancreatectomy.
Sulfonylureas can be used to treat some types of neonatal diabetes. While historically,
people with hyperglycaemia and low blood insulin levels were diagnosed with type 1 diabetes
by default, it has been found that patients who receive this diagnosis before 6 months of age are
often, in fact, candidates for receiving sulfonylureas rather than insulin throughout life.
While prior sulfonylureas were associated with worse outcomes, newer agents do not appear to
increase the risk of death, heart attacks, or strokes.
Side effects
UNIVERSITY, KOLHAPUR
rade
5. receivables 62.66L
K. Organization chart
Work Experience
80%
No. of Respondents 70%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
20%
10%
10%
0%
Less than a year Between 1-5 More than 5
Opinion
Interpretation4.1:
The above table and graph shows that work experience of employees. The researcher
found that 70% respondents are having an experience in between 1-5 years, 20% respondents
are having more than 5 years’ experience and remaining only 10% respondents are having less
than one year experience.
It is conclude that majority of respondents are having work experience between 1-5 years.
30%
20%
10% 5%
0%
Forum of industrial Participation in Identification of
democracy decision making goals of
management and
workers
opinion
Interpretation 4.2:
The above table and graph shows that what is worker’s participation in management.
The researcher found that 50% respondents are said that forum of industrial democracy, 45%
respondents are said that workers participation in decision making and remaining only 5%
respondents are said that workers participation inIdentification of goals of management &
workers.
It is conclude that majority of respondents are said that worker’s participation in
management means forum of industrial democracy.
4.3 The opinion of the employees about the participation in decision making Table
No. 4.3
Sr.No Level of satisfaction No. of respondents Percentage
1 Strongly agree 36 36%
2 Agree 30 30%
3 Strongly disagree 10 10%
4 Disagree 24 24%
Total 100 100%
20%
15%
10%
10%
5%
0%
Strongly agree Agree Strongly disagree Disagree
Level of satisfaction
Interpretation 4.3:
The above table and graph shows that worker’s participation in decision making. The
researcher found that 36% respondents are strongly agree that they should always participate in
decision making, 30% respondents are just agree with it, while 10 % respondents are strongly
disagree and remaining only 24% respondents disagree on this matter.
4.4 Opinion of employees about the participation in meetings conducted by company Table
No. 4.4
Sr.No Level of satisfaction No. of respondents Percentage
1 Yes 100 100%
2 No 00 00
Total 100 100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0%
Yes No
Level of satisfaction
Interpretation 4.4:
The above table and graph shows that worker’s attendance in company’s meetings. The
researcher found that 100% respondents are attending the meetings conducted by company.
It is conclude that all respondents are attending the meetings conducted by company.
Interpretation 4.5:
The above table and graph shows that importance of worker’s participation in
management. The researcher found that 27% respondents are strongly agree that worker’s
participation in management is important, 45% respondents are just agree with it, while 10 %
respondents are strongly disagree and remaining only 18% respondents disagree on this matter.
Graph No:4.6
Interpretation 4.6:
The above table and graph shows that worker’s point of view towards worker’s
participation in management. The researcher found that 10% respondents aresaid that due to
worker’s participation in management production of company increases, 30% respondents are
said that it improve relationship between managers and workers, while 60% respondents are
said that due to worker’s participation in management production of company increases as well
as it improve relationship between managers and workers.
4.7 Opinion of the employees regarding the rewards provided by the management for
suggestions given by workers
50%
40% 35%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Yes No
Opinion
Interpretation 4.7:
The above table and graph shows that rewards for the ideas of workers in company. The
researcher found that 35% respondents are said that their ideas get rewarded in company and
65% respondents are said that their ideas get neglected by management.
It is conclude that majority of respondents arenot rewarded for their ideas in company.
Interpretation 4.8:
The above table and graph shows that solving employee’s problems through worker’s
participation. The researcher found that 70% respondents are agrees that their problems are
solved through worker’s participation and 30% respondents are said that their problems are not
solved through workers participation.
It is conclude that majority of respondents are said that managementsolved their problems
through worker’s participation.
Graph No:4.9
No.80%
of Respondents 70%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Yes No
Opinion
Interpretation 4.9:
The above table and graph shows that Worker’s participation in management in improving
relation between workers and management. The researcher found that 70% respondents are
agrees that there is improvement in relation between workers and management and 30%
respondents are not agree with it.
It is conclude that majority of respondents agrees that there is improvement in relation between
workers and management.
4.10 Opinion of workers about whether their participation causes any positive impact in
management.
Graph No:4.10
Interpretation 4.10:
The above table and graph shows that impact of worker’s participation in management.
The researcher found that 70% respondents are strongly agree that there is positive impact of
worker’s participation in management, 27% respondents are just agree with it, while remaining
only 3% respondents are disagree
It is conclude that majority of respondents said that there is positive impact of worker’s
participation in management.
50%
40%
32%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Yes No
Opinion
Interpretation 4.11:
The above table and graph shows that participation of workers in middle and lower level.
The researcher found that 32% respondents are agrees that there is active participation in middle
and lower level and 68% respondents are not agree with it.
It is conclude that majority of respondents agrees that there is not active participation in middle
and lower level.
4.12 Opinion of workers about solving their complaints with workers involvement
Table No. 4.12
Sr.No Opinion No. of respondents Percentage
1 Yes 40 40%
2 No 60 60%
Total 100 100%
50%
40%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Yes No
Opinion
Interpretation 4.12:
The above table and graph shows that solving worker’s complaints with their involvement.
The researcher found that 40% respondents are agrees that their complaints are solved with their
involvement and 60% respondents are not agree with it.
It is conclude that majority of respondents does not agree that their complaints are solved with
their involvement.
4.13 Opinion of workers whether organizational goals can be achieved with the help of
workers participation
Graph No:4.13
30%
20% 14%
11%
10%
0%
Strongly agree Agree Strongly disagree Disagree
Level of satisfaction
Interpretation 4.13:
The above table and graph shows that achievement of organizational goal through
worker’s participation in management. The researcher found that 35% respondents are strongly
agree that organizational goals can be achieved through worker’s participation in management,
40% respondents are just agree with it, while 11% respondents are strongly disagree and
remaining only 14% respondents disagree on this matter.
It is conclude that majority of respondents said that organizational goals can be achieved
through worker’s participation in management.
4.14 Opinion of the employees whether the worker’s participation in management results
in improving current working of the company Table No. 4.14
Sr.No Level of satisfaction No. of respondents Percentage
1 Strongly agree 53 53%
2 Agree 25 25%
3 Strongly disagree 7 7%
4 Disagree 15 15%
Total 100 100%
Graph No:4.14
0%
Strongly agree Agree Strongly disagree Disagree
Level of satisfaction
Interpretation 4.14:
The above table and graph shows that worker’s participation in management results in
improving working of company. The researcher found that 53% respondents are strongly agree
that there is improvement in current working condition due to worker’s participation in
management, 25% respondents are just agree with it, while 7% respondents are strongly
disagree and remaining only 15% respondents disagree on this matter.
4.15 Opinion of workers about providing information of business and development by the
management
Graph No:4.15
50%
40% 35%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Yes NO
Opinion
Interpretation 4.15:
The above table and graph shows that information providing by management regarding
business and development. The researcher found that 35% respondents are agrees that
management provides them full information regarding business and development and 65%
respondents are not agree with it.
It is conclude that majority of respondents agrees that management does not provides them full
information regarding business and development.
4.16 Opinion of the workers whether working conditions are up to the mark. Table No.
4.16
Sr.No Level of satisfaction No. of respondents Percentage
1 Strongly agree 22 22%
2 Agree 18 18%
3 Strongly disagree 25 25%
4 Disagree 35 35%
Total 100 100%
Working conditions
40%
No. of Respondents 35%
35%
30%
25%
25% 22%
20% 18%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Strongly agree Agree Strongly disagree Disagree
Level of satisfaction
Interpretation 4.16:
The above table and graph shows that working conditions of company. The researcher found
that 22% respondents are strongly agree that the working conditions of company is up to the
mark, 18% respondents are just agree with it, while 25% respondents are strongly disagree and
remaining only 35% respondents disagree on this matter.
It is conclude that majority of respondents said thatthat the working conditions of company is
not up to the mark.
4.17 Opinion of workers about relationship with supervisor and colleges Table
No. 4.17
Sr.No Level of satisfaction No. of respondents Percentage
1 Strongly agree 55 55%
2 Agree 35 35%
3 Strongly disagree 00 00
4 Disagree 10 10%
Total 100 100%
40% 35%
30%
20%
10%
10%
0%
0%
Strongly agree Agree Strongly disagree Disagree
Level of satisfaction
Interpretation 4.17:
The above table and graph shows that worker’s relationship with supervisor and colleges.
The researcher found that 55% respondents are strongly agree that they are having excellent
relationship with their supervisor and colleges, 35% respondents are just agree with it and
remaining only 10% respondents disagree on this matter.
It is conclude that majority of respondents said that that they are having excellent relationship
with their supervisor and colleges.
4.18 Opinion of workers about satisfaction with the present system of worker’s
participation in management
Interpretation 4.18:
The above table and graph shows that worker’s satisfaction on present system of worker’s
participation in management. The researcher found that 50% respondents are strongly satisfied
with present system of worker’s participation in management, 35% respondents are just agree
with it, while 5% respondents are strongly disagree and remaining only 10% respondents
disagree on this matter.
It is conclude that majority of respondents are satisfied with present system of worker’s
participation in management.
Interpretation 4.19:
The above table and graph shows that factors affecting worker’s participation in
management. The researcher found that 25% respondents are said thateducational factor is
affecting the most to worker’s participation in management, only10% respondents said about
political factor, while 15% respondents said about psychological factor and remaining 50%
respondents said that all the factors are affecting to worker’s participation in management.
It is conclude that majority of respondents said that all the factors are affecting to worker’s
participation in management.
5.1 FINDINGS
7. It is found that maximum workers agree that worker’s participation in management can help in
achieving organizational goals.
8. It is clearly observed that most of workers believes that worker’s participation in management
can improve the way organization works.
9. It is seen that majority of workers believe that worker’s participation in management is a means
of achieving industrial democracy.
10. It is observed that maximum workers believe worker’s participation in management as a means of
participating in decision making process
11. It is found that most of workers believe that worker’s participation in management can bring good
industrial relations and increase efficiency in production
12. It is observed that a Maximum worker believes that all educational, political and psychological
factors are affecting to worker’s participation in management.
13. It is found that Management does not provide maximum information related to business and
development.
14. Middle level and lower level departments does not actively participate in workers participation
management.
15. Organization does not reward employees for their ideas and suggestions during workers
participation management.
16. It is observed that Management is unable to solve maximum issues raised by workers.
5.2 SUGGESTIONS
It is suggested that Management should provide maximum information related to business and
development.
Middle level and lower level departments should need to actively participate in workers
participation management.
Organization should need to reward employees for their ideas and suggestions during workers
participation management.
It is suggested that Management should try to solve maximum issues raised by workers.
Company should need to improve working conditions of company up to mark to get maximum
workers participation.
5.3 CONCLUSION
Worker’s participation in management has assumed great importance these days because
it reduces industrial unrest and helps in reducing employees misunderstanding about the outlook
of management and industry. The organization is giving utmost important to the worker’s
participation in management. The organization has been seem to practices sound participate
mechanism. There exist a healthy sign of team spirit and cooperation among the employees in
the organization. Worker’s participation in management may reduce alteration or increase
personal fulfillment of workers.
It also influences efficiency in various direct and indirect ways. Careful measurement
and calculation are required to assess the net effect of participation upon efficiency and
economic matter. Worker’s participation in management is respectable in Sama Chemo
Pharmapvt., ltd, Islampur and employees believe that they will benefit from being a part of
management affairs. Participation if confined to all members in the organization and considers
them at different levels of decision making. Employees acquiesce that committee members
share information with their colleagues after the meetings. the worker’s participation in
management improve understanding between the manager and workers and informed that joint
management councils is the methods of worker’s participation in management which is used
mostly in the organization.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS
WEBSITES
1. www.scribd.com
2. www.mbaslide.com
3. www.shodhganga.com
APPENDICES
QUESTIONNAIRE
AN ANALYSIS ON THE WORKERS PARTICIPATION IN MANAGEMENT
Personal information
Name:
Age:
A. Below 25
B. 25-35
C. 35-45
D. above 45
Gender:
A. Male
B. Female
C. Other
Educational Background:
A. Higher secondary
B. Diploma
C. Degree
D. Other
B. Increase in quality
C. Improve relationship between workers and management
D. All of them
7. In this organization, is employers are rewarded on their suggestion for increasing productivity?
A. Yes B. No
8. Do you think that workers participation in management helps to solve your problems in efficient
manner?
A. Yes B. No
9. Do you believe that workers participation equally contributes towards the better relationship
between workers and management?
A. Yes
B. No
11. Do you find enough participation of the workers at middle and lower level?
A. Yes
B. No
12. Do you think workers complaints are solved with the help of workers involvement?
A. Yes
B. No
13. Do you think organizational goals are achieved through your participation?
A. Strongly agree
B. Agree
C. Strongly disagree
D. Disagree
14. Do you agree that there is an improvement in current working of the company due to workers
participation?
A. Strongly agree
B. Agree
C. Strongly disagree
D. Disagree
15. Does the management provide full information regarding the business and development to you
during meetings?
A. Yes
B. No
17. Would you agree that there is excellent relationship with your supervisor and colleges? A.
Strongly agree
B. Agree
C. Strongly disagree
D. Disagree
18. Do you satisfied with the present system of workers participation in management in your
organization? A. Strongly satisfied
B. Satisfied
C. Strongly not satisfied
D. Not satisfied
19. According to you what are the factors affecting to the worker’s participation in management? A.
Educational
B. Political
C. Psychological
D. All of the above