Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Crim Coverage 9-24
Crim Coverage 9-24
CLASSES OF PENALTIES
PRINCIPAL Capital punishment
PENALTIES Death
AFFLICTIVE Reclusion perpetua ABSOLUTE DISQUALIFICATION
PENALTIES Reclusion temporal -Perpetual or temporary
Prision mayor
SPECIAL DISQUALIFICATION –
Perpetual or temporary
CORRECTIONAL Prision correccional
PENALTIES Arresto mayor
Suspension
Destierro
Suspension from public office, the right to vote and be voted for, the profession or calling.
Civil interdiction,
Indemnification
AMURAO:
The classification in Article 25 of the RPC assumes significance on Article 91 of the RPC
on Prescription:
contemplates that there has been no contemplates that there has been a final
judgment of conviction yet judgment by the courts
for violations of the RPC = what law for violations of special law = what law
governs? the Revised Penal Code governs? Special penal laws
Examples of provisions in the RPC that have suppletory application pursuant to Article 10 of the
RPC
1. Article 100 – Civil Liability; there are two sides of crime, the criminal liability and the civil
liability, the former imposes the penalty prescribed for the crime, the latter is for the
payment of damages
2. Article 22 – Retroactive Application; the law becomes favorable to the accused as long
as he is not a habitual criminal and is convicted by final judgment
3. Article 17 – Principals; are classified into three: (1) by direct participation, (2) by
inducement, (3) by indispensable cooperation
4. Article 45 – Forfeiture of instruments or tools used in the commission of the crime
5. Article 39 – Subsidiary imprisonment for failure to pay fines
6. Article 8 – Conspiracy; in violation of the Human Security Act(RA9372), Dangerous
Drugs Act, sec 26 only (RA9165), Bouncing Checks Law (BP22)
RETROACTIVE EFFECT OF PENAL LAWS
Article 22. Retroactive effect of penal laws. –
GR: Penal Laws shall have a retroactive effect
EXPN: insofar as they favor the persons guilty of a felony, who is not a habitual criminal, as this
term is defined in Rule 5 of Article 62 of this Code, although at the time of the publication of
such laws a final sentence has been pronounced and the convict is serving the same.
ARTICLE 62 (5)
Habitual delinquency shall have the following effects:
(a) Upon a third conviction the culprit shall be sentenced
• to the penalty provided by law for the last crime of which he be found guilty and
• to the additional penalty of prision correccional in its medium and maximum periods;
(b) Upon a fourth conviction, the culprit shall be sentenced
• to the penalty provided for the last crime of which he be found guilty and
• to the additional penalty of prision mayor in its minimum and medium periods; and
(c) Upon a fifth or additional conviction, the culprit shall be sentenced:
• to the penalty provided for the last crime of which he be found guilty and
• to the additional penalty of prision mayor in its maximum period to reclusion temporal in
its minimum period.
Notwithstanding the provisions of this article, the total of the two penalties to be imposed upon
the offender, in conformity herewith, shall in no case exceed 30 years.
For the purpose of this article, a person shall be deemed to be habitual delinquent, is within
a period of ten years from the date of his release or last conviction of the crimes of serious
or less serious physical injuries, robo, hurto, estafa or falsification, he is found guilty of
any of said crimes a third time or oftener.
Article 62. Effect of the attendance of mitigating or aggravating circumstances and of habitual
delinquency. –
EFFECT OF MITIGATING AND AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES
Aggravating IF CONSTITUTES A CRIME OR INCLUDED BY LAW OR INHERENT
Circumstances TO THE CRIME OR NECESSARY TO COMMIT A CRIME
➢ Not taken into account
Mitigating or aggravating circumstances and habitual delinquency shall be taken into account for
the purpose of diminishing or increasing the penalty in conformity with the following rules:
1. Aggravating circumstances which in themselves:
➢ constitute a crime specially punishable by law or
➢ which are included by the law in defining a crime and prescribing the penalty therefor
shall not be taken into account for the purpose of increasing the penalty.
2. The same rule shall apply with respect to any aggravating circumstance inherent in the
crime to such a degree that it must of necessity accompany the commission thereof.
(INHERENT AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCE)
3. Aggravating or mitigating circumstances which arise from:
• to the penalty provided by law for the last crime of which he be found guilty and
• to the additional penalty of prision correccional in its medium and maximum periods;
(b) Upon a fourth conviction, the culprit shall be sentenced
• to the penalty provided for the last crime of which he be found guilty and
• to the additional penalty of prision mayor in its minimum and medium periods; and
(c) Upon a fifth or additional conviction, the culprit shall be sentenced:
• to the penalty provided for the last crime of which he be found guilty and
• to the additional penalty of prision mayor in its maximum period to reclusion temporal in
its minimum period.
Notwithstanding the provisions of this article, the total of the two penalties to be imposed upon
the offender, in conformity herewith, shall in no case exceed 30 years.
For the purpose of this article, a person shall be deemed to be habitual delinquent, is within a
period of ten years from the date of his release or last conviction of the crimes of serious or less
serious physical injuries, robo, hurto, estafa or falsification, he is found guilty of any of said crimes
a third time or oftener.
MODIFYING CIRCUMSTANCES
In justifying and exempting circumstances, there is no criminal liability. When an accused invokes
them, he in effect admits the commission of a crime but tries to avoid the liability thereof. The
burden is upon him to establish beyond reasonable doubt the required conditions to justify or
exempt his acts from criminal liability. What is shifted is only the burden of evidence, not the
burden of proof
Justifying circumstances:
Mitigating Circumstances – are those, which, if present in the commission of the crime, do
NOT entirely, free the actor from criminal liability, but serve only to reduce the penalty.