Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Radio Programme Ratings
Radio Programme Ratings
Structure
Introduction
Objectives
Radio Audience Measurements
14.2.1 Reach of Channel
14.2.2 Channel Share
14.2.3 Programme Ratings
Methods of Audience Measurements
14.3.1 Survey Research
14.3.2 Baseline Studies
14.3.3 Day-after Recall
14.3.4 Self-Completion Diaries
14.3.5 Audiometers and People Meters
Measuring Radio Audience
14.4.1 Demographics of the City
14.4.2 Listening to Different Channels
14.4.3 Time Spent on Different Channels
14.4.4 Listening to Specific Programmes
14.4.5 TV Audience Measurement System
Audience Measurements Data
14.5.1 Using Reach Figures
14.5.2 Using Share Figures
14.5.3 Using Ratings
Let Us Sum Up
Glossary
Check Your Progress: Possible Answers
14.0 INTRODUCTION
Broadcasting, either on radio or television is one of the public services available to the
citizens of the country to get information and education and it is also one of the means of
entertainment to a large number of people. In comn~erciallanguage it could be described
as one of the ranges of goods and services marketed to users or consumers. However,
broadcasting has certain unique features. In broadcasting, no visible 'sales' take place.
A seller of soaps, for example, can quantify how much soap s/he has sold in a day or a month.
A public transport company can easily calculate how nlany have traveled for what distances
during any particular period. A film producer, similarly, can find out how many people have
seen the film in the very first week and also subsequently. A newspaper company is als,o
aware of how many copies of the newspaper have been sold though the company may not
be sure of how many more have actually read their newspapers. But broadcasters have no
such immediate data about the users of their services. In other words, if radio programmes
were to be considered as 'products' marketed there is no direct way of ascertaining how many
consumers these products have and which aniong these products are doing well and which
are not. We know that successful marketing of a radio channel is basically convincing the
advertisers that they will get value for their money by advertising on that particular channel.
Advertisers will be convinced when they have concrete evidence to prove that a channel is
being listened to by a significant proportion of their target audience- the persons who are
I
likely to buy their products.
The mechanism to get concrete evidence of the extent of listening to channels or specific
programmes is called Programme Ratings which are being widely used the world over.
To get these ratings, various methods have been evolved. In this unit the different issues
involved in obtaining and interpreting these measures are discussed. We shall also examine
the different measures of radio audience that can be used for marketing radio channels and
programmes.
Radio Programme
14.1 OBJECTIVES . Ratings
When broadcasting has to depend on its own earnings, this type of data is very much needed
for marketing radio channels and programmes. Even when broadcasting is funded by public
money there has to be adequate accountability and assessment of the efficaCy of Public
Service Broadcasting, which is needed not only by the funding agencies but the broadcasters
themselves.
There are a number of relevant parameters through which the performance of a radio channel
could be assessed. One is the geographical coverage of the channel- how far the signals reach.
Perhaps it is more important to know how many and what type of people within that range
have facilities to listen to that channel. When there are many channels, another obvious point
of interest is the comparative performance of the channels- which of them is doing well and
which is not and among which section of the population. Another obvious point of interest
will be the relative performance of programmes broadcast on these channels. One would like
to know which of them is popular among the different sections of listeners and which have
limited appeal. One could similarly think of other quantitative and qualitative criteria for
judging radio channels.
The performances of radio channels are assessed around the world through three quantitative
measures. These are, the 'reach' of the channel, the 'share' of the channel and the 'ratings'
of different programmes broadcast on the channel. Each of these measures is distinct and
independent and each deals with a specific aspect of the audience to the channel. However,
quite often all these three measures are clubbed together under the common term 'Radio
Programme Ratings'. Let us try to understand the meaning of these terms.
How many people a channel can reach depends to an extent on the technical parameters like
the power of the transmitter, the modes of transmission- FM or AM, Analog or Digital and
so on. The signals of any radio transmitter have a specific geographical range and whoever
has a radio set which can receive that channel in that range is a potential listener of the channel.
Technically, two radio channels with the same power and using the same broadcast technology
can be expected to reach the same number of people. That is to say, in a city, two FM chanyels
of the same power will have the same technical reach. The technical reach of a channel is the
percentage of people living in a specific geographical area with the facilities to receive the
programmes of that particular channel to the total population of that area.
Generally, statistics about the population living within a geographical area are available froin
the decennial Census reports. In some cases, statiqtics about the number of households having
Radio Management However, the actual reach of a radio channel will be different from its technical reach.
And Marketing . A channel which has programmes appealing to a larger section of the population is likely
to reach a larger number than a channel with programmes that has appeal to a small section
of the listening public. In the example quoted of a city with two FM channels, if one of these
channels is broadcasting only educational programmes and the other broadcasting general
entertainment programmes the general entertainment channel is likely to have a larger reach
than the educational channel. ,
The actual reach of a channel is the average percentage of people who tune to that channel at
least for some period within a specified period of time. The weekly reach of a channel is the .
average percentage of people who tune to that channel at least for some time during a week
and the average daily reach is the average percentage of people who tune to that channel at
least for some time in a day. Though the reach (technical or actual) is generally expressed as
a percentage to the total population of the area, in some cases, it may be expressed in absolute
numbers - so many millions or so many thousands. Apart from the total reach, that is reach
among the total population, sometimes it could be necessary to determine the reach for
specific demographic groups like youth, women, those in the higher income groups etc.
It is possible that a channel which has a higher reach among the total population could have
a comparatively lower reach among a particular section of the same population.
To illustrate, in a particular city with a populatioii of say 10 lakhs (in rating studies the
population is generally defined as people above a particular age like above 4 years, above
8 years or above 15years etc) if channel A is tuned at least for some time during a particular
week by 2 lakhs and channel B by 1.5 lakhs, then the weekly reach of channel A is 20 percent
and the weekly reach of channel B is 15 percent. If in that city, the youth population is
estimated at 2.5 lakhs and Channel A is listened in a week by 50,000 and Channel B by one
75,000 young people in that area, the weekly reach of channel A among youth is 20 percent
and the reach of channel B among the same youth population is 30 percent.
In radio broadcasting also such share figures will often be useful to assess the relative
performance of different channels. Let us assume in a city there are four radio channels and
people of that city in a day, on an average spend 18 minutes with channel- 1, 12 minutes with
channel-2, 15 minutes with channel-3 and 15 minutes with chaniiel-4. The total time spent
on listening to radio in this case, works out to 60 minutes and the share of channel-1 is 18
minutes of these 60 minutes or 30 percent of radio listening in that particular city. The share
of channel can be defined as the percentage of time spent by listeners with a particular
channel to the total time devoted to radio listening among all listeners.
Apart from the share (over a day or a week), many times it may become important to know
the share of the channel at different parts ofthe day like mornings, afternoons, evening prime
time etc. (Such specific timings are called 'day parts'.) Similarly, in some cases, it is important
to know the shares by audience-type, such as women, youth etc. As in the case of reach, a
channel having a higher share among the total population could have a comparatively lower
share among certain sections of the same population.
Collecting information on the exact time spent on listening to different channels is not an
easy task and it may be easier to calculate the shares at specific timings. Let us assume that
in a kity of 10 lakhs, at 9:00 P.M for example, one lakh people are listening to radio and of
them 50,000 are listening to channel A, 20,000 are listening to channel B and the rest to
other channels. The share of channel A at that point is 50 percent; the share of channel B is
20 percent. This is the share at that particular point of time.
sn
Radio Programme I
The main difference between the share and the reach could be noted here. The base for Ratings i,
calculating the reach is the total population of the area whereas the base for calculating the
share is the number listening to radio and the shares of different channels adds up to one
Activity
List the Radio Channels that are listened to in your area of residence. Try to find out the
possible reach of these channels and their share of listening among the student community.
Though the rating is the percentage of people listening to a programme, the word 'people'
is defined in different ways in different rating systems. In some systems, it is the total
population (as mentioned earlier in audience measurement studies the population is generally
defined as people above a particular age). In some other systems the base will be taken as
only those who listen to radio. For example, let us assume that radio ratings are calculated for
. a city with an estimated population of 10 lakhs, with 6 lakh people listening to radio. Let us
further assume that the system estimates that 60,000 people are estimated to be listening to
programme P and 30,000 to programme Q. If the base for the ratings is taken as the total
population, the rating of programme P will be 60,000 divided by 10,00,000 and multiplied by
100 that is 6 and in a similar way the rating of programme Q will be 3. However, if the base is
taken as the radio listeners the rating for programme P will be 60,000 divided by 6 lakhs and
-:lultiplied by 100 equal to 10 and the rating of programme Q will be 5. It is to be noted here
that whatever the base may be, the relative position of programmes A and B remain the same,
programme A is twice as popular as programme B.
Though the ratings evaluate individual programmes, the ratings of different programmes
broadcast on a channel contribute to the reach and share of that channel. A channel, which has
a larger number of programmes with higher ratings, will naturally have a greater share of the
audience than a channel with fewer programmes of higher ratings. Similarly, the reach of a
channel with popular progra~nmeswill be higher than another channel, which does not have
many popular programmes.
On radio channels with composite programmes, each individual programme like a news
bulletin, a drama or an interview etc has its own patrons and the rating of each programme
will be required separately. But in thematic and purely entertainment channels (like channels
broadcasting only film songs), one individual programme may not be much different fiom
another. In such cases, the average ratings are calculated by day-parts like mornings,
I afternoons and evenings or for time-chunks like 8:OO-9:00 AM, 600-9:00 PM etc.
As in the case of reach and share, ratings of programmes to the total population is important
but some times the ratings of the programme of a specific audience group like women, youth
etc may be more relevant. Ratings are also calculated for such groups.
Radio Management Check Your Progress: 1
And Marketing
Sampling
The bas& principle of sampling is that we can draw reasonably valid conclusions about the
whole (population or universe) by examining only a small part (sample). These principles
have been learnt from everyday life and are universally applied to all fields of knowledge.
For drawing valid conclusions about the population through the study of sample there are two
main requisites. The first is that the sample should be representative. This implies it should
be capable of representing a cross-section of the radio listening public of the place. The
second requisite is that the size of the sample should be adequate- it should not be too small.
All estimates made on the basis of a sample will always have a component of 'error' and this
error is measurable and could be reduced by increasing the size of the sample. However,
increasing the size of the sample beyond a certain number will be counter-productive; it
could bring in different kinds of errors. Another important point is that the sample size need
not be related to the population size, that is, a sample of say 5000 may be adequate for a city
of twenty lakhs or even for a city of fifty lakhs.
52
Questionnaire Radio Programme
Ratings
In survey research, the basic instrument of data collection is the questionnaire and it is very .
i~iiportantthat this question~lairehas been prepared properly. An English maxim says- 'If you
ask a silly question, you get a silly answer' and this word of wisdom is specially addressed
to those developing questiollilaires for surveys. In survey research, there is a need to avoid
ambiguity and the questions to be asked should be worded carefully to help the respondent to
answer them accurately and precisely. The questionnaire should be able to get all information
needed, in this case, all facts required for calculating the different measures of listening. At
the same time, there should not be too many questions as this can create weariness among
the respondents. There has to be proper balance between what is needed and what could be
obtained. In our country people speak many languages, hence proper translation of the
questions is very important. The translator should have a good knowledge of the language
and idioms of the area where the survey is to be conducted. A badly prepared or translated
questionnaire can spoil an otherwise well organised survey.
Field Interviews
The success of survey research mainly depends on how well the fieldwork is conducted. In
audience measurement studies, part-time interviewers generally do the fieldwork. There has
to be a proper selection of such interviewers who should be adequately trained. In addition,
there has to be proper supervision during the fieldwork and certain number of interview
schedules should be rechecked to ensure quality. The success of a field interview depends
largely on the interviewer. The interviewer has to establish proper rapport with the
respondents. Hisher personality, manners, tone and even body language also contribute to
the success of the interview and collection of accurate information.
In the example cited earlier (in 14.2.3) of a city with an estimated population of 10 lakhs
(persons who are 15 years or more) 6 lakh people are listening to radio and among them
60,000 people are estimated to be listening to programme P. For estimating how many
listen to radio (in this case 6 lakhs), the sample has to be taken from the general population
including radio listeners and non-listeners. Whereas, to estimate the number of people
listening to programme P (in the given example 60,000), the sample could have been taken
only from radio listeners, leaving out the non-listeners.
A survey that is conducted among the total population of an area to get estimates about
how many and what categories of people listen to radio, with what frequency and to which
channels etc is generally called a Baseline Survey. Quite often, such a survey will form a part
of a larger multi-purpose survey for estimating media habits, ownership of consumer durables
etc. Such baseline surveys are conducted taking a representative sample of all households in
the city. In the selected household, one adult member will be contacted and information from
himlher will be collected through a questionnaire. For selecting the household member, there
is a simple procedure to ensure randomness by using what is called Kish Grid. Kish Grid is
a table of numbers used for selecting one member of a household.
The questionnaire in such surveys will be designed to collect two types of information: one
about the household and the other about the individual interviewed. The relevant information
about the household collected in such baseline surveys4willbe the number of family members,
their age, education, the family income, details about the radio sets in the family etc. The
information relevant about the individual relevant to be collected will be hislher radio
listening habits, channels listened, time spent on different channels etc. If the individual
is not listening to radio at all, no further questions will be asked.
Radio Management Activity
And Marketing
In surveys, to estimate the number of people listening to different channels and programmes
radio listeners in that area will form the universe. Generally, radio broadcasts follow a weekly
schedule and some programmes are broadcast only on specific days, e.g., dramas on Fridays, .
interviews on Mondays etc. If it is necessary to get ratings for all the programmes then a
separate representative sample for each day has to be drawn independently. In some other
cases, it would be sufficient to cover weekdays and weekends separately.
For collecting information about listening on specific days and at specific timings three
methods are available. All three methods employ sample survey techniques, applying the
principle of drawing conclusions about the population through the study of a sample. These
three methods are Day-after recall, Self- completion diaries and Audio meter1Peoples' meter.
Such audiometers or People meters can be attached to radio sets, which are kept at a fixed
place. With the growth of transistors and car radios, such meters have gone out of use from
radio but the same technology is extensively used now in Television Audience Measurements
(TAMS).
b
Check Your Progress: 2
Mention one merit and one demerit of each of the following methods:
1) Day-After Recall.
Merit ......................................................................................................
Demerit.. ................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
2) Self-completion diary.
Merit. .....................................................................................................
Demerit. .................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
3) Audiometer/People Meter.
Merit ......................................................................................................
In the above table we see the city has a population of 1280 thousand or 12 lakhs 80 thousand
and the number of persons who are 15 years are above is 10 lakhs and of them 5.2 lakh are
men and 4.8 lakh are women. (The figure of 10 lakhs has been taken to make calculations
simple and easy to follow.)
Now we have information about radio listening habits from a representative random sample
of 5000 persons in the city. After tabulation of the 5000 schedules it is found that 3000 of
the 5000 persons in the sample are listening to radio, at least one day In a week and 2000
are not listening to radio at all. Similarly, 1500 persons are listening to Ch-1, 1200 persons
are listening to Ch-2 etc as shown in the second column of Table-2. The reach of different
channels can be calculated from these figures. The reach of a channel is the percentage of
people listening to that channel and as in this case, 1500 out of 5000 in the sample are
listening to Ch-1 the reach of this channel works out to 30 percent. The city has a population
of 10 lakhs (15 years or above), we can deduce that this channel is reaching 3 lakh or 300
thousand people. In Table 2, similar figures have been worked gut for other channels
operating in the city.
From the data collected in the survey, the reach of the channels by different variables like sex,
age, education etc. can also be calculated. In Table 3, the reach of these four channels by men
and women are shown as an illustration.
From the above figures, it could be interpreted that a higher percent of women listen to radio.
Ch-3 has the highest reach of all channels among both men and women. Ch-2 reaches more
women whereas Ch-4 reaches more men.
Radio Programme
14.4.3 Time Spent on Different Channels Ratings
During the course of the survey, information was collected from the respondents on how
much time they spend listening to the different channels on a normal day. Only those who
listen to radio (in this case 3000 of the 5000 respondents) had provided this information and
I share of Ch-1 is 18 of these 85 minutes or 31.2 percent of total listening. Similar figures have
been calculated for the other channels in Table-4.
From the large baseline study, we have estimated the reach and the share of the channels. Let
us assume for estimating the ratings the 'day-after-recall' method was used. For each of the
seven days, independent samples of 300 radio listeners were drawn and the number listening
to each programme was tabulated. It needs to be noted here that only radio listeners (who
form 60 percent of the city) were included in these samples.
After tabulation of the data for all the seven days it was found that the highest number- 90
the city. ~ h e r a t & s of the eight popular programmes have been worked out with both the
bases in Table-5.
The ratings could also be calculated by different variables like sex, age, education etc. The
ratings (base: radio listeners) by men and women for the same eight programmes are given in
Tabled.
The focus of this unit is Radio Programme Ratings. However, it will be relevant to look at
Television Audience Measurement (TAM) system using People Meters which is operating in
a number of cities in India for nearly a decade. This system collects information from all those
who are 8 years and above in the select sample households and supplies data about TV
audience once a week. As an illustration, some extracts from a weekly report for Delhi about
the reach and share of some select channels and ratings of a few TV programmes telecast
during a specific week in 2002 are reproduced below.
Illustration
Figures from Television Audience Measurement (TAM) System for a particular week for
the city of Delhi
Reach of Select Channels
(Base: Population (8 years and above, 76 lakhs)
Channel All Individuals All Males All Females All Kids All Adults
Channel All Individuals All Males All Females All Kids All Adults
Aaj Tak 3.1 3.6 2.8 2.3 3.2
I Local Cable 9.8 8.1 12.7 7.8 10.1
DD- 1 8.9 9.4 8.2 10.5 8.6 1
DD-2 22.3 21.0 24.5 22.0 22.8
Star Plus 11.2 9.2 13.1 11 .O 11.3
Zee TV. 3.1 2.1 4.2 2.0 3.4
Even for commercial channels, reach figures will be important in attracting advertisers.
There are some products, which are targeted to the general public and many others, which
are targeted to specific groups, and the advertisers require reach figures to select the right
channel.
In commercial broadcasting, the objective to improve the total share of the channel improving
the share during 'peak listening hours' becomes more important. This is because in broadcasting,
the advertising tariffs are different for different day parts and is the highest at the peak listening
hours and the earnings of the channel could be improved if its share in the peak listening hours
increases. The share figures are not that important for public service channels but even such
channels try to ensure a reasonable share of the audience otherwise there is the danger of losing
their relevance among the public.
The media planners and buyers of airtime want their messages to reach as many as possible
and putting out an advertisement in a programme which has a higher rating will be more
beneficial than broadcasting the same advertisement with a programme having a lower ratlng.
In marketing of airtime, two other terms connected with ratings are widely used. They are
'Cost per Thousand' (CPT) and 'Gross Rating Points' (GRP). Let us try to understand these
terms.
59
Radiio Management Cost Per Thousand
And Marketing
Advertisers use ratings of radio programmes to calculate a value that is called 'costper
thousand'. Cost per Thousand is the unit amount, which the advertiser has to spend to reach
1000 persons among his potential buyers. Let us assume that the rating of radio programme
A is 10 and another programme B is 5 and these ratings are calculated with a base of six
lakh radio listeners. Let as also assume that the cost of putting a 10 second advertisement in
programme A is Rs 300 and an advertisement of the same duration on programme B costs
Rs 200. From these ratings, we can calculate and find that programme A is listened to by
60,000 and programme B by 30,000. The advertiser for putting out the advertisement with
programme A will be spending Rs 300 to reach 60,000 people or slhe will be spending
Rs 5 to reach one thousand people. If s h e puts out the same advertisement with programme
B slhe will be paying Rs 200 to reach 300,000 or spending Rs 6.67 to reach one thousand
people. In other words, the cost per thousand for advertising in programme A is Rs 5 and
the same is Rs 3.33 for programme B.
The calculation of cost per thousand will not only be useful for exploring more efficient
advertising options among different radio channels and individual programmes on these
channels. The same concept is also used in choosing different media like newspapers,
radio and television.
Generally an advertiser (or an advertising agency on hisiher behalf) does not buy a single
advertising spot but many spots at different timings and with different programmes. These
programmes have their own ratings and the sum total of the rating points of all the programmes
in which an a*&ivent appears is called the gross ratingpoint. Such gross rating points
will be useful fbr aaessing the results of the total advertising campaign. When two products
are competing in a market keeping track of the gross rating points of the competitor will be
helpful in planning future campaigns.
2) Let us assume that the cost of 10 second advertisement with programmes P and Q will be
Rs 1000 and the same cost with programmes T and U will bc Rs 500. Calculate the cost
per thousand for these four programmes.
P ....................< .................................................................................
Q ......................................................................................................
T ......................................................................................................
u ......................................................................................................
14.6 LET US SUM UP
Broadcasters do not have immediate data about the users of their services and special efforts
have to be made to get this sort of information indirectly. Such data is critical for marketing
radio channels and programmes and also for accountability and assessment of the efficacy of
broadcasting, which is needed not only by the funding agencies but the broadcasters as well.
For the assessment of the performance of broadcasting, certain measures which are together
called Programme Ratings have been developed and are being used widely the world over.
To get these ratings, various methods have been evolved. In this unit we have learnt about
the meaning and use of these measures and have understood the various issues involved in
obtaining and interpreting these measures.
\
We have first discussed the definitions of the three quantitative measures the 'reach'of the Radio Programme
Ratings
channel, the 'share' of the channel and the 'ratings'of different programmes broadcast on the
channel. We have also learnt that reach &d share are meant to assess a radio channel as a
whole whereas programme ratings assess the relative performance of different programmes
broadcast on the same and also across different channels.
We have also seen these measurements basically tell us how many listen to radio, to the
different channels, to different programmes on these channels andlor and at different times
of the day. They also tell us the people of what age, which sex and what social backgrounds
etc. listen to these channels and programmes.
We have also learnt in all radio audience measurement studies "Survey research" method
is generally employed. We have recapitulated very briefly three basic issues connected
with survey research relevant for audience measurements - the selection of the sample, the
We have noted that radio audience measurement studies require at least two different sets
of information- one set of information to be collected from a representative sample of the
total population of the area including radio listeners and non-listeners and the other set to be
collected from a sample of only those who listen to radio. We have also learnt about base-line
surveys, which are survey conducted among the total population of an area to get estimates
about how many and what categories of people listen to radio, with what frequency and to
which channels etc.
We have also learnt that for collecting information about listening on specific days and at
specific timings three methods are available all employing the sample survey principle of
drawing conclusions about the population through the study of a sample. We have learnt in
detail about these methods Day-after Recall, SeljlCompletion Diaries and use of Audiometers
and People Meters.
We have discussed in a separate section the various stages involved in planning and
conducting radio audience measurement surveys for a fictitious city and we have also are
calculated for this city from imaginary data all the audience measurements like reach etc. In
practice different people engaged in broadcasting require different kinds of information about
the radio audience for different purposes. We have learnt how people in broadcasting use the
14.7 GLOSSARY
The number (of persons, Radio listeners etc) used to
calculate percentages
2) The weekly reach of a channel is the average percentage of people who tune to that
channel at least for some time during a week
3) The audience share of channel is the percentage of time spent by listeners with a
particular channel to the total time devoted to radio listening among all listeners.
4) The rating of a radio programme is the percentage of people listening to that programme.
1) Day-After-Recall
Merit : Is easy to practice in the field situation- asking questions and getting
answers appear to be simple task.
Demerit : The respondents may not be remembering all the programmes they had
listened on the previous day
3) Audiometer/People Meter
Merit : The electronic device will maintain a very accurate record of listening.
Demerit : Not possible to attach meters to transistor sets and car radios.
1) Number Listening
Programme Q 1 R 1 S I U 1 V
Listeners (Lakhs) 1 1.72 1 1.60 ( 1.44 1 1.32 1 1.30
Programme R U V
CPT (Rs) 6.25 3.78 3.85
62
FURTHER READING
All India Radio (2002), Audience Research Unit, Prasar Bharati, Broadcasting Corporation
of India, New Delhi.
Kotler Philip (1999), Marketing Management, Prentice Hall of India Private Limited,
New Delhi.
Manual on Audience Research (1992), Audience Research Unit, A11 India Radio, New Delhi.
Mandel Toby (2000), Public Service Broadcasting: A Comparative Legal Survey, UNESCO
and AIBD, Kuala Lumpur.
Panwar, J.S. (1997), Marketing in the New Era: Combating Competition in a Globalising
Economy, Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
Wirnrner, Roger D., and Dominick, Joseph R. (2000), Mass Media Research:
An Introduction, Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont.
Malf to:
Programme Coordinator (PGDAPP)
Education, Research & Training Unit
EMPC, IGNOU, Maidan Garhi,
New Delhi-110068, India.