Professional Documents
Culture Documents
الاقتباس في النصوص البحثية أهميته وأشكاله وإشكالاته
الاقتباس في النصوص البحثية أهميته وأشكاله وإشكالاته
""
2
" "
06/01/2019
17/10/2018
— —
647
2019331
aissou.akila@gmail.com :
.
Abstract
Scientific research is producing work intended to develop human
knowledge (update, revise, advance, etc.). For conducting a research,
most of the time, researchers have not to start from scratch. They need to
resume from wherever others ended (ideas, results, data, etc.); it further
consolidate their own contributions. Consequently, they need to cite
previous work. The use of quotation gives an intellectual richness,
credibility, and scientific authority to their work. In such situations,
researchers should strive to comply with ethical principles concerning
source citation. Nevertheless, a still significant number of researchers
ignore the formats and the rules for the use of citations, which exposes
them to scientific integrity rule breaches, violating copyright aspects and
the risk of making plagiarism.
Through this work, we would like to define the notion of quoting
and bibliographic citation, and specify their philosophy, forms and
practices, as well as misconducts and breaches at citing sources into
which many researchers fall.
Keywords: quotation; source citation; scientific research;
plagiarism; scientific integrity; ethics.
1
648
2019331
.
—
—
—
—
—
— —
— —
649
2019331
.
—
—
citation •
650
2019331
.
—
—
renvoi citation •
2 Pochet 2015
3
« renvoi bibliographique » « référence bibliographique »
« citer quelqu’un ou citer un article »
« le nombre de citations d’un article ou d’un auteur »
recherche scientifique •
[] 1974
4
plagiat •
—
—
651
2019331
.
— —
auto-plagiat
êthos (moeurs) éthique •
5 mores morale
Dictionnaire de la
6 philosophie, Larousse
—
—
intégrité scientifique •
—20107
—8
éthique
10— —9déontologie
652
2019331
.
2115 11
20151230
12
653
2019331
.
expertise
citation
le renvoie (la citation textuelle
bibliographique à la source
1
— —
— —
—
654
2019331
.
1.1
— —
— — —
—
— —
(la citation mot à mot) 1.1.1
—
—
—
13
—
— —
(alinéa)
655
2019331
.
—
—
20121964
20121964
2012
2
—
—
—
—
— Web Numérique
658
2019331
.
—
—
1.2
1.1.2
Harvard –
MLA APA
1620122003
622007
16 :20122003
1620122003
659
2019331
.
62:2007
2007
Vancouver
2 1
1
6220071
note de bas de page
appel de notes de fin de document
— —
—
—
(1)
6220071
2007
2.2
—
660
2019331
.
—
—
— APA
MLA
Chicago/Turabian
3.2
citations fausses —
citations —
discriminatoires
citations honorifiques —
(Auto-citation) —
661
2019331
.
—
—
—
—
—
—
— —
662
2019331
.
— —
bases de données bibliographiques
bases de données en texte intégral
—
—
—
—
663
2019331
.
—
—
–
— —
664
2019331
.
181973 -1
2- Pochet B. Comprendre et maîtriser la littérature scientifique.
Gembloux : Les Presses agronomiques de Gembloux, 2015.
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/186181, (02/08/2018).
-3
-4
152002
-5
28،2016
6- Larousse. Dictionnaire de la philosophie, 1984.
7- ANR (Agence Nationale de la Recherche), Politique en matière
d'éthique et d’intégrité scientifique, 2014. http://www.agence-
nationale-recherche.fr/.
،(Lisbonne 2007 -8
Rio 2015 Montréal 2013 Singapour 2010
Hong Amsterdam 2017
MelbourneHong KongKong 2019
— -9
— —
—
10- Singapore Statement on Research Integrity. 2nd World Conference
on Research Integrity (September 2010).
https://www3.ntu.edu.sg/wcri2010/.
152004 -11
201512302115 -12
-13
guillemets
—
—
espacesalinéas
665
2019331