Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Munson Young and Okiishis Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics 8th Edition 8th Edition Ebook PDF
Munson Young and Okiishis Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics 8th Edition 8th Edition Ebook PDF
Eighth Edition
Dr. Hochstein has twice been a NASA Summer Faculty Fellow for two consecutive summers: once
at the NASA Lewis (now Glenn) Research Center, and once at the NASA Marshall Space Flight
Center. Dr. Hochstein’s current primary research focus is on the capture of hydrokinetic energy to
produce electricity.
Dr. Hochstein is an Associate Fellow of AIAA and has served on the Microgravity Space
Processes Technical Committee since 1986. He joined ASME as an undergraduate student and
served for 4 years on the K20 Computational Heat Transfer Committee. He is a member of ASEE
and has served the profession as an ABET Program Evaluator since 2002.
About the New Authors xi
A Quarter-Century of Excellence
Bruce R. Munson, Professor Emeritus of Engineering Mechanics at Iowa State University, received
his B.S. and M.S. degrees from Purdue University and his Ph.D. degree from the Aerospace Engi-
neering and Mechanics Department of the University of Minnesota in 1970.
Prior to joining the Iowa State University faculty in 1974, Dr. Munson was on the mechanical
engineering faculty of Duke University from 1970 to 1974. From 1964 to 1966, he worked as an
engineer in the jet engine fuel control department of Bendix Aerospace Corporation, South Bend,
Indiana.
Dr. Munson’s main professional activity has been in the area of fluid mechanics education and
research. He has been responsible for the development of many fluid mechanics courses for studies
in civil engineering, mechanical engineering, engineering science, and agricultural engineering and
is the recipient of an Iowa State University Superior Engineering Teacher Award and the Iowa State
University Alumni Association Faculty Citation.
He has authored and coauthored many theoretical and experimental technical papers on
hydrodynamic stability, low Reynolds number flow, secondary flow, and the applications of viscous
incompressible flow. He is a member of The American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Donald F. Young, Anson Marston Distinguished Professor Emeritus in Engineering, received his
B.S. degree in mechanical engineering, his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in theoretical and applied me-
chanics from Iowa State University, and has taught both undergraduate and graduate courses in fluid
mechanics at Iowa State for many years. In addition to being named a Distinguished Professor in
the College of Engineering, Dr. Young has also received the Standard Oil Foundation Outstanding
Teacher Award and the Iowa State University Alumni Association Faculty Citation. He has been
engaged in fluid mechanics research for more than 35 years, with special interests in similitude and
modeling and the interdisciplinary field of biomedical fluid mechanics. Dr. Young has contributed
to many technical publications and is the author or coauthor of two textbooks on applied mechanics.
He is a Fellow of The American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Ted H. Okiishi, Professor Emeritus of Mechanical Engineering at Iowa State University, joined the
faculty there in 1967 after receiving his undergraduate and graduate degrees from that institution.
From 1965 to 1967, Dr. Okiishi served as a U.S. Army officer with duty assignments at the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, where
he participated in rocket nozzle heat transfer research, and at the Combined Intelligence Center,
Saigon, Republic of South Vietnam, where he studied seasonal river flooding problems.
Professor Okiishi and his students have been active in research on turbomachinery fluid dy-
namics. Some of these projects have involved significant collaboration with government and indus-
trial laboratory researchers, with two of their papers winning the ASME Melville Medal (in 1989
and 1998).
Dr. Okiishi has received several awards for teaching. He has developed undergraduate and
graduate courses in classical fluid dynamics as well as the fluid dynamics of turbomachines.
He is a licensed professional engineer. His professional society activities include having been
a vice president of The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and of the American
Society for Engineering Education. He is a Life Fellow of The American Society of Mechanical
Engineers and past editor of its Journal of Turbomachinery. He was recently honored with the
ASME R. Tom Sawyer Award.
Wade W. Huebsch, Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineer-
ing at West Virginia University, received his B.S. degree in aerospace engineering from San Jose
State University where he played college baseball. He received his M.S. degree in mechanical engi-
neering and his Ph.D. in aerospace engineering from Iowa State University in 2000.
Dr. Huebsch specializes in computational fluid dynamics research and has authored multiple
journal articles in the areas of aircraft icing, roughness-induced flow phenomena, and boundary
xi
xii A Quarter-Century of Excellence
layer flow control. He has taught both undergraduate and graduate courses in fluid mechanics and
has developed a new undergraduate course in computational fluid dynamics. He has received mul-
tiple teaching awards such as Outstanding Teacher and Teacher of the Year from the College of
Engineering and Mineral Resources at WVU as well as the Ralph R. Teetor Educational Award from
SAE. He was also named as the Young Researcher of the Year from WVU. He is a member of the
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, the Sigma Xi research society, the Society of
Automotive Engineers, and the American Society of Engineering Education.
Alric P. Rothmayer, Professor of Aerospace Engineering at Iowa State University, received his un-
dergraduate and graduate degrees from the Aerospace Engineering Department at the University of
Cincinnati, during which time he also worked at NASA Langley Research Center and was a visiting
graduate research student at the Imperial College of Science and Technology in London. He joined
the faculty at Iowa State University (ISU) in 1985 after a research fellowship sponsored by the Office
of Naval Research at University College in London.
Dr. Rothmayer has taught a wide variety of undergraduate fluid mechanics and propulsion courses
for over 25 years, ranging from classical low and high speed flows to propulsion cycle analysis.
Dr. Rothmayer was awarded an ISU Engineering Student Council Leadership Award, an ISU
Foundation Award for Early Achievement in Research, an ISU Young Engineering Faculty Research
Award, and a National Science Foundation Presidential Young Investigator Award. He is an Associ-
ate Fellow of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), and was chair of the
3rd AIAA Theoretical Fluid Mechanics Conference.
Dr. Rothmayer specializes in the integration of Computational Fluid Dynamics with asymp-
totic methods and low order modeling for viscous flows. His research has been applied to diverse
areas ranging from internal flows through compliant tubes to flow control and aircraft icing. In 2001,
Dr. Rothmayer won a NASA Turning Goals into Reality (TGIR) Award as a member of the Aircraft
Icing Project Team, and also won a NASA Group Achievement Award in 2009 as a member of the
LEWICE Ice Accretion Software Development Team. He was also a member of the SAE AC-9C
Aircraft Icing Technology Subcommittee of the Aircraft Environmental Systems Committee of SAE
and the Fluid Dynamics Technical Committee of AIAA.
Preface
This book is intended to help undergraduate engineering students learn the fundamentals of fluid
mechanics. It was developed for use in a first course on fluid mechanics, either one or two semesters/
terms. While the principles of this course have been well-established for many years, fluid mechanics
education has evolved and improved.
With this eighth edition, a new team of authors is working to continue the distinguished tradi-
tion of this text. As it has throughout the past seven editions, the original core prepared by Munson,
Young, and Okiishi remains. We have sought to augment this fine text, drawing on our many years
of teaching experience. Based on our experience and suggestions from colleagues and students,
we have made a number of changes to this edition. The changes (listed below, and indicated by the
word New in descriptions in this preface) are made to clarify, update, and expand certain ideas and
concepts.
In addition to the continual effort of updating the scope of the material presented and improving the
presentation of all of the material, the following items are new to this edition.
Self-Contained: Material that had been removed from the text and provided only on-line has been
brought back into the text. Most notable are Section 5.4 on the second law of thermodynamics and
useful energy loss and Appendix E containing units conversion factors.
Compressible Flow: Chapter 11 on compressible flow has been extensively reorganized and a lim-
ited amount of new material added. There are ten new example problems; some of them replace
previous examples. All have special emphasis on engineering applications of the material. Example
solutions employ tabulated compressible flow functions as well as graphs.
Appendices: Appendix A has been expanded. Compressible flow function tables have been added
to Appendix D. A new extensive set of units conversion factors in a useful and compact format
appears in Appendix E.
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD): A still unsettled issue in introductory fluid mechanics
texts is what to do about computational fluid dynamics. A complete development of the subject is
well beyond the scope of an introductory text; nevertheless, highly complex, highly capable CFD
codes are being employed for engineering design and analysis in a continually expanding number
of industries. We have chosen to provide a description of many of the challenges and practices that
characterize widely used CFD codes. Our aim is twofold: to show how reasonably complex flows
can be computed and to foster a healthy skepticism in the nonspecialist. This material is presented
in an expanded Appendix A.
Problems and Examples: Many new examples and problems emphasize engineering applica-
tions. Approximately 30% new homework problems have been added for this edition, and there are
additional problems in WileyPLUS.
Value: Nearly everyone is concerned about the upward spiral of textbook prices (yes, even authors
and publishers!). We have taken a few modest steps to keep the price of this book reasonable. Most
of these steps involve the removal of “bells and whistles.” For example, the thumbnail photos that
accompanied the video icons in the 7th edition have been dropped. Wiley has also developed a num-
ber of different products to meet differing student needs and budgets.
xiii
xiv Preface
y Key Features
Fr < 1
Fr = 1
Illustrations, Photographs, and Videos
Fr > 1 Fluid mechanics has always been a “visual” subject—much can be learned by viewing various char-
acteristics of fluid flow. Fortunately this visual component is becoming easier to incorporate into
E
the learning environment, for both access and delivery, and is an important help in learning fluid
mechanics. Thus, many photographs and illustrations have been included in the book. Some of these
are within the text material; some are used to enhance the example problems; and some are included
as margin figures of the type shown in the left margin to more clearly illustrate various points dis-
cussed in the text. Numerous video segments illustrate many interesting and practical applications
of real-world fluid phenomena. Each video segment is identified at the appropriate location in the
(© Photograph courtesy
text material by a video icon of the type shown in the left margin. Each video segment has a separate
of Pend Oreille Public associated text description of what is shown in the video. There are many homework problems that
Utility District.) are directly related to the topics in the videos.
Examples
V1.9 Floating One of our aims is to represent fluid mechanics as it really is—an exciting and useful discipline. To
VIDEO razor blade this end, we include analyses of numerous everyday examples of fluid-flow phenomena to which
students and faculty can easily relate. In this edition there are numerous examples that provide de-
tailed solutions to a variety of problems. Many of the examples illustrate engineering applications of
fluid mechanics, as is appropriate in an engineering textbook. Several illustrate what happens if one
or more of the parameters is changed. This gives the student a better feel for some of the basic prin-
ciples involved. In addition, many of the examples contain photographs of the actual device or item
involved in the example. Also, all of the examples are outlined and carried out with the problem
solving methodology of “Given, Find, Solution, and Comment” as discussed in the “Note to User”
before Example 1.1.
Homework Problems
A wide variety of homework problems (approximately 30% new to this edition) stresses the practical
application of principles. The problems are grouped and identified according to topic. The following
types of problems are included:
1) “standard” problems,
2) computer problems,
3) discussion problems,
4) supply-your-own-data problems,
5) problems based on “The Wide World of Fluids” topics,
6) problems based on the videos,
7) “Lifelong learning” problems,
8) problems that require the user to obtain a photograph/image of a given flow situation and write
a brief paragraph to describe it,
Preface xv
System of Units
Three systems of units are used throughout the text: the International System of Units (newtons,
kilograms, meters, and seconds), the British Gravitational System (pounds, slugs, feet, and seconds),
and the English Engineering System, sometimes called the U.S. Customary System (pounds (or
pounds force), pounds mass, feet, and seconds). Distribution of the examples and homework prob-
lems between the three sets of units is about 50%, 40%, 10%.
considers fluid energy and energy dissipation, a formal course in thermodynamics is not a neces-
sary prerequisite. Chapter 7 features the advantages of using dimensional analysis and similitude for
organizing data and for planning experiments and the basic techniques involved.
Owing to the growing importance of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in engineering de-
sign and analysis, material on this subject is included in Appendix A. This material may be omitted
without any loss of continuity to the rest of the text.
Chapters 8 through 12 offer students opportunities for the further application of the principles
learned earlier in the text. Also, where appropriate, additional important notions such as boundary
layers, transition from laminar to turbulent flow, turbulence modeling, and flow separation are intro-
duced. Practical concerns such as pipe flow, open-channel flow, flow measurement, drag and lift, the
effects of compressibility, and the fundamental fluid mechanics of turbomachinery are included.
Students who study this text and solve a representative set of the problems will have acquired
a useful knowledge of the fundamentals of fluid mechanics. Faculty who use this text are provided
with numerous topics to select from in order to meet the objectives of their own courses. More
material is included than can be reasonably covered in one term. There is sufficient material for a
second course, most likely titled “Applied Fluid Mechanics.” All are reminded of the fine collection
of supplementary material. We have cited throughout the text various articles and books that are
available for enrichment.
Instructor Resources
WileyPLUS provides instructor resources, such as the Instructor Solutions Manual, containing com-
plete, detailed solutions to all of the problems in the text, and figures from the text appropriate for
use in lecture slides. Sign up for access at www.wileyplus.com.
Student Resources:
Through a registration process, WileyPLUS also provides access to students for appropriate resources
such as fluids videos and additional problems, among others.
Acknowledgments
First, we wish to express our gratitude to Bruce Munson, Donald Young, Ted Okiishi, Wade
Huebsch, and Alric Rothmayer for their part in producing seven editions of this excellent book. Also
we thank the people at Wiley, especially Don Fowley, Linda Ratts, and Jenny Welter, for trusting us
to assume responsibility for this text. Finally, we thank our families for their continued encourage-
ment during the writing of this edition.
Working with students and colleagues over the years has taught us much about fluid mechanics
education. We have drawn from this experience for the benefit of users of this book. Obviously we
are still learning, and we welcome any suggestions and comments from you.
Philip M. Gerhart
Andrew L. Gerhart
John I. Hochstein
Contents
xix
xx Contents
10.3 Energy Considerations 566 11.10 Analogy between Compressible and Open-
10.3.1 Energy Balance 566 Channel Flows 667
10.3.2 Specific Energy 567 11.11 Two-Dimensional Supersonic Flow 668
10.4 Uniform Flow 570 11.12 Chapter Summary and Study Guide 670
10.4.1 Uniform Flow Approximations 570 References 673, Problems 673
10.4.2 The Chezy and Manning Equations 571
10.4.3 Uniform Flow Examples 574
10.5 Gradually Varied Flow 579 12 TURBOMACHINES 679
10.6 Rapidly Varied Flow 581 Learning Objectives 679
10.6.1 The Hydraulic Jump 582 12.1 Introduction 680
10.6.2 Sharp-Crested Weirs 587 12.2 Basic Energy Considerations 681
10.6.3 Broad-Crested Weirs 590 12.3 Angular Momentum Considerations 685
10.6.4 Underflow (Sluice) Gates 593 12.4 The Centrifugal Pump 687
10.7 Chapter Summary and Study Guide 594 12.4.1 Theoretical Considerations 688
References 596, Problems 596 12.4.2 Pump Performance Characteristics 692
12.4.3 Net Positive Suction Head (NPSH) 694
12.4.4 System Characteristics,
11 COMPRESSIBLE FLOW 604 Pump-System Matching,
Learning Objectives 604 and Pump Selection 696
12.5 Dimensionless Parameters and
11.1 Ideal Gas Thermodynamics 605
Similarity Laws 700
11.2 Stagnation Properties 610
12.5.1 Special Pump Scaling Laws 702
11.3 Mach Number and Speed of Sound 612
12.5.2 Specific Speed 703
11.4 Compressible Flow Regimes 617
12.5.3 Suction Specific Speed 704
11.5 Shock Waves 621
12.6 Axial-Flow and Mixed-Flow
11.5.1 Normal Shock 622 Pumps 705
11.6 Isentropic Flow 626 12.7 Fans 707
11.6.1 Steady Isentropic Flow of 12.8 Turbines 708
an Ideal Gas 627
12.8.1 Impulse Turbines 709
11.6.2 Incompressible Flow and
12.8.2 Reaction Turbines 716
Bernoulli’s Equation 630
12.9 Compressible Flow Turbomachines 719
11.6.3 The Critical State 631
12.9.1 Compressors 719
11.7 One-Dimensional Flow in a Variable
Area Duct 632 12.9.2 Compressible Flow Turbines 723
11.7.1 General Considerations 632 12.10 Chapter Summary and Study Guide 725
11.7.2 Isentropic Flow of an Ideal References 726, Problems 727
Gas With Area Change 635
11.7.3 Operation of a Converging Nozzle 641
11.7.4 Operation of a Converging–
Diverging Nozzle 643 A Computational Fluid Dynamics 737
11.8 Constant-Area Duct Flow With Friction 647
B Physical Properties of Fluids 756
11.8.1 Preliminary Consideration: Comparison
with Incompressible Duct Flow 647 C Properties of the U.S. Standard
11.8.2 The Fanno Line 648 Atmosphere 761
11.8.3 Adiabatic Frictional Flow
(Fanno Flow) of an Ideal Gas 652 D Compressible Flow Functions
11.9 Frictionless Flow in a Constant-Area for an Ideal Gas 763
Duct with Heating or Cooling 660
E Comprehensive Table of Conversion
11.9.1 The Rayleigh Line 660
Factors 771
11.9.2 Frictionless Flow of an Ideal
Gas with Heating or Cooling
(Rayleigh Flow) 662 Answers See WileyPLUS for this material
11.9.3 Rayleigh Lines, Fanno Lines,
and Normal Shocks 666 Index I-1
1 Introduction
Learning Objectives
After completing this chapter, you should be able to:
■ list the dimensions and units of physical quantities.
■ identify the key fluid properties used in the analysis of fluid behavior.
■ calculate values for common fluid properties given appropriate information.
■ explain effects of fluid compressibility.
■ use the concepts of viscosity, vapor pressure, and surface tension.
Fluid mechanics is the discipline within the broad field of applied mechanics that is concerned with
the behavior of liquids and gases at rest or in motion. It covers a vast array of phenomena that occur
in nature (with or without human intervention), in biology, and in numerous engineered, invented,
𝓵
or manufactured situations. There are few aspects of our lives that do not involve fluids, either
directly or indirectly.
The immense range of different flow conditions is mind-boggling and strongly dependent on
p the value of the numerous parameters that describe fluid flow. Among the long list of parameters
involved are (1) the physical size of the flow, ℓ; (2) the speed of the flow, V; and (3) the pressure,
V p, as indicated in the figure in the margin for a light aircraft parachute recovery system. These are
just three of the important parameters that, along with many others, are discussed in detail in various
sections of this book. To get an inkling of the range of some of the parameter values involved and
the flow situations generated, consider the following.
(Photograph courtesy
■ Size, ℓ
of CIRRUS Design Every flow has a characteristic (or typical) length associated with it. For example, for flow
Corporation.) of fluid within pipes, the pipe diameter is a characteristic length. Pipe flows include the
flow of water in the pipes in our homes, the blood flow in our arteries and veins, and the
airflow in our bronchial tree. They also involve pipe sizes that are not within our everyday
experiences. Such examples include the flow of oil across Alaska through a 4-foot-diameter,
799-mile-long pipe and, at the other end of the size scale, the new area of interest involving
flow in nano scale pipes whose diameters are on the order of 10−8 m. Each of these pipe
flows has important characteristics that are not found in the others.
Characteristic lengths of some other flows are shown in Fig. 1.1a.
■ Speed, V
As we note from The Weather Channel, on a given day the wind speed may cover what we
think of as a wide range, from a gentle 5-mph breeze to a 100-mph hurricane or a 250-mph
1
2 Chapter 1 ■ Introduction
V1.1 Mt. tornado. However, this speed range is small compared to that of the almost imperceptible
VIDEO St. Helens flow of the fluid-like magma below the Earth’s surface that drives the continental drift
eruption motion of the tectonic plates at a speed of about 2 × 10−8 m/s or the hypersonic airflow
around a meteor as it streaks through the atmosphere at 3 × 104 m/s.
Characteristic speeds of some other flows are shown in Fig. 1.1b.
■ Pressure, p
The pressure within fluids covers an extremely wide range of values. We are accustomed
to the 35 psi (lb/in.2) pressure within our car’s tires, the “120 over 70” typical blood pres-
sure reading, or the standard 14.7 psi atmospheric pressure. However, the large 10,000 psi
pressure in the hydraulic ram of an earth mover or the tiny 2 × 10−6 psi pressure of a sound
wave generated at ordinary talking levels are not easy to comprehend.
Characteristic pressures of some other flows are shown in Fig. 1.1c.
The list of fluid mechanics applications goes on and on. But you get the point. Fluid
mechanics is a very important, practical subject that encompasses a wide variety of situations. It
is very likely that during your career as an engineer you will be involved in the analysis and
design of systems that require a good understanding of fluid mechanics. Although it is not pos-
sible to adequately cover all of the important areas of fluid mechanics within one book, it is
hoped that this introductory text will provide a sound foundation of the fundamental aspects of
fluid mechanics.
Standard atmosphere
“Excess pressure” on hand
p, lb/in.2
■ Figure 1.1 Characteristic values of some fluid flow parameters for a variety of flows: (a) object size, (b) fluid
speed, (c) fluid pressure.
1.1 Some Characteristics of Fluids 3
One of the first questions we need to explore is––what is a fluid? Or we might ask–what is the
difference between a solid and a fluid? We have a general, vague idea of the difference. A solid is
“hard” and not easily deformed, whereas a fluid is “soft” and is easily deformed (we can readily
move through air). Although quite descriptive, these casual observations of the differences between
solids and fluids are not very satisfactory from a scientific or engineering point of view. A closer
look at the molecular structure of materials reveals that matter that we commonly think of as a solid
(steel, concrete, etc.) has densely spaced molecules with large intermolecular cohesive forces that
allow the solid to maintain its shape, and to not be easily deformed. However, for matter that we
normally think of as a liquid (water, oil, etc.), the molecules are spaced farther apart, the intermo-
lecular forces are smaller than for solids, and the molecules have more freedom of movement. Thus,
liquids can be easily deformed (but not easily compressed) and can be poured into containers or
forced through a tube. Gases (air, oxygen, etc.) have even greater molecular spacing and freedom
of motion with negligible cohesive intermolecular forces, and as a consequence are easily deformed
Both liquids and
gases are fluids.
(and compressed) and will completely fill the volume of any container in which they are placed.
Both liquids and gases are fluids.
F
Although the differences between solids and fluids can be explained qualitatively on the basis
of molecular structure, a more specific distinction is based on how they deform under the action of
Surface
an external load. Specifically, a fluid is defined as a substance that deforms continuously when
acted on by a shearing stress of any magnitude. A shearing stress (force per unit area) is created
whenever a tangential force acts on a surface as shown by the figure in the margin. When common
solids such as steel or other metals are acted on by a shearing stress, they will initially deform
(usually a very small deformation), but they will not continuously deform (flow). However, com-
mon fluids such as water, oil, and air satisfy the definition of a fluid—that is, they will flow when
acted on by a shearing stress. Some materials, such as slurries, tar, putty, toothpaste, and so on, are
not easily classified since they will behave as a solid if the applied shearing stress is small, but if
the stress exceeds some critical value, the substance will flow. The study of such materials is called
rheology and does not fall within the province of classical fluid mechanics. Thus, all the fluids we
will be concerned with in this text will conform to the definition of a fluid.
Although the molecular structure of fluids is important in distinguishing one fluid from
another, it is not yet practical to study the behavior of individual molecules when trying to describe
the behavior of fluids at rest or in motion. Rather, we characterize the behavior by considering the
average, or macroscopic, value of the quantity of interest, where the average is evaluated over a
small volume containing a large number of molecules. Thus, when we say that the velocity at a
certain point in a fluid is so much, we are really indicating the average velocity of the molecules in
a small volume surrounding the point. The volume is small compared with the physical dimensions
of the system of interest, but large compared with the average distance between molecules. Is this
a reasonable way to describe the behavior of a fluid? The answer is generally yes, since the spacing
between molecules is typically very small. For gases at normal pressures and temperatures, the
spacing is on the order of 10−6 mm, and for liquids it is on the order of 10−7 mm. The number of
4 Chapter 1 ■ Introduction
molecules per cubic millimeter is on the order of 10 18 for gases and 10 21 for liquids. It is thus clear
that the number of molecules in a very tiny volume is huge and the idea of using average values
taken over this volume is certainly reasonable. We thus assume that all the fluid characteristics we
are interested in (pressure, velocity, etc.) vary continuously throughout the fluid—that is, we treat
the fluid as a continuum and we refer to the very small volume as a point in the flow. This concept
will certainly be valid for all the circumstances considered in this text. One area of fluid mechanics
for which the continuum concept breaks down is in the study of rarefied gases such as would be
encountered at very high altitudes. In this case the spacing between air molecules can become large
and the continuum concept is no longer acceptable.
Since in our study of fluid mechanics we will be dealing with a variety of fluid characteristics, it
is necessary to develop a system for describing these characteristics both qualitatively and quan-
titatively. The qualitative aspect serves to identify the nature, or type, of the characteristics (such
as length, time, stress, and velocity), whereas the quantitative aspect provides a numerical mea-
sure of the characteristics. The quantitative description requires both a number and a standard by
which various quantities can be compared. A standard for length might be a meter or foot, for
Fluid characteris- time an hour or second, and for mass a slug or kilogram. Such standards are called units, and
tics can be several systems of units are in common use as described in the following section. The qualitative
described description is conveniently given in terms of certain primary quantities, such as length, L, time,
qualitatively in T, mass, M, and temperature, ϴ. These primary quantities can then be used to provide a qualita-
terms of certain tive description of any other secondary quantity: for example, area ≐ L 2, velocity ≐ LT −1,
basic quantities
density ≐ ML−3, and so on, where the symbol ≐ is used to indicate the dimensions of the
such as length,
secondary quantity in terms of the primary quantities. Thus, to describe qualitatively a velocity,
time, and mass.
V, we would write
V ≐ LT −1
and say that “the dimensions of a velocity equal length divided by time.” The primary quantities are
also referred to as basic dimensions.
For a wide variety of problems involving fluid mechanics, only the three basic dimensions, L,
T, and M are required. Alternatively, L, T, and F could be used, where F is the basic dimensions of
force. Since Newton’s law states that force is equal to mass times acceleration, it follows that
F ≐ MLT −2 or M ≐ FL−1 T 2. Thus, secondary quantities expressed in terms of M can be expressed
in terms of F through the relationship above. For example, stress, σ, is a force per unit area, so that
σ ≐ FL−2, but an equivalent dimensional equation is σ ≐ ML−1T −2. Table 1.1 provides a list of
dimensions for a number of common physical quantities.
All theoretically derived equations are dimensionally homogeneous—that is, the dimensions
of the left side of the equation must be the same as those on the right side, and all additive separate
terms must have the same dimensions. We accept as a fundamental premise that all equations
describing physical phenomena must be dimensionally homogeneous. If this were not true, we
would be attempting to equate or add unlike physical quantities, which would not make sense. For
example, the equation for the velocity, V, of a uniformly accelerated body is
V = V0 + at (1.1)
where V0 is the initial velocity, a the acceleration, and t the time interval. In terms of dimensions
the equation is
LT −1 ≐ LT −1 + LT −2T
and thus Eq. 1.1 is dimensionally homogeneous.
Some equations that are known to be valid contain constants having dimensions. The equation
for the distance, d, traveled by a freely falling body can be written as
d = 16.1t 2 (1.2)
1.2 Dimensions, Dimensional Homogeneity, and Units 5
■ Table 1.1
Dimensions Associated with Common Physical Quantities
and a check of the dimensions reveals that the constant must have the dimensions of LT −2 if the
equation is to be dimensionally homogeneous. Actually, Eq. 1.2 is a special form of the well-known
equation from physics for freely falling bodies,
gt 2
d= (1.3)
2
in which g is the acceleration of gravity. Equation 1.3 is dimensionally homogeneous and valid in
any system of units. For g = 32.2 fts2 the equation reduces to Eq. 1.2 and thus Eq. 1.2 is valid
only for the system of units using feet and seconds. Equations that are restricted to a particular
system of units can be denoted as restricted homogeneous equations, as opposed to equations valid
General homoge- in any system of units, which are general homogeneous equations. The preceding discussion indi-
neous equations cates one rather elementary, but important, use of the concept of dimensions: the determination of
are valid in any
one aspect of the generality of a given equation simply based on a consideration of the dimensions
system of units.
of the various terms in the equation. The concept of dimensions also forms the basis for the powerful
tool of dimensional analysis, which is considered in detail in Chapter 7.
Note to the users of this text. All of the examples in the text use a consistent problem-
solving methodology, which is similar to that in other engineering courses such as statics. Each
example highlights the key elements of analysis: Given, Find, Solution, and Comment.
The Given and Find are steps that ensure the user understands what is being asked in the
problem and explicitly list the items provided to help solve the problem.
The Solution step is where the equations needed to solve the problem are formulated and the
problem is actually solved. In this step, there are typically several other tasks that help to set up the
solution and are required to solve the problem. The first is a drawing of the problem; where appro-
priate, it is always helpful to draw a sketch of the problem. Here the relevant geometry and coordi-
nate system to be used as well as features such as control volumes, forces and pressures, velocities,
and mass flow rates are included. This helps in gaining an understanding of the problem. Making
appropriate assumptions to solve the problem is the second task. In a realistic engineering problem-
solving environment, the necessary assumptions are developed as an integral part of the solution
process. Assumptions can provide appropriate simplifications or offer useful constraints, both of
6 Chapter 1 ■ Introduction
which can help in solving the problem. Throughout the examples in this text, the necessary assump-
tions are embedded within the Solution step, as they are in solving a real-world problem. This
provides a realistic problem-solving experience.
The final element in the methodology is the Comment. For the examples in the text, this
section is used to provide further insight into the problem or the solution. It can also be a point in
the analysis at which certain questions are posed. For example: Is the answer reasonable, and does
it make physical sense? Are the final units correct? If a certain parameter were changed, how would
the answer change? Adopting this type of methodology will aid in the development of problem-
solving skills for fluid mechanics, as well as other engineering disciplines.
(a) (b)
quantities (force, mass, time, and temperature). There are several systems of units in use, and we
shall consider three systems that are commonly used in engineering.
International System (SI). In 1960 the Eleventh General Conference on Weights and
Measures, the international organization responsible for maintaining precise uniform standards of
measurements, formally adopted the International System of Units as the international standard.
This system, commonly termed SI, has been widely adopted worldwide and is widely used
(although certainly not exclusively) in the United States. It is expected that the long-term trend will
be for all countries to accept SI as the accepted standard and it is imperative that engineering stu-
dents become familiar with this system. In SI the unit of length is the meter (m), the time unit is the
second (s), the mass unit is the kilogram (kg), and the temperature unit is the kelvin (K). Note that
there is no degree symbol used when expressing a temperature in kelvin units. The kelvin tempera-
ture scale is an absolute scale and is related to the Celsius (centigrade) scale (°C) through the
relationship
K = °C + 273.15
Although the Celsius scale is not in itself part of SI, it is common practice to specify temperatures
in degrees Celsius when using SI units.
The force unit, called the newton (N), is defined from Newton’s second law as
1 N = (1 kg)(1 m s2 )
Thus, a 1-N force acting on a 1-kg mass will give the mass an acceleration of 1 ms2. Standard
In mechanics it is
gravity in SI is 9.807 ms2 (commonly approximated as 9.81 ms2) so that a 1-kg mass weighs 9.81 N
very important to
distinguish between under standard gravity. Note that weight and mass are different, both qualitatively and quantita-
weight and mass. tively! The unit of work in SI is the joule (J), which is the work done when the point of application
of a 1-N force is displaced through a 1-m distance in the direction of a force. Thus,
1J=1N∙m
The unit of power is the watt (W) defined as a joule per second. Thus,
1 W = 1 Js = 1 N ∙ ms
Prefixes for forming multiples and fractions of SI units are given in Table 1.2. For example,
the notation kN would be read as “kilonewtons” and stands for 103 N. Similarly, mm would be read
as “millimeters” and stands for 10−3 m. The centimeter is not an accepted unit of length in the SI
system, so for most problems in fluid mechanics in which SI units are used, lengths will be
expressed in millimeters or meters.
British Gravitational (BG) System. In the BG system the unit of length is the foot (ft), the
time unit is the second (s), the force unit is the pound (lb), and the temperature unit is the degree
Fahrenheit (°F) or the absolute temperature unit is the degree Rankine (°R), where
°R = °F + 459.67
■ Table 1.2
Prefixes for SI Units
The mass unit, called the slug, is defined from Newton’s second law (force = mass × acceleration)
as
1 lb = (1 slug)(1 ft s2 )
This relationship indicates that a 1-lb force acting on a mass of 1 slug will give the mass an accel-
eration of 1 fts2.
Two systems of units The weight, 𝒲 (which is the force due to gravity, g), of a mass, m, is given by the equation
that are widely
𝒲 = mg
used in engineering
are the British and in BG units
Gravitational
(BG) System and 𝒲(lb) = m (slugs) g(fts2 )
the International
Since Earth’s standard gravity is taken as g = 32.174 fts2 (commonly approximated as 32.2 fts2 ),
System (SI).
it follows that a mass of 1 slug weighs 32.2 lb under standard gravity.
English Engineering (EE) System. In the EE system, units for force and mass are defined
independently; thus special care must be exercised when using this system in conjunction with
Newton’s second law. The basic unit of mass is the pound mass (lbm), and the unit of force is the
pound (lb).1 The unit of length is the foot (ft), the unit of time is the second (s), and the absolute
temperature scale is the degree Rankine (°R). To make the equation expressing Newton’s second
law dimensionally homogeneous we write it as
ma
F= (1.4)
gc
where gc is a constant of proportionality, which allows us to define units for both force and mass.
For the BG system, only the force unit was prescribed and the mass unit defined in a consistent
manner such that gc = 1. Similarly, for SI the mass unit was prescribed and the force unit defined
in a consistent manner such that gc = 1. For the EE system, a 1-lb force is defined as that force
which gives a 1 lbm a standard acceleration of gravity, which is taken as 32.174 fts2. Thus, for
Eq. 1.4 to be both numerically and dimensionally correct
(1 lbm) (32.174 fts2 )
1 lb =
gc
so that
(1 lbm) (32.174 fts2 )
gc =
(1 lb)
1
It is also common practice to use the notation, lbf, to indicate pound force.
1.2 Dimensions, Dimensional Homogeneity, and Units 9
ft
m kg slug N
lbm lb
2
0.04
1 0.02
With the EE system, weight and mass are related through the equation
mg
𝒲=
gc
where g is the local acceleration of gravity. Under conditions of standard gravity (g = gc ) the
weight in pounds and the mass in pound mass are numerically equal. Also, since a 1-lb force gives
a mass of 1 lbm an acceleration of 32.174 ft s2 and a mass of 1 slug an acceleration of 1 ft s2, it
follows that
When solving We cannot overemphasize the importance of paying close attention to units when solving
problems it is problems. It is very easy to introduce huge errors into problem solutions through the use of incor-
important to use a rect units. Get in the habit of using a consistent system of units throughout a given solution. It
consistent system really makes no difference which system you use as long as you are consistent; for example, don’t
of units, e.g., don’t mix slugs and newtons. If problem data are specified in SI units, then use SI units throughout the
mix BG and SI solution. If the data are specified in BG units, then use BG units throughout the solution. The rela-
units. tive sizes of the SI, BG, and EE units of length, mass, and force are shown in Fig. 1.2.
Extensive tables of conversion factors between unit systems, and within unit systems, are
provided in Appendix E. For your convenience, abbreviated tables of conversion factors for
some quantities commonly encountered in fluid mechanics are presented in Tables 1.3 and 1.4
on the inside back cover (using a slightly different format than Appendix E). Note that numbers
in these tables are presented in computer exponential notation. For example, the number 5.154 E+2
is the number 5.154×102 in scientific notation. You should note that each conversion factor
can be thought of as a fraction in which the numerator and denominator are equivalent. For
example, an entry for “Length” from Table 1.4 instructs the user “To convert from … m … to
… ft … Multiply by 3.281.” Therefore 1 m is the same length as 3.281 ft. Therefore a fraction
formed with a numerator of 1 m and a denominator of 3.281 ft is the very definition of a fraction
with a value of one, as is its reciprocal. This may seem obvious when the units of the denomina-
tor and numerator are of the same dimension. It is equally true for the more complicated conver-
sion factors that include multiple dimensions and therefore a greater number of units. You
already know that you can multiply any quantity by one without changing its value. Likewise,
you can multiply (or divide) any quantity by any conversion factor in the tables, provided you
use both the number and the units. The result will not be incorrect, even if it does not yield the
result you hoped for.
10 Chapter 1 ■ Introduction
SOLUTION
𝒲
a COMMENT As you work through a large variety of problems
in this text, you will find that units play an essential role in
arriving at a numerical answer. Be careful! It is easy to mix units
and cause large errors. If in the above example the acceleration
Ff had been left as 15 fts2 with m and g expressed in SI units, we
would have calculated the force as 893 N and the answer would
■ Figure E1.2b have been 72% too large!
The study of fluid mechanics involves the same fundamental laws you have encountered in physics
and other mechanics courses. These laws include Newton’s laws of motion, conservation of mass,
and the first and second laws of thermodynamics. Thus, there are strong similarities between the
general approach to fluid mechanics and to rigid-body and deformable-body solid mechanics. This
is indeed helpful since many of the concepts and techniques of analysis used in fluid mechanics will
be ones you have encountered before in other courses.
The broad subject of fluid mechanics can be generally subdivided into fluid statics, in which
the fluid is at rest, and fluid dynamics, in which the fluid is moving. In the following chapters we
will consider both of these areas in detail. Before we can proceed, however, it will be necessary to
define and discuss certain fluid properties that are intimately related to fluid behavior. It is obvious
that different fluids can have grossly different characteristics. For example, gases are light and
compressible, whereas liquids are heavy (by comparison) and relatively incompressible. A syrup
flows slowly from a container, but water flows rapidly when poured from the same container. To
quantify these differences, certain fluid properties are used. In the following several sections, prop-
erties that play an important role in the analysis of fluid behavior are considered.
1.4.1 Density
The density of a The density of a fluid, designated by the Greek symbol ρ (rho), is defined as its mass per unit
fluid is defined as volume. Density is typically used to characterize the mass of a fluid system. In the BG system, ρ
its mass per unit has units of slugsft3 and in SI the units are kgm3.
volume. The value of density can vary widely between different fluids, but for liquids, variations in
pressure and temperature generally have only a small effect on the value of ρ. The small change in
the density of water with large variations in temperature is illustrated in Fig. 1.3. Tables 1.5 and 1.6
list values of density for several common liquids. The density of water at 60 °F is 1.94 slugsft3 or
999 kgm3. The large numerical difference between those two values illustrates the importance of
paying attention to units! Unlike liquids, the density of a gas is strongly influenced by both pressure
and temperature, and this difference will be discussed in the next section.
The specific volume, υ, is the volume per unit mass and is therefore the reciprocal of the
density—that is,
1
υ= (1.5)
ρ
This property is not commonly used in fluid mechanics but is used in thermodynamics.
1000
990
@ 4°C ρ = 1000 kg/m3
Density, ρ kg/m3
980
970
960
950
0 20 40 60 80 100
Temperature, °C
Gases are highly compressible in comparison to liquids, with changes in gas density directly related
to changes in pressure and temperature through the equation
p
ρ=
RT
or, in the more standard form,
p = ρRT, (1.8)
where p is the absolute pressure, ρ the density, T the absolute temperature,2 and R is a gas constant.
Equation 1.8 is commonly termed the ideal or perfect gas law, or the equation of state for an ideal
In the ideal gas gas. It is known to closely approximate the behavior of real gases under typical conditions when the
law, absolute gases are not approaching liquefaction.
pressures and Pressure in a fluid at rest is defined as the normal force per unit area exerted on a plane
temperatures must
surface (real or imaginary) immersed in a fluid and is created by the bombardment of the surface
be used.
with the fluid molecules. From the definition, pressure has the dimension of FL−2 and in BG units
2
We will use T to represent temperature in thermodynamic relationships although T is also used to denote the basic dimension of time.
1.5 Ideal Gas Law 13
is expressed as lbft2 (psf) or lbin.2 (psi) and in SI units as Nm2. In SI, 1 Nm2 defined as a
44.7 30 pascal, abbreviated as Pa, and pressures are commonly specified in pascals. The pressure in the
ideal gas law must be expressed as an absolute pressure, denoted (abs), which means that it is
measured relative to absolute zero pressure (a pressure that would only occur in a perfect vacuum).
Standard sea-level atmospheric pressure (by international agreement) is 14.696 psi (abs) or 101.33
kPa (abs). For most calculations these pressures can be rounded to 14.7 psi and 101 kPa, respec-
tively. In engineering it is common practice to measure pressure relative to the local atmospheric
14.7 0 pressure, and when measured in this fashion it is called gage pressure. Thus, the absolute pressure
can be obtained from the gage pressure by adding the value of the atmospheric pressure. For
example, as shown by the figure in the margin, a pressure of 30 psi (gage) in a tire is equal to
0 –14.7
(abs) (gage) 44.7 psi (abs) at standard atmospheric pressure. Pressure is a particularly important fluid character-
p, psi istic and it will be discussed more fully in the next chapter.
SOLUTION
The air density can be obtained from the ideal gas law (Eq. 1.8)
p
ρ=
RT
so that
(50 lbin.2 + 14.7 lbin.2 ) (144 in.2ft2 )
ρ=
(1716 ft ∙ lbslug ∙ °R)[(70 + 460)°R]
= 0.0102 slugs/ft3 (Ans)
Note that both the pressure and temperature were changed to
absolute values.
The weight, 𝒲, of the air is equal to
𝒲 = ρg × (volume) ■ Figure E1.3a (Photograph courtesy of Jenny
= (0.0102 slugft3 ) (32.2 fts2 ) (0.84 ft3 ) Products, Inc.)
= 0.276 slug ∙ ft/s2
(50 psi, 0.276 lb) of the pressure, p, the results shown in Fig. E1.3b are obtained.
0.2 Note that doubling the gage pressure does not double the amount
of air in the tank, but doubling the absolute pressure does. Thus,
0.1 a scuba diving tank at a gage pressure of 100 psi does not contain
twice the amount of air as when the gage reads 50 psi.
0
–20 0 20 40 60 80 100
p, psi
■ Figure E1.3b
14 Chapter 1 ■ Introduction
The gas constant, R, which appears in Eq. 1.8, depends on the particular gas and is related to
the molecular weight of the gas. Values of the gas constant for several common gases are listed in
Tables 1.7 and 1.8. Also in these tables the gas density and specific weight are given for standard
atmospheric pressure and gravity and for the temperature listed. More complete tables for air at
standard atmospheric pressure can be found in Appendix B (Tables B.3 and B.4).
1.6 Viscosity
V1.3 Viscous The properties of density and specific weight are measures of the “heaviness” of a fluid. It is clear, how-
VIDEO fluids ever, that these properties are not sufficient to uniquely characterize how fluids behave since two fluids
(such as water and oil) can have approximately the same value of density but behave quite differently
when flowing. Apparently, some additional property is needed to describe the “fluidity” of the fluid.
To determine this additional property, consider a hypothetical experiment in which a mate-
rial is placed between two very wide parallel plates as shown in Fig. 1.4a. The bottom plate is
rigidly fixed, but the upper plate is free to move. If a solid, such as steel, were placed between the
two plates and loaded with the force P as shown, the top plate would be displaced through some
small distance, δa (assuming the solid was mechanically attached to the plates). The vertical line
V1.4 No-slip AB would be rotated through the small angle, δβ, to the new position AB′. We note that to resist
VIDEO condition the applied force, P, a shearing stress, τ, would be developed at the plate–material interface, and for
equilibrium to occur, P = τA where A is the effective upper plate area (Fig. 1.4b). It is well known
that for elastic solids, such as steel, the small angular displacement, δβ (called the shearing strain),
is proportional to the shearing stress, τ, that is developed in the material.
Real fluids, even
though they may
What happens if the solid is replaced with a fluid such as water? We would immediately notice
be moving, always a major difference. When the force P is applied to the upper plate, it will move continuously with a
“stick” to the solid velocity, U (after the initial transient motion has died out) as illustrated in Fig. 1.5. This behavior is
boundaries that consistent with the definition of a fluid—that is, if a shearing stress is applied to a fluid it will deform
contain them. continuously. A closer inspection of the fluid motion between the two plates would reveal that the
fluid in contact with the upper plate moves with the plate velocity, U, and the fluid in contact with
the bottom fixed plate has a zero velocity. The fluid between the two plates moves with velocity
u = u (y) that would be found to vary linearly, u = Uyb, as illustrated in Fig. 1.5. Thus, a velocity
gradient, dudy, is developed in the fluid between the plates. In this particular case the velocity
gradient is a constant since dudy = Ub, but in more complex flow situations, such as that shown
by the photograph in the margin, this is not true. The experimental observation that the fluid “sticks”
to the solid boundaries is a very important one in fluid mechanics and is usually referred to as the
no-slip condition. All fluids, both liquids and gases, satisfy this condition for typical flows.
δa
P P
B B' τA
U δa
P
B B'
u
b
y
y u = u(y) In a small time increment, δt, an imaginary vertical line AB in the fluid would rotate through
an angle, δβ, so that
u = 0 on surface δa
δβ ≈ tan δβ =
b
Solid body Since δa = U δt, it follows that
U δt
δβ =
b
We note that in this case, δβ is a function not only of the force P (which governs U) but also of
time. Thus, it is not reasonable to attempt to relate the shearing stress, τ, to δβ as is done for
solids. Rather, we consider the rate at which δβ is changing and define the rate of shearing
strain, γ̇, as
δβ
γ̇ = lim
δt→0 δt
which in this instance is equal to
U du
γ̇ = =
b dy
A continuation of this experiment would reveal that as the shearing stress, τ, is increased by
increasing P (recall that τ = P/A), the rate of shearing strain is increased in direct proportion—
that is,
τ ∝ γ̇
or
du
τ∝
dy
V1.5 This result indicates that for common fluids such as water, oil, gasoline, and air the shearing stress
VIDEO Capillary tube and rate of shearing strain (velocity gradient) can be related with a relationship of the form
viscometer
du
τ=μ (1.9)
dy
where the constant of proportionality is designated by the Greek symbol μ (mu) and is called the
absolute viscosity, dynamic viscosity, or simply the viscosity of the fluid. In accordance with
Eq. 1.9, plots of τ versus dudy should be linear with the slope equal to the viscosity as illustrated
in Fig. 1.6. The actual value of the viscosity depends on the particular fluid, and for a particular
fluid the viscosity is also highly dependent on temperature as illustrated in Fig. 1.6 with the two
Dynamic viscosity curves for water. Fluids for which the shearing stress is linearly related to the rate of shearing strain
is the fluid property (also referred to as the rate of angular deformation) are designated as Newtonian fluids after Isaac
that relates Newton (1642–1727). Fortunately, most common fluids, both liquids and gases, are Newtonian. A
shearing stress and more general formulation of Eq. 1.9 which applies to more complex flows of Newtonian fluids is
fluid motion. given in Section 6.8.1.
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.