Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Ebook PDF)
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/a-world-full-of-women-6th-edition-ebook-pdf/
A World Full of Women
This page intentionally left blank
Sixth Edition
Martha Ward
University of New Orleans
Monica Edelstein
University of New Orleans
First published 2014, 2009, 2006 by Pearson Education, Inc.
Copy right © 2014, 2009, 2006 Taylor & Francis. All rights reserved.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in
any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter
invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or
retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Notice:
Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are
used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Credits and acknowledgments borrowed from other sources and reproduced, with permission,
in this textbook appear on appropriate page within text.
Preface xiii
INTRODUCTION 1
A World Full of Women 2
Old Words and New Realities 3
Where We’re Coming From 4
Where to Begin and What Follows 8
Gender, “Nature,” and Culture 9
Cultural Code Switching 11
Talking Troubles and Carrying Conversations 12
Loss and Lamentation 14
What Do You Think? 15
Some Books That Changed Our Lives 15
vii
viii Contents
Glossary 238
Bibliography 248
Index 260
PREFACE
A World Full of Women, Sixth Edition, addresses the lived experiences of women throughout the globe.
The text combines descriptive ethnography with gender theory and international statistics to present a com-
prehensive picture of the lives of women in societies and cultures both present and past. The ethnographic
and chronological depth of the text offers students the opportunity to better comprehend and contextualize
women’s issues and experiences in today’s world. World Full of Women, sixth edition, addresses a broad
range of topics, including the multifaceted experiences of work in a globalizing world; the bodily and ritual
experiences of the life cycle and healing; sexuality and the construction and performance of gender; fam-
ily structures and cross-cultural marriage practices; social and political organization, accommodation, and
resistance; and the complexities of exploitation and physical abuse, as well as women’s own forms of power,
authority, and agency.
xiii
xiv Preface
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to offer our gratitude to those who have generously reviewed World Full of Women: Sharla
Blank, Washburn University; Jessica Bodoh-Creed, California State University, Los Angeles; Diana Fox,
Bridgewater State College; and Sarah Orndorff, George Washington University. Your input has been invalu-
able in guiding the direction of this text. We are incredibly thankful to our editor at Pearson, Nancy Roberts,
for supporting and encouraging the continued growth of this work. We would also like to thank Renee
Eckhoff and Jennifer Jacobson of Ohlinger Publishing Services for their editorial care in bringing this edition
to publication.
Martha Ward &
Monica Edelstein
Introduction
I still haven’t approached the subject—and it’s perhaps a very long subject—of
women in Guatemala. We have to put them into categories, anyway: working-
class women, peasant women, poor ladino women, and bourgeois women. There
is something important about women in Guatemala, especially Indian women,
and that something is her relationship with the earth—between the earth and the
mother. The earth gives food and the woman gives life. Because of this closeness
the woman must keep this respect for the earth as a secret of her own. The rela-
tionship between the mother and the earth is like the relationship between hus-
band and wife. There is a constant dialogue between the earth and the woman.
This feeling is born in women because of the responsibilities they have, which
men do not have.
That is how I’ve been able to analyze my specific task in the organ-
isation. I realize that many compañeros, who are revolutionaries and good
compañeros, never lose the feeling that their views are better than those of
any women in charge of them. Of course, we mustn’t dismiss the great value
1
2 Introduction
of those compañeros, but we can’t let them do just whatever they like. I have
a responsibility, I am in charge, and they must accept me for what I am.
(Menchú 1984:220)
Rigoberta Menchú Tum’s story will bring you to tears. In her life, she has been
both powerful and powerless, challenged and challenger. At times, her identity and de-
sires as a woman conflicted with her drive to fight. In other ways, being a woman fu-
eled her response. In 1992, she was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. A woman who has
achieved an atypical measure of international influence, she nevertheless represents the
struggles and strengths of many women the world over. Her life and words mirror many
of the themes and experiences we will cover throughout A World Full of Women.
“civilizations.” This social science coincided with the rise of colonial empires through-
out the world and what everyone perceived as an enormous rate of social and cultural
change. The subject matter of anthropology seemed to be disappearing rapidly. Anthro-
pologists tended, therefore, to take an odd view of time and space; we spoke of before
contact with the West and after contact with the West.
Anthropology grew out of the European and specifically the Victorian worldview,
in which women were “naturally” subordinate, inferior, and taken for granted. It had a
clear masculine bias. With a few dramatic exceptions, much of the research tended to ig-
nore, misinterpret, or trivialize the lives of women: When people believed that “women’s
place was in the home,” they could not see much else. So women were invisible. And
the best strategies of survival probably did not involve drawing themselves to anyone’s
attention. So much of women’s lives in our own and in other cultures have been hidden.
Many traditional anthropologists only saw women in the role they were believed to be
playing right here at home: supporting and nurturing men, dutifully following orders, work-
ing at home raising children, gossiping, preparing food, and so forth. They did not even see
women in other roles: women whose deepest emotional relationships were with each other;
middle-aged women who came into their power so easily that no one noticed they were in
charge; married women who supported husbands and children but who could not claim the
tributes of that labor; women who cooked or cured but were never addressed as chef or doc-
tor; women who both mothered and fathered, and who, denied formal access, found radical,
resistive, and restorative private routes to sensuality, spirituality, artistry, or professionalism.
of being a citizen of the planet, connected or tied to women regardless of our cultural
differences. At the same time, I want to honor those cultural differences.
A number of terms or words are used for women’s condition in the world: sexism,
patriarchy, sex or gender stratification, sexual asymmetry, male dominance, female sub-
ordination, gender segregation, paternalism or paternalistic dominance, and women’s
oppression. The meanings are clear. They indicate a form of social inequality based
on gender; we know these conditions vary in intensity from place to place and time to
time in complex ways. I am not using these terms in any technical or cleverly theoreti-
cal sense. I’m not even going to argue that these phenomena really exist. They just do.
We also have a set of terms to describe our goals and hopes for changing these
conditions. We speak of feminism, feminist consciousness, women’s rights, women’s
movements, women’s emancipation, consciousness-raising, and women’s liberation. A
great many books and articles, some of which I included in the bibliography, throw light
on these concepts. However we use these terms, we are speaking out about awareness,
our sense of working together, and our shared commitment to alternative visions of the
future.
These themes will cross and crisscross in many complex ways. I have found it
impossible to find words, labels, or terms that will please everyone in every context. The
glossary includes terms used in the text, with some interpretations.
to admit me because my husband was a graduate student and their blanks could not be
stretched to include me as head of household. Click. I could not get credit in my own
name, and under the head and master laws in Louisiana could not own property under
any name or vote in my “maiden” name. Click. My husband said, “I like the dessert my
sister served us. Get the recipe for it.” My brothers said, “While you’re up, get me the
mayonnaise.” Click. I realized I would protect my daughter with my life; that meant I
had to take care of myself first. Click. A well-loved relative revealed the sexual abuse
her father had hoped to conceal. CLICK. A pregnant friend was beaten by her husband
and the baby died. CLICK. Friends, relatives, and students were raped, stalked, beaten,
and battered. CLICK. CLICK.
When the fourth edition of this book came out, I believed that the trajectory of my
life was set and major decisions made. I was wrong. Hurricane Katrina in August 2005
lifted up the people of my beloved city and threw us to the ground. When and wherever
we landed, whatever losses we endured collectively and individually, we were changed
at a cellular level.
Prior to the storm I entered into a conditional dance of courtship with a bilingual,
multicultural man raised in Panama, of Asian parents, a former student radical and car-
penter turned banker. Frank had never married but wanted to “find someone to share the
rest of my life with.” Both of us had raised one child to successful adulthood; we had
established careers. Each of our mothers had recently died. We shared the social riches
and myriad troubles of New Orleans—decades of interlocking community networks and
friendships across racial, sexual, and class boundaries. But I was not ready to live with
anyone again, however special.
By the time Hurricane Katrina struck, Frank had tricked me into evacuating—
whatever possessed me to believe I could survive hot flashes with no air-conditioning,
much less the floods and breakdowns of civil life, I’ll never know. I credit him
with saving my life. On the second evening of our terrifying exile, we watched his
house—and all his bachelor furniture—drown on television. Lives can change in
an instant—CLICK. At that moment, I decided to spend the rest of my life with
this man, knowing in every pore of my body that we were going to make living
together—a life together—work.
Frank and I sheltered in Houston for six weeks with my veterinarian daughter, my
ex-husband who was receiving cancer treatments, his ailing wife, and their two teenag-
ers. Disasters have an interesting way of reorganizing households. The best part of a
terrible time was being together and counting our blessings. We lost two houses out of
three, most of our social networks, and faith in the government to protect and help its
citizens. During this time of surreal adventure, shock and loss, Frank and I committed to
the rebuilding of New Orleans and to each other. When we returned to our stricken city,
my intact house became an ark—full of survivors, refugees, and pots of soup.
Six weeks after Katrina, the University of New Orleans reopened in a parking lot
on high ground in another parish. The campus itself, like all other colleges and universi-
ties in New Orleans, had been badly damaged in the flood and winds. Of the Women’s
Center and Women’s Studies Programs my colleagues and I struggled to build for three
decades, only tiny fragments remain. The few of us left do not have the time or energy
to rebuild what we had and have lost forever. The feminist theories I learned in more
youthful times have not been helpful or enlightening in the new world we face here—
although women’s time-honored ways of survival have.
6 Introduction
In February 2007, a year and a half after Katrina, a huge and unseasonal tornado
yanked Frank and me out of bed, jerked off his socks, and hung a cypress beam a foot
above my head. It shattered the house we were turning into a refuge and shared home.
To spit in the face of climate change and affirm love in a still-suffering city, we planned a
true New Orleans family–community celebration, inviting hundreds of friends and rela-
tives. On the first day of the 2007 hurricane season, we married amid the wreckage of
city and household. As my daughter, Marlowe, says, “My mother got married at age 23,
divorced at 43, and fell in love at 63.” That same month, feeling the urgent call to home
and her own CLICKS, she moved back to New Orleans, went to work in a veterinary
clinic housed in double-wide trailers, bought a house, and found a wonderful husband
on match.com.
Six years post-Katrina, I retired after forty-two years of teaching. Now I weave;
I have a Dutch loom, a Japanese one, a Canadian one, and have just ordered another
American-made one. I weave within the many traditions of women’s handwork around
the planet and feel connected to them through time and space. In this book you will
notice many examples, including the patterning at the edges of each page, of the work
of women’s hands in artistic and artisanal crafts.
Meanwhile, like so many women of her generation and for the usual reasons, my
daughter, Marlowe, had postponed childbearing until her late thirties. I worried that
the goal for this stage of my life—to be a grandmother—was also the one I had no
control over whatsoever. So when Monica and I first emphasized the pain of infertility
and the “Do Anything” principle in Chapter 3, we had no idea that my family would
soon embark on our own “pregnancy pilgrimages”—miscarriages, journeys to medical
centers, failures, tests, drugs, acupuncture, and three rounds of assisted reproduction.
Although my daughter, her husband, and I had to learn much about the science of repro-
duction in our time, we also trusted the accumulated wisdom of women’s experiences
around the planet. Do what it takes—appeal to the spirits, pray, bargain, promise, honor.
Make charms and amulets; wear orange—I wove her a special pregnancy scarf in that
color and she built a home altar.
Between in-vitro fertilization and powerful female magic, Marlowe achieved
motherhood, and I have a much-desired granddaughter. Soon after her birth, baby Row-
an, her parents, Frank and I bought two houses side-by-side in an old New Orleans
neighborhood. He and I plan to age-in-place all together in a matrifocal compound like
the ones you will read about in this book. Life is good.
Monica says of herself: I grew up in an upper-middle-class neighborhood in New
Jersey, granddaughter to Jewish immigrants who fled persecution in Eastern Europe in
the early part of the twentieth century. As an undergraduate at Vassar College in the late
1980s, I studied anthropology and astronomy and enrolled in my first Women’s Stud-
ies course. We—women (and a few men) of different ethnicities, religions, economic
classes, sexual orientations, and ages—sat in a circle and discussed our own experi-
ences, Simone DeBeauvoir and Rigoberta Menchú. Glimpsing other women’s worlds
changed our lives. We were moved to sympathize with each other and with women we’d
never met. Many of us took these feelings further into action through various protests
and volunteer projects. It prodded me further toward the work I would eventually do.
After college, I worked for the Association of Community Organizations for
Reform Now (ACORN), first in Dallas and then in New Orleans. My job was to assist
low-income people in developing their own grassroots community organizations that
Introduction 7
would eventually fight for housing and banking rights, among other local issues. I also
helped develop radio and television programs designed to assist in these grassroots ef-
forts. It remains one of the most meaningful experiences in my life. During this time,
I volunteered with ACT-UP, an organization fighting for the rights of people with HIV
and AIDS, and participated in clinic defense actions to protect women’s abilities to seek
abortions and other reproductive medical care.
In 1995, I entered the graduate program in anthropology at Tulane University.
While working towards my Ph.D., I began teaching courses in cultural anthropology
and gender at Tulane. In the late 1990s, I went to Israel to conduct fieldwork among
Ethiopian immigrants and their traditional healing practices, particularly spirit posses-
sion. The women I worked with taught me about resilience, healing, survival, and strug-
gle. They lived with painful memories and difficult social and economic realities. They
sought solace in their families and traditions. Many looked toward the future.
After I completed my doctorate, I married and eventually had two amazing
daughters. Motherhood opened my eyes to the world in an entirely new way. Sudden-
ly, things I had been studying made sense—my dissertation, child language acquisi-
tion, birth and menstrual rituals, miscarriage and pregnancy, paid and unpaid work,
responsibility and spirituality, being a being in this world.
I thought I was firmly on the “mommy-track” when I met Martha Ward at a wed-
ding of mutual friends in 2004. A month later, I was teaching anthropology again, this
time at the University of New Orleans. By the start of 2005, Martha had invited me to
join her as co-author of A World Full of Women as it moved into its fourth edition.
When Hurricane Katrina struck in 2005, my husband, daughter, and I safely and
sadly evacuated to Baton Rouge. From there, we watched events unfold back in New
Orleans. I wrung my hands and emailed frantically as reports of people trapped in the
city, especially the Superdome and Convention Center, flooded across the media. I
was reminded of the Sudanese refugee camps I’d heard tell of from the Ethiopian im-
migrants in Israel. Social order had collapsed; base instincts took over. Survival and
bravery mixed with death, violence, and desperation. After people started returning to
the city, I continued to hear reports of rape and violence against women that occurred
in the shelters and on the streets. I also heard men denying these things ever happened.
But we know better.
Two months later, we returned to New Orleans. Spared the rising waters, we were
members of the lucky minority who still had a relatively intact house. Communities
pulled together here in town while tens of thousands of New Orleanians remained scat-
tered and homeless throughout the country. The lights slowly came back on; stores re-
opened. People returned; people left for good. Survivors continued to search for missing
loved ones. Vague obituaries suggested suicides. Posttraumatic stress disorder surfaced
in many forms. In December, plump, green watermelons popped up all over uninhabit-
able devastated areas. Meanwhile, friends picked up hammers, killed mold, and had
babies. We were rebuilding. Living in New Orleans during this time was a mixed bag
of the depressing, hopeful, and surreal. Now in 2012, the signs of Katrina have been
pushed to the geographical edges and inner pockets of our city. There are still a few
neighborhoods that have not fully come back—those that were most violently destroyed
and where people did not have the resources to return and rebuild.
When I was in college, the “personal-is-political” issues were access to abortion,
protection from AIDS, and liberation from racism. What I hear from students these days
8 Introduction
is concern for fair treatment of people regardless of sexual orientation, legal rights for
homosexual couples, respect regardless of body type, and access to wholesome foods
whatever your income level. Meanwhile, my cohort wrestles with careers, earning a
living, relationships and marriage, and devoting time to our children. Stories of IVF,
infertility, child loss, and ailing parents color our conversations.
As much as my formal education in anthropology has informed my contribution
to this volume, so have my friendships with people from an amazing variety of back-
grounds here and abroad. I watch the lives of the men and women who were children
when I did my fieldwork unfold on Facebook. I am heartbroken by stories of friends,
gay parents denied access to their children, and awed by friends who worked so hard to
build successful careers, struggled with getting pregnant (after decades of trying hard
NOT to get pregnant), and adopted or bore children in their forties. I stand witness as
friends rebirth themselves through alternative gender identities and sexualities. I receive
wisdom from yoga teachers who expand their practice to empower abused women. For-
ever, I will be inspired by Helen Hill, a friend who was violently murdered in 2007.
Mother, activist, filmmaker, and fellow New Orleanian, she remains a symbol to me
of the powers of being a woman and the possibilities for creating a more just world
through a sustainable, everyday activism fueled by kindness and compassion. This book
is dedicated to her memory, with the hope that as we learn about the struggles women
face throughout the globe, we will work together to make the world a safer and healthier
place wherever we may be in our own lives.
Chapter 1 introduces the sphere of work. The many ways that women work in the
world have often been ignored, overlooked, or undervalued. Chapter 1 seeks to remedy
this by looking beyond industrial and postindustrial societies and including ways of
working that do not neatly fall under the rubrics of production and wage labor. Here
again, we are stressing women as active. After grounding ourselves in the concrete reali-
ties of work, Chapter 2 addresses the beginnings of the relationship between anthropolo-
gists and gender studies. The lives, works, and relationships of Margaret Mead and Ruth
Benedict set the groundwork for many of the theories that have since directed gender
and women’s studies. Where did they find the gumption to act against the gender roles
assigned them? How did their pursuits lead them to other cultures? Their research pro-
foundly questioned the naturalistic gender dichotomies of their time.
Chapter 3 addresses an essential question: What do we do with these bodies?
Biological markers identify us as women and are the platform upon which we erect
gender ideologies. While women cannot be reduced to biological entities, we do live
through our physical bodies. Chapter 3 discusses this experience of being in the flesh
and some of the ways we interpret and express this culturally. Human patterns of part-
nering are the subjects of Chapter 4. In this chapter, I present several examples of
households composed of various combinations of adults and children. Heterosexual
monogamy emerges as only one partnering option among many found throughout the
world. Chapter 5 discusses women’s power in everyday contexts, including authority
and influence based on household dynamics, kinship, and economic systems. Women’s
power surfaces in some unexpected forms amid experiences of local change, transna-
tionalism, and globalization.
Chapters 6 and 7 bring us deeper into the concept of gender as cultural construc-
tion. In Chapter 6, we look at ethnographic examples in which the worlds of women and
men are sharply divided. Chapter 7 questions the dual model of gender classification.
Several cultures lend themselves to more than two genders. What then does it mean to
be a woman in societies where man and woman are not the only clearly defined options?
Chapters 8, 9, and 10 address issues of suffering, violence, exploitation, power,
and resistance. Chapter 8 focuses on women’s experiences of suffering and healing.
Around the world women suffer from ailments that are not recognized by biomedical
systems. What makes these forms of suffering unique to women and why do they pat-
tern as physical symptoms? We will see that these afflictions occur at the junction of
medicine and religion, oppression and resistance. Chapter 9 addresses violence against
women. This violence, though varied, is systemic in a number of cultures. In the face of
battering, rape, daughter “disappearances,” and genital cutting, it is necessary to over-
come the extremes of cultural relativism and look to the voices of world women for
answers. Chapter 10 brings us back to work—this time as it connects to global systems,
quality of life, health, and human rights. Chapter 10 concludes, much as we began, with
women as warriors—fighting and struggling for rights, welfare, and survival against
military and economic powers.
and anthropologists still face some major theoretical dilemmas. As best I can determine,
there is a theoretical continuum, a standing argument, a scholarly debate over women that
runs from crude biological determinism to crude cultural determinism. Between these
ends, however, are an amazing variety of very nuanced, sophisticated, and fascinating
theories.
In the model of biological determinism, women have babies. Babies are helpless;
therefore, the little women stay at home and tend the kids. This brings in female hor-
monal changes, pregnancy, lactation, women’s preoccupation with children, and conse-
quent limited participation in public affairs, particularly war, politics, or anything that
makes lots of money. In this view (at its most unsophisticated), male dominance is more
or less inevitable. Female “nature” is more or less predictable. In the basically biology
viewpoint, the rights and duties assigned to each gender will “naturally” follow. There-
fore, the rights and duties should stay “essentially” the same. Women are essentially
“born this way.” “Essential nature” cannot be changed. The reality of dominance and
subordination can’t be questioned either. According to this theory, the deviations from
the baseline roles women were assigned in hunting cultures or in the 1950s, or whenever
it was that women did their job properly, have already damaged us psychologically, even
undermined the stability of civilization.
The other end is crude cultural determinism—bodies don’t matter. Human lives
are really assorted identities, representations, and cultural artifacts. We are the way we
were raised to be and that varies dramatically between families, cultures, and ethnic
origins. What we do and how we do it can be credited only to cultural and subcultural
differences. Women can be hunters and men can be mothers with equal facility. Every-
thing is relative (and presumably right) within a given culture’s expectations and norms.
In this view, we’re forced to swallow such customs as breaking and binding little girls’
feet in traditional Chinese history or husbands who batter their wives to death. After all,
their culture made them do it—or at least allowed it.
So how can we make women’s lives visible without falling into essentialist or
relativizing traps? How can we safely explore the dangerous topic of the differences
we hold in common? At this point, I am often accused of being what one friend called
a promiscuous heretic. The sexual revolution (for good or bad) taught me that there are
many ways to have sex or to make love, more than one position to do it in, and much to
desire. The history of wars taught me that merely to think about certain ideas is not a
reason to die for them or because of them. So I want as much freedom and flexibility in
thinking about the anthropology of women as I can get.
At points along the theoretical spectrum are those who hold the view that the
bodies, personalities, and social lives of men and women are—for an animal species—
extremely plastic. Let’s also assume there are some biological and psychological dif-
ferences between women and men. Not only do individuals have a wide range of
physical and emotional characteristics, but so do the human cultures we know about.
In this approach, people see not the similarities, but the large-scale differences in how
we sculpt our plasticity. When women began to counter the essentialist or “just doing
what comes naturally” position, we were at great pains to point out women as achiev-
ers in “nontraditional” fields: women as warriors, women carrying bricks, women
making businesses. We would say that in some societies the healers were women, in
others they were men, and in many other groups, healers were anyone with a recog-
nized gift for the work.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
DANCE ON STILTS AT THE GIRLS’ UNYAGO, NIUCHI
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.