Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Etextbook 978 1608318056 Visualdx Essential Adult Dermatology Visualdx The Modern Library of Visual Medicine
Etextbook 978 1608318056 Visualdx Essential Adult Dermatology Visualdx The Modern Library of Visual Medicine
Lindy P. Fox, MD
Assistant Professor of Clinical Dermatology
Director, Hospital Consultation Service
Department of Dermatology
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California
ASSOCIATE EDITORS:
Art Papier, MD
Associate Professor of Dermatology and Medical Informatics
Department of Dermatology
University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry
Rochester, New York
ASSISTANT EDITORS:
Ron Birnbaum, MD
Resident in Dermatology
Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Torrance, California
Daniel Miller, MD
Resident in Dermatology
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California
Priya M. Rajendran, MD
Resident in Dermatology
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California
Emma Taylor, MD
Resident in Dermatology
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
Los Angeles, California
All rights reserved. This book is protected by copyright. No part of this book
may be reproduced in any form by any means, including photocopying, or
utilized by any information storage and retrieval system without written
permission from the copyright owner, except for brief quotations embodied in
critical articles and reviews. Materials appearing in this book prepared by
individuals as part of their official duties as U.S. government employees are
not covered by the above-mentioned copyright.
Printed in China.
RL71.V57 2010
616.5—dc22
2009052719
Care has been taken to confirm the accuracy of the information presented and
to describe generally accepted practices. However, the authors, editors, and
publisher are not responsible for errors or omissions or for any consequences
from application of the information in this book and make no warranty,
expressed or implied, with respect to the currency, completeness, or accuracy
of the contents of the publication. Application of the information in a
particular situation remains the professional responsibility of the practitioner.
The authors, editors, and publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that
drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accordance with current
recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view
of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant
flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is
urged to check the package insert for each drug for any change in indications
and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly
important when the recommended agent is a new or infrequently employed
drug.
Some drugs and medical devices presented in the publication have Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance for limited use in restricted
research settings. It is the responsibility of the health care provider to
ascertain the FDA status of each drug or device planned for use in their
clinical practice.
Victor Newcomer was a legendary dermatologist and a resident of California for more than 50 years.
He was Clinical Professor of Medicine/Dermatology at the University of California, Los Angeles, for
more than 40 years. He was an esteemed and beloved educator and a mentor to physicians and students
throughout the city and state. He was strongly dedicated to his patients, to patient advocacy, and to
issues surrounding patients' rights.
Dr. Newcomer was renowned for being a superb teacher and role model for generations of
dermatologists. He was so beloved by his students that, in 1988, they established the Victor
D.Newcomer, MD Award for Excellence in Teaching. Among his other honors was the Golden Apple
Award, an annual award given to the most outstanding teacher in the UCLA medical school.
Additionally, he received Excellence in Teaching recognition from the Virginia and the California
Medical Association; the Thomas L. Stern Award for Excellence in Clinical Teaching from Santa
Monica Hospital; the J.N. Taub International Memorial Award for Psoriasis Research; the Clark W.
Finnerud Award from the Dermatology Foundation; and the Everett C. Fox, MD Memorial
Lectureship. And he is one of a select few Masters in Dermatology, awarded by the American
Academy of Dermatology.
Dr. Newcomer had a long and distinguished career and served as a member of prestigious boards,
committees, foundations, associations, societies, academies, and task forces. In addition, he published
more than 152 articles and book chapters. Passionate about medical photography, throughout his career
he used his collection of 40,000 clinical images to train residents and medical students. Many of his
excellent images are in this book.
Dr. Newcomer was a dedicated physician, a tireless and enthusiastic teacher, and a patient's best
advocate. He was a true healer, a rigorous scholar, a stoic comedian, and a student's dream. When a
medical student or a resident or a junior faculty member or a colleague or the chair of dermatology
asked Dr. Newcomer for his thoughts about a patient, they were not asking for a differential diagnosis;
they were asking for THE diagnosis. His collection of slides of patients over a long and productive
career in dermatology cataloged over half of a century in Los Angeles. He began his career at a time
when clinical diagnosis was still a fine art. Though in person he was a humble giant, through his work,
he became an institution. Over 50 years, he personally taught an enormous percentage of practicing
dermatologists in Los Angeles, using this slide collection that has since been digitized and archived. It
is only through the efforts of rigorous clinician-scientists like Dr. Newcomer that we can define the
range of dermatologic disease presentations accurately and improve the ability of doctors to recognize
variations of disease severity and quality.
Aside from dermatology, he was dedicated to conservation, preservation of water sources, wildlife, and
plants. His contributions to his patients and students and to the field of medicine were immeasurable
and speak volumes as to the quality of human being he was. Quality of excellence was the standard in
all that he did.
Humor was a close ally. Some favorite sayings were, “Always clean the manure and chicken droppings
from under your fingernails before seeing patients,” “A good remedy smells bad, is brightly colored,
and stains people's clothes,” “That's tinea corporis every day of the week, spreading across the skin like
a Santa Monica brush fire,” and “Hello, I'm Dr. Newcomer, rhymes with cucumber.”
Scenario 2:
Figure 5 In dark skin, small papules are common as well as the more typical
scaly plaques in pityriasis rosea.
Figure 6 Pityriasis rosea. In light skin, classic morphology with thin, scaly,
salmon-colored plaques; however, this patient does not have a “Christmas
tree” pattern to the lesions, which is often cited as a clue to this diagnosis.
Be sure to register for your free subscription to VisualDx online at
www.essentialdermatology.com/adult, and start accessing VisualDx to:
Develop a differential diagnosis using the data from the actual patients
being examined. This process fulfills practice-based learning goals and
allows more comprehensive and relevant differential diagnoses as you
work.
If you have an exam room computer, log in and bookmark VisualDx so
that you can quickly search for images to use for patient education and
reassurance. There is nothing like a picture to reassure a patient that a
rash is common and there is no need to worry.
Use the LearnDerm link for interactive training in dermatology exam,
morphology, and disease variation.
Review many more diagnoses and pictures.
CHAPTER 1
Is the approach to the dermatology patient any different than the approach to
a patient with a general medical problem such as hypertension, chest pain, or
a cough? Indeed. For starters, because most problems on the skin are visible,
dermatology patients, and often those around them, are acutely aware of the
problem at hand. Many times, patients seek dermatologic advice because a
family member or casual observer suggested they “get it checked out.”
Having a skin problem can be very distressing and stigmatizing. In today's
world, the role of the physician or caregiver is rapidly changing. Especially in
dermatology, many patients have already tried to self-diagnose and self-treat
using advice they have gathered from friends, family, and the Internet. Some
have even ordered prescription medications over the Internet. Thus, many
patients have a different type of anxiety about the problem than they might
when they are going to have a breast or a prostate examination.
Compared to the typical patient-doctor interaction, the approach to a
specific dermatologic problem can be focused early during the visit. Patients
will usually offer their own opinions about when and how a skin condition
began, what caused it, what helped it, what did not help it, and what the
condition means for the patient and his or her family. However, a preliminary
objective assessment of the problem can help incorporate the subjective
thoughts of the patient into the course of information gathering. One effective
method to develop rapport during initial data gathering is to examine patients
while they are voicing their concerns. For example, saying to the patient
“Show me while you are explaining what you think caused your skin
problem” can be helpful. With dermatologic issues, it is useful to examine the
patient in the first few minutes of the visit to get a sense of what types of
primary lesions (if any) are involved. Naturally, the initial examination can
be tailored depending on whether the visit is intended for prevention,
diagnosis, or ongoing treatment of the skin problem at hand.
Once the physician determines the nature of the skin problem by a
physical examination, a more focused and detailed history can be obtained.
After building the differential diagnosis based on the primary lesion
morphologies and anatomic distribution, the physician can gather information
to support or refute the various diagnoses. Occam's razor has a two-sided
blade. In the perfect diagnostic world, all the skin lesions of an individual and
their history would mesh congruently. However, this is not always the case;
the skin lesions may have nothing to do with other signs or symptoms, or
individuals may have two different skin diseases simultaneously. Diagnosis
of skin diseases is a learned skill that is always improved with practice and
feedback from the reality of each patient.
The dermatologic history includes time of onset, duration of the
problem, and a history of prior episodes. Associated symptoms, aggravating
or relieving factors, and previous therapies tried may be helpful information
as well. A thorough review of systems can be useful if the skin condition
could be associated with other systemic problems (e.g., pyoderma
gangrenosum in a patient with ulcerative colitis and gastrointestinal
complaints). Review of medications is important (including topical, over-the-
counter, and herbal medications). Alterations to medication regimens may be
relevant when a cutaneous reaction is suspected. Certain skin conditions are
associated with underlying medical diseases (e.g., acanthosis nigricans and
diabetes), have a genetic component (e.g., neurofibromatosis), or are
associated with or exacerbated by social habits or exposures. Review of the
past medical history, the social history, and the family history, therefore, may
be relevant depending on the problem being addressed. Obtaining a history
may be especially challenging when the patient's native language is not the
one the physician can speak, the patient communicates with sign language, or
ethnic or religious reasons prevent full frankness of discussion. Social and
occupational histories, a focused family history, and a noncutaneous medical
history establish the full and rich substrate for the physician-patient
relationship. This approach remains an essential part of exemplary patient
care, as many dermatologic diseases are influenced by environmental,
genetic, and occupational factors.
After the initial screening examination is completed and a thorough
history obtained, a more detailed physical examination can be performed.
Thoroughness establishes the physician as the consummate professional and
expert. Looking in the mouth and between the toes, careful parting of the hair
to examine the scalp, and inspection of all of the nails may not have been
performed by previous examiners. The patient will be positively impressed
by the assiduous search for disease and etiology. Talking with the patient and
explaining what you are observing makes the patient a part of the process and
ultimately enlists him or her in the diagnostic, prevention, or treatment plans.
Explaining the need for photographs, with the reassurance of confidentiality,
is also logically done at this stage.
In patients where the diagnosis is already confirmed and the problem is
not contagious, clinicians can reassure the patients by touching the skin. This
is especially important in skin diseases such as psoriasis, where the patient
may feel disfigured. If the skin lesions are not contagious (as with many skin
problems), do not wear gloves while touching the patient.
The process of gathering and integrating information from the history
and physical examination directly influences what additional information a
physician decides to gather; however, physicians do face challenges that may
impair their ability to effectively do so. Cognitive bias describes the
phenomenon whereby physicians see what they think they should be seeing
rather than being a critical observer of what actually exists on the patient
being examined. Examples of this bias include being misled by a false “clue”
from the history, a recent patient, another physician's previous diagnosis, or
an article that was read just before seeing the patient. In addition, due to the
evolving nature of skin lesions and the diseases associated with them, a
diagnosis may not be possible at the time of the initial visit; this unsettling
fact must be communicated to the patient with compassion and knowledge.
Biopsies and Laboratory Testing
Biopsies and laboratory tests are most useful when purposely performed to
establish an important diagnosis. In many parts of the world, these tests may
cost the patients, their insurers, or their governments more than the
physicians' visits. Significant judgment goes into the decision to do tests,
especially when genetic testing is contemplated. Classical psoriasis with
multiple plaques covering 10% of the body or classical acanthosis nigricans
in an obese adolescent or adult is not an indication for a biopsy. If a diagnosis
is made clinically, it may be worthwhile to explain why no tests are needed to
make the diagnosis. Likewise, the physician should discuss with the patient
why a biopsy or any laboratory test will be performed. Whenever considering
any laboratory test, the clinician should have a solid understanding of the
limitations of the test about to be ordered and an idea of what diagnoses are
under consideration before the test is ordered.
The approach to the biopsy is an important concept and interlocks with
the discussion about when to refer a patient to a dermatologist. Not all
patients or settings permit a skin biopsy; furthermore, in certain situations,
pathology or dermatology services may not be available at all. Thus, after
building a differential diagnosis, carefully evaluate the potential serious
diagnoses and the risks and benefits of performing a biopsy. Weigh this
against the risks of empirically treating the patient without a biopsy, the
likelihood that a patient will be able to follow up, and the accessibility of a
dermatology consultation should one be necessary.
Before performing a biopsy, a clinician should have a reasonable
differential diagnosis in mind, as most biopsy results require
clinicopathologic correlation. If a clinician has no idea what the diagnosis
could be, a biopsy is unlikely to yield useful information. In these cases, it
may be prudent to refer the patient to a dermatologist for evaluation before
performing a biopsy. However, in cases where a clinician is trying to decide
between three and four possible diagnoses or, at the very least, is trying to
confirm a single diagnosis, a biopsy would be indicated. Destruction of a skin
lesion such as a seborrheic keratosis or an actinic keratosis should be
performed only when there is certainty in the diagnosis. Many malpractice
suits have come from destruction of a lesion that has turned out to be a
malignancy.
Deciding which type of biopsy to perform is important. Shave biopsies,
punch biopsies, and excisional biopsies can be used in various circumstances.
Shave biopsies are preferred for diseases that primarily involve the epidermis
or superficial dermis (most inflammatory diseases such as eczema and
psoriasis and nonmelanoma skin cancers), while punch biopsies are preferred
for lesions where the suspected infiltrate is deeper (sarcoidosis, erythema
nodosum, dermal neoplasm, etc.). An excisional biopsy is preferred for
subcutaneous nodules. When biopsying annular lesions (e.g., erythema
annulare centrifugum or porokeratosis), the leading edge of the lesion is
usually preferable to biopsy.
Evaluation of pigmented lesions is challenging. It is important to
remember that no matter what technique is used, if a melanoma is diagnosed,
additional surgery will be required. Thus, a biopsy performed by the primary
care provider can save the patient many weeks or months of waiting for an
appointment. In some settings, this fact alone can justify performing a biopsy
with the best technique available. General rules of thumb follow. When
suspicion for melanoma is high, excisional biopsy is the preferred technique.
When evaluating a pigmented lesion and suspicion for melanoma is present
but very low (e.g., a clinically apparent seborrheic keratosis), a shave biopsy
can be used to remove the lesion with optimized cosmetic results. If the
biopsy results are not as expected, a larger excisional biopsy can be
performed at follow-up to evaluate the full extent of the melanoma.
Performing a small punch biopsy of a much larger pigmented lesion is not
recommended, as it can mistakenly capture a benign component of a
malignant process (i.e., a melanoma arising in a nevus or associated with a
seborrheic keratosis). Know the qualifications of the pathologist interpreting
the skin biopsy. Dermatopathology is a recognized subspecialty because of
the complexity and variations in inflammatory skin diseases; general
pathologists are competent to diagnose neoplastic lesions. Pigmented
premalignant lesions are often sources of alternative interpretations, even
among experts in the histopathology of these lesions.
In many kinds of lesions, rebiopsy of a different portion of the lesion,
biopsy of another lesion, or rebiopsy as a lesion evolves is necessary for a
diagnosis. The complexity of biopsy interpretation should not dissuade a
physician from performing a biopsy; it is equally important to note that there
are circumstances in which the patient should not be left with the unrealistic
expectation that the biopsy will answer everything.
Referral
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.