Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project in Sad 2
Project in Sad 2
Submitted by:
(List down your name here)
Submitted to:
Manolo A. Bilog Jr, MIT
Instructor, (Replace it with your section) - System Analysis and Design
I. Advising process of PLMun
For Students:
- Once the student's profile is displayed, the course advisor selects the courses the
student needs to retake or enroll in.
- Upon confirmation, the advised subjects for enrollment are sent and displayed on the
student portal.
Data Flows:
- Student information and account credentials flow from the student to the system.
- The system's response regarding eligibility flows back to the student.
- Student information flows from the system to the adviser.
- Course recommendations flow from the adviser to the system.
- The credit form and/or copy of grades flow from the system to the student.
-Student: The main participant in the process, seeking academic advice for course
selection.
- Course Adviser: A faculty member or designated advisor responsible for guiding
students based on their academic performance and program requirements.
Use Cases:
1. Access Student Credentials:The course adviser has the ability to retrieve and review
the student's academic record, encompassing past grades, completed courses, and
current program status.
2. Submit Advising Request: The student can initiate an advising request through the
system. This request may include details about their academic objectives, preferred
course load, and any specific concerns or questions they wish to address.
3. Browse Available Subjects: The student can explore a catalog of open courses for
the upcoming semester. This list may be filtered based on program, level, or other
relevant criteria.
4. Generate Advised Course List: The course adviser has the capability to create a list
of recommended courses for the student. This is determined by considering the
student's academic standing, program requirements, and other pertinent factors.
5. Enroll in Advised Courses: The student can enroll directly in the advised courses
through the system, provided they meet prerequisites and there are available slots.
2. Credentials Check:
- The system verifies the student's login credentials to ensure identity. Access is
denied if credentials do not match.
- Upon finalizing the list of recommended courses, the adviser submits them to the
student's portal. This action makes the advised courses visible to the student, enabling
them to review and enroll in the courses as desired.
Communication:
1. Student to System: Initiates login to the PLMUN student portal.
2. System to Student: Validates the provided credentials.
3. Student to System:Requests advising if no advised courses are visible.
4. System to Course Adviser: Notifies the course adviser of a new advising request.
5. Course Adviser to System: Examines the student's profile and academic record.
6. Course Adviser to System: Chooses courses requiring enrollment, focusing on failed
courses.
7. Course Adviser to System: Optionally selects extra courses to fulfill program
requirements.
8. System to Student: Conveys the list of advised courses to the student portal.
9. Student to System Reviews and enrolls in the advised courses.
Sequence of Actions:
1. The student commences the login process to access the PLMUN student portal.
2. The system verifies and authenticates the student's provided credentials.
3. If no advised courses are visible, the student submits a request for advising.
4. The system alerts the course adviser about the newly submitted advising request.
5. The course adviser examines the student's profile and academic record for
comprehensive insights.
6. The course adviser selects courses for enrollment, specifically identifying those the
student needs to retake.
7. Optionally, the course adviser may choose additional courses to aid the student in
meeting program requirements.
8. The system compiles the advised course list and sends it to the student portal.
9. The student, upon receiving the advised course list, assesses and enrolls in the
recommended courses as desired.
VI. Based on your study, what can you recommend to improve the advising process of
Our study found that using online advising is better than the old way of doing things at the
College of Information Technology and Computer Studies (CITCS). However, we think CITCS's
online advising can be even better. Here are some ideas to make it improve:
First, let's listen to the students. Ask them about their experiences and what problems they
face with online advising. This will help advisors and department heads know what needs to
be better in the online advising process.
Second, let's make it easy for new irregular students. They should be able to use the system
without confusion. Provide simple guides and tutorials to help them understand how it works.
Lastly, let's give students options for communication. They should be able to choose whether
to talk online or in person during advising sessions. This will make things easier for both
students and advisors, especially if coming to the school is not convenient. These changes aim
to make the CITCS online advising system more user-friendly and convenient for everyone.