IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE

RAWALPINDI

Muhammad Ashraf son of Baghay Khan resident of House

No. DN-283, St no.7, Mohallah Ameen Town, Khiyaban-e-
Sirsyed, Rawalpindi.

Appellant

Versus

Bushra Shaheen daughter of Haji Ghulam Sarwar resident of

House No.I-126, Iqbal Road Mohallah Chhachi Rawalpindi

Respondent

APPEAL AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND

DECREE DATED: 5.9.2015 WHEREBY THE
LEARNED RENT CONTROLLER MR. MALIK
IMRAN YAQOOB RENT CONTROLLER AND
DISMISSED THE REPLY LEAVE TO CONTESTS
AND ORDER TO VACATE THE PREMISES
WITHIN 30 DAYS.

PRAYER IN APPEAL.

To set aside to impugned Judgment and decree

dated: 5.9.2015 and remained the ejectment petition.

1. Briefly stated the fact of the case are that the

respondent filed ejectment petition against the
appellant on 21.05.2015 stated that the appellant is a
tenant in the above mentioned premises, the
respondent also admitted that it tenancy agreement
dated: 12.11.2014 also executed, in fact the rent
agreement executed between Muhammad Ashraf
tenant and Haji Ghulam Sarwar who is the real
father of the respondent and the rent deed was also
started 12.11.2014 and for 1 year before the expiry
of the said rent deed the respondent, hence this
appeal on the following amongst other

GROUNDS:-

A. That the impugned judgment and decree is

against law and facts of the case.

B. That the appellant is not rent defaulter and the

respondent is not been landlord, it is correct that
she is the owner of the said premises but the
father of the petitioner is a landlord who is
receiving the rent of the premises from the
appellant and also handed over the said premises
from rent to the appellant. So the section 2(D) to
the extent of landlord is attracted The Punjab
Rented Premises Act, 2009 “Landlord means the
owner of a premises and includes a person for the
time being entitled or authorized to receive rent
in respect of the premises”

C. That the tenancy for specific period which is not

expired for that period and the respondent is not
entitled to evict the tenant appellant before the
expiry of that period accepted on the ground of
damage, sub-letting, nuisance but not on the
ground of personal requirement.

D. That no opportune was given to the appellant to

contest of this case which is against the nature
justice.

E. That the impugned judgment and decree is not a

speaking judicial judgment and not based on
reasoning rather it is based upon assumptions and
presumptions.
 F. That the findings of the learned trial court are
erroneous and not sustainable in the eye of law.

G. That the impugned judgment and decree is not

sustainable in the eye of law.

H. That the learned trial court failed to appraise the

material in it’s true perspective.

I. That impugned judgment and decree is result of

illegalities and irregularities which resulted in
into grave miscarriage of justice and is liable to
be set-aside.

J. That the impugned judgment and decree is result

of misreading and non reading of material
available on record.

K. That the learned trial court exercised the

jurisdiction not vested in it and did not exercise
the jurisdiction vested in it.

L. That the impugned judgment and decree has been

passed in a post haste and arbitrary manner, thus
is not sustainable in the eye of law.

M. That the learned trial court did not view the

case form it’s right angle and reached a wrong
conclusion.

PRAYER:-
It is, prayed that this appeal may be accepted and the
impugned judgment and decree dated: 5.9.2015 may
kindly be set aside and the ejectment petition against the
appellant may be remanded to the Rent Controller/ Trial
Court with the direction to decide the matter after fresh
hearing.

Any other relief which this Honorable court may

deem fit and proper be also awarded to the appellants.

Appellant
Through

Khaliq Hussain Bhatti

Advocate, High Court.

Certified as per instructions that this is the first appeal

against the impugned judgment and decree before this
Honorable court.

Advocate.
 IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE,
RAWALPINDI.

Masood Ahmad Sheikh Vs. Nadir Khan

Appeal

APPLICATION FOR SUSPENSION OF

IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED: 20.12.2018

Respectfully sheweth:-

1. That the applicant has filed the above

captioned appeal in this Honorable court and
the contents of appeal may be read as integral
part of this application.

2. That the applicant has a good prima-facie case

and hopes to succeed in it. Balance of
convenience lies in his favor and he will suffer
an irreparable loss in case of suspension of
impugned judgment and decree.

It is, therefore, prayed that the impugned

judgment and decree dated: 20.12.2018 may
kindly be suspended, till the decision of
appeal.

Applicant

Through

M. Zafar Ullah Salari

Advocate High Court
 IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE,
RAWALPINDI.

Masood Ahmad Sheikh Vs. Nadir Khan

Appeal

APPLICATION FOR SUSPENSION OF

IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED: 20.12.2018

AFFIDAVIT

I, Nadir Khan son of Nasir Khan resident of House No. 5,

St. No. 14, Al-Noor Colony Rawalpindi. Occupant of
Nadir Motors, 143-F, Muree Road, Marrir Chowk,
Rawalpindi, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare that
the contents stated in my accompanying application are
true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information
and belief, nothing has been concealed.

Deponent

Verified on oath at Rawalpindi on this .03.2019 that

contents of above affidavit are true and correct to the best
of my knowledge, information and belief, nothing has
been concealed.

Deponent