Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CATIA Users
Have you ever needed to translate your CATIA files to another program? STEP and IGES are two neutral file formats that are very
commonly supported by many CAD and CAD-related programs. IGES (Initial Graphics Exchange Specification) was originally
developed by the U.S. Air Force and was first published in 1980. STEP (Standard for the Exchange of Product model data) is a bit
newer format and was originally released in the mid-1990s. While IGES files typically only contain surface data, STEP files can also
include solids and even 3D annotation data, too.
CATIA natively supports the IGES file format – no extra licenses are needed. In general, to save a file as an IGES, it’s as easy
as going to File > Save As… and selecting igs (*.igs) from the list.
Of course, things don’t always go perfectly. Here’s a common scenario: A part is made up of a mix of solids, surfaces, and other
wireframe elements. Unfortunately, when exporting, the surfaces don’t show up.
Now, surface elements will be created and exported for the IGES format.
STEP Export
Unlike IGES files, an add-on license is required to export STEP files. The license: ST1. To access this license, you may need to
go to Tools > Options > General > Shareable Products and select it from the list.
Once you’ve got the license, head to File > Save As… and choose the stp (*.stp) option.
For many solid and wireframe parts, this is all that’s needed. However, if 3D annotations and other model-based information
needs to be exported, then you may need to tweak a couple of options.
Here’s the problem: The default settings typically will not export 3D Annotation data, even though the STEP format has this ability.
Happy Exporting
IGES and STEP are two very common and necessary file types when exporting data. With the basics out of the way (and a
couple of tweaks to help avoid some common pitfalls), you should have a solid start to CATIA file exports. Of course, there may
be a little bit of trial and error involved when trying to find the best file type and export settings, so don’t be afraid to play around
with them to get exactly what you need.
There are two main methods in which you can change the colors of parts, features, and faces.
Either:
1. Right mouse button click and choose properties from the contextual menu, or
Figure 3: This example is changing the color at the PartBody level (works the same on geometrical sets).
Every feature inside the PartBody changes to the selected color. All four features are yellow.
Figure 4: This example is selecting a feature and changing the color. You can see
that selecting the EdgeFillet.1 feature and changing the color to blue overrode the PartBody
color change of yellow. Selecting a feature and changing the feature’s color is a higher level
than changing the color at the PartBody level.
Once a part file is added to a product file, the part instance can be selected and the color changed. This will trump all color
changes made at the part file level. This is shown in Figure 6.
In the Assembly workbench, locate the “Scenes” toolbar. (If you cannot find the toolbar, go to View>Toolbar from the windows
menus at the top of the screen and turn it on).
When creating multiple scenes, it is always a good idea to start off by creating a default generic scene that displays the original
product file with all components in their correct location. That way, you can always go back to an initial state of the assembly.
Uncheck the “Automatic naming” option and label this scene either “Initial State” or “Default.” If you do not uncheck “automatic
naming” then it will label the scenes “Scene.1, Scene.2, etc.”
Now various exploded views can be created and saved for the assembly. Using the same method as above, create an enhanced
scene and call it “Exploded 1.”
Once you are you in the scene creation mode (i.e. green background), snap your compass to the various parts you wish to
move. Note, if you receive the following warning, select the “Do not display…” option and hit “Close.”
Next, select on the four nuts from your model or tree while holding down the control key on your keyboard.
Once completed, I exit the scene. In your specification tree, you will now find the two scenes listed under the Applications and
Scenes branch of the tree. You can create as many scenes as you’d like.
To now apply those exploded scenes to your assembly, you will apply the scene by right clicking. The option is within an additional
drop down.
Then from the part file, select on the scene from the tree, then the surface.
Scenes in CATIA are covered in more detail in both the Rand 3D CATIA Advanced Assembly Design & Management and
DMU Navigator and Space Analysis classes.
Have you worked with Creo (formally known as Pro/ENGINEER) before you began using CATIA V5? Then you are used to using
the middle mouse button to rotate the model and using the <CTRL> key and the middle mouse button to zoom the model.
In CATIA V5 you also can use the buttons of your mouse and the <CTRL> key to rotate and zoom.
►► To rotate, simultaneously hold down the middle mouse bottom and hold down either the right or left mouse button.
►► To zoom, either
1. Hold down the <CTRL> key and the middle mouse button, or
2. Hold down the middle mouse bottom and click either the right or left mouse button.
Creo
Function Mouse
Rotate Middle
Zoom <CTRL> + Middle
CATIA V5
Function Mouse
Rotate Hold Middle + Hold Right
or
or
or
The draft analysis button within CATIA V5 will helps you quickly gather the draft angle on multiple surfaces without the need for
tedious manual measurements. Here is a quick rundown of how the icon works when you have a given die direction.
For the purpose of this demo, I have a part with several drafted surfaces that is oriented in vehicle location (i.e. not perfectly
aligned with x, y or z direction) as seen in Figure 1. The die direction is indicated by the dashed red line.
The first step is to change your shading style to “Shading with Material” (Figure 2). (Don’t worry if you forget- CATIA will alert
you!) The next step is to click on the draft analysis icon in the Analysis toolbar (Figure 3).
Note that the draft analysis initially assumes a Z axis direction. The incorrect draft analysis is shown in Figure 4. Since our part
was created in vehicle location, we must first fix the default direction that CATIA assumes. This can be done with the dragging of
the compass (fast method) or by creating an axis system with respect to the die direction (requires a little more leg work).
For the dragging method, begin by clicking on the compass direction icon within the draft analysis dialogue box (Figure 5). This
will snap the compass onto the part’s origin. Reset your compass using View >> Reset Compass so that it is now ready to be
moved onto the die line. Figure 6 shows the steps involved with moving the compass.
Figure 5
You can create an axis system where the new z axis is in the same direction as the die line. After you have the compass on the
part, right click on the compass and tell it to use the local axis system (Figure 8).
Draft analysis is covered in detail in the CATIA V5 Advanced Part Design class from Rand 3D. Contact a Rand 3D rep for
more info, class schedules and pricing.
The view frame is the dashed box that appears around a drawing view. This frame allows the user to quickly pick a view to drag it to
another location on the drawing sheet. However, these frames can start to overlap one another in crowded areas of the drawing.
There are two methods to have CATIA not display these view frames on your drawing. The first is to turn off the frame in individual
drawing views. This is done via the view’s properties.
Next, let’s say you want to see what the drawing will look like with all views removed. You could do it manually as discussed above,
but there is a button that will act as a global display off/on and it’s located in the visualization toolbar of the drafting workbench.
For more information on this topic, attend the Rand 3D training class, CATIA Generative Design.
Investigating the differences between old and new revisions of items in CATIA can be difficult especially when the changes are
very minute. The comparison command is an excellent tool to help visualize these changes. For comparisons on parts and prod-
ucts, check out the first part of this blog by my colleague, Amy Rath: https://resources.rand3d.com/insights-from-within/
part-comparison-in-catia-v5
Now let’s focus on applying this concept to a drawing environment. Below is an older revision CATIA part file and it’s associative drawing.
The Compare Drawings tool compares two cgm format documents to detect differences between them. This requires the original
drawing to be saved as a .cgm format. This is easily done with a File --> Save As or Save Management.
Once a design change is made to the CATIA part file, the drawing will need to be updated. The drawing will register that it is
currently displaying the older revision of the part file, as indicated by the icons located on the drawing views in the specification
tree. To refresh the drawing, simply select the “update” icon and save the drawing again as a cgm file (make sure to make a
change in the file name).
Open the original cgm file and ensure that you are in the DMU 2D Workbench.
The drawing compares will immediately show up. In the case of a drawing where the scales and drawing views are in the same
location, then the comparison will not need any adjustment. The color differentials by default are red, green, and blue (area of
the drawing where there in no change).
Now let’s look at a more complicated scenario. If the second drawing you want to compare is not simply an updated version of
the first drawing, you may find that the drawing view you wish to compare is at different scale or are at different location on the
sheet. Below is such an example. The same general area is created within the drawing as a detailed view for both an older and
newer part. These detailed views are at different scales and are located at slightly different locations on the drawing sheet.
To fix this, let us first deal with the scaling issue. Clicking on “Calibrate” and adjust the zoom using the resizing option.
After resizing, we can fix the location misalignment with another calibration using superimposing.
Creating a detail drawing view allows a user to enlarge areas within a drawing view to a different scale. In CATIA V5, you can
select to make a detail view area in a circular shape, or a custom shape that the user creates.
Once completed, the area within the parent view will be circled and labeled.
Then, complete your drawing with dimension, notes, specialty symbols, etc. Here I have some dimensions calling out the depth
of the hole details.
Sometimes, changes that you make to your drawing may require you to redefine the detail view area. Notice that both of my detail
views are based on a section cut. Section cuts have a certain direction associated with them. In my case, the direction of the cross
section shows the opening of the counter-drilled hole from the top surfaces. If I reverse the direction of my cross section cut, I have
a problem.
First, you need to synchronize the view, then you can move the detail view areas.
Detail Views will now be updated. Any dimension/annotations will appear again attached to their parent reference.
More information about this topic can be found in the Rand 3D training class, CATIA V5: Generative Drafting.
In some CAD modeling packages, there is an automatic “tunnel vision” that occurs when you are active on a child component
within a higher-level assembly. Below is an example of a CREO assembly, where a part file has been made active. Notice how
the non-active files are ghosted out.
By default, CATIA does not have this option enabled, so when you activate on a component (in CATIA this is done with simply a
double click), there is no visual change. To make this change, start by going into the CATIA internal option via Tools --> Options,
then change the setting in the following location:
The default installation of CATIA V5 has the view axis displayed turned on in drawing views. This means that in the active view,
there is a blue horizontal and vertical axis that is displayed and always aligned to the part’s origin location (or assembly). De-
pending on how a company designs their parts, this could mean that you have a part’s location far away from the part origin.
This will cause your view frame is be overly large, which many (including myself) find annoying.
More information about this topic is found in the Rand 3D training class, CATIA Generative Drafting.
Performing a static clash in CATIA is a powerful tool that can detect areas of interference, contact and minimum clearance
violations. In this video, we break down how to set up, read your clash analysis, and adjust internal setting for the clash in
CATIA V5. Then we talk about two methods of visualizing the interference area with sectioning and Boolean operations.
More information about this topic can be found in the Rand 3D training class, DMU Navigator and Space Analysis.
When working in CATIA V5 assemblies, the importance of specifying the component instance can be overlooked. If you have a
CATIA administrator at your company then they may have already configured your installation of CATIA to display the instance
name. Let’s discuss how to check if this is the case. In this example, I have created a CATIA assembly and then created a part
file in context. This component was automatically called “Part1” and notice that nothing comes after it. This shows that the instance
name is not displayed.
The instance display on your specification tree is turned on in your internal settings, starting with Tools --> Options.
Now, as a general rule of thumb, all your files should have a unique naming convention.
Boolean Operations are now available in the sketcher workbench starting with release CATIA V5-V6 2018. These Boolean
operations work very similar to the ones used in the Part Design workbench for when a designer has multiple bodies. The
Boolean operations in the sketcher workbench are useful for combining multiple profile shapes. The options are as follows:
Figure 1-1
A designer will need to access the sketcher workbench and draw out two different profile shapes like the one in Figure 1-2.
Figure 1-2
The designer will need to highlight one complete profile shape as shown in Figure 1-3.
Figure 1-3
Figure 1-4
Figure 1-5
CATIA added the two shapes together, trimming off the total intersection area. Leaving us with one profile shape. This has
eliminated the need to trim our profile.
Next we will look at the Subtract option using the same sketch. Select one of the profile shapes and right click. This time we
select subtract as shown in Figure 1-6. Figure 1-7 shows what we are left with.
Figure 1-6
CATIA subtracted the highlighted shape, removing the intersected portion from the non-highlighted shape. Eliminating the need
to have to trim the profile shapes together.
Next we will look at the Intersect option. Select one of the profile shapes and right click. This time we select Intersect as shown
in Figure 1-8. Figure 1-9 shows what we are left with.
Figure 1-8
Figure 1-9
The Model-Based Definition (MBD), which deals with the definition of products through annotated 3D CAD models rather than
traditional 2D drawings, is supported in CATIA by the Functional Tolerancing and Annotation (FT&A) workbench. The FT&A
workbench enables the designers to embed the 3D Annotations, such as dimensions, GD&T symbols, etc., directly into CATIA
3D models, providing the ‘single source of truth’ for the manufacturing engineers and machinists.
Many large enterprises across the globe have adopted the MBD approach, so they no longer send 2D drawings to their suppliers. This
presents a challenge for the suppliers, which is the ability to open and read the manufacturing information provided by their OEMs.
One obvious solution for the supplier would be to purchase CATIA software and use it to open and read the native CATIA models,
including 3D Annotations. The problem for the smaller machine shops, however, could be the software cost.
Fortunately, there is another solution to this problem, which is using a neutral format such as STEP for data exchange. The
STEP format has been around since 1994, but things have changed considerably with the advent of the STEP 242 protocol,
which offers dedicated MBD support.
In this blog post, I will explain how to export CATIA’s 3D Annotations to a STEP file using the 242 protocol.
First, the pre-requisite is that you must have a proper license to be able to export, which is the SXT (Extended STEP Interface)
add-on product. Having the ST1 (STEP Core Interface) license, included in most CATIA configurations, is not enough. Also note
that the FTA (3D Functional Tolerancing & Annotation) license is not necessary. As you see below, I will be using the basic MD2
configuration along with the SXT license in my examples.
Second, you must activate some settings. Go to Tools > Options > Compatibility > STEP, activate the 3D annotations toggle,
and select 242 ed1 in the Application Protocol pull-down list, as shown below.
Select File > Save As and select stp (*.stp) in the Save as type pull-down list. Click Save to save the STEP file.
Now open the saved STEP file in CATIA, as shown below. As you can see, the annotations came through just fine.
Note that the exported annotations are stored in the Annotation Set Result.1, which means they are not editable and cannot be
deleted. However, the result annotations can be hidden if desired.
Things become a little trickier if you want to export an assembly with annotations, rather than a single part. As an example, let’s see
how the export works on the product shown below, in which we have annotations on the product level as well as on the part level.
Turns out CATIA’s annotation export to STEP has some limitations, one of those being that the annotations on the product level
cannot be exported. Specifically, this is what CATIA documentation says.
But what about annotations on the part level? To export those, you need to activate yet another option in the Tools > Options >
Compatibility > STEP, which is Global nested assembly, instead of the default One STEP file.
The use of MBD and 3D Annotations is covered in the Rand 3D class: CATIA Functional Tolerancing & Annotation.
When dealing with very large, complex assemblies (especially those with components that have a long names) the specification
tree size can quickly start to overtake the screen itself. When this happens, we have three go-to methods to manage the tree size.
►► The first method is one that probably everyone is familiar with and I always tell my new students that it’s easy to remember
because it rhymes. “Control and scroll.” Holding down the “ctrl” key plus scrolling with the wheel of your mouse will allow
you to simply change the physical tree text size. This method is best for when you have a large resolution size and if you
have good eyesight so that you can still see the tree branches at a small size.
►► The second method is also another rhyming tip. “Hide your tree, hit F3.” You can scroll your specification tree up and down
with the wheel of your mouse but when you are dealing with an extra long tree, you don’t want to scroll for 2 minutes just to
get the tree our of the way. So, the F3 shortcut is a quick tool to temporarily hide your tree no matter the size.
►► The third option is a lesser known tool to controlling your specification tree size.
Any CATIA designer worth one’s salt knows how to use Measure Item and Measure Between to make measurements.
What is less known is that you can do the same using parameters and formulas, and this is what I will explain in this post.
The Engineering Knowledge Language (EKL) used in CATIA’s formulas has a rich set of measurement functions, located in the
Measure and the Part Measures sections of the formula editor’s Dictionary, as shown below. For example, there is a distance
function that lets you measure distance between any two objects, a length function for measuring length of a curve, an area
function for measuring area of a surface or a closed curve, etc.
Although the function signatures as shown in the Members of list may initially seem cryptic, they all follow the same convention
that is easy to learn. For example, consider this function:
The first word (length) is the name of the function. In the parentheses, you find the function’s input parameters. In this example,
it says Curve, which means the function requires a curve as the input parameter. The “three dots” ellipsis symbol (…) means
that the function can take any number of input parameters, i.e. that it could be used to measure the total length of several curves
at once. Lastly, after the colon symbol you find the type of the value that the function returns. In this example, it says Length,
which means that the function returns a value in length units.
Now let’s consider a couple of examples. In the first example, I will use a formula to measure the length of the spline shown below.
First, we create a user parameter that will hold the value of the measurement. In the Knowledge toolbar, select the Formula icon.
In the New Parameter of type pull-down lists, select Length and Single Value, then click the New Parameter of type button.
In the Formula Editor dialog box, select the Measures section in the Dictionary list and double-click the length(Curve,…
):Length function in the Members of list, so it populates the right-hand side in the formula. Note that the space between the
parentheses is empty, which means we still need to select an input parameter to pass into the function.
Click OK twice to close the Formula Editor and the Formulas dialog boxes. The measurement and the formula are displayed in
the tree as shown below.
In the second example, I will use a formula to measure the mass of the part shown below.
In the Formula Editor dialog box, select the PartMeasures section in the Dictionary, double-click the
smartVolume(elem:Solid,…):Volume function in the Members of list, and double-click the PartBody in the tree to use it as the
input parameter for the function.
Since mass is volume times the density of the material, we now need to add the material density to the formula. Add the multiplication
operator “star” (*), click the material object in the tree, and double click the material density parameter in the Members of list. The
completed formula looks as shown below.
The use of parameters and formulas in CATIA is covered in the following Rand 3D classes:
Technical Trainer, Trisha West, demonstrates how the four different coupling methods (ratio, tangency, tangency then curvature,
and vertices) can affect your final multi-section, and how to use coupling curves in a complicated shape scenario.
The content from this video is covered in more detail in the Rand 3D training class, CATIA Introduction to Modeling.
Have you ever had a model that was imported in as an isolated model? Meaning it didn’t have history to it or any features listed
in the specification tree except a solid branch. Here is an example shown in Figure 1-1 and Figure 1-2.
If there’s no feature history displayed in the specification tree, it makes it difficult to make changes to the features. What if you
need to change the fillet size or need to modify the size of the hole? In the Part Design workbench there is a toolbar that allows
you to pull out features from isolated models. The toolbar is called PartDesign Feature Recognition shown in Figure 1-3.
Figure 1-3
continued on next page
The first step is to define the Solid as the Work in Object as shown below.
Figure 1-4
The first icon in the toolbar is the manual recognition. This allows the user to decide what features need to be pulled out. Click
on the manual icon as shown in Figure 1-5.
Figure 1-5
Figure 1-6
continued on next page
Figure 1-7
Click ‘ok’ to the dialog box. Notice that the Fillets are no longer showing in the model. CATIA added two Fillet feature branches in
the specification tree as shown in Figure 1-8. Now the Fillet feature can easily be changed larger or smaller by typing in a different
value into the dialog box. (Note: The reason we can’t see the fillets in the model is due to the defined object. We are still defined
back in history in the Solid.)
Figure 1-8
Figure 1-9
Click ‘ok’ to the dialog box. The holes were removed from the model and two hole feature branches were added into the specification
tree as shown in Figure 1-10. Now the hole features can easily be changed larger or smaller by typing in a different value or changing
the depth option in the dialog box. (Note: The reason we can’t see the holes in the model is due to the defined object. We are still
defined back in history of the Solid.)
Figure 1-10
Figure 1-11
In order to pull out the Pad feature we need to select on a Recognize up to face. We will add the back face into the dialog box as
shown in Figure 1-12.
Figure 1-12
Figure 1-13
We took a model that had no history and pulled out each feature so that changes could be made easily.
The next icon in the toolbar is the automatic feature recognition. This will automatically compile the features from the options
selected from the dialog box. The automatic Feature Recognition is pictured in Figure 1-14.
Figure 1-14
Turn on the Local Feature Recognition. This will allow you to select the features that you want to recognize. We will turn on Pad,
Fillet, and hole as shown in Figure 1-15. Select all the faces that you want to be recognized.
Figure 1-15
Figure 1-16
DeFeature a Shape
The last icon in the toolbar is DeFeature. This means that if the feature history is there you can remove it or strip it from the model.
First we will define ourselves into the last feature created which is Fillet.2 as shown in Figure 1-17.
Figure 1-17
Next, select the Defeature icon from the toolbar as shown in Figure 1-18.
Figure 1-18
Figure 1-19
Click on the plus icon again. This time, select hole filter. Adjust the minimum and maximum diameter value you want CATIA to
defeature as shown in Figure 1-20.
Figure 1-20
Click ‘ok’ to the dialog box. Both filters should be added to the defeature dialog box as shown in Figure 1-21.
Figure 1-21
Figure 1-22
Here is another CATIA V5 visual option that some people find useful. By default, all reference features you create in CATIA will
automatically “shine” through any other solid/surface leaving a cluttered screen.
In CATIA V5, you can compare the same part from two different development stages to see how the design has matured over
time. Generally a comparison is performed on the part when it was early planning to the same part that was released into mass
production. We will compare the two parts shown in Figure 1-1. In the picture below; the left side part is considered the old and
the right side part is considered the new.
Figure 1-1
Part comparison function is in the DMU Space Analysis workbench. The SPA license may need to be selected in order to receive
this workbench. You can find the compare icon in the DMU Space Analysis toolbar as shown in Figure 1-2.
Figure 1-2
Figure 1-3
Figure 1-4
Figure 1-5
There are two different options for comparing parts; Geometric and Visual comparison.
Visual comparison:
►► Visually represents the difference between the models
►► More accurate
Figure 1-6
Figure 1-7
Geometric Comparison:
►► Compares models by creating geometrical shapes
►► The more accurate you make the comparison the better the results, however, it is not as accurate as visual comparison
Figure 1-8
Figure 1-9
The accuracy can be adjusted for geometrical comparison making it more accurate. This means that CATIA will compare the
difference by making smaller geometrical shapes. The more accurate you go, the more time the analysis takes to run.
Here is an example of changing the geometrical comparison to 0.1mm accuracy. It did take longer to preview the results. The
results are shown in Figure 1-10. The results are more accurate with smaller shapes.
Figure 1-10
More information about this topic can be found in the Rand 3D training class, DMU Navigator and Space Analysis.
3DEXPERIENCE
►► 3DEXPERIENCE Generative Shape Design Essentials
►► CATIA Assembly Design Expert
►► CATIA Drafting Expert
►► CATIA Mechanical Design Fundamentals
►► CATIA Mechanical Design Expert
►► CATIA Sheet Metal Design Essentials
►► Transition to the 3DEXPERIENCE Platform for CATIA V5 Users
►► Transition to the 3DEXPERIENCE Platform for Mechanical Designers
CATIA V5
►► CATIA Introduction for Experienced 3D CAD Users
►► CATIA Introduction to Modeling
►► CATIA Intro. for Managers & Reviewers
►► CATIA Advanced Part Design
►► CATIA Advanced Assembly Design & Management
►► CATIA Advanced Part Design and Advanced Assembly Design and Management
►► CATIA Sheet Metal Design
►► CATIA Functional Tolerancing & Annotation
►► CATIA Composites Part Design
►► CATIA Knowledge Advisor and Expert
►► CATIA Administration
►► CATIA Introduction to Surface Design
►► CATIA Advanced Surface Design
►► CATIA Generative Drafting (ANSI)
►► CATIA Generative Structural Analysis (GSA)
►► CATIA Electrical Systems
►► CATIA Introduction for NC & FEA Engineers
►► CATIA Numerical Control Manufacturing
►► CATIA VB Automation
ENOVIA
►► DMU Kinematics
►► DMU Navigator and Space Analysis
Amy joined Rand 3D in 2005 as a traveling instructor. With Amy having prior CATIA and Honda
experience, this soon led her to be a permanent resident at Honda. In more recent years, her job
has transitioned to not only teaching CATIA classes, but also developing Honda-specific course
material, including the creation of training videos and interactive training for Honda.
Amy holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Michigan State University and a
Master’s in Business from Ohio Dominican. She is green belt certified in LEAN Knowledge Transfer.
Iouri Apanovitch
Senior Technical Training Engineer
His primary area of expertise is product analysis and simulation with FEA tools such as SIMULIA/
Abaqus, Autodesk Simulation, Mechanica, including linear and non-linear simulations, dynamics,
fatigue, and analysis of laminated composites.
Natasha Reaves
Rand 3D Technical Training Engineer
As a graduate of North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, she earned her
Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Mechanical Engineering. After graduating, Natasha served
as a mechanic in the U.S. Army National Guard and worked as a mechanical designer for a
multinational telecommunications and data networking equipment manufacturer. Her love of
CAD manifests at Rand 3D, where she enjoys teaching Creo Parametric and CATIA training
classes. She holds certification from Dassault Systèmes as a CATIA V5 Expert Mechanical
Designer and Certified Surface Design Associate.
Scott Henderson
Technical Training Engineer
Scott Henderson is a Dassault Systèmes Certified Instructor. With expertise in CATIA, DELMIA,
and ENOVIA, he has been leading training classes and providing on-site customer support since
2006, focusing primarily in the Automotive industry.
Trisha West
Rand 3D Technical Training Engineer
Trisha is a full-time trainer at Rand 3D, teaching clients how to get the most out of their CAD
software. She graduated with a degree in Aerospace Engineering from Ohio State University and
spent 2 years working on communication satellites before joining the Rand 3D team. Trisha is a
Dassault Systèmes Certified Expert in CATIA V5 Mechanical Design, Shape Design, and Digital
Mock-Up. This certification validates the skills and competence in part/assembly/surfacing design
in CATIA V5 and its DMU (viewing) workbenches.