Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ma 2009
Ma 2009
as artificial cartilage
Ruyin Ma, Dangsheng Xiong, Feng Miao, Jinfeng Zhang, Yan Peng
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology,
Nanjing 210094, China
Abstract: In this work, novel polyvinylpyrrolidone blend hydrogel and stainless steel ball nearly exhibited a
(PVP)/polyvinylalcohol (PVA) blend hydrogels were pre- mixed lubrication regime especially under bovine serum
pared by repeated freezing-thawing cycles. The factors lubrication, and it can be proposed as a promising method
that influenced friction properties of blend hydrogels, such to reduce wear of the prosthesis. Ó 2009 Wiley Periodicals,
as PVP content, contact load, sliding speed, and lubrication Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 93A: 1016–1019, 2010
condition, were mainly studied by sliding with stainless
steel ball. The results showed that friction coefficients of
the PVP/PVA blend hydrogels were definitely dependent Key words: polyvinylalcohol (PVA); polyvinylpyrrolidone
on such influence factors. The friction system consisting of (PVP); friction property; mixed lubrication
Figure 1 represents the effect of PVP content on Under different kinds of lubrication, a similar
friction coefficient of PVP/PVA blend hydrogels. It tendency of the friction coefficient versus the sliding
is observed that friction coefficient reduced as the speed is observed. For instance, under the lubrica-
PVP content increased. It was reported that surface tion of deionized water, when the sliding speed
water was consisting of equilibrium water and free increased from 0.06 to 0.18 m/s, the friction coeffi-
water.20 Equilibrium water played a major role dur- cient dropped to 14%. PVP/PVA blend hydrogel is a
ing the lubrication process than free water because it kind of viscoelastic material with small elastic modu-
had larger surface interaction with the polymer sur- lus. Under the applied load, material surface tended
face. Amide groups increased as the PVP content to deform; meanwhile, it performed strain lagging
increased, resulting in more equilibrium water and for its viscoelasticity.24 With a low sliding speed,
improving the lubrication condition, followed by surface strain rate of the blend hydrogel differed lit-
smaller friction coefficient. tle from the sliding speed, this lead to larger contact
Figure 2. Effect of load on friction coefficient (PVP 5 15 Figure 4. Effect of sliding speed on friction coefficient
wt %; sliding speed 5 0.12 m/s, bovine serum lubrication). (PVP 5 1%, load 5 7.5 N, bovine serum lubrication).
area and friction resistance, so as to produce a larger presented an approximate same friction coefficient
friction coefficient. However, when sliding against under the four lubrication conditions. Friction coeffi-
stainless steel ball on a higher speed, material sur- cient increased sharply on dry friction with the pas-
face deformation velocity lagged behind the sliding sage of time. However, it almost remained a certain
speed, which made it difficult to produce deforma- value under the other three friction conditions. PVP/
tion on the blend hydrogel surface. Therefore, con- PVA blend hydrogel represented a three-dimen-
tact area and contact depth of the blend hydrogel sional network of polymer chains, which retained
were relatively small, so that a smaller friction large amount of water in it.1,16,19 When sliding
resistance was obtained. Anyway, as illustrated in against the stainless steel ball on dry friction, plenty
Figure 4, friction coefficient of the PVP/PVA hydro- of water molecules were squeezed out from the
gels dropped with the rise of sliding speed. polymer network structure to the friction surface to
form a water lubricating film; this played a lubricat-
ing role for the friction pairs.1,2 But as the time pro-
Effect of lubrication condition longed, free water on the contact surface consumed
a lot for evaporation, the water deep in polymer
The change of friction coefficient as a function of structure could not transfer to the friction surface
time under different lubrication conditions is shown promptly, which caused the destroy of the water
in Figure 5. It is observed that during the initial lubricating film. That was the indicative reason for
stage of the friction (t < 25 min), the blend hydrogel
Figure 3. Contact area and contact depth under different Figure 5. Effect of lubrication condition on friction coeffi-
applied loads (PVP 5 15 wt %; sliding speed 5 0.12 m/s, cient (PVP 5 1 wt %; load 5 7.5 N; sliding speed 5
bovine serum lubrication). 0.12 m/s).
the sharp rise of the friction coefficient on dry friction 4. Revell PA, Al-Saffar N, Kobayashi A. Biological reaction to
after the initial friction stage, as shown in Figure 5. debris in relation to joint prostheses. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]
1997;211:187–197.
Figure 5 shows that the lubricating fluid demon- 5. Xiong D, Ma R, Lin J, Wang N, Jin ZM. Tribological proper-
strated a significant role in reduction and stabiliza- ties and structure of ultra-high molecular weight polyethyl-
tion of the friction coefficient. Lubricating fluid was ene after g irradiation. Proc Inst Mech Eng [J] 2007;221:315–
mediated by formation of a fluid film with normal 320.
bearing capacity to reduce the contact stress.1 With 6. McCann L, Udofia I, Graindorge S, Ingham E, Jin Z, Fisher J.
Tribological testing of articular cartilage of the medial com-
the rise of lubricant viscosity, the fluid film thickness partment of the knee using a friction simulator. Tribol Int
increased, which resulted in a lower friction coeffi- 2008;41:1126–1133.
cient. This explained the reason that it obtained the 7. Dowson D. A comparative study of the performance of me-
smallest friction coefficient on bovine serum lubrica- tallic and ceramic femoral head components in total replace-
tion, as well as the largest one on deionized water ment hip joints. Wear 1995;190:171–183.
8. Dong H, Shi W, Bell T. Potential of improving tribological
lubrication. On the other hand, bovine serum con- performance of UHMWPE by engineering the Ti6Al4V coun-
tained several kinds of organic macromolecules, terfaces. Wear 1999;225–229:146–153.
such as gamma globulin and La-DPPC; during fric- 9. Weightman B, Light D. The effect of the surface finish of alu-
tion, these macromolecules could not permeate into mina and stainless steel on the wear rate of UHMW polyeth-
ylene. Biomaterials 1986;7:20–24.
the three-dimensional network like the water mole-
10. Xiong D. Friction and wear properties of UHMWPE compo-
cules, which led to a thicker fluid between the bear- sites reinforced with carbon fiber. Mater Lett 2005;59:175–179.
ing surfaces.23 It also contributed to produce a small- 11. Unsworth A. Tribology of human and artificial joints. Proc
est friction coefficient on bovine serum lubrication. Inst Mech Eng [H] 1991;205:163–172.
12. Suciu AN, Iwatsubo T, Matsuda M. Theoretical investigation
of an artificial joint with micro-pocket-covered component of
and biphasic cartilage on the opposite articulating surface.
CONCLUSIONS
ASME J Biomech Eng 2003;125:425–433.
13. Oka M, Noguchi T, Kumar P, Ikeuchi K, Hyon SH, Naka-
PVA hydrogel is considered as the most promising mura T, Fujita H. Development of an articular cartilage. Clin
Mater 1990;6:361–381.
material for biomedical applications for its tissue-like
14. Mondino AV, Gonzalez ME, Romero GR, Smolko EE. Physi-
mechanical behavior and excellent biocompatibility, cal properties of g irradiated poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel
as well as it can improve lubrication regime by preparations. Radiat Phys Chem 1999;55:723–726.
replacing the rigid prosthesis component serving as 15. Peppas NA, Merrill EW. Crosslinked poly (vinyl alcohol)
artificial cartilage. Adding PVP polymers to PVA hydrogels as swollen elastic networks. J Appl Polym Sci
1977;21:1763–1770.
hydrogels can significantly reduce friction coefficient
16. Kim SJ, Park SJ, Kim IY, Lee YH, Kim SI. Thermal character-
of PVA hydrogels. Furthermore, the friction istics of poly (vinyl alcohol) and poly (vinyl pyrrolidone)
behavior of PVP/PVA blend hydrogels is mainly IPNs. J Appl Polym Sci 2002;86:1844–1847.
determined by lubrication friction conditions and 17. Biswas A, Willet JL, Gordon SH, Finkenstadt VL, Cheng HN.
changed a lot in different walking conditions. The Complexation and blending of starch, poly (acrylic acid), and
poly (N-vinyl pyrrolidone). Carbohydr Polym 2006;65:397–
friction system consisting of blend hydrogel and
403.
stainless steel ball nearly exhibited a mixed lubrica- 18. Ping Z, Nguyen QT, Néel J. Investigation of poly (vinyl alco-
tion regime, especially under bovine serum lubrica- hol)/poly (N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) blends. III. Permeation
tion, which can be proposed as a promising method properties of polymer blend membranes. Macromol Chem
to reduce wear of the prosthesis, and make an excel- Phys 1994;195:2107–2116.
19. Razzak MT, Zainuddin, Erizal, Dewi SP, Lely H, Taty E,
lent use in develop novel biomaterials for early Sukirno. The characterization of dressing component materi-
invention, which can be used as another type of als and radiation formation of PVA-PVP hydrogel. Radiat
therapeutic measure for young and active patients Phys Chem 1999;55:153–165.
suffered from osteoarthritis. 20. Corkhill PH, Jolly AM, Ng CO, Tighe BJ. Synthetic hydrogels
hydroxyalkyl acrylate and methacrylate copolymers water-
binding studies. Polymer 1987;28:1758–1766.
21. Stammen JA, Williams S, Ku DN, Guldberg RE. Mechanical
References properties of a novel PVA hydrogel in shear and unconfined
1. Suciu AN, Iwatsubo T, Matsuda M, Nishino T. A study upon compression. Biomaterials 2001;22:799–806.
durability of the artificial knee joint with PVA hdyrogel carti- 22. Wierzcholski KC. Friction forces for human hip joint lubrica-
lage. JSME Int J C 2004;47:199–208. tion at a naturally permeable cartilage. Int J Appl Mech Eng
2. Suciu AN, Iwatsubo T, Matsuda M, Nishino T. Wear charac- 2006;11:515–527.
teristics of novel bearing system for artificial knee joint 23. Walker PS, Dowson D, Longfield MD, Wright V. ‘‘Boosted
(micro-pocket-covered femoral component and tibial poro- lubrication’’ in synovial joints by field entrapment and enrich-
elastic-hydrated cartilage). JSME Int J C 2004;47:209–217. ment. Ann Rheum Dis 1968;27:512–520.
3. Kadoya Y, Revell PA, Kobayashi A, Al-Saffar N, Scott G, Free- 24. Pan Y, Xiong D, Gao F. Viscoelastic behavior of nano-hydroxy-
man MAR. Wear particulate species and bone loss in failed total apatite reinforced poly (vinyl alcohol) gel biocomposites as an
joint arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;340:118–129. articular cartilage. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008;19:1963–1969.