Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Project Proposal

    Uploaded by

    Finestgoods
    16 views12 pages
    Energy renewable project

    Original Title

    Project proposal

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Energy renewable project

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    16 views12 pages

    Project Proposal

    Uploaded by

    Finestgoods
    Energy renewable project

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 12
    JCM_MN_F Val Rep _ver01.0 JCM Validation Report Form Ail. General Information Title of the project Centralization of heat supply system by installation of high-efficiency heat only boilers in Bormuur sonim Reference ntunber MNOO2 Third-party entity (TPE) National Renewable Energy Centre (NREC) Project participant contracting the TPE | SUURIKEIKAKU CO..1TD of Japan ‘Date of completion of this report 29! June, 2015 A.2 Conclusion of validation ‘Overall validation opinion Dd Positive D1 Negative A.3, Overview of final validation conehusion Only when all of the checkboves are checked. overall validation opinion is positive. ‘em Validation requirements Ne CAR or CL remainin: Pinject design | The TPE determines whether the PDD was completed using document form | the latest version of the PDD forms appropriate to the type of project and drafied in line with the Guidelines for a Developing the Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) Project Design Document. Monitoring Plan and Monitoring Report. Project The description of the proposed JCM project in the PDD is description accurate. complete, and provides comprehension of the id proposed JCM project Application of | The project is eligible for applying applied methodology approved JCM| and that the applicd version is valid at the time of a methodology | submission of the proposed JCM project for validation. ies) Emission All ielevant GHG eniision somes covered in the sources and | methodology are addressed for the purpose of calculating B calculation of | project emissions and reference emissions for the propased emission ICM project rednetions The values for project specific parameters to be Fixed ex ante listed in the Monitoring Plan Sheet ore appropriate, if ica applicable Environmental _| The project participants conducted an environmental impact impact assessment, if required by Mongolia, in line with Q assessment Mongolia’s procedures. Losal The projest participants have completed a local stakcholder stakeholder consultation process and that due steps were taken to engage Q consuiltatian __| stakeholclers and solicit comments for the propased project. ‘Monitoring The description of the Monitoring Plan (Monitoring Plan i 1 JCM_MN_F Val Rep_ver01.0 Trem ] Validation requirements No CAR or CL | remaining: Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet) is based on the approved methodology and/or Guidelines for Developing the Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) Project Design Document, Monitoring Plan, and Monitoring Report. The monitoring points for measurement are appropriate, as well as whether the types of equipment fo be installed are appropriate if necessary. Public inputs | All inputs on the PDD of the proposed JCM project submitted in line with the Project Cycle Procedure are taken a 7 _| into due account by the project participants, Modalities of | The corporate identity ofall project paxticipants and a focal communications | point, as well as the personal identities, including specimen signatures and employment status, of their authorized | signatories are included in the MoC. The MoC has been correctly completed and duly authorized. a Avoidance oF | The proposed JCM project is not registered under other double international climate mitigation mechanisms Q registration : ‘of | The start of the operating date of the proposed JCM project a {operation does not predate January 1, 2013. Authorised signatory: Mr. & Ms. (1) Last name: Baldor) First name: Altangerel Title: Director Specimen signature: Date: 29/06/2015 JCM_MN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0 Rn 5 Scheme Technical | On-site a Name Company | Funetion® | competence? | competence* | visi Mz | M\Natsagbadam | NREC ‘Team Sectoral ao leader x seope 23 | py Ms. x Mr | TBurte NREC Teain Sectoral Oo member scope 1.2.3 Ms. q a Pl Ms | O.Bavaudoy | NREC Techical Sectoral 1.23 a reviewer a seope a 0 ts TiLandamnoroy | Mon-Eneigy | Technical Sectoral Consult expert scope 1.2.3 Ms. Co.Ltd y Qo Oo Please specify the following. for each item Function: Indicate the role of the personnel in the validation activity such as team leader; team member; technical expert, or internal reviewer: Scheme competence: Check the boxes ifthe personnel have sufficient knowledge on the JCM. Technical competence: Indicate ifthe personnel have sufjicient technical competence related to the project under validation. C.L, Project design document form Please state if CARs, CLs, or EARs are raised, and how they are resolved. ‘No CARs, CLs and FARs have been raised by NREC. «Conclusion based on reporting requirements> Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements. REC confirmed that the PDD was completed using the latest version of the PDD forms appropriate to the type of project and drafted in line with the PDD and Monitoring Guidelines. JCM_MN_F Val Rep_ver01.0 C2. Project description Please stare conclusion based on reporting requirements. NREC confirmed that the description of the proposed JCM project in the PDD was accurate, complete, and provided an understanding of the proposed JCM project. C3. Application of approved methodology(ies) NREC assessed whither the project was eligible for applying selected methodology and that the applied version was valid at the time of submission of the proposed JCM project for validation through Document review and Follow-up actions (on-site visit and interviews) with Evidence. Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved (CL02: There was no Evidence related to the Criteion| to 6. (CLO02 was closed out because the PP has submitted the Ref.01 to 06. Conclusion based on reporting requirements> Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements. NREC confirmed that the project was eligible for applying selected methodology and that the applied version was valid atthe time of submission of the proposed JCM project for validation. C4, Emission somes and calculation of emission reductions Please state if CARs, CLs, or EARS are raised, and how they are resolved. No CARs, CLs and FARs have been raised by NREC Please state if CARs, CLs, or ARs are raised, and how they are resolved. ‘CLO3: There was no Evidences regarding the result of ELA (CLO3 was closed out because the PP has submitted the Ref 01 Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements. ‘NNREC confismed that the project participants conducted an environmental impact assessment in line with Mongolia’s procedures C6. Local stakeholder consultation Please state if CARs, CLs, or EARs are raised, and how they are resolved. ‘CLO4: The description of the notice and the results regarding the Local stakeholder consultation ‘were not enough to explain the compliance with the requirements. CLO4 was closed out because the PP described the information about the notice and the results regarding the Local stakeholder consultation have heen added to the PDD E.1 and E.2 JCM MN _F Val Rep ver01.0 Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved. (CLOS: The information regarding the emission sources, monitoring points and datz collecting procedure were not enough to explain the compliance with the requirements, CLOS was closed out because the PP described the information regarding the emission sources, ‘monitoring points and data collecting procedure have been added to the PDD C.2 and Monitoring, Plan Sheet Table] with Ref 06 and 07, CLO6 - The description regarding QA/QC in the Measurement methods and procedures of Monitoring Plan Sheet Table! was not enough to explain the compliance with the requirements. CLOG was closed out because the PP described the information regarding QA/QC in the Measurement methods and procedures of Monitoring Plan Shect Table! have been added to the Monitoring Plan Sheet Table] Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements NREC confirmed that the description of the monitoring plan (Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Stmchire Sheet) is based on the approved methodology and PDD and Monitoring Guidelines, and that the monitoring points for measurement are appropriate, as well as the types of equipment to be installed are appropriate. CS. Modalities of Communication Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved. No CARs, CLs and FARs have been saised by NREC. ‘Conclusion based on reporting requirements Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements NREC confirmed the authenticity regarding identity of all project participants and a focal point incnded in the MC, as well as the personal identities, including specimen signatures and ‘employment status, of their authorized signatories and that the MaC’ has been correctly completed and duly authorized with other contract documents. C9, Avoidance of double registration Please state if CARs, CLs, or EARs are raised, and how they are resolved. No CARs, CLs and FARs have been raised by NREC Conclusion based on reporting requirements> Please state conclusion based on reporting reqsarements NREC confirmed that the proposed ICM project is not registered under other international climate mitigation mechanisms. €.10. Start of operation jeans of validation NREC assessed the start of the operating date of the proposed JCM project and whether the date does not predate January 1, 2013. ‘ Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved. CLO7: There was no Evidences regarding the start of the operating date of the proposed JCM project and whether the date does not predate January 1, 2013 JCM_MN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0 ‘CLOT wos closed out because the PP submitted the contract documents regarding Heat supply to the customers which contains the starting date of the Heat supply. Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements. ‘NREC confinmed the start of the operating date of the proposed JCM project and that the date does not predate January 1, 2013. CLL, Other issues Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved. Not applicable.

    You might also like