A Treatment Approach to Malocclusions Under the Consideration of Craniofacial Dynamics Sadao SatoPreface Orthodontics had been established for two decades now. My involvement in the field of orthodontics is not only limited ¢6 clinical orthodontics. In fact, from the very start I had been fascinated with bone biochemistry. I realized that the only possible research field that will likely conduct a dynamic bone research is the specialized field of orthodontics. This is so since consideration of the bone cells, phosphoric acid calcium crystallization, collagen and other bone proteins is of great relevance during the initial stage of treatment. The bone tissue uscd to be regarded as a very static tissue where the adaptational activity is low. However, with the development of molecular biology, results showed that the bone is a very active tissue with a high adaptational capacity to the environment. This renders tooth movemeat is possible. However, despite its high adaptational capacity ‘o the environment, we are still faced with the problem of abnormal growth. During the 70's, research studies reveal the importance of environmental factors in the growth of craniofacial skeleton. The adaptational capacity of the bones to the environment was seen to be the possible key After nearly « decade of clinical orthodontic, treated patients, including my own, started coming back for re-treatment. These patients, unfortunately, had recurrence of malocelusion and I wondered what went wrong with the treatment. Surprisingly, ‘most of these patients had open bite tendencies. So I concluded that this is not simply relapse but rather a recurrence of malocclusion. Besides, these changes usually appeared after the termination of the pubertal growth stage. If the relapse of malocclusion is attributed to hereditary factors, why then did the changes not appear during the active growth period? ‘This question looms in our minds The answer to this question appeared afier examining the cephalometric Yadiogram and oral cavity, which showed that there was 2 problem of posterior discrepancy and vertical dimension of the posterior teeth. However, even though the problem has already been identified, we were lost with respect to the proper approach for the management of these problems. With the timely lecture of Dr. Young H. Kim, Thad a chance encounter with the MEAW treatment. Afterwards, [had the intuition {hat this could be it. The day following that lecture of Dr. Kim, I could vividly remember that I had started bending MEAW in the treatment room In this book, a new approach to the treatment of malocclusion was presented based on the experiments done on most of the patients who had recurrence of malocelusion, the researches of Dr. Kim and his clinical experience that gave rise to the idea of MEAW technique, and my concept and method as well. Dr. Sadao Sato Associate Professor Department of Orthodonics Kanagawa Denial College September 1991Editor’s Note Marubranshu, the pupil of Dekaruto by chance saw a dog while walking with a friend along the street and says, “this is a machine named dog” and left. The dog upon seeing Marubranshu wagged its tail and ran away. The rest is a joke. The teacher, Dekaruto recognized the importance of intracerebral process and attributes it to the humanlike response of mental activity. The anatomist, Prof. Yoro, made further studies on this matter and affirmed that it is the result of the peripheral nervous system's domination over the central nervous system. The concept that the stimulation of the central nervous system comes from the peripheral nervous system was introduced for the first time, This correlates with the established and dominating structural concept of “Periphery as the Center”. For instance in a cultural society, development does not necessarily mean progress from an uncivilized to a civilized society but rather they co-exist. This also goes with the importance of stimulation of the periphery to the central nervous system, The founder of structuralism, Louie Strauss, also insisted that the world consisis of people with a mental culture of equality. Prof. Yoro tried to correlate this equality in the realm of nerves, but it turned out to be the opposite. In recent years, the author of this book, Dr. Sato, started re-treating his patients with open bite and mandibular protrusion, He investigated the cause of the relapse and determined the mechanism behind it. One reason is that itis related to the cranial base growth due to the enormous effect of the vomer to the growth and position of the maxilla. This makes is necessary to manage the occlusal condition, too. Another aspect is the discrepancy that causes supra-eruption of the molars resulting to the displacement of the mandible, and stimulating the remaining growth capacity, thus expanding the mandibular ramus. Dr. Sato had excellently explained the remarkable mandibular growth during the pubertal growth spurt. The concept on the primary guidance of jaw morphology claims that mandibular protrusion develops when the mandible enlarges. However there is the new explanation which states that there are changes in jaw morphology caused by abnormal occlusal function, Dr. Sato was fortunate to have met Dr. Kim who authored the treatment using a multi-loop appliance where this concept was based. With the data that has captivated the development of orthodontics, the existing treatment approaches based on the established philosophy proves to be inadequate There are still numerous patients who still cannot help but rely on surgical operations. These are the patients whom Dr, Sato intends to help. Itis indeed my great fortune to be part of that endeavor by making me the editor of this book. Prof. Yoshii. Suzul Professor Department of Orthodontics Kanagawa Dental College September 1991FOREWORD On this occasion of Dr. Sadao Sato’s publication, 1 sincerely compliment his superb production, In such a short period of time, he has published in the JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTIC PRACTICE seventeen monthly articles covering the theory of the craniofacial disharmony, the diagnosis and the treatment modality for dificult malocctusions. Certainly, these articles deserve a compilation so that many orthodontists can learn from them. The history of orthodontics, especially during the past three decades, has evolved through numerous, so-called philosophies, concepts and techniques. Among them, the techniques utilizing the edgewise principles have proven to be the everlasting method of treating malocclusions. However, under the concept of the edgewise principles, there are varieties of Diomechanical approaches. In a broad sense, there are two categories. The first approach is to customize the individual arch form and meet the demands of the individual requirement. And the other is to utilize highly commercialized and prefabricated archwires on all paticnts. The unfortunate part of the latter is that there are no two individuals who are exactly alike. And, therefore, a prefabricated product cannot be suitable to all patients. There are too many variations among individuals. Accordingly, the treatment must follow the customized concept to provide an utmost functional occlusion to the patient Whatever the treatment modality one may choose to follow, the importance of correct diagnosis cannot be overemphasized. ‘The dentition behaves according to the facial pattern. This very fact is often overlooked by many, and when a desired occlusion is not attainable, a surgical remedy is too frequently sought, ‘To treat complicated malocclusions, | have introduced the Multiloop Edgewise Archwire Technique over two decades ago, and Dr. Sato has revolutionized the concept. Now many orthodontists in Japan are utilizing the technique to obtain the utmost result of orthodontic treatment. With this diligent search for satisfactory answers to the orthodontic problems, he has produced an immense amount of information regarding many varieties of difficult malocelusions, and he has demonstrated superb treatment results utilizing the MEAW therapy. He even modified the mechanism to appropriately to mobilize the posterior teeth to quickly eliminate the crowded conditions. It seems that his imagination is endless and his never-ending effort will someday lead us to an even better understanding malocelusions. Young H. Kim, D.DS, DM.D.MS. Founder, President of + MEAW Technique and Research Foundation June, 1991 Boston, MA, USAFOREWORD Most people don’t like CHANGE, We all have our comfort zones and most of us dare not do anything new. Approximately more than a quarter of a century ago, Dr. Young Kim introduced this strange-looking archwire with so many loops in it known as the Multiloop Edgewise Archwire (MEAW), originally designed for the treatment of open bile cases, Several years later, as he introduced this technique in different parts of the world, it has not only gained such great following but most significantly, a number of modifications and improvisations have evolved. And this I attribute to the endless pursuit of Professor Sadao Sato for clinical excellence. He has developed a new orthodontic treatment approach for various types of malocclusions such as skeletal Class III, mandibular lateral displacement, crowding, Class Il (including high angle cases) and even TMJ dysfunction cases. This treatment approach is not just based on techniques but more importantly based on the Dynamies of Craniofacial Skeleton Orthodontists have long been treating malocelusions as if it were a static entity; treating merely the symptoms and not the cause of malocelusion. This book will be an eye opener for many for it clearly explains the developmental process of malocelusions and how to formulate the proper treatment objectives and provide the utmost functional occlusion to our patients, Whenever there is a paradigm shift, there are always two groups formed: @ group who will adapt to the change and a group who decides to be left behind. May this textbook revolutionize our orthodontic treatment methods and benefit not just ourselves but most of all, our patients as we make clinical excellence a common trait, Cynthia Protacio-Quismundo , DMD,FAPO President, MEAW Study Club of the Philippines Manila, Philippines February, 2001TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1: THEORIES & PRINCIPLES Chapter 1. Dynamic Mechanism of the Craniofacial Skeleton esse tive Morphological Characteristics of the Craniofacial Skeleton in Skeletal Malocclusion...... 12 Dymamic Mechanism of Craniofacial Skeleton 4 The Dynamic Mectranism of the Neufocranial Base... 15, ‘The Dynamic System of Skeletal Sutures and Articulations 16 ‘The Importance of the Temporal Bone in the Dynamic ‘Mechanism of the Cranial Skeletal System 0 ‘The Growth of the Maxilla based on its Dynamic Mechanism v The Growth of the Maxilla According to the Flexion- Extension of the Cranial Base 19 Lateral Rotation of the Maxilla 2 Chapter 2. The Dynamic Mechanism of Craniofacial ‘Skeleton and Mandibular Growth Relationship of Heredity with the Growl of Craniofacial Skeleton 2B ‘The importance of Functional Environmental Factors . 23 Mandibular Movement and Growth 25 Relationship of Vertical Dimension with Mandibular Growti 1 Occlusal Function and Growth 28 Developmental Mechanism of Growth Abnormality... 30 Chapter 3. The Role of Posterior Di Development of Skeletal Malocetw 3 Discrepancy and Malocclusion 3 The Meaning of Posterior Discrepancy 34 Feedback Regulatory Mechanism in the Development ‘of Skeletal Maloeclusion 38 Feedbacks Regulatory Mechanism in the Development ‘of Mandibular Mesiocclusion 38 Dental Compensation ~The erroneous concept of Dental ‘Compensation 4 Feedback Regulatory Mechanism in Mandibular Distocelusion 4B Chapter 4. Occlusal Plane and Functional Occlusion ... 44 ‘Orthodontics and Functional Ocelusion 44 Dynamic Mechanism of the Maxillofacial Skeieion and Ocelasion 4s Functional Occlusion and Occlusal Piane 50 Molar Interference and Posterior Discrepancy 31 ‘Occlusal Plane and Mandibntae Position 31 Chapter 5. The Characteristics of Malocclusion and the Morphological Types of the Craniofacial Skeleton .. 36 Occlusal Plane and Denture Frame Morphology 56 ‘The Basis of Harmonious Denture Frame Morphology - 56 Occlusal Plane of an Individual with Normal Occlusion : 59 Effect of the Changes of Occlusal Plane on the Denture Frame 39 Orthodontic Approach to Denture Frame 61 Denture Frame Analysis 61 FH-MP, a PP-MP “ OP-MP a OP-MP/PP-ME.. 66 AB-MP 6 AUP 66 Ars 67 AIA” o Denture Frame of the Upper and Lower Anterior Teeth ‘and the Measurement of the Relationship of Tipping, and Position of the Molar or Tooth Material 68 ‘Types of Craniofacial Skeleton and Malocclusion ...... 69 Hyperdivergent-Mesio.ocelusion Type 9 iypodiversent- Mesio-Ovelusion Type © Hyperdivergent-Disto-Ocelusion Type 8 Hypodlivergent-Disto-Occlusion Type im Chapter 6, Diagnosis of Malocelusion .... 2 Dental Examination of Anterior Guidance n Relationship of the Occlusal Paue and Incisal Path Inclination 73 Examination of Mandibular Position 8 Reference Position (RP) 9 Ingereuspal Position (ICP) » ‘Therapeutic Reference Position (TRP) Mandibular Position as the Treatment Objective .. 79 ‘Therapeutic End Position (TEP) 3 Examination of Posterior Support 8 Examination of Posterior Guidance 3 Characteristies 85 Quality a5 Quantity 85 Symmetry 86 Tnelination 86 Reproducibility 86 Retrat Stability 86 Clicking or Noise 86 Ligament Situation 86 Muscle Problem 7 Chapter 7. Diagnosis af Discrepancy .. Discrepancy and Malocclusion Disadvantages of 4 General Consileration of DiserepaneyOcclusal Problems Caused By Discrepancy 9 Crowding and Mesial Tipping of Molars coe 89 Procrusion of Tet 90 Impacted Tooth and Difficulty of Eruption... 90 ‘Supraeruption of Teeth... B Clinical Examination of Posterior Discrepancy 94 Chapter 8, Orthodontic Treatment and Tooth Extraction 101 Imponance of Tooth Extraction in Orthodontic ‘Treatment 101 Disadvantages of Premolar Extraction 102 Advantages of Malar Extraction in Orthodontic Treatment 104 Extraction of 1* Molar 105 Extraction of 2 Molar 106 Extraction of 3 Molar 106 Early Extraction of Lower 3° Molar Toot Gem (Germectomy} 110 Chapter 9. Objective of Orthodontic Treatment and Its Guiding Principles mM Te Objective of Orthodontic Treament a ‘Treatment Objectives Based on the Dynamics of the ‘Craniofaciat Skeleton ui Flexion Position - Low Angle ML Flexion Poition - High Angle .... 113 Extension Position - Low Angle 13 Extension Position - High Angle n3 Reconsiruction of Occlusal Plane 4 Relationship of Vertical Dimension with Mandibular Position ug Relationship of Ocelusal Support with TM! no Relapse and Loss of Occlusal Support 120 PART 2: CLINICAL Chapter 1.The Use of MOAW, MEAW and DAW in ‘Occlusal Reconstruction. Modified Otet Archwire (MOAW) Muliloop Edgewise Archwite(MEAW). Double Archwire (DAW) Chopter 2, Occlusal Reconstruction in Skeletal Clas IHL Maloeclusion . : Treatment Objective Skeletal Clee Ill Maloeshsion 136 ‘Treatment Procedure for Skeletal Class HIE Malocelusion 136 Clinical Case #1 141 Clinical Case #2 M48 Chapter 3, Ocelusal Reconstruction in Open Bite so. 153 ‘Similarity in the Development of Skeletal Class I) and ‘Open Bite Malocelusions 153 ‘Treatment Onjective in Open Bite 137 CCinical Case #1 138 Clinical Case #2 164 Chapter 4, Occlusal Reconstruction in Skeletal Class 1H ‘Open Bite. 168 Treatment Plan for Skeletal Class Il Open Bite 168, eal Case #1 i 1 Clinical Case #2. 8 Clinical Case #3 183 Chapter 5, Occlusal Recoastruction of Mandibular Lateral Diacement (MLD), 19 ‘The Developmental Process of Skeletal MLD 190 Occlusal Reonstryetion of MLD... won 194 Clinial Case #1 196 Clinical Case #2 203 Chapter 6, Occlusal Reconstruction of Crowding Treatment Plan for Crowding ‘Treatment Procedare for Crowding Clinical Case #1 Clinical Case #2 Clinical Case #3 Chapter 7. Occlusal Reconstruction of Mandibular Distocelusion +230 Teeatment Objective for Mandibular Distocelusion 234 Effectivess of the Deuble Archwire (DAW), 231 Clinical Case #1 234 Clinical Case #2 239 Chapter 8. Occlusal Reconstruction of Malocehusion with Associated TMJ Disorder « ‘The Relationship of Premolar Extraction with TMI Arthrosis 246 Lingual Tipping of Maxillary Anterior 246 246 Load to the TM) due to Loss of Occlusal Support 247 Incerference in the Molar Area Due w Posterior Discrepancy 27 ‘Treatment Objective in Malocelusions with TMI Arthrosis.... 247 Clinical Case #1 249 Chinicak,Case 42 237 APPENDIX. 265 {(, Molat Supraeruption in Posterior Discrepancy/2. Relation ship of Cranial Base Movornent ard Palatal Plane Tipping)’. Relationship of Maxillaskeletal inorphology and Occlusal Plane! 4. How to Make & DAW, Recoastruction of Occlusal Plane Showing Sudden Tipping/6, Adjunctive Appliance for Dental ‘Archi Expansion) BIBLIOGRAPHY 2m INDEX 215-278 SUMMARY ABOUT THE AUTHOR 280PART 1: THEORIES AND PRINCIPLES Dynamic Mechanism of the Craniofacial Skeleton “The Dynamic Mechanism of Craniofacial Skeleton and Mandibular Growth The Role of Posterior Discrepancy in the Development of Skeletal Maloociusion Oceiusal Plane and Functional Occlusion The Characteristics of Malocciusion and tne Morphological Types of Craniofacial Skeleton Diagnosis of Malocclusion Diagnosis of Discrepancy Orthodontic Treatment and Tooth Extraction Objective of Orthodontic Treatment and Its Guiding Principles 4 23 33 44 56 88 101 m1. THE DYNAMIC MECHANISM OF THE CRANIOFACIAL SKELETON Introduction Dental medicine revolves around the study of occlusion. The basis of occlusion is not simply the interdigitation of the aligned teeth in both the upper and lower jaws, but a combination of their positional relationship and the functional movement of the mandible, This is controlled by a complicated system of functional elements, i.e. the masticatory muscles, neuromuscular system, ‘TMJ function etc., which serve as a basis of dental treatment. Orthodontics, a branch of dental medicine, constructs an occlusion by correcting malaligned teeth. in Prosthodontics, re- contouring of tooth crowns, as the primary measure in bite construction, is an important approach in improving malocclusion. Therefore, in clinical practice, especially in orthodontics, it is very necessary to fully understand the physiology of occtusal function and the biology of tooth movement. However, these important topics are not sufficiently tackled so far in orthodontics Looking at its history, the development of orthodontics tends to focus more on orthodontic, appliances and their improvement. With technology, as the focal point of therapeutic advancement, the treatment effects on malocclusion has certainly improved and its ation has expanded. Nevertheless, numerous contradictions have come about as a result of mere technological advancement. The orthodontic approach seems to have been isolated from the basics of dental medicine (i.e. physiology of occlusal function, biology of tooth movement etc.), enclosing itself in a specialized field. ‘The orthodontic advancement in the pastfailed to give attention to the causes of malocclusion and mechanism of its development. ‘The introduction of cephalometric radiography for orthodontic diagnosis has certainly played a significant role in understanding malocclusion. However, it does not clearly show the cause of malocclusion, It only localizes the site of skeletal malocclusion and shows the degree of displacement, The elimination of the cause is an indispensable factor in the radical treatment method and with this, stable results can be obtained. With the current orthodontics, it is simply the identification and the treatment of the symptoms, and not the cause. Moreover, the current orthodontic therapy has insufficient therapeutic objectives. To improve the facial profile as a treatment objective, orthodontics can obtain results as if it were a section of cosmetic orthopedic surgery. Of course, in managing the maxillofacial area, the relevance in the improvement of facial profile must not be neglected, but this cannot be the ultimate treatment objective in orthodontics. As mentioned earlier, occlusal construction is one of the effective approaches in orthodontic therapy. However as a treatment objective, the basic guideline and an established therapeutic technique as to which type of occlusion has to be managed is still non- existent. And the time has come to re-evaluate orthodontic therapy. Since the Angle’s expansion arch appliance, various improvements have been imroduced in the evolution of the current full bracket system, From a mechanical standpoint it is believed to be an adequate accomplishment. However, why are there still a number of patients who are difficult to treat? Why does malocclusion recur post treatment? Does this mean that serious errors were committed in the development of ‘occlusal treatment? As numerous improvementsare being made, the current treatment approach thas become too complicated. This is perhaps, due to the unpredictable results obtained by symptomatic treatment based on a. less accurate diagnosis (ie. only the identification of symptoms) Orthodontic occlusal construction is one of the important measures in occlusal therapy and should be widely used in dental medicine, However, this does not reconcile with the concerns of present orthodontics as the contradiction is evident from its new standpoint Hence, new treatment objectives and techniques need 10 be introduced Inthis book, the dynamic mechanism of the bones of the maxillofacial skeleton and the mechanism of the development of malocclusion will be clearly discussed. On this basis, the diagnosis, treatment objective, and treatment techniques for orthodontic occlusal construction will also be explained. Distinctive Morphological Characteristics of the Craniofacial Skeleton in Skeletal Malocelusion Most malocclusions are simply the manifestations of an abnormality in the alveolar bone and dentition as well as growth abnormality of a bone associated with a disproportion of the skeletal morphology . The latter type, classified as skeletal malocclusion is considered to be an extremely difficult orthodontic case . Even though the diagnosis of malocclusion is confined only to the teeth and alveolar structures, the absence of skeletal discrepancy cannot be confirmed. It is because the functional abnormality of occlusion extremely affects the maxillofacial skeleton and the entire skeletal system due to the dynamic 12 mechanism of skeletal and neuromuscular systems. This only means that skeletal discrepancy can be considered to invariably co-exist with malocclusion. And it is basically important to understand the skeletal characteristics of each malocclusion and the mechanism of its development in correcting a malocclusion, Since Downs, cephalometric radiogram was used in case analysis to find out the static symmetry or asymmetry of the maxillofacial skeleton. This in turn, ied to the diagnosis of malocclusion. However, with this type of analysis alone, it is difficult to recognize the development of the skeletal characteristics, and the changes that would occur from then on. Besides, ironic the findings maybe, the most important thing in orthodontic diagnosis is that all the bones of the maxillofacial skeleton can be dynamically captured from the static cephalometric radiogram. Figure 1 shows the cephalometric radiogram of the facial profile of the skeletal Class III and skeletal Class I malocelusions. Chart | also shows the morphological characteristics of the same malocclusions. Though both patients of Figure L are 22 years old, they have a remarkable morphological difference as shown in their respective typical characteristics. How did these skeletal morphological differences develop remarkably? The mechanism in the development of malocclusion and the diagnosis of orthodontic malocclusion are considered to be extremely important in making an occlusal construction plan. ‘There seems to be a problem when these morphological characteristics are simply presumed as growth abnormality or individual differences. It is because these characteristics resulted actually from the adaptation to physiological and functional demands during theprocess of growth and development. Figure 2 is an illustration that shows the interaction of the bones that comprises the maxillofacial skeleton. ‘The maxillofacial skeleton has a complicated bone interaction and consists of their respective movements. During the growth period of an individual, the mobility of each bone is extensive especially that the interosseous suture is mostly open. According to Hooper (1985), the movement of the bones that constitute the face and the neurocranium depends on the mutual articulating action of a bone and the adjacent bone 1 Dynamic Meck of dhe Craniofacial Skeleon ‘Figure 1. Mowgogical characterises of skeletal an ular mesioechisien an skeletal! arate dstoecsion ofthe maillovctl skeleton as sown inthe cephalometric raiogram. ‘shell mandibular mesioelasion bs skeleal manditulardisiechision ‘ot sre 27 years ok. Observe rekon the manila, mandibular positon, ‘morphology. bat also the aeuroanial base which consites the ethmoid ore, sphenoid bone, tc location an sizeof te ccc pal bore, morphotogy Cf the manila sat and prerygppataine f4s, vrteal dimension, ovelaat plane 2m the ctaracterisos ofthe whole mawillofacel skeleton. There ta remarkable diference especially im the vertical dimension with the veritval Jeni heatllovaal skeleton. Te skeletal growrh pater inthe growth proces leads this dection because of dhe functions demands, (Fig. 3). The most important articulation in the skull, excluding the TMJ, is the sphenobasiar articulation because it has a dynamic movement. There is no concrescence in this attachment from the early stage of growth until its maturity thus its articulating action persists. Looking at this 13Skeletal Mandibular Skeletal Mandibular Mesiocelusion Distocelusion Anterior cranial base length Posterior cranial base length Cranial angle (NSBa) Anterior cranial angle (NSP) Posterior cranial angle (PSBa) Morphology of pterygopalatine fossa Floor of maxillary sinus Floor of nasal cavity Palatal plane (PP) Anteroposterior dm. of maxilla (A’-P) Ht, from OP to PP Occlusal plane Anteroposterior dm, of mandible (Co-Gn) Axis of maxillary anterior teeth Axis of mandibular anterior teeth short Jong short long small large small large straight curve low high deformed flat anterior tipping posterior tipping short long, long short flat posteriorsudden tipping long. short lingual tipping labial tipping Chart 1 Charsetersties of skeletal mandibular mesioestusion and skeletal mandibular distocelasion of the maxillofacial skeleton from a cross-sectional angle, there is no concrescence in the articular surface between the sphenoid and occipital bone where these imteract. Evident in Figure 2, the movement of the spheroid bon, which is located at the center of the skull also affects the other bones comprising the maxillofacial skeleton, making up the whole dynamic mechanism. Dynamic Mechanism of Craniofacial Skeleton ‘The dynamic mechanism of the craniofacial skeleton can be discussed in detail under the osteopathic field where cranial bone correction is mainly managed. According to the cranial concept in osteopathy, the articulating action of 14 the cranial sutures in the maxillofacial skeleton depends on the primary respiratory mechanism (includes the resting phase of respiration, heart rate, fluctuation of cerebrospinal fluid) and functions according to the rythmic impulse of the iniracranium, ‘An abnormal interactive movement between these bones will develop, in case that during the developmental period, the harmony of the movement of these bones is not preserved. A change in the growth pattern may result. ‘Another cranial bone function is its important influence on occlusion and mastication Mastication comprises the mandibular movement, which is regulated by the neuromuscular system. Needless to say, that the mandible is connected= i Froutal bane ‘Cocipital bene \ 7 Nasal bane Taped bone Vener > Pstase a ‘oes Ve. 3 “Coy cee. Figure 2. Group of bores that comprises the manillotical stele. Articulations are formed thug sure ce care, beeen a bons and the adjacent bone, éyramically relating 10 each otter. A hone ‘communicates with de aljacet bore, an the ae bone willcommunieae to the next bone creating the whoie dynamic mechanism. This Cyramic 1mectarasm ha a gteatiniluence onthe grow pastern of an ivi uring ie grow period, which brings about the morphological ea ofthe maxillofacial skeleton. (nde Wusuation, Infer‘r nasi concta, tacrimal bone, and tyaid hone were excluded) to the skull through the TMJ, which shows that it has the most important function among the cranial bones. In addition, it plays an important role in ‘occlusion and has a great influence on the functional movement of the skull. Moreover, thefluctuation transmitted from the mandible through the temporal bone has an influence on the movement of the skull. Now, let us further 1. Dynamic Mechanism of ne Craniofacial Skeleton Figure 3. Correlation of the bones comprising dhe neural base ‘a neutcranka base nner from the ventral vowsartal section of the neuroeranial ase, the communication of exh bose, speci oe and occipital bone through an articulation, te sphenotempclarclation ‘nd the oecipitotemporal articulation are locate between the respesive ‘tures of he erepurl, shennan ocrptal bones discuss the movement of the cranial bones. ‘The Dynamic Mechanism of the Neurocranial Base In understanding the function of eranial bones, it is imperative to touch on the concept of dynamic mechanism of the neurocranial base which are the Cranial Concept (Hooper, 1986) and Cranial Motion (Blum, 1958, 1987). Needless, to say that the neurocranial base consists of series of connected bones which are the frontal, ethmoid, sphenoid, and occipital bones (Figure 3). A suture lies between each bone (0 connect 15them and the part where a biodynamic force is obtained and a sudden growth is seen is the so- called articulation. In the neurocranial base, the ethmosphenoidal, intersphenoidal and sphenobasilar articulations can be found. Among these, intersphenoidal articulation fuses and becomes one at birth, but there is no concrescence ‘on the sphenoethmoidal articulation until 7-8 y.0. Also, sphenobasilar articulation fuses at about 18-20 years old and the articulation persists and the aspect of a dynamic mechanism is shown here. In other words, the developing articulation functions to mediate the difference in the growth condition of the neurocranium with the craniofacial skeleton after birth. In addition, it copes with the changing mechanical force from the craniofacial skeleton through its articulating action after birth, and preserves the harmony of the whole craniofacial base through the rotation of the cranial base and intraosseous tissue movement (Figure 4), ‘The Dynamic System of Skeletal Sutures and Articulations The articulating action of skeletal sutures is explained by numerous researchers like Blum (1985), McEthaney et. al. (1970), Wood (1971). The movement of the skeletal suture usually corresponds to the biodynamic force and primary respiration, and regulates the movement of the connecting bones through its articulating action. ‘This means that the skeletal sutures function as a hinge of the connecting bones (Markens & Oudhof, 1980). “The cranial bones are very dynamic bones usually interacting with the skeletal sutures. The cranial base slides repetitively, consistently coping 16 Figure. Movements ofthe Occipital and Spnenoi Bones ‘ "Te + represons the rotating center ofthe ephersd ad cipal move- Flexion eersionts te crsicrrsrgn crnncritinsionts with the dynamies of respiration, heart function, and the pressure of the cerebrospinal fluid (Retzlaff, 1972, 1975, 1977, 1983) Moreover, the functional force originating from the occlusal function through the action of masticatory muscles is transmitted to the temporal bone through the TMI, which influences the group of bones that consists the cranial base, a dynamic movement that constantly occurs.Among the skeletal sutures, the parts that havea very important articulating action are the occipitomastoid region, the suture between the pyramidal base of the temporal bone, and the sphenobasilar articulation (Hooper 1986, Blum 1987) According to Hooper, the fashion of the neurocranial movement is classified into two types as shown in Figure 4, which is flexion and extension. The sphenobasilar articulation is the most fundamental articulating suture among the cranial bones and it is where the movement of flexion-extension occurs Among the functions of the maxillofacial skeleton, mastication, the most important biodynamical function, is trat ‘itted to the entire craniofacial skeleton as a masticatory force, causing an effect on the dynamic movement of the cranial base. ‘The Importance of the Temporal Bone in the Dynamic Mechanism of the Cranial Skeletal System In the dynamic mechanism of the cranial skeleton, the temporal bone holds the most important role among the maxillofacial bones due tothe following reasons. Looking at its anatomical position, the temporal bone is located between the sphenoid, occipital and the parietal bone (Figure 3). In the external part forms the zygomatotemporal process attached to the zygomatic arch. The zygomatic process forms the hollow space called mandibular fossa, forming the mandibular and maxillary joints. A muscular mechanical force is obtained with the unity of the functions of the forceful masticatory muscles (masseter muscle, temporal muscle). In addition, the temporal bone usually functions through the influence of mechanical force related to mandibular movement, mastication ete The temporal bone affects the rotating movement of the sphenotemporal articulation, which is formed between the temporal and sphenoid bones, and the temporo-occipital articulation, which is formed between the temporal and occipital bones. The temporal bone itself, rotates in the petrotemporal axis of the pyramidical part, The results obtained with the occlusion in recent orthodonties or prosthetic construction bite is that the whole facial bone is secondarily affected once themandibular movement is transmitted to the temporal bone The Growth of the Maxilla based on its Dynamic Mechanism As mentioned earlier, the maxillofacial skeleton is always understood as a complex of extremely dynamic bones. This dynamic mechanism has a surprising effect on skeletal growth. The importance of the dynamic aspect Of the maxilla in orthodontics will now be the focus of the discussion, ‘The maxilla, where the maxillary sinus is located, has 4 external processes, which are the frontal, zygomatic, palatal, and alveolar processes, The alveolar process accommodates 17every tooth in the maxilla forming the upper dental arch creating an occlusion with the lower dental arch, The frontal process and zygomatic process forms a joint with the frontal, nasal and zygomatic bones, etc., respectively. On the other hand, the palatal process forms a joint with the palatal process of the opposite side, This attachment site of the palatal process is the median palatal suture, a protuberance along the surface of the nasal cavity, forming the nasal crest, The inferior border of the vomer attaches to the nasal crest, forming a joint. Moreover, the vomer is formed between the neurocranial base and the maxilla as a support (Rigure 5), and transmits the important movement of cranial base to the maxilla. Once the superior surface of the vomer is exposed (vorner wing), @ joint is formed between the inferior surface and rostrum of the sphenoid bone. Based on this structure, it is easy to understand that the movement of the sphenoid bone is transmitted to the palatine bone and maxilla through the vomer. Also, the inferior border of vomer transmits the growth pressure of the nasal septum and movement of the ethmoid bone, which is connected to the ethmoid perpendicular plate and the nasal septum cartilage, to the maxilla. However, the movement of the sphenoid bone is indirectly transmitted to the mandible because the anterior border of the median layer of the sphenopterygoid process is connected to the vertical process of the palatine bone. As described above, the maxilla moves anteroinferiorly when the movement of the ethmoid, sphenoid and occipital bones etc. is exhibited, consequently inducing a growth in the suture part of the maxilla. 18 Figures the ma se Tue moverert of every bore of the neurocranial base i coming fiom de yore east to the mari “Anteroinroy movement ofthe maxila allows moderate exersion of ‘phenoid bone, aeivatingaflesiesteogeneis ofthe manilay twbesity GF tie posterior border, exfanting the cscptafrona diameter of the rashi iit te entice Figure 6. Relationship in the growth dirsetion ofthe maxilla and the spheno-cccpial bore Nexon exten jsextersfon. the manila i shed amernferiotly det he exon, the manila strongly pushed inferioty hus the vee a. When de coxpital base mov When te cranial ase moven The Growth of the Maxilla According to the Flexion-Extension of the Cranial Base The rotating movement of the neurocranial base is at the spheno-occipital articulation. The rotating axes of the sphenoid and occipital bones are the anterior of sella turcica and the posterior of major occipital foramen respectively (Figure nopteryaid process and veret rotation: tofcetal size ofthe me asa minimal increase 4). The rotating movement of the sphenoid bone is transmitted to the mandible through the vomer, which results to the anteroinferior pushing of the maxilla (Figure 8). The vomer has a direct effect rotating axes of the sphenoid and occipital bones are the anterior of sella turcica and the posterior of major occipital foramen respectively (Figure 4). The rotating movement of the sphenoid bone 19Three types of maxi Cae 1, Transl frontal bone [Fignre 7 An ilsration ofthe growth puters of the manila ry movement (Precious et al., 1987) oe 2, Vertical elongation 3, Anterior rotation, which both advances and elongates the inferior part of the maxilla “Toe growth pater he mila classified ino three and each growth panera cles fated we development of malesiosen is transmitted to the mandible through the vomer, which results to the anteroinferior pushing of the ‘maxilla (Figure 5), The vomer has a direct effect on the rotation of the sphenoid since the sphenoid ‘and vomeer are communicating with the rostrum of the inferior surface of sphenoid and the wing of vomer. In addition, the rotating movement of the sphenoid bone is indirectly transmitted to the maxilla because the inferior border of vomer is connected to the maxillopalatine process and the nasal crest of the palatine horizontal plate (Figure 6). This is how the movement of cranial bones affects the maxilla especially when the pushing direction of maxilla changes related to the rotating 20 direction of the neurocranial base, for which this would indicate the growth of the maxilla, For example, when the rotation of the sphenoid bone is flexion, this would influence the rotating force of the wing of vomer, which is posteroinferior, preventing the pushing of the maxilla anteriorly, instead it will move inferiorly. On the contrary, ‘when the rotation of the sphenoid bone is extension, the rotation of the vomer would be anterior, and the maxilla will be strongly pushed anteriorly. In the pushing movement of the maxilla, it gives enough space in the posterior part of the upper teeth, allowing the growth of the posterior border of the maxillary tuberosity (Ross, Enlow).ee, Figures. Anittustion othe maxillary Intra retation 8. External rotation b,Ineral rotation, Tis pe of later rotation has malay teeth Scott (1960) considered that maxillary growth is due to maxillary movement, which is dependent on the growth of the nasal septum cartilage and secondarily due to the growth of the skeletal suture. However, it is extremely difficult to explain the pushing movement of the maxilla due to the growth of the nasal septum cartilage alone, which is communicating with the perpendicular plate of sphenoid and anterior border of vomer. ‘When the growth of the nasal septum cartilage has an effect on the pushing movement of the maxilla, looking from its anatomical position, it affects the movement of the maxilla towards the superior, inferior and vertical direction. In terms of the protrusive movement of the maxilla, it is absolutely difficult to explain this movement of the maxilla without the influence of the rotating movement of the sphenoid. At this point, it is very necessary to touch on an important matter Dymumie Mechanism ofthe Craniofacial Steen reat effect ces the Loh sdnidth of the that is quite significant in the field of orthodontics And this is the flexion of the neurocranial base which is becoming a very relevant phenomenon in the development of skeletal reversed occlusion. The posterior cranial base length of a patient with a skeletal reversed occlusion is short, the cranial angle is smail, and the anterior maxillary growth is poor. This is due to the neurocranial base flexion Position. In the prolonged flexion position of the neurocranial base, the anteroposterior growth of the sphenobasilar articulation and the extension of the sphenoid and occipital bones is inhibited resulting to a short posterior cranial base length and small cranial angle. Additionally, the inhibition of the maxillary tuberosity growth related to the anterior movement of the maxilla aggravates the posterior discrepancy and this has a serious effect ‘on the occlusal system (Appendix 2). According to Precious et. al. (1987), maxillary growth has basically three patterns as 2growth patterns is possible These patterns, looking from the dynamic mechanism of the skull, resulted from the anterior rotation of the vomer due to the elongation of the maxilla resulting to the protrusive maxillary movement with frontomaxillary suture as the fulcrum In this case of mazullary rotation, the anterosuperior tipping of the palatal surface becomes strong, and the Jabial tipping becomes visible in the anterior teeth, of themaxilla Moreover, the occipito-frontal Gtameter of the maaulla increases because of an extensive growth of its posterior part creating an eruption space for the molars. ‘On the other hand, inferior movement of the maxilla 1s due to the posteroinferior rotation of the vomer telated to the flexion of the cranial base In this case, the anteromnferior tipping in the palatal surface is visible, and there is not much, room for the tooth to gain space because the occipitofrontal diameter of the maxilla does not, increase In other words, thts reveals discrepancy. Lateral Rotation of the Maxilla Maxillary movement 15 mot only anteromferior, but 1 also laterally rotates. AS shown in Figure 8, the lateral rotations of the maxilla are anternal and external. In the internal rotation, the incisive bone 1s pushed anteriorly because the length and width of the dental arch are increased and decreased respectively (Figure 9). This also makes the palate deep and this can bbe generally interpreted as Class 1] Division 1 maloceiusion. On the other hand, external rotation of the maxilla decreases the length and increases the width of the dental arch, creating a shallow palate, These characteristics are eviclent ina patient with skeletal reversed occlusion. The development ‘of numerous malocelusions 1s completely related to this dynamic mechanism of the maxilla 22 FFagure9 The corrlayon ofthe morphology with te Inteal route of the mle 2 legratrottonb Ester rctaon~ he characterises ad morpblegy lott ental arc eerved in malay prerasion apd evesed oLsion ‘dv (os ype oF madary mavernent2. THE DYNAMIC MECHANISM OF CRANIOFACIAL SKELETON AND MANDIBULAR GROWTH Relationship of Heredity with the Growth of Craniofacial Skeleton Before even considering the discussion of craniofacial growth, it is important to be historically acquainted with the concepts related to the regions of its growth. The basic skeletal research related to the concept of this growth region started in 1940, and was revised ten years later (Carlson, 1985) With the old concept, the growth of the craniofacial skeleton was believed to be related to heredity (Charles, 1925), and not due to environmental factors, 2s seen irom mumerous cranial bone research studies (Figure 1) Therefore, artificial alteration of the growth pattern of the craniofacial skeleton was considered impossible then. Sicher (1947) is perhaps the first researcher to present a clear concept of the mechanism of craniofacial growth. The sutural dominance theory, which he authored , states that the growth of the craniofacial skeleton is in the growth of the skeletal sutures where the growth center is the cartilage located in the neurocranial base, nasal septum, and the mandibular condyle etc. This growth is thought to be due to heredity and very less attributed to environmental factors. However, Scott (1953) believed thai the growth of skeletal sutures is not controlled by heredity alone, but rather, itis greatly influenced by environmental factors, though there was a strong concept that the cartilage or periosteal growth is clearly influenced by hereditary factors. This matter was subsequently mentioned by Courtesy et. al. (1968) Nevertheless, Scott, like Sicher, believed that the craniofacial cartilage is the primary growth center, especially the nasal septum cartilage, which has a major role in the anteroinferior growth of the maxilla, Actually, this type of concept raised a serious question then. It is because the growth of the nasal septum cartilage horizontally and vertically expands the middle third of the face, thereby regulating the craniofacial growth, Though this is influenced by heredity, chiefly between gestation to several years after birth, its becoming apparent that the growth of the tooth and alveolar part, muscle function ete., is influenced by environmental factors ‘The Importance of Functional Environmental Factors Inthe 1950's, research studies, using animal subjects, have increased which elucidated the mechanism of craniofacial growth. After 1960, a number of theories were presented based on the results of these research studies. The Moss (1962) functional matrix theory, in particular, is the one that has the most relevant concept. The influence of this concept to the 231940 1350 1970 1300 1390 | So New cn tent ———— | St enn Mandir conde Sonais Peedetemticns Noval exer cniage Nesornaa be Manlbulor eo) Niamerons crn Peosteum, tone ‘Sleletl sone uke Nae [Seeder Is meisbgs ad > Figure L-Trarsion of he craniofacial seleal grow heores Finctonal mae decry a Maret conte ‘The masilfscil slot possess ahigher dsee | Deep | "The old concep ofthe eraficalgrowrh Ms praally changed, and the importance of functional ervionmentalfctor was recognivd. (ists in orthedontics, Carlson) development of clinical orthodontics and to researchers is immeasurable A very good example of the cranial bone growth is explained in the functional matrix theory, The growth in the cranial suture is not only due to the external expansion of the suture. This could also be due to the capacity of the brain to expand, creating a translation in the spatial 24 position of the cranial bones, consequently proliferating the connective tissue, creating a transformation, resulting to the expansion of the whole cranium. ‘This is not only attributed to the relationship of the skull and brain, but also due to the orbital and ocular relationship, or the maxilla and maxillary sinus relationship etc. Moss, in theSS functional matrix theory, generalized that the organs, cavity, sinuses etc, affect skeletal growth. ‘The basic concept of functional matrix theory is that, the local functional environmental factors have extensive roles in the growth of the craniofacial skeleton. The paradigm shift in relation to craniofacial growth spontaneously changed the mandibular growth concept. Among. the bones of the craniofacial skeleton, it is the mandibular growth that has the most serious concern for orthodontists Mandibular Movement and Growth Among the bones of the maxillofacial skeleton, the mandible is the only bone that has the voluntary and the most extensive movement. In order to understand the movement of this bone, it is necessary to comprehend the occlusal function and neuromuscular system. An articulation (TMJ) is formed between the mandible and the temporomandibular fossa, and its movement has a great influence on occlusion The relationship of mandibular movement with ocelusal function or mandibular position will be examined especially the relationship of the changes of occlusal system with mandibular growth As mentioned earlier, the studies in the 1950’s showed that environmental factors have a greater influence than hereditary factors in the growth of skeletal sutures and periosteum etc. according to Moss. This gave Moss the opportunity to determine whether this is closely related to skeletal growth and function through the functional matrix theory. In the 1960°s, several researchers of craniofacial growth accepted the functional matrix, 2, Dynmic Mechanism of Cranofacia Skeleton tnd merutula grovih interests were diverted to mandibular growth, its function and functional relationship. Petrovie, Carlson, McNamara, Woodside et. al., are just few of the various researchers who reported, using functional appliance on animals as clinical subjects. This studies showed the possibility that the growth pattern of the mandible can be changed since its growth is related to its function. Petrovic (1975) comprehensively studied the factors affecting the growth of the craniofacial skeleton, As a result, he reported on the cybernetic model of mandibular growth with the concept of Moss as his basis. The most important point in the cybernetic model is that occlusal function is an important factor in mandibular growth. The anteroinferior displacement of the maxilla directs the mandibular growth adaptation. In the cybernetic model, the functional factor that regulates mandibular growth is “occlusal function”. It is important since it serves as a functional matrix, The cybernetic model of Petrovic can be simplified into the manner shown in Figure 2. The most important local factor in the control of mandibular growth is the occlusal surface and spatial position of the maxilla the maxillary dental arch, The occlusal movement of the mandible, which is in the occlusal surface, is dependent on the action of the central nervous system and masticatory muscles. The anteroinferior growth of the’ maxilla functionally shifts the mandible, making the TMJ adjust to the new mandibular position; which leads to mandibular remodelling or growth, Hormones also influence the growth of the mandible and mandibular condyle ‘The most important point in this concept is that mandibular growth is not only controlled by the endocrine system and its growth potential but 25in ‘Tempoeal bane Spheasid oe Mmliie oN Figure 3. Relationship ofthe mardi, trapoal and sphencid bane ubserved from the roma view The funtioasl displacement of the mandible afc the neuroranil base Uhrough the rotation ofthe temporal bone. Through this system, the dyrarnic ‘mechanism of eclusal function and fecal shelton is lsc rele also, the position of the occlusal surface of the maxillary teeth (functional occlusal plane) to which the mandible is functionaily related with For instance, in a patiem where the maxilla vertically descends, the functional occlusal surface will change to an inferior position Consequently, the mandible will move inferiorly and elongate vertically. ‘The adaptation to the new mandibular position, is not simply due to mandibular growth and TMJ remodelling. But it is also affected by the functional force from the mandible to the 2 Dynunic Mechanism of Craniofacial Skeleton and mandibular growth temporal bone through the joint cavity, masseter muscle, changes in the traction force from the temporal muscles to the temporal bone, movement or rotation of the temporal bone (Figure 3), Jn addition, the tension of the medial and lateral pterygoid process, which is related to the positional change of the mandible, affects the rotation of the sphenoid bone. As mentioned earlier, the sphenoid bone movement changes the ‘maxillary movement and vert‘cal position through the vomer. A change in the mandibular position due to occlusion controls the harmony of the whole craniofacial skeleton The occlusal function and the craniofacial skeleton are closely related, creating a whole dynamic mechanism. The balance of this dynamic mechanism has a great influence on the growth of the maxillofacial skeleton in actively-growing infants. Therefore, orthodontic occlusal treatment is not simply the alteration of the occlusion but the consideration of craniofacial dynamic mechanism, Relationship of Vertical Dimension with Mandibular Growth Schudy (1964) mentioned, as stated below, the relationship of the vertical growth of craniofacial skeleton and mandibular rotation. The increase in the vertical dimension of the craniofacial skeleton, as shown in Figure 4, is due to the increase of nasion (1), inferior movement of the mandible (II), increase of the vertical dimension of the maxillary teeth (IID, and mandibular teeth (IV). When the harmony of these and the vertical increase of the mandibular condyle (A) is maintained, mandibular rotation will not ecenrVertical Growth T+tl+il+Vea (Schudy , 1964) Figure 4. Retonship of an increase i vertcst dimension wath mandibular condvlr goth estcal groath of nason (D, vertical displacement of maxills (, increase 1m the vertical dlameter of che milly teth (11), ed ‘andl molars (I), de close rlstonsip of the increase in vera ies of te ibe withthe sow ofthe ana dar cay e() ‘A talanced growih of hese sirucures will result wa harmonious relationship ofthe skeletal pacern (Set, 1958) However, the increase of I, II, III changes the vertical position of the maxillary occlusal plane leading to the adaptation of the mandible, allowing the growth of the mandibular condyle. ‘As shown in Figure 5, a lesser increase in vertical dimension than the growth of the mandibular condyle, results to the forward rotation of the mandible presenting an open bite condition on the molar region. But this usually leads to the posterosuperior rotation of the mandible because of the disocclusion between the upper and lower molars. ‘This type of mandibular adaptation to ocelusion gives a load to the mandibular condyle where its growth will be regulated. On the contrary, when this load is excessive to the TMJ adaptation capacity, the load becomes strongly abnormal for the temporal bone, articular dise, and masticatory muscles, causing TMJ arthrosis. On the other hand, a better increase of vertical dimension than the growth of the mandibular condyle results to the backward rotation of the mandible, presenting an open bite condition of the anterior teeth creating a fulcrum in the molars, which in this case, causes an abnormal load on the TMJ ‘As mentioned earlier, the inerease in vertical dimension and mandibular growth are closely related. When there is an increase or decrease in vertical dimension, the mandible adapts through functional displacement. Hence, it is important to develop and maintain their harmonious growth. ‘Occlusal Function and Growth Research studies of the craniofacial skeletal growth before the 1940's showed that alterationIi+ll+V A Figure S. Relationship ofthe increase in vertical dimension wilh manfitularconésar gic 2, Lesser increase of he vertical dimension than the mandibular eenyle grows recast the forward rotation ofthe mandible. b An inrease ofthe ‘vertical dimersion more thn the mandibular condyle resus ote bckwared rotation othe nanible, (Sehuly, 1964) of its growth pattern could not be artificially changed. Then, with the advent of the functional matrix theory and cybernetic model, alteration of the growth pattern has proven to be not at all impossible. In fact, research studies by McNamara, Graber, Harvold, Bass et. al., inthe 1970's revealed that the amount of mandibular growth changes due to cell proliferation in the mandibular condyle is related to the changes in ocelusal function. This suggests that itis possible toalter the craniofacial growth pattern The history of growth research studies is said to have unveiled the importance of functional environmental factors in growth. The most important point thatshould be considered is the morphology of the craniofacial skeleton, observed from the cephalometric radiogram. It is not solely influenced by hereditary factors, but by functional environmental factors as well. ‘The growth of the craniofacial skeleton at the pubertal period, which is the final stage of occlusion, and the post pubertal period is influenced more importantly by occlusal function rather than the inherent genetic factors. Even if a craniofacial growth abnormality is suspected, behind it isan underlying functional cause. Thus, improving the occlusal function, which is the 29etiologic factor, will prevent the growth abnormality. It is important to note that even if it is possible to alter the growth pattern, the improvernent of the function has to be attained first. Herein lies the importance of orthodontic management of occlusion in children during the period of growth. In orthodontic diagnosis, possible occlusal function abnormality can be detected at an early stage, and the corresponding measures may be applied. A patient shown in Figure 6 is an 11-year- old boy who came to the hospital with a chief compiaint of reverse occlusion, During the pretreatment orthodontic diagnosis, evident were the ff: a deficient anteroposterior length of the maxilla, excessive mandibular length, and an insu‘ficient vertical dimension of the maxilla If this growth pattern progresses, it would result toa skeletal malocclusion The growth pattern changed after the maxillary 2" molars and the mandibular 3rd molars were extracted. The reconstruction of occlusal plane and the attainment of a functional occlusion were the orthodontic treatment objectives. Length of active treatment was about one and a half years, A retainer was used for about a year, and then orthodontic treatment terminated, Figure 6b shows the 2-year post-treatment progress of the cephalometric radiogram at the age of 16. There has been a significant change in the skeletal morphology as seen in Figure 6c which shows the superimposition of the pre and post treatment cephalometric tracings On the other hand, Figure 6d shows the skeletal morphology of the same patient at the age of 16 had he not undergone orthodontic 30 treatment ‘As mentioned earlier, the method of orthodontic case analysis and diagnosis in the current static skeletal analysis merely focuses on localizing the skeletal abnormality or the degree of skeletal displacement. But the functional abnormality that causes skeletal displacement is ot clear. Developmental Mechanism of Growth Abnormal Research studies of the craniofacial skeletal growth play an important role in the field of orthodontics. In the occlusal management of an orthodontic patient, the important elements in craniofacial growth are certainly the maxilla and mandible, The sudden growth of the mandible after treatment may render the efforts of the orthodontist and the surgeon wasted. Various orthodontists are puzzled with the thought that growth phenomenon is nothing but abnormatity, What then is the mechanism of this type of growth abnormality? To ascertain this, itis very important to conduct an accurate occlusal reconstruction As mentioned earlier, environmental factors have an extremely great influence on the craniofacial skeleton at birth, and especially on the function of the occlusal system, The abnormalities of occlusal function easily displace the mandible. In fact, various malocclusions show a displacement of the mandible from the central position. Moreover, this displacement in malocclusion increases with age. ‘As understood in the cybernetic model of Petrovic, mandibular displacement, mediated by the neuromuscular system, guides the mandibular condylar growth, A persistent mandibularal Skeleton and manitus growdisplacement consequently results to the skeletal morphological displacement. According to Mos: the latent growth potential of the cartilage is extremely low, Mandibular elongation is explained as a secondary or compensatory growth and is achieved through the functional displacement of the mandible, which is related to the protrusive movernent of the maxitla that is so, it could be interpreted that the abnormality in the mandibular growth is actually an abnormal adaptation to occlusal function in the normal skeletal pattern. Moreover, the increase in the incidence of abnormality of te ‘TMJ post puberty creates an abnormal occlusal function making the mandibular condyle adapt, through an immense growth, This growth, however, diminishes the growth potential of the mandibular condyle, Either way, the cause of the abnormal grow(h is assumed to be essentially the functional factor of the stomatognathic system In the field of orthodontics, it was long believed that growth and development which is genetically predetermined is the main etiologic factor of malocclusion, Orthodontists have long blamed growth and abnormal growth to be the cause of skeletal malocclusion. This is the reason why unsuccessful response to orthodontic treatment, or when the expected growth does not match with the skeletal changes, or relapsed cases, even after treatment ete, are attributed to abaormal growth which is believed to be genetically predetermined. The convenient explanation for orthodontists is that all are due to growth Assuming that growth development is really the cause of the development of malocclusion, improving malocclusion alone is not possible. And with this growth concept in mind, in the long tun, we cannot help but view orthodontic 32 treatment as futile ‘That growth is the culprit ofall, as mentioned a while ago, is incorrect. Rather, the abnormal growth pattern is the result of mandibular adaptation related to occlusal function abnormality. Therefore, early orthodontic management has a very important implication in the harmony of craniofacial skeletal growth. This viewpoint is important in reconsidering the developmental process of skeletal malocclusion. ‘The orthodontic management does not only involve tooth alignment especially in occlusal guidance but more importantly, it is the consideration of the harmony of the craniofacial skeleton and the management of the entire growth. In order to do that, itis important to understand the relationship of occlusal function and the craniofacial skeleton, and the development of specific skeletal growth abnormality. This concept is based on the dynamic mechanism of craniofacial skeleton and the developmental mechanism of skeletal malocclusion3. THE ROLE OF POSTERIOR DISCREPANCY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF SKELETAL MALOCCLUSION Discrepancy and Malocelusion Discrepancy means the disharmony between the size of the jaw and the size of the teeth commonly known as tooth-to-denture base discrepancy. In discrepancy, the tooth size is usually too large or too small for the size of the jaw. This discrepancy problem is usually encountered in orthodontic treatment The reason for the emergence of the concept on discrepancy is attributed to the importance of tooth extraction mainly in orthodontic occlusal construction. The advocacy of non-extraction in the occlusal construction of Angle has been renowned but was opposed by the tooth extraction concept of Case and of course by his successors like Tweed, Steiner, Begg et. al. , who asserted the importance of tooth extraction in orthodontic treatment. This became the basis for the concept of discrepancy Moreover, Tweed noticed that bimaxillary protrusion results from treating cases without extraction and in fact, considered discrepancy as the cause of anterior tipping of the teeth and presented the Tweed analysis in measuring the labial inclination of the lower anterior teeth in measuring discrepancy. This has been accepted as the basis of the measurement of the extent of discrepancy even at present ‘The total discrepancy is computed by adding the required space and the arch length discrepancy for the correction of the labial inclination of the anterior teeth 1o its ideal position, In this analysis, discrepancy is usually presented as an insufficient space in the anteroposterior relationship of the dental arch, and the problem of whether to extract or not in this standpoint is included in the orthodontic treatment. However, this concept of Tweed and Steiner on diserepaney has some problem points. Firstly, the discrepancy in the values obtained from the measurements of arch length and the tooth crown Width are too much emphasized which becomes their basis in determining the need for extraction. ‘This is an alarming situation. In other words. the anteroposterior dimension receives so much attention, How about the three-dimensional difference (discrepancy) of tooth support, dynamic skeletal growth changes, and the growth of skeleton during tooth eruption? Secondly, Tweed views discrepancy as the disharmony of the size of the teeth mesial! to the first molars and the size of the anterior part of the alveolar base. However, based on the real definition, discrepancy means the relationship of the size of the entire jaw and the entire teeth, and not just the anteior part of the jaw. Thus it is not a limited phenomenon. The functional occlusion 33and abnormal growth is rather a vertical problem, than a horizontal one. Since anterior discrepancy is considered to be prevalent in the analysis of diserepancy, the importance of posterior discrepancy is not recognized, Posterior discrepancy is actually more important than anterior discrepancy because related to the relapse of crowding in the lower anterior teeth and impaction of 3 molar (Richardson). In fact, various patients show an impacted 3 molar as seen in their x-rays after treatment. Thirdly, the method in calculating the discrepancy considers the mandibular dental arch as the focus and not the maxillary arch. It has been demonstrated in the cybernetic model of Petrovic, that discrepancy in the maxillary arch more important since symptoms manifest from any problem in this area rather than the mandibular arch. Discrepancy is a concept involving the jaw and the biological environmental factors of the teeth, and the mutual relationship of the jave with the tooth development. This means that the failure of this mutual relationship implies discrepancy, and it is important for the orthodontist to determine as to whether the harmony of this mutual relationship is preserved or not. The method of Tweed and Steiner in treating, Class 1I patients, can be applied but with several precautions. For instance, Tweed calculates the total discrepancy by converting the labial tipping of the mandibular anterior teeth into discrepancy, and adding the arch length discrepancy. However, in most patients, discrepancy tends to have a pushing action of the occlusal surface towards the lateral side, because the teeth are pushed anteriorly or laterally and simultaneously 34 vertically (Sato, 1987), (Figure 1). In this type of patient, the inclination of the occlusal plane and the labial tipping of the anterior teeth are closely related. This means that the extent of labial tipping of the anterior teeth is a manifestation of discrepancy. However, precaution is needed in reconstructing the occlusal plane, that is, the labial tipping of the anterior teeth has tobe eliminated at a certain degree. In most cases, the labially tipped anterior teeth show a mesial tipping of the premolar and molar, and consequently, the labial tipping of the anterior teeth is improved when aligning the entire dental arch, (Sato, 1989) (Figure 2) As mentioned earlier, the objective in computing for the total amount of discrepancy is to determine whether to extract or not. If the manner by which to compute the total amount of discrepancy is, as advocated by Tweed & Steiner, ‘most of the patients will have an extracted space. ‘Then if there is space left after extraction, an ‘excessive lingual tipping of the anterior teeth or mesial tipping of the molar may result, and attaining a functional occlusion becomes difficult, prolonging the treatment period. In addition, labial tipping is not always a symptom caused by discrepancy. This is influenced by the rotation of the maxilla and mandible. Therefore, a prudent consideration is important in the currently used tooth extraction standards. ‘The Meaning of Posterior Discrepancy ‘Tweed and Steiner presented discrepancy as the “difference in the size of the tooth and the size of the alveolar base” anterior to the first molar. On the other hand, as mentioned carlier,4 Daselapnem ot Skeletal Maloctuson and Dasssgpsediscrepancy should be understood as the difference in the size of the entire jaw and the size of the teeth. However, itis not easy to get the difference between the size of the entire jaw and the total width of the tooth crown. It is because usualls the patients suitable to be the subjects are from the mixed dentition c the permanent demtition periods and the second and third molars have not yet erupted. But the diagnosis of the existence of discrepancy in those patients is important in the Tweed and Steiner method, The important thing to note is that, once there is an anterior discrepaney (in the anterior part of the first molar), then itis most likely that there is also a discrepancy between the entire jaw and the entire dentition. It is important to include the posterior part in determining the amount of discrepancy, because the discrepancy that has an. enormous influence on occlusal function is posterior rather than the anterior ‘The discrepancy in the posterior part of the first molar is called posterior discrepancy. This is usually due to the vertical pushing action or the“squeezing out” of the teeth thereby producing an occlusal interference to the posterior region. leading to the functional displacement of the mandible and eventually (o abnormal growth, And most skeletal malocclusions are due to these causes. In the relationship of posterior discrepancy with skeletal malocclusion, the most important thing to understand here is on how does posterior discrepancy affects the dentition Diserspany is the basic cause of malocclusio + parting various conditions to the occlusal sy: em. In the concept of discrepancy so far, Ux. symptoms manifested are crowding, protrusios, displacement mainly the vertical and 36 Figure 2 lmpewversen of abil peping ofthe ateror ee de 19.008 ‘peng and cool of he oecsa plane 1 fn climinating posterior discrepancy, tooth uprising improves the Jablltgping of €asterior teeth since the uprighing ofthe postesine teeth ie ist Inthe presence of psterior discrepancy the eatmeot objective is usally fo flaten he ecu pane hus maprovemont of the aterioe png can teschieven posterior displacement. Hlowever, the most severe symptom that affects occlusal function and maxillofacial growth is the vertical pushing of the tooth. When this occurs in the molar area, it certainly has an effect on the occlusal function. In the supracruption of the molar, the phestomenon in the vertical pushing8 drretopenc or tetera tatoctusior ana Discrepancy of the tooth is basically caused by discrepaney especially the posterior discrepancy. ‘The conditions, which have great effect to posterior discrepancy, are eruption, expansion, formation of the tooth germ of the 1°, 2" and 3° molar, expansion and easy pushing of the molar due to eruption. This creates an occlusal interference in the posterior part of the dentition resulting to a disturbance in occlusal function (Figure 1d). Supraeruption due to the pushing phenomenon would result (0 the change of the occlusal plane, causing disharmony to the maxilloskeletal morphology. This pushing movement of the tooth due to posterior discrepancy is the major cause of occlusal function disturbance, causing a dysfunction in the mandibular movement, which displaces the mandible, leading to an abnormal growth of the mandibular condyle. Cephalometric analysis, as the main diagnostic tool in orthodontics has rapidly progressed. This confirms the degree of skeletal displacement and its local site. However, itis still inaccurate because it doesn’t reveal the cause of the malocclusion. Due to the effort of orthodontists to understand more accurately and more detail the morphology of craniofacial skeleton, a complicated method has evolved consequently defeating the original purpose. ‘The etiology of skeletal malocclusion is related to posterior discrepaney and this is important in analyzing the morphological characteristics in the cephalometric analysis (Appendix 1). Posterior discrepancy, is an important factor inthe developmental process of malocclusion. However, it is more important to consider the original characteristic pattern of the patients. How does posterior discrepancy develop? ‘This matter is explained in the theory of evolution (Inoue, 1986) which is the relationship of the ja size reduction with the tooth size reduction. But the concept that discrepancy is a part of the growth, process of an individual after birth cannot be accepted. Certainly, the explanation of the evolution theory of discrepancy is interesting However, the dietary change associated with jaw reduction, leading to the reduction of the tooth, size originally, keeps the harmony, but as to why it is that the reduction of the jaw precedes the reduction of the tooth size, remains a question. It is important to consider the crowding of the tooth germ during the developmental period (Daie, 1969) in obiaining sufficient space for the tooth eruption. In the series of processes for eruption, the acquired factors have no influence on discrepancy As already mentioned, when there is growth in the maxillary tuberosity due to the forward pushing or rotation of the maxilla, it allows sufficient space for tooth eruption in the anteroposterior diameter of the dental arch. In case of minimal maxillary pushing related to the rotation of the sphenoid, space for tooth eruption becomes insufficient because the growth in the posterior part of the maxilla results to posterior discrepancy Posterior discrepancy changes the occlusal plane due to the pushing action of the teeth, creating an acclusal interference in the posterior part of the dentition. To prevent the interference, the mandible, in response, rotates associated with a protrusive displacement related to the neuromuscular system. Persistent protrusive displacement of the mandible changes the rotation of the temporal bone and since the mandibular condyle is not fused to the joint cavity it leads to a7a secondary growth and decreases the functional pressure to the temporal bone through the joint cavity, promoting a flexion of the neurocranial base. These series of processes eventually minimize the protrusive rotation of the maxilla and because it enhances its vertical descent, the more severe the posterior discrepancy becomes. With the acquired causes, the development of posterior discrepancy is closely related to the ‘dynamic mechanism of the craniofacial skeleton. Feedback Regulatory Mechanism in the Development of Skeletal Malocclusion ‘There are several cases, erroneous concepts about the developmental process of skeletal maloclussion. The worst one is that malloclusion is related to the abnormal growth of the maxilla ‘or mandible. The maxillofacial skeleton is composed of numerous bones with complicated morphology, mutually relating and influencing each other, creating the entire craniofacial skeleton (Figure 3.) With its complicated structure, it is too simple to understand that mandibular protrusion is a growth abnormality of the mandible and that maxillary protrusion is a growth abnormality of the maxilla. From the above standpoint, feedback regulatory mechanism is the developmental mechanism of malocclusion from the mutual relationship of all the bone tissues of the craniofacial skeleton. “The craniofacial skeleton is not composed of static bones, It always shows a dynamic movement. The functional pressure originating from the mandibular function like mastication, swallowing, pronunciation, ete., is transmitted, 38 in an orderly manner, to the temporal bone - neurocranial base (ethmoid, sphenoid, occipital bones) - vomer ~ maxilla, creating a cycle. The maxillary position displaces the position of the occhisal surface of the upper dentition because again, this has an influence on mandibular function, and this cycle is an unceasing chain of reactions, The special characteristics of the skeletal morphology of skeletal malocclusion are formed due to this vicious cycle, Figure 4 and 6 show the characteristics of the skeletal system in mandibular mesiocclusion and distocclusion and the illustration of their respective feedback regulation. In the orthodontic management of malocclusion, the objective is to have harmony established from the feedback regulatory mechanism by inhibiting this vicious circle through management of the occlusal system. Feedback Regulatory Mechanism in the Development of Mandibular Mesiocclusion Ina patient showing harmony of the skeletal growth, as shown in Figure 3, the neurocranial base displays an appropriate movement based on respiration, swallowing, pronunciation, mastication etc. causing the protrusive movement of the maxilla, The mandible functionally displaces anteroinferiorly in response to the displacement of the maxillary occlusal plane, consequently feading to the growth of the mandibular condyle, stimulating the rotation of the temporal bone in response to mandibular function like mastication etc. The temporal bone rotation and the flexion-extension of the neurocranial base is regulated by this mechanism, feedback regulatory cycle.TT $§ 5 Doveterment of Stra Matoctuson ant Discrepancy In the severe case of posterior discrepancy as shown in Figure 4, since the occlusal plane is flat due to a supraeruption of the molar, and the mandible adapts to this by tts rotation associated with a protrusive displacement, The mandibular isplacement secondarily decreases the functional pressure applied to the temporal bone, externally rotating it. In addition, it leads to the flexion of the neurocranial base resulting to a decrease mm the anterior pushing of the maxilla In this type of patient, the posterior discrepancy 1s more and more aggravated because the growth in the posterior border of the maxillary tuberosity 1s inhibited leading to an excessive eruption of the molar, creating the vicious circle, thereby manifesting the skeletal conditions. This 1s amandibular feedback regulation and once this vicious circle 1s imtiated, this system cannot be easily inactivated For that reason, the persistent protrusive rotation of the mandible increases the angle of the mandible because of the lingual tipping of the mandibular anterior teeth and mandibular symphysis. This leads to bone deposition in the posterior border of the mandible, making the mandibutar length longer than the average The flexion of the neurocrantal base inhibits the elongation of the posterior crantal base length and shortens the cranial base angle Inaddition, the downward growth of the body Of the maxilla results because of the inhibition of the anterior pushing of the maxilla. This decreases the anteroposterior diameter of the basal bone, thereby aggravating the posterior discrepancy causing the crowding of the molar. Thus, the treatment objective in orthodontic occlusal management 1s to terminate thts vicious circle Figure 3. The movement of de Bones ofthe cram base and maillary promt mcelation co 4 spedcrate ratio ofthe shenox hone regalates the anteroueror growth ofthe maulla These a wluenee the growth ofthe manticDENTAL COMPENSATION The erroncous concept of dental compensation- The term dental compensation came from the concept that the teeth compensate for the function of the jaws through compensatory adaptation when there is disharmony of the skeletal relationship of the upper and lower jaw ‘Taking the skeletal reversed occlusion as an example, anteroposterior pressure on the maxilla and mandible causes labial upping of the maxillary antenor teeth or hngual tipping of the mandibular anterior teeth and the teeth respond by compensation. This concept believes in the adaptation of the tunetion of the occlusal system io the growth abnormality of the jaw The functional adaptation in response to the pre- existing growth abnormality can be illustrated adiagram However, this growth concept clearly comradicts the concept that belreves in the tntluence of environmental factors in the skeletal growth and above all the enormous influence of occlusal function to the craniofacial skeletal growth Unless the alteration of the occlusal system is prioritized, skeletal growth ts interpreted as the secondary compensation The changes in the inclination of the anterior teeth of both the mandible and maxilla im the dental compensation ig not the result of tooth tipping but rather its the adaptation of (ie skeletal system Dental compensation is actually the functional adaptation of the mandible, As shown m Figure 5, in the skeletal reversed occlusion, the occlusal plane of the maxilla flattens, and the mandible adapts to this through protrusive rotation, 23 Development of Skeletal Malacelston and Discrepancy gu 65 Dental ompenntion daring he development process salt rangibular esiectusion associated wilh the functional displacement This may fesull (0 the Lingual upping of the anterior teeth of the mandible Actually in patients with these changes, lingual tippmg of the mandibular antersor teeth 1s not observed sn the superimposed tracings of the mandible when observing an anteroposterior change. In this phenomenon, the degree of lingual tipping of the mandibular anterior teeth 1s described as the process of functional reaction of the mandible related to the abnormality of occlusal function of that patient. Simularly, the mesial movement of the molar associated with a vertical descent to the occlusal surface 1s the cause of the labsal tipping of the maxillary antertar teeth. alProeigve rotten of te mally ‘Andelopeserce eve of he mola Elana of seep. ‘The peciional changes of fa sl g ‘Sudan ping ot ech sa pine, Dict eaten of the = A ‘Mandibutee dtoetnsen, areas of frwona Cc to be suit ccnaile Iosuticient yoo of the marie conde Figure 6 Foodback regulatory mechanism inthe develmisal proces of skeletal mandibular diseetuson 2Feedback Regulatory Mechanism in Mandibular Distocclusion When the rotation of the neurocranial base is extension, the sphenoidal rotation will forcefully push the maxilla protrusively through the vomer. In this case, even if the occlusal plane is tipped superiorly and the body of maxilla is moved inferiorly, the spatial position does not change much (Figures 6 and 7a), In the case where there is a slight change in the occlusal plane, there is no need for the mandible to functionally adapt through protrusive rotation or protrusive displacement. This is because it usually takes the mandible to be in a reiruded position, inhibiting the mandibular growth, thereby increasing the functional pressure to the temporal bone. Naturally, since temporal bone rotation and the neurocranial base extension is intensified, anterior pushing of the maxilla increases, associated with its forceful rotation induces the growth of maxillary tuberosity, preparing a sufficient space for molar eruption In the above mechanism, since posterior discrepancy is eliminated in maxillary protrusion, the occlusal plane does not present a significant change. In mandibular distocclusion, there are several patients having an excellent vertical growth of the ramus of mandible but shows a posterior tipping of the palatal plane (PP). This means that the frontomaxillary suture is the axis in the protrusive rotation of the body of maxilla. This type of patient is shown in Figure 7 where the mandibular growth, due to its adaptation t0 maxillary rotation, tips the occlusal plane in the molar area, 3. Development of Skeletal Maloccusion and Discrepancy Figure 7. Manillary movement and cesisal plane changes 1 When th anerie displacement of Ue xs isexensv, the postion of the ech ‘> When ne mall arteromnteriony displaces, oelusl plane descends na paralleling manner. «Ina patiea with an extensive growth of the ramus of mandi, the ‘navi anteriorly roa, the occlusal plane aens due to the tipping oF (he pola pane 434, OCCLUSAL PLANE AND FUNCTIONAL OCCLUSION Orthodontics and Functional Occlusion Attainment of a functional ocelusion is the ultimate objective of orthodontic occlusal construction. In fact, this is the basic therapeutic, objective of dental medicine in general. The same is true with regards to the treatment objective of operative dentistry and prosthetics. However, it is important to determine whether the attainment of functional occlusion through orthodontic approach and prosthetics are considered to be in the same level. Special consideration is important in orthodontic therapy because most of the patients being treated are at the growth period. The dynamic alteration of an individual's occlusion during the growth period is considered important in harmonizing the craniofacial skeleton through occlusal treatment. Functional occlusion has totally been disregarded not umtil recently with the development of orthodontics (Roth, 1979). The basic concept of prosthetic occlusal construction, which apparently is a different method applied to ‘orthodontic occlusal construction needs to be re- evaluated Functional occlusion affects mandibular movement through the neuromuscular system. Mandibular movement is guided by the mutual function of the teeth and TMJ with a minimal efficiency load. Generally, regulation of mandibular movement through the teeth is called anterior guidance and mandibular movement through the TMJs called posterior guidance (Figure 1). This can also be classified into two: anterior occlusion, induced by the anterior teeth and vertical dimension support through the molar (posterior 44 support). Each of these efficiently contributes to the preservation of harmony However, when there is a defect of the mandibular guidance in the anterior teeth, it produces interference in the molars, producing an excessive load leading to the destruction of the periodontal tissue. In addition, when there is a problem with the posterior support, the task is, shifted to the anterior teeth and the TMJ. From this functional perspective, malocclusion is a result of the disturbance of the harmony ‘Malocelusion can basically be classified according to the causes of functional malocelusion. As shown in Figure 2, it is classified into: premature contact, cuspal interference, occlusal interference, and loss of occlusal support. In orthodontics, it is necessary to recognize the causes Annericr Guidance Posterior Ouidance mimic posenee aulace ude Figure 1. Poserlor and anterior guidance in he funsional movement of ‘hemandidleof functional malocclusion. Premature contact in a narrow sense means the cuspal contact in the reference position (central position) of the mandible however, in a broad sense, comprised in a concept, cuspal contact is not only in the central position but could also be in the intercuspal position or the eccentric position. This means that the mandible has the tendency to position itself in the effort to avoid the interference. In this regard, cuspal interferenee is the occlusal contact in the central position of the mandible, which induces sliding of the mandibular condyle causing a discrepancy of the centri¢ mandibular position and maximum intercuspal position. Primarily, the normal movement of the mandible, as shown in Figure 3, is both the smooth rotation and sliding movement of the mandibular condyle, However, cuspal imerference is a cuspal contact where the rotation of the mandibular condyle is specially prevented. On the other hand, occlusal interference is the cuspal contact where the sliding movement of the mandible is inhibited. For example, the cuspal contact is on the balancing side during a lateral movement of the mandible, And finally, the loss of occlusal support disharmonizes the relationship of mandibular growth and the increase of vertical dimension, resulting to an insufficient vertical dimension. All of these abnormalities interfere with the movement of the jaw related to the function of the neuromuscular system and has an effect on the mandibular position either by displacement oF avoidance. It has also an indirect effect on the growth of the mandibular condyle. Moreover, the loss of occlusal support emanates trom tooth 4. Oeclasil Plane and Furetiona! Osshision position, tooth axis, and tooth rotation ete. When the appropriate position and volume of the centric stop in central occlusion is not established, that occlusion becomes very unstable resulting in an insufficient posterior support. The objective of orthodontic occlusal reconstruction is to eliminate the aforementioned causes, and establish an intereference-free occlusion based on the functional mandibular movement. ‘The concrete objectives of orthodontic ocelusal reconstruction is presented in Table | The most important thing in these objectives is the attainment of occlusal harmony through a functional movement of the mandible. However, this is not at all easy, It is important to secure the stability of occlusion post-treatment especially in the elimination of cuspal interference and ocelusal interference in the molar. This point has to be given careful attention Dynamic Mechanism of the Maxillofacial Skeleton and Occlusion As mentioned earlier, the maxillofacial skeleton possesses a very dynamic mechanism, ‘The regulatory mechanism of this skeleton is related to its growth as well as to the development of skeletal malocclusion The mandible basically has a rotating and sliding movement, and the cause of malocclusion is the interference on this movement. The movement of the mandible, is the most important factor in ensuring the harmony of the craniofacial skeleton. Mastication, swallowing and. speech are the normal functions of the occlusal system. In case there is an abnormality of the occlusal system, this has an effect on the whole 4p