Approved For Release 2001/03/07 : CIA-RDP96-00792R000700130001-6 References: ‘nate Pacem cht he Dpmetfat Thagh WW Noon peg RR lt Cia ee wa eS tan na Doms Noon CoN Yr 62 5: Gr aabppoN sm Sy, Wi NaC ew Yo, Fat Tapio Ng ns, rif), Dk New Yor SiS Nein Ena Pelee Say 3) Neen Fras ie me Te Vin, Ge Patil hey (Peper o Mae peta (rane ame Ca Coteus ow Yor 960. rus he Umametan Op 1 eas Pera sete Pct anf of Compete Feo Woks Faget dan Smyth oon ot Pop Seey if WN Rome Ca ee Yok ES ean so Freda Adopt iy Of eS fred’ eno Deter. Bi Fh ine fcr Fret Te Que of ay Fre Ihe Si tmp Mas Ac a Boks. New | | | | | | on ceria Si sa faeate used agin The orbitals of consciousness. A neurosyntergic approach to the discrete levels of conscious experience JACOBO GRINBERG-Z¥LBERBAUM Galnelaiaees Pcersinonco ven ce Mene ‘baw neiona Pal Esto de een et am een en tng al i on ae em ease Okt ee are Sects i) Conan epee pense cet ose nas ISOS Want atom tectaton oes canny weiner orton ee eeu eran sinaang uct ect seu pein 4. THEORETICAL INTRODUCTION When the neuronal fl (Grinberg-Zylberbaum, 1982) interacts wih the [Quantum ield (Capra, 1976) ahypercomplexenersicintcference pattems ‘ested (Grinberg Zsberbaum, 1983). Thisntrferenee patter consiues the encrgtic sractre of perceptal experience. This energetic setae is ‘ot localized in space and, ene, ts conscious appearance as an individ Beheclous experience requires # fcalzation operation. This focalzation {fvotvesa sew interection betwoen the interference patter and the ental Drowssor responsible for activating a typothetial diretonaliy factor {[Gainborg Zfberbeum, 1981). The dreconaity factor simulates limited Porton of the intrferenoe pater, transforming its eneratisructare into a [unttaely istnet pereeptoal experience. The purely energetic structure of Ae iperesptoal experience (the interference pattern in space) is thus {tansformed int the dimension ofa vividly eonscios experience, The central processor responsible the atv ofthe directionality factor i intimately ‘Approved For Release 2001/03/07 :|CIA-RDP96-00792R00070013000%6236 41, GRINBERG-ZYLBERBAUM ee cies e quantum field, together with their 7 1, are located in a syntergic continuum (Grinberg-Z; 19). The ext (Grinberg-Zylberbaum, mnsbetween partsand restricted high syntergy, each one of itsGe: tion of high coherence, rich coffections between parts and unrestricted complexity (Grinberg- in @ analogue, rather than in a disc syQms of thought that (Vibekananda, Ie in@Pference pattern, thus experience. 5 -essor anda non-discrete ing raise to quantized levels of conscious 3 2, SHE ORBITALS OF CONSCIOUSNESS 2 shes unt ata fi bipolar and later on in ganglionic cells, in which patterns of neuronal act ORBITALS OF CONSCIOUSNESS 2x1 tertiary oceipital cortexand later on in high integration polisensory structures, ® from where abstractions and language processes concentrate in coherent S neuronal algorithms high amounts of previously disconnected information. S ‘Thus, a neurosyntergic continuum can be postulated in the bran. 8 "The neurosyntergic organization of the brain unites with the syntergic 5 ization of space by the creation, expansion and interaction of the © e quantum field, The neuronal field appearsasaresultof the brain structure, This S ‘expands iva neurosyntergic functor a y g 5 quantum fi 8 physical world that seems to surround 3 a i Ke i 03 xr must happen before the central & 11 and quality of experience whl interacting with the interference ps structure of our prceptual experience. Prot correspond space is greater ‘Processor would give rise to an image of r Release 2001 innumerable levels of energy patteras, What makes conscious S xperience behave in a discrete fashion i that the interaction between 8 neuronal and quantom fel rests in congruent interference pattern only Be lar symtergic level. The orbitals of eonsciousness ction where the sytergy ofthe gic levelof the quantum Feld. An extreme example of consciousness wiJ. GRINBERG-ZY. of the frequencies that the for unitary consciousness, because the frequencies that can central processor's central proc end the possibl 3 Howand where ano 3 Howend whe: Semainsa deep mystery that Exists between the central di spheres of consciousness (sephitot) in which we human being 8). ‘The central processor can be conceived as pure consciousness. When the interaction between neuronal and quantum fields hasa complex structure, the ORBITALS OF CONSCIOUSNESS 29 structure into an image replete jon reaches its maximum syntergi¢p ‘central processor experiences every the experience thats activated is unitarg level and becomes homogeneous thing aga reflection of itself and t 2 ively different modalities of perceptuat, consciousness, several orbitals observer) isalways the same; what changes neve consciousness. This content is determined by bra neuronal field is more stable than the quantum field ang tergic level (of the neuronal field) is determined by the partioufar anf, Instead, the quantum field varies its synters4 of the quanttim field coexists simultaneously in space? ‘processor always rémains the same because, belonging tod activity does not depend on any syntergic level qr considerations lead to an important conclusion which i y (after death, the central processor is si icture of experience (the- 1 interaction between the neuronal “pare’ quantum field. S level of br wha evel of conseousness he was aS || was able to experience unitary consciousness, Hf pou mortem coment of eonseiousness will be pure consciousness. Tae reasons of Being does not need any interaction bwtween the cent processor and the quantum field inorder to exist. 3 Ciousnessin which a human being ud 4, PHYSICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS proved Prince Louis de Broglie (Beiser, 1968) confronted, in physics, the problem, the existence of discrete orbitals in the atom. His solution was extraordinarf ‘gant. He stated that each electron has an associated wavelength and that perimeter of an orbital is an exact multiple of this wavelength, does the electron not disappear from the orbital Forbidden orbitals are those whose lengths are not an exact multiple of thethe realm of consciousness, there are also self interference processes. ly peaking, there is only one energetic field and thus unitary conscious- Sess should be the most natural ifnot the only level of consciousness. Init, the Ghotomy between the idea of the existence of a physical versus a non- ‘Dhysical universe is dissolved in the perception of an all-encompassing and {obal consciousness, Sst different le {Goitary consciousness because We are not pure enough and our neuronal fields ox , asenergetic components We are the ones that ‘Qatterns and algorithms became impossible. What could be a new and more {Cfowerful syntergic level, degenerates into a low syntergic pattern in which Shterference, lack of organisation and poor connections between parts ‘eBbstruct the achievement of unity. To live in a ‘forbidden’ level of conscious- Stich fine powder the powder acquires the form ofa Srequency of the sound is increased, the pattern becomes more complicated ‘Shut maintains abasic structure. When the frequency reaches some threshold, “ie pattem becomes three-dimensional. Ifthe quantum field is conceived asa structure with which the vibrating neuronal field interacts, creating cymatic Patterns, the differing levels of consciousness could be related to discrete eymat rman hasdifferentenergeticbodies Wilson, 1974). These hodies are related to PALS OF CONSCIOUSNESS 2 led ‘energetic body’ is a Ison, 1974) were able to gic interactions.<9 stable eymatic pattern. what is, for the rest of us, invisible cymatic~s ry, he is able to acceptall his experiences s real and asa genuin® part of himself, he permits his convergent codifiers to unify everything withige sorithm thatisable tobe transformed by the centrag and coherent jus experienc’. Thee 1 and high synergic levels of consciousness total acceptance 2 ‘We live ina very complex world jn which we are stimulated by powerf information fields. The interaction\ of these fields create new levels experience. ow In physics itis observed that, when an atom interaets with a magnetic eldeg new spectral lines appeat. This phenomenon is called the Zeeman effeqy (Besser, 1968) ands Smlr to the new experiences hat we were discussing before {In fact, when the laws of usness behaves ‘The similarity implies that both realms mn or absorption of energlp trons change from one to another orbitaé lar energetic interchanges when a subject is in amg sof consciousness. During their quantum jump, the electrons behave as if they were simultaneously in two orbitals (Bese 1968). In the realm of consciousness, something similar pens when © change in consciousness occurs and the mind of the observer is sill in aay interface between orbitals. The individual then feels as if he were simul ‘Wo levels of consciousness and in none of them and, as we hav said, during this process he is open to receive or radiate energy. a 2 < 5, THE NATURE OF THE CENTRAL PROCESSOR: If the central processoi included within every process and22 J.GRINBER: thought ofthe mind, In Pls notaffected by thought emotion, Sraturetobeablerotestfyalthese change or losing ts capacity to observe them $3 When a human being identifies hinself with the Self, he transcends every ‘kind of unchangeable silence from whence experiences appear and are seen as SS miraculous happenings standing out from a ground of empty fullness, and at ‘Sthe same time forming part of an immense and a 8 relationships, To the question about the individual or eollenive rag SHeentral processor, nobody. can give a final answer, Robserver in each one of us is the One Observer, the self in each one of us the Orie Self and the central processor in each one of us the One Central BP rocessor To conclude, itis posible to postulate thatthe central processor does not Gpbide in any space, is atemporal and belongs to a non physical reality and has (2no shape or form. : 0 Pot "References n, C., Lo Oeuto, Editorial Noguer, Barcelona, 1974 Scientific e: collapse D.F. LAWDEN le more than ary by which a tinguished from all other physical systems,@> such an instruglen\ is recognizable by the circumstance tha} functions as required of seh anNastrment bythe axioms of quantum theo certain day of the year were more likely to becomeactorsthan 243