Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Intro Results and Discussion Final
Intro Results and Discussion Final
In today's fast-paced and technologically advanced world, students are constantly exposed
to various environmental stimuli that can significantly impact their cognitive performance. One
such factor that has gained attention in recent years is background noise. Studies examined by the
World Health Organization (WHO) have found that children exposed to continuous disruptive
noise can experience poorer reading ability, memory, and academic performance. This research
aims to investigate the effects of background noise on students' memory recall within the classroom
environment. The classroom environment plays a crucial role in shaping students' learning
experiences and academic achievements. Traditionally, classrooms were designed to be quiet and
focused, providing an ideal setting for students to absorb information and engage in cognitive tasks.
However, with the advent of technology and changing educational practices, classrooms have
become increasingly noisy, with various sources of background noise such as conversations,
electronic devices, and external sounds. There has been considerable discussion in recent literature
about the potential negative effects of various technologies on students’ concentration in the
processes, particularly their memory recall. Memory recall is an essential aspect of learning, as it
involves retrieving previously learned information and applying it to new situations. Additionally,
adequate memory recall is essential for academic performance, and it is a necessary part of our
everyday life. On the other hand, cognitive psychology has long been interested in the relationship
between background noise and memory recall. According to the cognitive load theory, working
memory has a limited capacity, and when it becomes overloaded, the ability to process information
and retain it in long-term memory decreases (Sweller, 1988). Research has shown that background
noise can have a detrimental effect on memory recall by increasing cognitive load, particularly in
situations where the task at hand requires significant attention and working memory resources
(Banbury & Berry et. al, 1998). This study aims to investigate the effects of background noise on
Numerous studies have demonstrated a negative correlation between background noise and
attention, background noise serves as an irrelevant distractor that competes for limited attentional
resources (Broadbent, 1958). When background noise is present, individuals must exert additional
effort to filter out the distraction and focus on the relevant information, resulting in a decrease in
the amount of attention available for encoding and retrieval processes. Several studies have
empirically supported the detrimental effects of background noise on memory recall. For instance,
one study found that students exposed to background noise performed significantly worse on a
memory recall task compared to those in a quiet environment (Hodgetts and Hayes, 2007).
Similarly, another study demonstrated that increased noise levels impaired the ability of students
to recall words from a list (Evans and Hygge, 2005). These findings suggest that background noise
can disrupt memory processes, leading to reduced retention and retrieval of information.
RESULTS
Memory Recall Inside the Classroom Environment”. In Table 1.1, the Control group has a mean
of 12.76923, exhibiting values ranging from 7 to 19 which presents that the effect of background
Control Group
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Table 1.1
The Experimental group has a mean of 9.538461538, exhibiting test scores result ranging
from 6 to 13 (please see table 1.2), that display a more concentrated distribution compared to the
Control group showing that background noise has more effect on student’s memory recall inside
the classroom.
Experimental Group
14
12
10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Table 1.2
Applying the t-test with equal variances reveals crucial insights into the effects of
background noise on students’ memory recall inside the classroom environment. The test allows
us to show the results whether the observed differences in means between the Control and
The calculated test statistic and corresponding p-value illuminate the extent between the two
groups. The p-value falls below the predetermined significance level of 0.05, which suggests
substantial evidence against the null hypothesis since the p-value is < 0.05, indicating the
background Noise inside the classroom environment has a significant effect on student’s memory
recall.
Table 2
Interpretation of the results derived from the t-test showed that the Experimental group's
Table 1.3
In conclusion, using the t-test, assuming equal variances, aids in unraveling the significance
of differences between sample means, offering a statistical lens comparing the Control and
Experimental substantial evidence against the null hypothesis. Thereby we conclude that the
background noise inside the classroom environment has a significant effect on students’ memory
recall.
DISCUSSION
Researchers used a between-subject design in conducting this experimental study, with the
Participants were divided into two groups, the Control Group and the Experimental Group to study
and conduct an experiment on the effects of Background Noise on students' Memory Recall.
The study's findings supported the alternative hypothesis that background noise in the
classroom affects student's capacity to retain memories. Our data show that the alternative
hypothesis is accepted and the null hypothesis is rejected. Given the p-value having less than 0.05,
the alternative hypothesis which shows that background noise significantly affects students'
memory recall was accepted. Convenience sampling is the most practical method for the
The finding suggests that students in the Control Group were able to concentrate and
comprehend effectively because of minimized noise and silent environment, which resulted in their
higher value score. The Experimental Group did not comprehend well and attained a much lower
score due to the intervention of background noise inside the classroom setting.