Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2. Dependent Variables:
a. Shear Strength: The resistance to shear deformation at the interface, including parameters such as peak
shear strength, residual strength, and overall shear strength behavior.
b. Failure Mode: The mode of failure at the interface, whether it involves sliding along the
geotextile/geogrid, rupture within the geosynthetic material, or shear failure within the calcareous
sand.
c. Dilation/Contraction Behavior: Changes in volume or dilation of the soil mass during shear, which can
be influenced by the particle size distribution.
d. Interfacial Friction Angle: The angle between the geotextile/geogrid and the calcareous sand, indicating
the resistance to sliding.
e. Cohesion at Interface: Cohesive properties between the geotextile/geogrid and calcareous sand, if
applicable.
f. Pore Water Pressure: The development of pore water pressures within the calcareous sand, affecting
the effective stress and shear strength
Observations/ findings:
The observed characterstics areThe interface shear strength is also affected by the surface roughness of the interface
material, but the relative particle size surpasses this effect. When the normal stress is increased from 25 kPa to 100 kPa,
the peak shear stress of CGCS is 1.36–1.70 times that of FGCS and 1.25–1.58 times that of MGCS (For geogrid-calcareous
sand interface), respectively. For the geotextile-calcareous sand interface, the peak shear stress of CGCS is 1.33–1.60 times
that of FGCS and 1.06–1.28 times that of MGCS, respectively (see Table 4). The reason is that with the increase of normal
stress and coarse grain content of calcareous sand, the friction between calcareous sand particles, the friction between
calcareous sand and geogrid surface/mesh, and the friction etween calcareous sand and geotextile surface are enhanced,
which leads to the corresponding in crease of interface peak shear stress.
Figures
Conclusion
The interface shear stress-displacement curves of the GT/GG-CS show different shear softening characteristics. However,
the hear softening mode of GG-CS interface is close to that of URCS interface, and its Gds-ds relationship can be described
with the power function model, while the Gds-ds relationship of GT-CS interface can be described with the logarithmic
function model. Under different particle size distributions, the attenuation range of interface shear modulus exceeds 70%
(0.1–10 mm).
The reinforcement effect of a geogrid and geotextile on dredger fill coarse-grained calcareous sand foundation is greater
than that of fine-grained calcareous sand and medium-grained calcareous sand.Using coarse-grained calcareous sand as
reinforced soil filler improves the stability of a calcareous sand foundation and revetment reinforced soil engineering. •
Embedding geogrid/geotextile in calcareous sand can significantly improve the peak cohesion, while the contribution of
peak friction angle is not obvious. In the case of coarse-grained calcareous sand, the peak cohesion increased by 3.68 times
(GG-CS) and 2.41 times (GT-CS). The interface shear strength index is influenced by the particle size distribution and the
reinforcement type. The shear strength of the GG-CS interface is greater than the GT-CS interface.