Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wa0003
Wa0003
DELHI
VERSUS
SHRI. SATNAM DEFENDANT
INDEX
1. Memo of Parties
NEW DELHI
DATE:
18/10/2021
IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE COURT, SOUTH, SAKET COURT
DELHI
VERSUS
SHRI. SATNAM DEFENDANT
MEMO OF PARTIES
VERSUS
Moonshine Ltd.
A Company Incorporated Under The
Companies Act. Having Its Registered Office
At South Extension, Delhi
Through its director
Shri. Satnam DEFENDANT
NEW DELHI
DATE:
18/10/2021
IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE COURT, SOUTH, SAKET COURT
DELHI
VERSUS
SHRI. SATNAM DEFENDANT
ADDRESS FORM
Respected Sir,
Address at which the service of notice and summons be effected.
VERSUS
Moonshine Ltd.
South Extension,
Delhi
Through its director
Shri. S a t n a m DEFENDANT
NEW DELHI
DATE:
18/10/2021
IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE COURT, SOUTH, SAKET COURT
DELHI
VERSUS
SHRI. SATNAM DEFENDANT
having its registered office B-40, Greater Kailash, New Delhi. Mr. Nitin
the Plaintiff and is authorized and competent to sign and verify the plaint,
earned international repute and has earned a big name in the business.
materials and
designing items from the plaintiff on credit basis and the plaintiff is
4. That during the course of business, the defendant purchased several types
TOTAL 100,000
plaintiff.
7. That the plaintiff and defendant entered into the agreement for the
9. That on 15.10.2021, the plaintiff raised the final bill of Rs. 100,000/-
against which the Defendant handed over cheque no. 23549 dated
10. That the cheque was presented by the Plaintiff, however the same was dis
11. That the Plaintiff immediately informed the Defendant about the dishonor
of the said cheque and called upon the Defendant to make the payment of
the said amount along with interest @ 18% per annum. However, the
Defendant failed to pay the same to the Plaintiff despite repeated requests
and reminders.
12. That the Plaintiff therefore finally issued a legal notice dated 2.11.2021 to
amount of Rs. 100,000/- along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum
13. That the Defendant is now liable to pay a sum of Rs. 100,000/- along with
interest @ 18% per annum from the date on the Plaintiff’s bill. The
different types of boxes/ply sheets from the plaintiff on credit basis and
the plaintiff was maintaining his ledger account. The cause of action arose
company and the cause of action further arose on various dates when the
requested him to clear the said amount but the defendant did not make
the said payment. The cause of action still subsists and is continuing as
the Defendant has not paid the money to the Plaintiff due under the above
15. That it has specially been mentioned on the bottom of the Invoices that
Hon’ble Court has territorial jurisdiction to try and adjudicate upon the
present matter. The amount of claim under the Suit being amount is
16. That the valuation of the Suit for the purpose of Court fee and jurisdiction
appended thereupon”.
17. That the plaintiff submits that the present Suit is filed under the provision of
Order XXXVII of CPC, 1908. The Plaintiff in term of Rule 2 of Order XXXVII of
the CPC, 1908 declares that no relief has been claimed which does not fall
(a) Pass a decree of sum of Rs.100,000/- in favour of the plaintiff and against
(b) Pass a decree of interest amount @ 18% p.a. on the said amount under
prayer (a) above w.e.f. the date of filing the suit till the date of realization
of the amount in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant; and.
(c) Award the costs of the present suit and also the Court fees in favour of the
plaintiff;
AND
(d) Grant any other and/or further relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem
fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the
PLAINTIFF
IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE COURT, SOUTH, SAKET COURT
DELHI
VERSUS
SHRI. SATNAM DEFENDANT
AFFIDAVIT
I, Nitin Kumar, Partner of, Sunshine Pvt. Ltd. At Greater Kailash, New Delhi
do hereby solemnly affirm and state as follows:-
1. That I am one of the partners of the Plaintiff firm in the above said
case/suit and I am conversant with the facts of the case and as such
3. That the contents of the said plaint are not being repeated here for
affidavit.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
Verified at New Delhi on this day of October, 2021 that the contents of
my foregoing affidavit are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
DEPONENT