Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This Content Downloaded From 49.36.39.63 On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 05:20:53 UTC
This Content Downloaded From 49.36.39.63 On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 05:20:53 UTC
SOCIOLOGICAL APPRAISAL
Author(s): Jaganath Pathy
Source: Sociological Bulletin , MARCH 1995, Vol. 44, No. 1 (MARCH 1995), pp. 11-32
Published by: Sage Publications, Inc.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Sage Publications, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Sociological Bulletin
Jaganath Pathy
Jaganath Pathy is on the faculty of the Department of Sociology, South Gujarat University, Surat
395 001.
Since the early 1980s, the IMF and the World Bank have imposed the SAP in as
many as 76 countries as a precondition for receiving loans. These countries, for
diverse reasons, were experiencing mounting debt, foreign exchange shortages,
and difficulties in meeting even short-run payments. Between 1980 and 1991,
the World Bank had extended 258 adjustment loans valued at more than $ 41
billion to these countries. The adoption of SAP indicates a green signal to the
Paris and London clubs, bilateral donors, foreign investors and commercial
banking institutions.
Despite the institutional and technological diversities of different countries,
a uniform SAP package is prescribed in quite a universal and indiscriminate
manner which allows individual countries freedom to make only minor changes
in its contents. The standard package invariably consists of the IMF sponsored
short-term macro-economic stabilization and the World Bank directed long
term structural reform programmes. Short-term macro-economic stabilization
means: (a) devaluation of the local currency and elimination of exchange
controls; (b) the curtailment of government expenditure, typically through
austerity measures like cuts in social sector programmes and dismissal of
unproductive public sector employees; (c) market liberalization through drastic
reduction of various subsidies as well as removal of price and physical controls;
and (d) de-indexation of wages and liberalization of the labour market.
The structural reforms package of the World Bank demands: (i) libera
lization of trade, elimination of protective tariff barriers and expansion of
incentives for export; (ii) liberalization and privatization of the banking system,
with the determination of interest rates being left to the vagaries of the market;
(iii) privatization of the public industrial and financial sector, and elimination of
unproductive expenditure; (iv) privatization of social programmes like health
and education on the principle of cost recovery; (v) tax reforms like reduction of
direct taxes and enhancement of indirect taxes; (vi) privatization of the
remaining common property resources; and (vii) special schemes to assist those
adversely affected by the SAP. The common thrust in the package is to
drastically reduce the degree of state control over the economy, to curb
domestic demand and stimulate exports (Streeten 1987:1469-70). This objective
requires several instruments, like an exit policy, sale of the equity capital of
public sector enterprises, reduction in import tariffs and controls, and so on.
Let us now turn to the basic focus of the NEP of the Indian government. To
begin with, the NEP was directed at short-term stabilization of the balance of
payments and reduction of the budget deficit. The Indian rupee was sharply
devalued by 75 per cent and made partially convertible, with the assurance of
full convertibility in the near future. Needless to mention, devaluation benefits
the imperialist countries, for a larger volume of exports is necessary to earn the
same value in dollar terms, while the import cost escalates in rupee terms. The
import policy is liberalized to encourage exports and to contain imports. In the
first three union budgets, the deficit was brought down by reducing the capital
and social welfare expenditure and withdrawal of some subsidies. It is of course
another matter that lately the actual fiscal deficit has become higher than the
proposed figures. For example, in the 1993-94 budget the deficit was expected
to be at 4 per cent of the GDP but it actually rose to 8.3 per cent.
The stabilization programme was quickly followed up with programmes of
structural reform. The new industrial policy (1991) virtually freed the domestic
investors from all licensing requirements. Except for 18 major industry groups,
the policy did away with capacity restrictions in all industries. The amendment
of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) allowed free inflow of foreign
capital, and direct foreign investment was raised to 51 per cent of total equity in
38 broad industry groups, mostly in the manufacturing sector and in hotel and
tourism related industries. In fact, in selected cases like power generation, the
foreign equity can now be cent per cent with a guaranteed return of as much as
16 per cent.
The definition of the small scale industries is so revised as to cover up to Rs.
60 lakh investment, and the large industries are permitted to have up to 26 per
cent of equity in small scale units. Public sector investment has been drastically
pruned, and some profit-making public enterprises such as NALCO, HZL,
IPCL, BHEL, HMT, NTPC and the like, have been asked to sell about 20 per
cent of their equity holdings. Proposals to close loss-making units in cotton
textiles, jute and in engineering industries are strongly articulated. Attempts are
II
SAP has invariably increased the debt burden of the signatory countries, and the
ecological destruction and impoverishment of the marginalized peoples. In
addition the huge debt continues to hold back world economic recovery and
increases the scope of political instability. Small wonder,'debt forgiveness' is
now considered as being in the interest of both the imperial North and the
colonized South (Griffin 1988).
The second common experience of the SAP administrated countries is the
increased poverty, unemployment, inequality and destitution. Almost all the
SAP projects in Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa have had an adverse
impact on poverty (Taylor 1988). During the last decade, there has been a
severe decline in the average incomes by 15 per cent in Latin America and by
30 per cent in sub-Saharan Africa (Turk 1993). The incidence of poverty had
doubled in a decade in Latin America (Veltmeyer 1993:2084). The UN
Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean has estimated that the
number of people living in poverty rose from 112 million in 1980 to 164 million
in 1986 (ECLAC 1990). The percentage of households below the poverty line
during 1980 and 1990 had increased in Argentina (from 9 to 13 per cent), Brazil
(30 to 40 per cent), Costa Rica (22 to 25 per cent), Peru (from 46 to 52 per
cent), Uruguay (11 to 15 per cent) and Venezuela (22 to 27 per cent). However,
the percentage declined a little in Columbia (39 to 38 per cent) and Mexico (32
to 30 per cent). The UNDP has observed that the adoption of the SAP has
doubled the absolute poverty, income inequality and infant mortality (cited in
Budhoo 1993: 17). The UNICEF and the U.N. Commission for Africa has
estimated that at least six million children under five years of age have died
each year since 1982 in the Third World, largely because of the SAP (Ibid.: 18).
The removal of price controls, especially of food, export-led agriculture,
austerity programmes, cuts in food subsidy and in the social sector have
aggravated the crisis for the poor (Eshag 1989; Helleiner 1987; Streeten 1987).
Between 1980 and 1987, in more than half of the countries receiving SAP loans,
the per capita availability of food declined (George 1992: 15). During the
1980s, in SAP administrated countries the expenditure on health declined by 50
per cent and on education by 25 per cent (Budhoo 1993: 7). In Africa, primary
school enrollment fell by 7 per cent. Whereas primary consumption goods have
been reduced to half for the poorest 80 per cent of the population, consumption
of luxury goods has actually increased for the wealthy in these countries (Amin
1992: 34-35). These developments have led to an increased polarization. The
cuts in investments on human development have eroded the future productivity
of these countries.
Poverty means an input into the cheap labour economy. Real wages have
dropped from their pre-crisis levels by anything from 30 per cent to 90 per cent
in extreme cases (George 1992). Slashing of overstaffed bureaucracies,
reduction of capital investment, exit policy and the like have contributed to
increased unemployment (Hoeven 1987: 145). The SAP has created much of the
additional malnutrition, infant mortality, ill health, illiteracy, and has given rise
of the respective governments to the SAP. Ghana, the role model for Africa,
received 11 structural adjustment loans worth $ 775 million. With other external
loans and investments, it got $ 8 billion during 1983-91. The debt service ratio
has risen sharply. The export of timber, minerals, food, cocoa and livestock has
led to widespread deforestation, decreased food production, increased un
employment, inflation, malnutrition and disease. In Nigeria, the per capita
income is now just one-fourth of that which prevailed before the introduction of
the SAP. Sixty per cent of the children under five years in Nigeria suffer from
malnutrition. Thirteen million out of the total population of 89 million are
unemployed. The debt service ratio is 36 per cent of the total revenue. In late
1993, the fuel prices were raised six times to meet the debt service.3
Chile has been put up as the showcase of neo-liberal reforms. Since the
mid-1980s, it has had a steady growth rate, a rapid rise in exports, a positive
trade balance, increased foreign investment and low inflation rate, but the total
external debt has meanwhile increased fourfold. Forty-two per cent of the
people live in poverty, and in 1988 the poorest 50 per cent had only 17 per cent
of the national income. Copper mining, timber logging and commercial fishing
have threatened the survival of the indigenous peoples. In Mexico, the minimum
wage has declined by about 65 per cent of its 1960 purchasing power. In fact,
real wages have dropped by 50 to 75 per cent during the 1980s. There is a
decline in industrial employment. Poverty is increasing and the peasantry faces
formidable problems of survival (Barkin 1993: 531-37). Nicaragua, in the four
years since the acceptance of the SAP, has almost halved fundings for all public
services and has freezed wages. Real wages have declined, unemployment and
underemployment have risen to over 60 per cent, school enrolment has dropped,
the number of homeless children has increased and the incidence of teen-age
prostitution and drug trafficking has increased (Werner 1993: 9-13).
If these are the success stories of the SAP, then its adverse impact elsewhere
on the poor, the working classes, slum dwellers, children, and its threat to
ecology, democracy, human rights and participatory development can be anti
cipated. The growth of these economies are essentially due to massive foreign
aid and investment, large-scale export of primary goods, forced use of cheap
labour and the near-authoritarian nature of their state systems. The newly
industrialized countries of Asia—Taiwan, Singapore and South Korea-are often
presented as examples worthy of emulation by countries like India. But unlike
India, these countries have never experienced prolonged and systematic colonial
exploitation, and have thus managed to shape their autonomous economic
structures, adopt effective land reforms and extend heavy government support
for literacy and health care. Besides, they have derived substantial benefits from
their geo-political significance for the USA. Their authoritarian political
regimes managed to raise the GNP through gross abuse of political freedom and
their resource bases. To put them up as models is to ignore not only their history
and institutional set up but also their adverse socio-political implications.
Having taken a cursory glance at the social impact of the SAP in the other
countries, let us now look at India's NEP . To begin with, let us see the status of
India's foreign debt. Between 1980 and 1991, India's external debt increased
from Rs. 15,500 crores to Rs. 100,425 crores, an increase of 547 per cent in just
11 years. This again excludes the defence debt, civilian rupee-rouble debt and
the short-term debt of less than six months duration. Since the adoption of the
SAP, the figures rose rapidly to Rs. 199,000 crores by March 1992 and
Rs.244,000 crores by September 1992 ($ 87 billion) (Economic and Political
Weekly Research, 6 March 1993 and 5 June 1993). The annual report of the
Reserve Bank of India (1993) states that between March 1990 and March 1993,
the foreign debt increased from $ 61.5 billion to $ 89.5 billion, that is, in rupee
terms it represented a jump from Rs. 105,904 crores to Rs.280,076 crores in just
three years. This means the repayment problem is more intractable today than it
was in 1991. And currently the ratio of debt service payments to export of
goods and services is 30.8 per cent, which is about Rs.25,000 crores. India is
now the third highest indebted country in the world, and every Indian family has
to pay Rs.1,400 per annum to foreign powers to service the debt alone. In 1993,
debt servicing was about $ 8.2 billion, including $ 3.3 billion in interest pay
ments. From 1994, as India will have to repay the medium term loans borrowed
from the IMF and the World Bank as well as the dollars of non-resident Indians
and foreign institutional investors, the debt service payments are likely to rise
above $ 8 billion every year for in each of the next five years. The euphoria of
attaining nearly $ 14 billion foreign exchange reserve ignores the fact that much
of it is borrowed money with short maturation period and most volatile,
especially the Global Depository Receipts of the Indian companies, the
Non-Resident Indians (NRI) deposits and foreign institutional investments. In
any case, the bulk of the foreign exchange accruals have simply gone into
building up the reserves rather than supporting productive investments.
Incidentally, even the IMF's latest World Economic Outlook (October 1993)
advises India to increase domestic savings and investments and use the foreign
exchange reserves for productive purposes.
Be that as it may, in addition to foreign debt, the interest payments on the
domestic debt of the Union government have risen to nearly 30 per cent of the
total budgeted expenditure, which was only around 20 per cent in 1991-92. The
government continues to borrow as much as 2.7 per cent of the GDP every year
to finance its consumption expenditure. By the end of the century, it is
estimated that the share of interest payments will climb to 46 per cent of the
total Union budget.
The topmost tiny minority in India may remain insulated from the debt
distress but the rest of the population has to make sacrifices to repay the debt,
which it has neither asked for nor benefited from. The crisis is largely a product
of the unequal structure of trade, production and credit in the global market and
average reduced 2.7 per cent of the workforce, whereas their assets have
increased by over 90 per cent. In these units, unorganized labour constitutes
over 30 per cent of the total workforce (EPW, editorial, 5 February 1994).
In the name of efficiency, the VRS and the unofficial exit policy are being
indiscriminately adopted to retrench the organized workforce and to close down
most of the so-called sick industrial units. The proposed Industrial Relations Act
will make the process still easier. It seems the urgent focus is to break down the
strength of organized labour by dismantling the Trade Unions Act. The IMF
wants deindexation of wages and repealing of minimum wages legislation.
Trade unions have already lost much of their legal and political strength, despite
their successful organization of four nationwide strikes against the NEP and the
signing of the GATT, as well as numerous sectionwise strikes by the workers in
banks, insurance corporations, steel industries and in others against privatization
and closure of some of their units. But a further erosion of the workers' power,
like outlawing of strikes, detaining union leadership and declaration of some
form of emergency will certainly generate serious political unrest and turmoil in
the country. So also will rising inflation, unemployment, wage freeze and
retrenchment, which may compel the middle classes, numbering between 150 to
200 million, to opt for both organized and anarchic struggles.
Following the so-called social safety net of the World Bank, a National
Renewal Fund (NRF) was established in 1992 with a corpus of Rs. 200 crores.
This was intended to cover the cost of retraining, re-deployment and
retrenchment compensation to adversely affected labourers by the restructuring
of public sector industrial units. The retrenchment of labour was to be
compensated through the VRS, propagated as the 'golden handshake'. The VRS
was open to all surplus labourers who had put in ten years of service or had
reached 40 years of age. The scheme provided for leave encashment and one
and a half months full wages for each completed year of service or the
remaining duration of service, whichever is less.
Soon the World Bank offered $ 500 million on condition of a clear
formulation of the exit policy. With the disinvestment of 20 per cent shares in
the profit-making public sector units and reallocation of unutilized funds from
the International Development Agency, the NRF amount became Rs. 2,200
crores at the end of 1992. The 1992-93 budget provided an additional Rs. 450
crores to finance VRS for the central government employees. And the 1994-95
budget provided an additional amount. Nonetheless the government's funds
may not be adequate for even one-tenth of the total requirement. For instance,
the VRS for the surplus labour in the central public sector will alone cost
upward of Rs. 10,000 crores, and the full cost will be around Rs. 50,000 crores.
And there is no such money available.
The common assumption that the organized workers and public service
employees may escape the severity of the NEP burden due to their political
strength represented by 50,000 trade unions and the Left and liberal political
parties, as well as their own technical and administrative skills seems to be
The handloom sector, with about 3.5 million handlooms, supports about 17
million people. The phasing out of the Janata Cloth Scheme, rise of domestic
prices of cotton yarn, withdrawal of state support and export of raw cotton have
already brought the workers to the point of starvation and at least about 3 lakh
weavers have had to leave their jobs. Small wonder there have been reports of
starvation deaths and suicides among the handloom weavers in Andhra Pradesh.
The real income of handloom weavers has declined by more than 60 per cent
since the adoption of the NEP (Chossudovsky 1992b: 24-27). The government
however proposes to train about one lakh weavers and establish quality dyeing
centres to produce handlooms for export. The remaining weavers will of course
have to fend for themselves. After the increase of excise duties on all steel items
in 1994-95 budget, the future of 40,000 steel utensil workers of Delhi has
become bleak. So is the case with leather workers. These are only illustrative of
a much greater process of liquidation of cottage industries. It may be mentioned
that there are already 37 million educated unemployed in the country.
Though the NEP has not yet taken a clear and comprehensive stance on the
agricultural sector, which incidentally employs more than three-fourths of the
workforce, several instruments of the policy and the recently concluded GATT
agreement have a direct bearing on the agrarian classes. The World Bank (1991)
has already suggested a set of policies for Indian agriculture and some of its
prescriptions have already been implemented while others are likely to be
adopted soon. The suggestions include elimination of input subsidies to farmers
(especially fertilizer), which have been implemented since 1992-93 and a cut of
over 30 per cent in the subsidy on fertilizers. The second suggestion is of
scaling down the government's price and procurement policy of foodgrains and
eliminating compulsory procurement and price control over cash crops like
cotton, sugar, coffee and oil seeds, the reduction of the buffer stocks through the
curtailment of the role of the Food Corporation of India (FCI), and the reduction
of the scope of the public distribution system to target only the poor.
The government has already hiked the procurement prices to unprecedented
levels and the state's procurement of coffee, sugar and cotton has been reduced.
For the moment export of foodgrains has been allowed. The price of sugar,
wheat and rice in the public distribution system (PDS) has been sharply raised
and attempts are being made to get the support of the state governments to
restrict food subsidy to the targeted groups in some 1,700 blocks. It may be
mentioned that the supply of foodgrains to the poor is around 20 kgs per
household per year. This accounts for a benefit of as high as Rs.40 to each
household in Kerala. Even if this is extended to the selected blocks, the annual
food subsidy has to be increased from Rs.2,800 crores to about Rs.8,500 crores,
that is, 20 million tons of foodgrains and others, something unimaginable in the
current context. The sharp rise in the price of foodgrains and sugar has already
made the PDS less attractive. In any case, taking India as a whole, the PDS
networks remain almost negligible in the rural areas, except in Kerala and
Karnataka.
Gujarat food crops are being replaced by eucalyptus. Fruit and horticulture is
replacing food crops in Kerala and in northern India. The trend of replacement
of staple food crops will adversely affect the food security of farm workers and
small farmers. This, in turn, may increase their immigration to the urban
informal sector and thereby further depress wages. The trend to do away with
the rural credit cooperatives will strengthen the village moneylenders.
The real wages of the farm workers have been, by and large, stagnating—if
not declining-for the last several years. Hardly one or two per cent of the farm
workers are organized. As the NEP has inflated the price of food articles, the
farm workers, largely belonging to the Schduled Castes and Other Backward
Classes and the other poor people, will have to face a formidable crisis of
survival and social reproduction. The funds allocated to rural employment,
including the marginal increase in the 1994-95 budget can only suffice for a
small percentage of those below the poverty line. As many as 100 million rural
uneducated people are not able to find gainful employment for more than 150
days in a year.
The survival of about 50 million traditional fisherfolk has been severely
threatened by the new policy of allowing joint ventures with foreign companies
for deep sea fishing. These export-oriented enterprises enjoy tax holidays for
five years, and in 1993 alone they earned $ 615 million from marine exports.
France, Spain, Taiwan, South Korea, Japan and others net large quantities of
squid, mackerel, pomifet, cuttlefish, lobster, shrimp, seerfish, barracuda, tuna,
and bilfish. The poor fisherfolk catch so little that it is threatening their survival.
The new policy will not only lead to indiscriminate destruction of marine
resources and erode the small-scale decentralized fishing sector but will also
substantially reduce the availability of fish for domestic consumption.
The tribal peoples will suffer the most from the NEP, for the Exim policy
with indiscriminate mining and logging will rob them of their means of
livelihood and accentuate their poverty and destitution. Agro-forestry, fishery
and tourism of the MNCs and domestic big business houses will displace them
from their habitats in large numbers. It is not surprising that most cases of
starvation deaths reported in the last three years are from the tribal areas of
Orissa, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Karnataka and Tripura.
The distress sale of children and large-scale migration is becoming common in
drought prone and mega-development project based tribal areas.
Unemployment and poverty (touching about 400 million persons) is
endemic in the country, and the NEP will aggravate it further. Leaving the
public sector to fend for itself, the deepening of industrial recession, creation of
the new poor through the exit policy will increase unemployment by about 4 to
10 million persons during 1992-94, depending on the high or low growth
scenarios (Mundle 1993). In that case, the recent extension of reservation of
employment to the OBCs is of little significance, for the number of OBCs
getting government employment will not be higher than the number retrenched
from public and private sector employment.
CONCLUSION
Evidently, the NEP, the SAP and the recently concluded GATT have
considerably weakened the ability of the state to impose its own policies and
prescriptions on the TNCs and to regulate social and environmental
degradation. Put simply, the Indian state as an autonomous economic and
political entity will be threatened by the globalization of capital and the
consolidation of neo-imperialism. Of course, not all spheres of the power of the
state will tend to be impotent. The maintenance of the so-called domestic law
and order situation will be expanded in the interest of international capital. This
would necessitate strengthening the top bureaucracy instead of dismantling it.
Simultaneously the internal crisis may increase the intensity of sub-nationalist
and ethnic struggles, which would challenge the political legitimacy of the state
and thus threaten peace and stability. In short, both the process of globalization
and sub-nationalist tendencies will substantially erode the economic
sovereignty, cultural identity, legitimate political strength and even the
territorial integrity of the nation.
Let us hope that India will escape from such a political crisis because of her
long democratic tradition and the potentiality of the left and liberal forces in the
country. Nevertheless, the conditionalities of the Bretton Woods institutions and
the GATT will extend to almost every sphere of the economy, culture, and soon
to polity, leaving little sovereignty. To avert such a mishap India cannot but
pursue strategies of institutional changes for redistribution of assets and
incomes, including land reforms, in favour of the working people, women and
the scheduled population. The scope of self-reliance and decentralized planning
should be expanded. There is also the need for greater investment in rural
infrastructure, literacy and in the upgradation of traditional methods of
management and production. In order to pursue this course effectively, it is
necessary to eliminate the role of black money, estimated to be between Rs.
200,000 to 300,000 crores. It is necessary to have an increase in the direct
taxation, stop the payment of the foreign debt beyond a limit-say 10 per cent of
the export earnings-and cut down government expenditure, unessential imports
and luxury consumption. All these call for reaffirmation of the role of state
intervention and development planning. It entails giving greater autonomy to
different sections of the society within the framework of the Indian
Constitution, as well as the establishment of a regional confederation of states to
counter the threats of the dominant countries and corporations. Such an agenda
may appear obscurantist in the current decision-making circles, but those who
are concerned need to reflect and act soon. Silence knows no history.
NOTES
An earlier version of this paper was presented in the symposium on 'Social Dimen
Economic Reforms', at the XX All-India Sociological Conference of the Indian Soci
Society in Mangalore on 31 December 1993, and subsequently in a seminar at the Centre
Studies, Surat on 9 March 1994. 1 have benefited from the comments and suggestions o
participants, especially M.N. Panini, George Mathew, K. Gopal Iyer, Victor D'Sou
Punalekar, Bishwaroop Das, Ghanshyam Shah and Suguna Pathy. (This paper was received
1994—Ed.)
1. I hold no brief for the pre-NEP scenario; rather I maintain that for long, India was in need of
structural reforms in agriculture and industry, as well as limiting the plethora of ineffective
bureaucratic controls and consequent rise of inefficiency, indiscipline, corruption and growth
of black money. The presumed autonomous national economic policy and public accountability
were rarely evident. Nonetheless, despite the linkages with the dependence on international
capital and guidance, the Nehru-Mahalanobis model of planned development carried out partial
land reforms, expanded public infrastructure, built scientific and technological institutions,
created a gigantic private sector and thereby enhanced the economic growth and purchasing
power of the rural rich and upper middle class and that, in turn, allowed the state a degree of
relative freedom to negotiate in the dominating world system. Anyway the scope of this paper
being limited to the period of the NEP and the fact of recent maturation of the process of
internationalization of capital, forbids us to evaluate the first few decades of India's economic
policies and their relevance in the present context of internationalization of capital, except
asserting that globalization does not in itself convey the death of national economic
sovereignty. Rather there is still reasonable scope for asserting this autonomy (Patnaik 1994).
2. As the exit policy is a sensitive political issue, especially because of the recurring state
assembly elections and increased unity among the central trade unions on the issue, its
imposition had been postponed for the time being, despite the repeated references of the
Ministry of Finance. Curiously in 1993 the Confederation of Indian Industry as well as the
Federation of the Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry held that there is no urgent need
for an exit policy and the VRS may serve the purpose in the meanwhile. Of course, the
Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India, the World Bank and several foreign
business houses especially of Japan and Germany continue to emphasize the need to freely
retrench workers through a liberal exit policy.
3. I thank Suguna Pathy for this information and necessary calculations.
4. I am grateful to Dr. Sudhir Chandra for raising this issue in the CSS seminar. But it is too early
to reflect on the future strategic alignments with confidence.
REFERENCES
Amin, Samir. 1992; 'Moving Beyond Structural Adjustment', Third World Resurgence, 28: 34-
Barkin, David. 1993. 'Salinastroika and Other Novel Ideas', Economic and Political Weekly
&1 3): 531-37.
Budhoo, Davison. 1993. 'IMF-World Bank Wreak Havoc on Third World', Third W
surgence, 35:17-18.
Chossudovsky, Michel. 1992(a). 'The Global Creation of Third World Poverty', Third
Resurgence, 17: 13-20.
. 1992(b). 'Feeding on Poverty: India Under IMF Rule', Third World Resurgence
24-27.
Despande, Sudha and L. Despande. 1992. 'NEP and Female Employment', Economic and
Weekly, 27 (41): 2248-52.
ECLAC. 1990. Changing Production Patterns with Social Equity. Santiago: ECLAC.
Eshag, E. 1989. 'Some Suggestions for Improving the Operation of IMF Stabilisation Progr
International Labour Review, 128(3): 305-310.
Geetha, S.and M. H. Suryanarayana. 1993. 'Revamping PDS: Some Issues and Implic
Economic and Political Weekly, 28 (41): 2207-13.
George, Susan. 1992. 'Debt as Warfare', Third World Resurgence, 28: 14-19.